rsggamer123
Proud Member
At the end of the day if the band members watched it on a big theatre screen and have said positive things about the quality then it must be pretty good.
At the end of the day if the band members watched it on a big theatre screen and have said positive things about the quality then it must be pretty good.
It would be very stupid if they say "Well, its watchable... They(remasterer) did what can be done... "At the end of the day if the band members watched it on a big theatre screen and have said positive things about the quality then it must be pretty good.
I am looking very much forward to this release. Been looking forward to it for years! - Just saying picture quality is also important. - If you think audio is the only important thing - all you need is the Live CD!
When I watch a MJ Show it not just a concert. It's theater! It's a musical! It's a movie taking place in front of you! The visual is very important IMO!
But even if it is not very good quality I will still watch the show over and over and over.
I have got a reply from Warren Eagles, colorist of the BAD TOUR in London.
He said footage of several European, Australian and Japanese legs were recorded on film.
The Wembley show however was completely shot on film. 2 of the 5 nights were completely shot on film.
So the film reels are lying around somewhere. Frank Dileo knew where they were. This is madness, we need those in order to get the Bluray! The show was edited onto a 1 inch tape, so there is no film reel with the edited footage. ONLY RAW FOOTAGE!
Can we somehow get in contact with Frank Dileo's people? Maybe they can steer us.
FIVE nights? hell no, michael did SEVEN! is warren lying?
I have got a reply from Warren Eagles, colorist of the BAD TOUR in London.
He said footage of several European, Australian and Japanese legs were recorded on film.
The Wembley show however was completely shot on film. 2 of the 5 nights were completely shot on film.
So the film reels are lying around somewhere. Frank Dileo knew where they were. This is madness, we need those in order to get the Bluray! The show was edited onto a 1 inch tape, so there is no film reel with the edited footage. ONLY RAW FOOTAGE!
Can we somehow get in contact with Frank Dileo's people? Maybe they can steer us.
I have got a reply from Warren Eagles, colorist of the BAD TOUR in London.
He said footage of several European, Australian and Japanese legs were recorded on film.
The Wembley show however was completely shot on film. 2 of the 5 nights were completely shot on film.
So the film reels are lying around somewhere. Frank Dileo knew where they were. This is madness, we need those in order to get the Bluray! The show was edited onto a 1 inch tape, so there is no film reel with the edited footage. ONLY RAW FOOTAGE!
Can we somehow get in contact with Frank Dileo's people? Maybe they can steer us.
FIVE nights? hell no, michael did SEVEN! is warren lying?
and is it ACTUAL film. i.e. grainy, widescreen, 2.33:1 film?
if it is, then a release like this might be on the horizon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q7ztDgXg4Y
i mean, COME ON? led zeppelin and queen having SUPERB motion-picture quality concert films that were filmed AND released BEFORE michael?!?
Man in the Mirror performance in Moonwalker too. I hope they find them.The concert was shot on a mixture of 35mm and 16mm film, according to warren Eagles.
Footage of the ANOTHER PART OF ME VIDEO is from those reels.
One more thin that is make me wonder is, if the explicit "insit" of the fans, to release unedtited "just from one night, no mixing " show, has lead this to the wrong direction. Many don't realise that concerts are mostly mixed from 2-3 nights and that this is common procedure. cause the annoncement particularly states that its been taken to account this stupid (i know you realise this now) condition. Cause, its possible to take the HQ video footage they have and mix it with the multi-tracks audio, so that its not notible that both sources are from different nights. this has been done with other artist releases. BUUUUUTTT again, some will feel betrayed again, beef like they do with Bucharest and Munich.
I don't like watching concert dvd that is edited together from multiple shows. Its not real concert then. That's why I don't watch 30th Anniversary concert very often. If they ever find the films they should release full concerts and not edit them together.
Did you enjoy THIS IS IT? If so, that was a montage from various performances with pristine audio quality from one rehearsal together with the video. I don't care if they can release a full BAD tour show on Bluray consisting of various performances/nights.
Have you guys seen Queen Montreal 1981 blu-ray? It is actually mix of 2 nights. I doubt you noticed. However it works great.
Did you enjoy THIS IS IT? If so, that was a montage from various performances with pristine audio quality from one rehearsal together with the video. I don't care if they can release a full BAD tour show on Bluray consisting of various performances/nights.
I have got a reply from Warren Eagles, colorist of the BAD TOUR in London.
He said footage of several European, Australian and Japanese legs were recorded on film.
The Wembley show however was completely shot on film. 2 of the 5 nights were completely shot on film.
So the film reels are lying around somewhere. Frank Dileo knew where they were. This is madness, we need those in order to get the Bluray! The show was edited onto a 1 inch tape, so there is no film reel with the edited footage. ONLY RAW FOOTAGE!
Can we somehow get in contact with Frank Dileo's people? Maybe they can steer us..
See, thats what i'm talking about.I don't like watching concert dvd that is edited together from multiple shows. Its not real concert then. That's why I don't watch 30th Anniversary concert very often. If they ever find the films they should release full concerts and not edit them together.
The film reels is probably lying somewehere in warehouse without anyone knowing whats on them
The Estate should be spending the money to digitise absolutely everything in the best possible quality right now. Both so they have records of everything they actually have, and to preserve things from further degradation. Also they should be searching for and following leads on things that are out there that they may not have or have gone missing. It's very important. I don't know if these things are being done or not.
I can not in my wildest imagination understand how anyone could not mark the film of Michael's Bad concert or anyother concert. Even at the time it was a huge thing and not marking it properly would mean lost possible income, possible tremendous income might I say in case it was ever released. If Frank Dileo knew where the film was, how could he have forgotten or misplaced it??? For crying out loud, these films are a piece of history!!!
I dont know what you are even basing that on.
I have got a reply from Warren Eagles, colorist of the BAD TOUR in London.
He said footage of several European, Australian and Japanese legs were recorded on film.
The Wembley show however was completely shot on film. 2 of the 5 nights were completely shot on film.
So the film reels are lying around somewhere. Frank Dileo knew where they were. This is madness, we need those in order to get the Bluray! The show was edited onto a 1 inch tape, so there is no film reel with the edited footage. ONLY RAW FOOTAGE!
Can we somehow get in contact with Frank Dileo's people? Maybe they can steer us.
Well I think the Frank Dileo part was Iwhizzles own speculation. He should have seperated thet it from the information he recieved from Warren. he should have quoted Warren and then added his thoughts so as not to cause confusion. We don't know if Frank knew where the footage is. He was out of the picture for a long time and things have been moved checked out and in several times over the years. If he did know he would have told the Estate because he was working closely with them before he became ill. The estate has a lot of Michaels footage - I'm sure they have people hired and on the case to locate as much as they possible can. They know it's very important to have it in there possession. They are also digitalizing what they do have to protect it.my post was based on this;