Carmour260
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 537
- Points
- 28
"(Put It) On The Line," "All This Pain" and "Your Excuse" was taken down from YouTube... and I loved all three of them... I wonder what happened?
Sounds great and I think Michael would like it.Hee hee hoo hoo
Sounds great and I think Michael would like it.
This is literally awesome. How would someone get in contact with this MusicbyKabe guy?Sounds great and I think Michael would like it.
Has anyone ever trained an AI exclusively on MJ vocals post 2005? Hold My Hand, Best of Joy, WBSS 2008?
That would explain why it hasn't been done.difficulty here is, there's no 100% clean acapella available. only filtered stuff which sounds worse.
What happens now that Sony is going after everyone?
Except why not use AI to filter it?
Is there any good software for AI voice training?
Lyrics could definitely be betterYeah theyve done a great job creating something that sounds like something Michael would make. The chorus is fantastic but some of the lyrics are a bit wonky.
Nah, this about establishes the precedent. They can train a voice model off the 2006-2008 era stuff and have it sing those Post Invincible outtakes. It's practically inevitable as easily as it is thought up.I’ve long been a fan of Randy Travis (for those who don’t know he lost most of his ability to speak about 7-8 yrs ago from a stroke and before that had lime disease which didn’t help either) Well recently they put out an AI song and man you could’ve told me Randy got his voice back or it was a track from the vault and I’d have believed it! Insane! Most convincing AI I’ve heard thus far.
It got me thinking though, I wonder if the estate will try and do this with Michael. Except they’ve always been less than truthful and more than a little shady so I feel they’d do it and pass it off as the real McCoy. However with Michael, it seems to be impossible to pass it off as the real deal because no matter how good the model is, Mike is too difficult to emulate. Other artists might have distinct voices but usually not much else. Michael, however had such unique diction and stylistic choices that no matter how hard someone tries, it just feels inauthentic. They might nail some of it but that true authentic Michael sound is impossible to get from anything other than the source himself.
Depends on who does itHow long will it take until a good AI version of TYLA?
You don't really need an AI take, its just the production around it that suffers due to the quality of the recordings.How long will it take until a good AI version of TYLA?
It just needs to leak really.You don't really need an AI take, its just the production around it that suffers due to the quality of the recordings.
you could completely redo/overdub the production and make it sound good imo
Feels like AI is a bad catch all term we need to stop using quickly so we can define what is and isn't acceptable about itTo hell with AI in general. Killing jobs.
bit of an ignorant thing to say since AI helps with isolations & tracks that werent possible by hand. look at the beatle's Now & ThenTo hell with AI in general. Killing jobs.
Seems a bit harsh, imo. For every positive AI story I see there seem to be 3 or 4 negative ones. The positive ones seem to mostly be in health / medical stuff. The negative ones mostly in the arts. Steve Marriott and Scarlett Johanssen spring to mind.bit of an ignorant thing to say since AI helps with isolations & tracks that werent possible by hand. look at the beatle's Now & Then
Noam Chomsky calls it 'plagiarism software' but somehow I don't think that's what you had in mind, lol.Feels like AI is a bad catch all term we need to stop using quickly so we can define what is and isn't acceptable about it
Agree.AI will kill human race....
I agree with all of this ...You can make the same arguments about anything. These are simply tools that can be used for good or bad. Depends how they used. New technology drives innovation. Like it or not this tech is here to stay,
... but not so much with this. It will get better, that's for sure, but it won't necessarily make things better. As with every other human invention it will probably create as many problems as it solves. I still think it will be more effective in some fields (science, tech, medical, possibly agricultural) and less welcome (for me, at least) in the arts.and its only going to get better
It's been a great benefit to the arts though. The problematic stuff is "creating" with it. It's best benefit is to use as a tool to "fix" art. Now and Then.I agree with all of this ...
... but not so much with this. It will get better, that's for sure, but it won't necessarily make things better. As with every other human invention it will probably create as many problems as it solves. I still think it will be more effective in some fields (science, tech, medical, possibly agricultural) and less welcome (for me, at least) in the arts.