It's actually kind of hilarious that the Black Keys drummer has a negative opinion towards Michael, and immediately fans are hating him for it. Not everyone in the world has to love Michael, you know.
Some fans are ridiculous.
You're right, he has the right to dislike Michael and his music, that's perfectly fine. I'm more annoyed that he went on a completely childish and unprovoked attack on Michael's work, with many of his 'facts' not being even remotely correct.
"[It's] some ****ing bullshit that sucks so bad that it took them three years after he died to make it listenable," he tells Rolling Stone's Patrick Doyle. "Like he had to be dead for three years for it to be released." He suspects it finally saw the light of day because "L.A. Reid needed a new boat."
Well no, according to the Billboard magazine article, LA Reid first approached Timbaland about a year ago so it took around a year for the whole album to come together. Even then, a couple of the tracks (DYKWYCA, STTR) were remixed for
Michael within the year after Michael's death, and they were certainly more than listenable. Hell, they were great tracks, I don't even know where he got the three year number from. Many of the songs have been 'listenable' ever since they were first leaked, upwards of a decade ago when The Black Keys were no-one.
He's obviously pissed that Xscape poses a threat to the #1 position he desperately wants (though, because the Black Keys are 'current', I think they will get #1). It's also clear that by doing this, he would get attention for his new album - the old saying goes "Any publicity is good publicity". It's not hard to conclude that he was attacking Michael's work so he could draw attention to himself and his new album. Any article that mentions this will mention his new album somewhere.
I couldn't care if he dislikes Michael, that's perfectly fine, but his attack was unprovoked, childish and lacked even basic facts.