Who Would Like a Separate Section for News About Michael's Children?

[Ashtanga]

Maybe if we could keep on topic for a start, there wouldn't be such a venomous attitude in the threads in 2300.

Somebody mentioned Michael liked this place because it respects his privacy and that of his children. Why on earth would that go out of the window just because he's no longer physically here. It wasn't done to please him, it was done out of sheer respect and that is the long and short of it.

Therefore, there will not be a section about the kids and whatever 'news' it is that is meant by this thread. When they come of age, by all means. But for now and the forseeable future, it's a no.

:clapping:


Thanks for this!

 

[twinklEE]

Maybe if we could keep on topic for a start, there wouldn't be such a venomous attitude in the threads in 2300.

Somebody mentioned Michael liked this place because it respects his privacy and that of his children. Why on earth would that go out of the window just because he's no longer physically here. It wasn't done to please him, it was done out of sheer respect and that is the long and short of it.

Therefore, there will not be a section about the kids and whatever 'news' it is that is meant by this thread. When they come of age, by all means. But for now and the forseeable future, it's a no.

Thank you!



But the audacity of some people in here to compare Michael's albums dangerous, history etc to a sixty plus year old's non exitant career is ridiculous.
It's time to face reality MILLIONS of people bought, dangerous history, botf, you will be having trouble naming 20 people who bought a copy of any rebbie jackson album throughout her illustrious 'career'

ROTLMAO

 

[PurpleParrot]

I'm not comfortable with the idea of discussing Michael's children. Michael went to great lengths to keep them protected and I feel this should be honoured even though he isn't around anymore and they make more public appearances now. If there is a news story then it either will go in here or in the main section. There isn't enough news for it to generate its own section anyway.

I agree with that too.
Showing we want news from them will only encourage paps to stalk them.
As long as I know they are ok, I don't need more.
If one day they have their own carrer, then I have no problem discussing their projects and being happy about what they do.
But for now, I'll just let them be kids.
l.o.v.e.!

 

[Mechi]

Maybe we should just question ourselves... who, what and where we really are with our lives if we can't let underage children enjoy their privacy of growing up and need to follow them for 'news'.

 

[Speechless09]

Maybe we should just question ourselves... who, what and where we really are with our lives if we can't let underage children enjoy their privacy of growing up and need to follow them for 'news'.

Yes, thats true. I agree with you:agree:. We should leave those children alone and respect MJ's wishes for his kids.:angel:

 

[Alma]

Maybe we should just question ourselves... who, what and where we really are with our lives if we can't let underage children enjoy their privacy of growing up and need to follow them for 'news'.

Excellently put...

 

[Ashtanga]

respect MJ's wishes for his kids.:angel:

Always! :angel:

 

[Angelofmj]

no they are jacksons so they should be under 2300 jackson street like the rest of their family members

 

[CherubimII]

no they are jacksons so they should be under 2300 jackson street like the rest of their family members

I really DON'T feel comfortable with MJ's children being surrounded by all the negative energy in this 2300 section. :no:
Prince, Paris, and Blanket deserve MUCH BETTER. arty:

 

[ChickenMcNuggets]

Of course they shouldn't have their own section just because of one member's personal opinion of certain other members of the family. It's the thin end of the wedge that leads to every member of the family having their own forum... with hardly any posts in each. I'd suggest just growing up about it.

There are loads of positive threads here for those who are looking to escape any 'negative energy', such as the ones dedicated to the actual music of the likes of Jermaine and Janet. You know, the ones that people seem to ignore in their rush to post yet another comment in one of the many threads about yet another tabloid story relating to them. If people don't want negative energy, they shouldn't contribute as much as they do to creating it! **smoke starts coming out of ears**

Aaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnd breathe...

 

[twinklEE]

in 10 years from now everything will be about them, it has already started now it must be painful to those who are iin denial, but for now there shouldnt be section as his wishes need to be respected, its obvious that his own mother doesnt give damn about them but I do

 

[KingMikeJ]

in 10 years from now everything will be about them, it has already started now it must be painful to those who are iin denial, but for now there shouldnt be section as his wishes need to be respected, its obvious that his own mother doesnt give damn about them but I do

You talk the biggest load of shit in this section of the forum. You don't know what the relationship between Katherine and her grandchildren is. You act like this:

"Prince, Paris and Blanket were on TV, so their grandmother Katherine doesn't love them."

"Janet didn't speak to tabloids about Murray when asked, so she never loved Michael."

 

[twinklEE]

You talk the biggest load of shit in this section of the forum. You don't know what the relationship between Katherine and her grandchildren is. You act like this:

"Prince, Paris and Blanket were on TV, so their grandmother Katherine doesn't love them."

"Janet didn't speak to tabloids about Murray when asked, so she never loved Michael."

I know the truth is always bitter

 

[StaceyMJ]

Being as I gave a categoric answer further up in the thread and this is now just veering towards being used for a totally different purpose than it was created for which is much uglier, thread closed.