Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

11.As a consumer of the media, do you believe you share the guilt if someone is harmed? As a consumer do you have responsibilities? If so, please list them.

Why do bad stuff about famous people sell better than good stuff?
There should be ethics for journalists but what about those who buy the tabloids?
If people weren´t so interested to see new pictures of princess Diana and Michael then it had not been so many paparazzis chasing them.
Famous people need the media to promote their products, albums,concerts etc but it doesn´t mean they shouldn´t have any privacy.

Princess Dianas driver was drunk but I don´t think it had been an accident if it wasn´t for paparazzis.
If I remember right they took the car to get away from paparazzis who had found out what place Princess Diana and her new boyfriend were.

And you don't have to read it (read it)
And you don't have to eat it (eat it)
To buy it is to feed it (feed it)
Then why do we keep foolin' ourselves

Just because you read it in a magazine
Or see it on the TV screen
Don't make it factual
Though everybody wants to read all about it
Just because you read it in a magazine
Or see it on the TV screen
Don't make it factual, actual

To read it sanctifies it ('fies it)

(See, but everybody wants to believe all about it)
Had Michael been able to sleep better if he hadn´t been chased by all these paparazzis and treated so bad by the media?-and media was supported by those who bought it or watched it.
 
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

http://voiceseducation.org/content/raise-your-voice

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/gossip-instrument-power

Gossip as an Instrument of Power

Written by Melik Kaylan
melikkaylan.jpg


Melik Kaylan has worked as a journalist based mostly in New York for twenty-five years. Among other places, he has been an editor at the Village Voice, contributing editor at Spy magazine, associate editor at Connoisseur magazine, Arts editor at Forbes.com, editor-at-large at ReganBooks. His work has been published widely in the US and UK in the above publications and the Wall Street Journal, Vogue, New York Times, the Times of London, the Spectator, and other places. He has won Cultural Awards in Italy and Turkey for print and television work on antiquities smuggling. He has been to the Middle East numerous times, to Iraq five times, to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Burma, the Caucasus. His Travel and Leisure article on Tbilisi, Georgia, is included in the 2008 Best American Travel Writing collection. He has scuba dived for bodies with the NYPD scuba unit (New York Magazine), dived with the Cousteau ship in the Red Sea (Forbes.com), searched for Inca treasure in Ecuadoran mountains (Outside magazine), investigated the murder of a fellow journalist in Peshawar, Pakistan (the Spectator). Currently, he writes for the Wall Street Journal about culture.

al-Gore.jpg


I have just been on the South Ossetian separatist border of Georgia where the Russian armored invasion took place two years ago. I was there reporting at the time of the invasion, and I came back for an update. It has involved repeatedly getting past a front line manned by sanguinary pro-Russian militias into a mafiotic enclave immersed in despair. Suffice to say, all that manic stress makes you yearn for home. Odd little balloons of longing, brilliant ephemera, bubble up in your thoughts: a kitschy restaurant in midtown, a luminous blonde with a sunlit smile; old music; friends at an opening door.

You find, when you finally get home, that spending time in warzones has stripped away vital layers of cynical insulation. You swing your arms wide for an idealized welcome. But in reality, they're rather preoccupied at home, consumed with the scurviest concerns. The tabloids are eviscerating someone new: this time it's Al Gore. They're at it again, in Auden's words: "the hum of printing presses turning forests into lies". The UFO Bee or somesuch has printed allegations of an affair which the Drudge Report has picked up and the New York Post has front-paged. In great festive headlines Al Gore is being fed to the blender.

This is not at all how one dreams of the home front. While running from sounds of gunfire in South Ossetia, I remembered, in particular, slightly garbled words from Rupert Brooke's famous WW1 poem which begins "If I should die think only this of me" and goes on to invoke images of home: "laughter learnt of friends,,,dreams happy as the day; and gentleness/In hearts at peace". When you're away on a frontier where civilization grinds tectonically against its opposite -- you really need your side to represent decency, visibly so, from far away. The principle matters all the more to our soldiers in the field where loss of conviction can be the worst danger -- one that the sociopathic enemy can easily exploit.

America is fighting two wars and several ancillary struggles in a global effort to convince opponents to follow our path away from immiseration towards generosity and reconciliation. You'd think, with the world's eyes on us, we would guard over our dignity. Instead, the tabloids are brutalizing a figure the world universally recognizes as a gold-standard American idealist with the entire earth's interests at heart, a noble, likable, altruistic American.
Furthermore, a figure deprived of the presidency in a dodgy election which tarnished our most precious example to others, our democratic process. And not least, a figure who had the grace to put our democracy above personal ambition by walking away from the divisive dispute -- who then suffered an acute depression and bounced back to show the world how, as an American, you can rise even higher than the presidency. He is the best of us. What we are doing to him we are doing to ourselves in front of a global audience.

I've been introduced to Al Gore once, possibly twice, at cocktails, and to his family down the years. Literate, gracious, down-to-earth, impossibly talented, full of fun and mischief -- consider what they have lived through already: the family that gave up the White House with good grace. No really -- how would you have handled it? And now this additional gratuitous vileness.

al-gore.jpg
gw-al-gore-fire.jpg
Al-Gore-Devil-33977.jpg


Is there no way to halt the media's savage McCarthyism? Tabloid gossip gets a free pass because it purports to be apolitical. It falls so far below the tenor of political debate that it stays above criticism. But there is nothing apolitical about the assault on Al Gore and his family. It's one side of the political spectrum attacking the other entirely ad hominem with no evidence at all of wrongdoing public or private. In warzones, one sees improbable acts of chivalry and charity everywhere displayed, more of it than one sees in our feral media. Where is your charity, one wants to say, the chivalry to the Gore women and grandchildren, who have to endure the keel-hauling of their family as a national spectacle? To Tipper Gore or Karenna Gore we can precisely -- and shamefully -- quote Edmund Burke "In a nation of gallant men, of men of honor, I thought ten thousand swords must have leapt from their scabbards, to avenge a look that threatened her with insult. The age of chivalry is gone."

We should understand beyond doubt that gossip is power. Byzantine rumor is an instrument of force. The ancients knew it full well and used it to destroy political-military rivals. At the court of Byzantium, gossip was deployed as systematically as elections are today. Public families grew isolated, became distrustful even of their own kin as rumor worked its poison. This is what we have to look forward to. It's no good saying that Al Gore is/was a politician, that he knew the risks, that he's therefore different. If you take comfort in that, your turn will come. The briny atmosphere of rumor doesn't stay confined to the topmost layers. It consumes the air, the baker and butcher and small business owner.

Here's how it works -- one sees it in closed Islamic societies -- fear of gossip grows so disproportionate that families learn to enforce self-isolation. Cousins only marry cousins. Arranged marriages multiply. We become the social equivalent of banks that wont lend - we sit on our credit and credibility in a state of costive paranoia. The wide-open, easygoing, affectionate personality becomes dangerous, disappears from the world.
In the end, if I could speak to the Gores directly, I would want to say this: do not please shut yourselves away. As Americans we need to see your example -- that you handle this with the openhearted grace you've already displayed in overcoming previous adversity. Certainly, choose your friends carefully but do not self-destruct please. Do not hand a triumph to the sociopathic enemy. It will harm every citizen who needs a faith in home.

Source: Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melik-kaylan/the-al-gore-smear-gossip_b_617510.html. This article is used with permission.




 
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/sympathy-devil-final-thoughts-tiger-woods

Sympathy for the Devil: Final Thoughts on Tiger Woods



spies.jpg

by Michael Spies
Michael Spies holds an MFA from Columbia, and has freelanced for the Village Voice, among other publications. He's recently completed his first book, which is a memoir about the relationship of class and masculinity in New Jersey, which will be sent to publishers soon.
tiger_woods1.jpg


Tiger Woods has returned to the golf course where, in relation to the public, he belongs. He putts and drives for a living, and is particularly good at putting and driving, and owes us nothing for his talent, though his ability to negotiate a sand trap is a dazzling sight, even if you don't like golf, which I don't. Viewing great talent, in any form, is the spectator's highest privilege, as it offers relief from the banality of daily life and hints toward limitless possibility, the seed from which hope grows. After all, what are the odds a golf ball, no bigger than a jawbreaker, hit by a peculiarly shaped titanium club, will soar 400 yards into the air and land, finally, into a tiny hole, otherwise known as its intended destination?

Talent is a gift, and though it must be nurtured, we are essentially born with certain abilities--profound dexterity, perfect pitch, innate sense of composition--or we aren't. The showcasing of one's talent, then--the decision not to harbor one's gift like a secret--is a turn of the screw, the possessor sharing his good fortune with the public--an act of both courage and goodwill, as we are permitted to ignore, reject, scrutinize or take delight in the offering. If we take delight, we accept the gift and celebrate it, and this is where the exchange ends. We celebrate the talent, not the soul, which was never offered in the first place.

The soul is another, private matter. When the public begins to perceive this fact otherwise--when the public begins to believe the gift and the soul are given in tandem--it implies indentured servitude, as if, by sheer acceptance, we have all been made shareholders in the life of the talented one, on which he must pay out dividends until death. And herein lies the terrible confusion: we have mistaken one's gift for a pledge to serve.

But Tiger Woods' job has never been to serve the public. His job is to play golf, not to uphold a pseudo-righteous idea of moral turpitude, which is beside the point anyway. To say we feel betrayed by Tiger Woods' infidelity is as absurd as it is laughable. We feel betrayed because Tiger did not act as we, the shareholders, permitted him to act. We feel betrayed because, as a Pagan icon created out of our own imaginations, we could not control him, an unpleasant reminder of our inability to control anything. So we brought him to his knees, painted a scarlet letter on his forehead, and forced him into a public display of humiliation, as we demanded an apology for his uncouth actions--like fascist moral police--which he gave.

It was a truly putrid moment in our nation's history, Tiger quavering in front of television cameras and a live audience, and it was a stark example of our country's misplaced rage (much like James Frey's appearance on Oprah, and Kanye West's appearance on Leno). Adultery is a private, domestic issue--awful for sure--but private and domestic nonetheless, the awfulness of which has little to do with anyone other than the adulterer's immediate family. However, leading the country to the brink of economic collapse, as well as manipulating a vulnerable public into a costly, unjustifiable, decade's-long war, are offenses that affect all of us, and will continue to affect all of us deeply and well into the future. And these offenses were not committed by athletes or artists or actors or actresses; they were committed by unremorseful CEO's and politicians whose services we invest in, literally, and whose private actions--tailoring raw intelligence, cooking the books--have public consequences, none of which have been remotely accounted for. To say an apology from these culprits is in order is, to say the least, a drastic understatement, but that we cannot muster the same devastating ire and influence that brought Tiger to grovel for forgiveness is a complete failure of American sensibility and priority, akin to Nero playing his fiddle while Rome burned. And yet we still wonder how our leaders and banks and insurance companies get away with what they get away with. Well, here's the lesson: when faced with flames we demonized a golfer whose gift of talent was, apparently, not enough; on top of that we demanded his shame. Shame on us.

This piece originally appeared on the Huffington Post and is reprinted with permission from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.
Direct source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-spies/sympathy-for-the-devil-fi_b_522566.html.






 
Do you regularly watch certain TV programs? What do you watch and why?

I don´t watch them and I´m not sure what programmes they are sending now but We/I don´t want you programmes are very popular here.
Farmer seeks wife-or man, single mothers seeks men, who will they chose or not chose

Robinson,The farm, where they chose people with different interests who have to stay to together and every week one of them will be outvoted until there is only one left who wins money.
There are arguing, conflicts and conspircies anid that´s what they who makes the programmes want.
I think those who want to be involved in such programmes want attention but maybe sometimes it gets too much.
Tabloids write about them, I think it´s most 15 minutes of fame, although sometimes tabloids find some people more interesting.

I don´t know why people watch them ,I have watched some programmes and don´t want to do it again.
 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/w...second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/shocking-secrets-revealed-language-tabloid-headlines

Shocking Secrets Revealed: The Language of Tabloid Headlines


enquirer.jpg


Otto Friedrich has observed that "the average newspaper is simply a business enterprise that sells news and uses that lure to sell advertising space"(194). Whether one would accept this assessment for true hard-news publications, it does seem to be especially appropriate for tabloids, a term used here specifically for newspapers focused on gossip which, as Levin et al. state (article abstract), could concern "mundane events" in the lives of the famous or bizarre events in the lives of the otherwise ordinary. In fact, such newspapers' very job (at least for the Weekly World News, according to its Managing Editor Sal Ivone) is to "sensationalize the stories" they print (Meuse, 43). Since tabloids cannot rely on the hard-news value of their stories (or the reputations of their reporters) to sell copies, they must make use of other attention-getting devices to lure readers. One of these devices is the strategic placement of tabloids at the checkout counters of supermarkets, along with magazines and self-help booklets, so that bored customers might be led to look at them while they wait to pay for their groceries. A second device involves the layout of the front page, with its provocative photos and large, vari-colored, eye-catching headlines, often in block capitals reminiscent of comic-book captions. It is the nature of these headlines that is the focus here - specifically, the various linguistic devices that tend to recur in a fair percentage of headlines from issue to issue and that seem, whether by design or not, to function as lures to the reader's attention.

As a data base for an analysis of these devices, headlines were collected from nine weeks' worth of issues of the four most popular tabloids in America (according to Levin et al., article abstract): the National Enquirer, the Star, the National Examiner. These headlines were then examined to discover what content-related, rhetorical, and linguistic features could be seen to recur over the nine weeks.

It should be immediately apparent that the foremost device identifiable in tabloid headlines is the use of content-rich vocabulary - words that get the attention of the reader either through reference to a particularly interesting topic (e.g., "romance," "divorce," "sex," "scandal," etc.) or through evoking powerful, often emotional connotations (e.g., "weird," "sizzling, "stripped," etc.) - a device also common in advertising language (see Cook 101+). As early as 1959, Otto Friedrich identified "the art of exaggerating without actually lying" (194) as a key attention-getting device used in tabloid writing (thus, every woman is either "beautiful," "attractive," or "vivacious," depending on whether she is actually pretty, plain, or ugly, respectively [193]), and this sort of "creative" use of words can certainly be seen in current tabloids. In fact, a review of headlines from each tabloid determined that 81.8% of the National Enquirer's, 81.0% of the Star's, 78.0% of the National Examiner's, and 67.3% of the Globe's used at least one (subjectively identified) content- or connotation-loaded word. Compare, for example, a loaded headline like "My Stormy Marriage: By Willard Scott (Star, 8/9/88) with the bland "Jeane Dixon Answers Your Questions," from the same issue of the Star.

wwnhillarybaby.gif


Looking at the topics in more detail, one discovers the expected mix of sex, scandal, and tragedy, paranormal, or supernatural phenomena, outrageous behavior, how-to tips on self-improvement (especially dieting) and household tasks, and information about celebrities, outrageous or not (this last category being the most common focus of tabloid articles). Consider the following samples (where the lack of capital letters duplicates the original format): sex: "Surgeon, 70, Makes 11 Nurses Pregnant" (Nat. Ex., 7/26/88), and "The Day Priscilla Presleywoke up Nude in Bed with Richard Gere(Star, 8/30/88);scandal: "Marie Osmond puts her 5-yr-old son to work - and church is outraged" (Globe, 8/23/88), and "Jim & Tammy Swindled - hoaxed & fleeced by bogus preacher" (Nat. Ex., 10/11/88); tragedy: "ParalyzedLucy's Last Wish" (Globe, 7/26/88), and "Fred MacMurray Battles for Life: Wife Prays He'll Reach His 80th Birthday" (Globe, 8/16/88);paranormal/supernatural phenomena: "Lonely Aliens Are Stealing Our Pets" (Nat. Ex., 9/6/88), and "Linda Evans Says 35,000-Year-Old Spirit Tells Her to Move Out on Fiance - So She Does!" (Nat. Enq., 8/9/88); outrageous behavior: "How Tatum O'Neal Stripped to Seduce Michael Jackson" (Star, 8/2/88), and "Michael J. Fox Outrages Hotel Guests During His Bizarre Island Honeymoon" (Nat. Enq., 8/9/88); tips: "How Grits and Spaghetti Can Beat the Blues" (Nat. Ex., 10/4/88), and "Don Johnson's diet: Lose 25 lbs in 25 days[:] It's great for women, too!" (Star, 10/11/88); and celebrities: "Cybill Eats Nannies Alive: Twins' mom goes through 13 in a year" (Star, 10/4/88), and "Marilyn Monroe spent the night with dead lover" (Globe, 8/9/88). As these headlines illustrate, the topics mentioned earlier are by no means mutually exclusive- many celebrity features concern outrageous behavior involving sex, and so on.

headlines1.jpg


Besides these subjects, one might have also expected a fair sample of articles on physical deformities or freakish physical accomplishments, these being the topics perhaps most strongly associated with tabloids (at least, by critics and satirists), but rather surprisingly, only one relevant headline appeared in this sample: "Tragic story of newborn monster only a mother could love" (Nat. Ex., 9/6/88). Such sensational topics actually appear much more frequently on the covers of other tabloids not included in this sample, and a reasonable hypothesis might be that these four most widely bought tabloids aspire to be taken as more serious or newsworthy, and so avoid the less credible stories (unlike other tabloids such as Weekly. World News - which, according to Meuse, "will accept stories at their face value" [43]). For the sake of illustration, however, two sample headlines which deal with deformity and freakish behavior can be offered here from the Sun: "Shocked Granny, 67, Gives Birth to Chimp-Faced Twins" (10/25/88); and "Wife hooked on soap eats 12 bars every day" (9/6/88).(2)

A similar inspection of connotation-rich vocabulary (aside from those nouns which name sensational topics, already illustrated earlier) reveals nouns, verbs, and especially adjectives chosen for their impact on the readers. In "Why heart-broken Susan Lucci is an innocent victim" (Nat. Ex., 8/9/88), for example, the reader cannot even ascertain the actual event to be discussed, but "heartbroken," "innocent" and "victim" (and, of course, the celebrity name itself) all arouse curiosity and interest. In fact, several key terms recurred a number of times in the 212 headlines examined: the big winners were "baby" and the related "pregnant," in 16 and 11 headlines, respectively; but "secret" occurred 13 times; "diet" 7; "romance/romantic" 6; and "wacky," "hunk," "shocking " and "heartbreak/heartbroken/heartache" each appeared 4 times.
Another type of connotative vocabulary, what Madelon Heatherington has called labels of primary potency (177), were also expected to be quite common in tabloid headlines, but in fact, only two clear-cut examples were found. These words are adjectives which categorize and even stereotype people in certain ways (usually according to racial, ethnic or religious group; gender; etc.) and so tend to overshadow the nouns they modify (e.g., what is significant to the users of the phrase "black female lawyer" is ot so much the profession of the individual as her race and gender). The two examples appeared in the headlines "Male Nurse Makes 5 Old Ladies Pregnant" (Nat. Ex., 10/11/88) and "Mystery of Diana Ross' Blond Baby" (Star,8/2/88); in both stories, the labels of primary potency clearly do convey information central to the stories' import, but in most other tabloid articles other connotative adjectives (e.g., "heartbroken," "brave," "wacky," etc.) and the celebrity names by themselves serve the function of engaging the reader's interest.

Three other language devices that do occur frequently can be interpreted as having the purpose of bringing the reader dose to the individuals featured in the stories, making him or her feel intimately connected to them. The most obvious attempt to establish this sort of intimacy (see Brown and Ford 247, among many others) is through the use of first name only to identify celebrities, without any mention of the person's last name; such first-name use occurred in 39 out of 212 headlines (18.4%). The implication is that readers know these people personally, since they can use first names with them, and since they don't need last names to identify who is meant. Thus one has "Elvis' daughter flips for man twice her age" (Globe, 9/6/88); "Liz Pulls Strings In U.S. Senate to Keep Son Convicted of Drugs From Being Kicked Out of U.S." (Nat. Enq., 10/11/88); "Test-Tube Baby for Burt & Loni: Friends Say It's in the Works" (Globe, 8/2/88); and others.
But even beyond just using first names, some headlines actually use well-known nicknames for celebrities (in 20 headlines, or 9.4%), further reinforcing the sense of familiarity and intimacy that readers feel toward those so labeled. Consider "Fergie's Crash Diet: Lose 50 lbs. in 6 Weeks" (Star, 9/6/88); "Di's Last-Ditch Bid to Save Her Marriage: She & Charles Plan Move to Hong Kong!" (Star, 10/4/88); and "Conan Demands Give Me a Baby or Get Out" (Globe, 7/26/88). Of course, sometimes photos accompanying the headlines might be counted on to identify the focus of these articles, but the use of first names and nicknames can still be seen as a potent device for engaging readers - making them feel "inside" the story.

The other device apparently used to promote readers' feelings of closeness to individuals featured in tabloid articles is what will be called here pseudo-quotes. These statements are treated in some ways as if they were direct quotes: i.e., they often use first-person pronouns or command forms and are phrased so as to convey the attitudes supposedly held by the person being quoted, although the writer of the article is not at all likely to be privy to them - a clear application of "the omniscient narrator in newswriting" (Gibson 204), claiming access to the minds of story subjects in a manner which Gibson points out is fine in fiction but is much frowned upon in journalism (204). But one other characteristic suggests that they are not verbatim reports of actual utterances - specifically, a lack of quotation marks in many of the headlines. The use of these pseudo-quotes thus gives readers a feeling of involvement or intimacy with the article subjects (plus a spurious sense that the information is authentic). Examples include "Tubby Hubby Divorces Wife Who Lost 900 Lbs: She Weeps: 'He Liked Me Fat - when no other man wanted me'" (Nat. Ex., 8/2/88); "Conan Demands Give Me a Baby or Get Out" (Globe, 7/26/88); "Cher: Why I Like 'Em Young" (Star, 9/6/88).

A final category of linguistic devices found in tabloid headlines involves various literary or poetic devices, affecting the phonological shape of phrases rather than their content - part of what Cook (226) calls code play in advertising, manipulations of "sounds and rhythms, meaning and grammatical patterns of language," among other things, to direct "attention upon the substance and means of communication, rather than using these only to refer to the world." The effect is to make potentially unmemorable headlines or phrases more interesting purely in their pronunciation. The most common of these devices, whether used intentionally or occurring fortuitously, is alliteration; this kind of consonant pattern occurs in 72 headlines, or 34%, as in "First Photos of: Fergie's Baby" (Nat. Ex., 7/26/88); "Brave Lucy Bounces Back from Stroke . . ." (Nat. Enq., 7/26/88); "Eddie Murphy: Secret Surgery" (Nat. Enq., 7/26/88); "Liz Drowning Drama" (Globe, 10/11/88).

A less common device is rhyme - it occurs in only 6 headlines, or 2.8%, but is certainly noticeable when it is used; consider "Willie Nelson's Gal Pal Pregnant . . ." (Nat. Enq., 8/2/88); "Tubby Hubby-Divorces Wife . . ." (Nat. Ex., 8/2/88); "Cher's new toy boy . . ." (Globe, 10/4/88).
Finally, a number of instances of assonance can be found - in 38 headlines, or 17.9% (not counting assonance in proper names, such as Mike Tyson. However, these seem to be almost entirely accidental, simply occurring as fallout from word choice rather than as its deciding factor. Thus, in the examples "The Real Reason Wives Nag" (Nat. Enq., 8/9/88), "Bingo-Mad Grandmother Runs off with Boy, 14: 'That's my lucky number' says gambling granny" (Nat. Ex., 8/9/88), and "Beatles & Ex-lovers Defend Lennon Against Sex & Drug Charges" (Star, 8/30/88), only the last one seems to be so extensive that it might have been planned.

It is clear from this headline sample that only the content-related characteristics, of the ones just discussed, occur with an overwhelming degree of frequency. Nevertheless, it seems obvious that a number of the other devices analyzed here are used too frequently to be totally accidental (first names, pseudo-quotes, and alliteration, especially).

Certainly, when all these various characteristics are taken together, they give the strong impression of prose that is as carefully constructed as is advertising copy designed to sell a product (this impression can be reinforced by considering advertising-language characteristics themselves, as discussed in Cook's work and others). And, of course, that is precisely what Otto Friedrich claimed as the function of newspaper headlines, tabloids especially (194). In that respect, then, this analysis provides yet further evidence that Friedrich's 1959 dictum still holds true.

Whether such a conclusion causes distress today must depend on whether readers look upon the tabloids as real newspapers, whose function truly is to report facts, or as gossipy entertainments whose content is not relied upon to be true. As Gibson says, "One appreciates any effort by journalists to make the reading of the news less of a chore and a bore. Nobody wants to be dull. But if the alternative to dullness is dishonesty, it may be better to be dull" (208). Dullness is one flaw no tabloid headline can be accused of, but neither would most readers accuse tabloids of being unequivocally honest, a view, as we have already seen, that at least some of the tabloids themselves reinforce. So in the end, if readers choose to believe that extraterrestrials are kidnapping their pets or that Diana Ross had a blond baby, they cannot fairly say they weren't warned about the nature of the information they are reading; the headlines themselves give ample warning of the uncertain veracity of the content to follow.


Deborah Schaffer received her Ph.D. in linguistics from The Ohio State University Ohio State University. She is currently professor of English at Montana State University-Billings where she teaches linguistics, composition, and special topics in literature. Her research interests include conversational analysis and other areas of sociolinguistics socio-linguistics, the study of language as it affects and is affected by social relations.
Source: "Shocking Secrets Revealed! The Language of Tabloid Headlines" was originally published in the Spring 1995 issue (52.1) of ETC.: A Review of General Semantics (pp. 27-46). It is reprinted here with the permission of the Institute of General Semantics (IGS).


NOTES

To double-check the currency of the headline strategies identified in this corpus, headlines from the same four tabloids were collected during the week of 6/15/93. These headlines, twenty in all, showed a distribution of characteristics similar to those from 1988, except for more instances of labels of primary potency (six) and a lack of instances of assonance (and two examples of the latter were informally observed the week after). I am therefore assuming that my analysis of these earlier examples still holds for today's tabloid headlines.

One such headline was also found in my June, 1993, sampling: "Amazing courage of the toddler with no limbs" (Nat. Ex., 6/15/93).


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bell, Allan. The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.


Bolinger, Dwight . Language: The Loaded Weapon. NY: Longman, 1980.

Brown, Roger, and Marguerite Ford. "Address in American English." The Psychosociology of Language. Ed. Serge Muscovici. Chicago: Markham, 1972. 243-62. Rpt. from Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62.2 (1961): 375-85.

Cook, Guy. The Discourse of Advertising. NY: Routledge, 1992.

Fowler, Roger. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. NY: Routledge, 1991.

Friedrich, Otto. "A Vivacious Blonde Was Fatally Shot Today or How to Read a Tabloid." Language Awareness. Ed. Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. NY: St. Martin's.

Geis, Michael. "Language and Media." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics Applied linguistics 7 (1986): 64-73.

Geis, Michael. The Language of Television Advertising. NY: Academic Press, 1982.

Gibson, Walker. "Dullness and Dishonesty: The Rhetoric of Newswriting." Language Awareness. Ed. Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. NY: St. Martin's Press, 1974. 200-08. Rpt. from Walker Gibson, Tough, Sweet and Stuffy: An Essay on Modern Prose Style, Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1966.

Heatherington, Madelon. How Language Works. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop Pub., 1980.

Jenkins, Helen. "Train Sex Man Fined: Headlines and Cataphoric Ellipsis." Vol. 2 of Learning, Keeping, and Using Language: Selected Papers from the 8th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Sydney, 16-21 August 1987. Ed. M.A.K. Halliday, John Gibbons
John Michael Gibbons, and Howard Nicholas. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1990.

Levin, Jack, Amita Mody-Desbareau, and Arnold Arluke. Abstract of "The Gossip Tabloid as an Agent of Social Control." Paper presented at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association The American Sociological Association (ASA)4.1 (1992): 42-46.

Ogilvy, David. "How to Write Potent Copy." In Language Awareness. 4th ed. Ed. Paul Eschholz, Alfred Rosa, and Virginia Clark. NY: St. Martin's Press, 1986. 220-26. Rpt. from Confessions of an Advertising Man. NY: Atheneum.

Smith, Michael, and Michael Montgomery. "The Semantics of Winning and Losing." Language in Society 18.1 (1989): 31-57.

Wyckham, R., P. Banting, and A. Wensley. "The Language of Advertising: Who Controls Quality?" Journal of Business Ethnics3 (1984): 47-53.



Appendix A. Complete Corpus of Headlines

Week of 7/26/88:
Globe:
Conan Demands Give Me a Baby or Get Out
Paralyzed Lucy's Last Wish
Lover Dumps Crocodile Dundee - He's Too Old
Joan Kennedy - Spiked Drink Led to Drunk Driving Arrest

National Enquirer.
Joan Kennedy Drunk Driving Arrest - The Untold Story
Joan Collins Joan Henrietta Collins OBE (born May 23 1933) is a Golden Globe Award winning British actress and bestselling author. Early LifeCollins was born in London to Joseph William "Will" Collins (a South African Jewish talent agent, 1902-88) and Elsie (later Elsa) Bessant (a , 55, in Sizzling Romance with 24-Year-Old Hunk
Brave Lucy Bounces Back From Stroke - Plans Blockbuster Movie Comeback
Eddie Murphy: Secret Surgery

National Examiner:
Surgeon, 70, Makes 11 Nurses Pregnant
How to Read Minds
First Photos of Fergie's Baby
New Ways to Banish Arthritis & Headaches
Oprah's Weird & Wacky Diet Plans

Week of 8/2/88:
Globe:
Test-Tube Baby for Burt & Loni: Friends Say It's in the Works
Michael Jackson's Ugly Family Secret Is Out
The Girls on Eddie Murphy's Hit List
Victoria Principal's $Million Bid to Save Her Husband - as look alike gets Pam's role on Dallas
Vitamin E vitamin E or tocopherol. Fat-soluble organic compound found principally in certain plant oils and leaves of green vegetables. Vitamin E acts as an antioxidant in body tissues and may prolong life by slowing oxidative destruction of membranes. - Amazing Fountain of Youth Fountain of Youth legendary fountain of eternal youth. [World Legend: Brewer Dictionary, 432] See : Unattainability : It Can Work for You
Michael J. Fox's Wedding Fiasco: Story & Photos Inside
Your Lucky Numbers & Dates for August

National Enquirer:
Willie Nelson's Gal Pal Pregnant - Fed-Up Wife Wants Divorce
Simply Eating Certain Foods Will Increase Your IQ and Memory
Super Security as Michael J. Fox Weds - Even Tent Was Closed as Temperature Topped 100 [degrees]
Tasty Dishes You Can Fix Now ad Enjoy Later
Household Tips That'll Cut Your Cleaning Chores
Easy Ways to Make Your Hair Look its Best

National Examiner:
Tubby Hubby Divorces Wife Who Lost 900 Lbs: She Weeps: "He Liked Me Fat - when no other man wanted me"
Win Big Bucks Now! All New Lucky Lottery Horoscope horoscope: see astrology.
How Sex Almost Destroyed Lucille Ball - and it could happen again
Why Dolly Parton Dolly Rebecca Parton (born January 19, 1946) is a Grammy-winning and Academy Award-nominated American country singer, songwriter, composer, musician, author, actress, and philanthropist. Packs a Gun
Delicious Peanut Butter Diet: Lose 12 pounds in 2 weeks
Deadly illness haunts Frances Swaggart

Star:
How Taturn O'Neal Stripped to Seduce Michael Jackson
Fergie's Heartbreak Over New Baby
Tom Selleck Talks 'Divorce': Reports Claim 11-Month Marriage is Kaput ka·put also ka·putt adj. Informal.Incapacitated or destroyed. [German kaputt, from French capot, not having won a single trick at piquet, possibly from Provençal.
The Inside Story: Michael J. Fox's Wacky Wedding
Mystery of Diana Ross' Blond Baby
Dolly Goes into Hiding for Make-or-Break Movie
Bad Knee May Cripple Dirty Dancer Patrick Swayze

Week of 8/9/88:
Globe:
I Gave Sinatra Three Facelifts: What top plastic surgeon plastic surgeon A surgeon specialized in reconstruction or cosmetic enhancement of various body regions, most commonly the face–nose, chin, and cheeks, breasts and buttocks; PSs remove fat deposits through liposuction; PSs reduce scarring or disfigurement did for scores of aging idols
Chef: 1988's zaniest bride
Fergie's fear as baby is born - Whitney Houston is after my Husband
Baby for Tom Selleck: As Divorce Rumors Spread
Calorie Counter: For Frozen Treats
Marilyn Monroe spent the night with dead lover

National Enquirer:
Bruce Springsteen “Springsteen” redirects here. For other uses, see Springsteen (disambiguation). Bruce Frederick Joseph Springsteen (born September 24, 1949) is an influential American singer, songwriter, and guitarist. He has frequently recorded and toured with the E Street Band. Divorce Shocker: He's Furious over Report His Wife Will Charge Him With 'Physical Abuse'
Linda Evans Says 35,000-Year-Old Spirit Tells Her to Move out on Fiance - So She Does!
Michael J. Fox Outrages Hotel Guests During His Bizarre Island Honeymoon
How to Beat Your Fears
The Real Reason Wives Nag
Feuding at Work? Here's How to Bury the Hatchet to lay aside the instruments of war, and make peace; - a phrase used in allusion to the custom observed by the North American Indians, of burying a tomahawk when they conclude a peace.
to make peace or become reconciled. - Dryden. See also: Bury Hatchet

National Examiner:
Bingo-Mad Grandmom Runs off with Boy, 14: "That's my lucky number" says gambling granny
How Liz Taylor Is Saving Brando's Life: The Untold Story
Hollywood stars' secret formula to ... Look 15 Yrs Younger
Bonus: Exciting New Ways to Win Battle Against Aging
Will Knots Landing's Joan have baby at 45?
UFO Aliens Kidnap 1400 Farmers - astonishing a·ston·ish tr.v. as·ton·ished, as·ton·ish·ing, as·ton·ish·es. To fill with sudden wonder or amazement. See Synonyms at surprise.
Why heartbroken Susan Lucci is an innocent victim

Star:
Surprise Baby Saves Selleck's Marriage
Fergie's Million Dollar Baby: Happy Mom Spends Fortune on Fairytale Nursery
Jeane Dixon Answers Your Questions
Diet That Turned 'Tub of Lard' into World's Fastest Woman: Speedy 7-Day menu plan
Why Lisa Marie Presley Lisa Marie Presley (born February 1, 1968) is an American singer/songwriter, who is the only daughter of Elvis Presley and Priscilla Beaulieu Presley. Presley heritage
As Elvis' only child, Lisa Marie eventually inherited his estate at the age of 30. Can't Get Her Hands on Elvis' Riches
My Stormy Marriage: By Willard Scott
Barry Manilow's Romance with Beauty Queen
Shocking New Movie Shows Christ as Lover
How Fight Champ Tyson Blows $1.4M a Year - but Only $55 on Food

Week of 8/16/88:
Globe:
Fred MacMurray Battles for Life: Wife Prays He'll Reach His 80th Birthday
Cher Wedding Charade; Honeymoon Tiff Sparks Jail Drama
Liz in Hospital Again: Did she hurt herself falling off the wagon?
JFK Jr. Dates Princess Stephanie
20 Ways to Lose 20 Lbs. in 20 Days


National Enquirer:
New Cancer Ordeal for Bronson's Wife: Gutsy Jill Ireland Jill Ireland (April 24, 1936 – May 17, 1990) was an English actress. Biography. Born in London, England, Ireland was best known for her many films with her second husband, Charles Bronson, in the 1970s, and for her portrayal of Leila Kalomi in the episode "This Side Tells How She'll Win Life-or-Death Battle
'Growing Pains' Costar Tried to Save Child Actress - Days Before Her Dad Killed Her
Cher's Torment - Beau Could Get 4 Years in Jail Because of Mystery Man's Cruel Hoax
Madonna's Brawling Brother is Wilder than Sean Penn - He's Had 3 Assault Charges in only 6 Months
Four Ways You Can Control Anxiety Attacks
How to Make Small Rooms Look B-I-G

National Examiner:
Wealthy Grandma, 63, Weds Her 14-Yr-Old Kidnapper
Topic Psychic's Amazing ... Predictions for Fall 1988
Dallas' Linda Gray Linda Ann Gray (born September 12, 1940 in Santa Monica, California) is an American actress, best known for her role as Larry Hagman's long-suffering wife, Sue Ellen Ewing on the television soap opera Dallas Would Love to be a Granny
Horoscope Guide to Good Food and Good Health
They're Pals Again: Why Donny & Marie Kissed and Made Up

Star:
How Oprah Lost 22 Lbs. in 22 Days
Chef Sobs as Bagel-Boy Lover Goes on Rampage: Exclusive 3-page photo report reveals what really happened outside her home[;] 'I'm gonna kill you,' Rob screams as he hurls camera at fleeing photog pho·tog
n. Informal A person who takes photographs, especially as a profession; a photographer.
Mr. & Mrs. Michael J. Fox: Intimate Honeymoon Album
Liz Fights to Avoid Life in Wheelchair
Sinatra's Daughter Blasts his 'Streetfighter' Wife
Tom Cruise Cheats Death in 100 MPH Car Race Crash

Week of 8/23/88:
Globe:
50 Simple Ways to Beat STRESS
Sister Tells World: Don Johnson Pushed Cocaine[:] 'Thugs threatened to blow away his manhood'
Marie Osmond puts her 5-yr-old son to work - and church is outraged
Stars' Tearful Deathbed Vigil for Barbara Stanwyck Barbara Stanwyck (July 16 1907 – January 20 1990) was a four-time Academy Award-nominated, three-time Emmy Award-winning, and Golden Globe-winning American actress of film, stage, and screen.
Foxy TV Host Dates Kid from Head of Class . New Jessica Hahn Jessica Hahn (born July 7, 1959 in Massapequa, New York) is a model, actress, and former church secretary best known for her sex scandal with televangelist Jim Bakker. Bombshell: I was Pastor's Sex Slave for 7 Years
Your Fall Horoscope

National Enquirer:
'Miami Vice' Star Furious as Sister Charges: Don Johnson Was a Drug Dealer
Fergie's Baby - The Secret Drama[:] Her Nightmare Pregnancy Ends in Joy
Mike Tyson Warned by Wife: Stay Away from LaToya Jackson!
Be Nice - And You'll Cut Your Risk of Getting a Heart Attack

National Examiner:
Drunk More Took Wrong Twins at Liquor Store: She had them a week before realizing her boys were girls!
Superstar's friends fear ... Eddie Murphy to Share Fate of his Idol Elvis
Lose 15 Lbs and feel fitter instantly with ... New Miracle Herbs to Flush out Body Poisons
How Connie Chung stays superfit at 41
Fabulous Ice Cream Sundae Diet
Emma Samm's surprising pregnant secret

Star.
Fergie's Baby: Intimate story of her birth on luckiest day of the century
Plus Caroline Kennedy's Baby Rose - First Photos
Fall TV Preview: Post-strike guide to new shows, movies & mini-series
Priscilla Presley's ex reveals: My Forbidden Love for Elvis' Teen Daughter[:] Only in Star - Shocking new book that has Elvis fans in uproar
Diana Ross Pregnant Again at 44

Week of 8/30/88:
Globe:
The Wraps are off! Fall TV: What's hot & what's not - special 4-page pull-out
Family Fears for Joan Kennedy's Life
Morgan Fairchild falls for 74-yr-old senator
L.A. Law Beauty's Secret Battle Against Cancer: She hid the bad news for 2 years
Why Elvis' daughter thinks he's still alive
20 Ways to Take 20 Years Off Your Face
Your lucky dates & numbers for September

National Enquirer:
Fergie and Andy Fight Over Baby: Hubby Has Her in Tears Day After Birth ... and Di Furious as Charles Snubs New Baby
She's Pregnant! Thrilled L.A. Law Hunk Sets Fall Wedding Date
Steven Spielberg's Marriage in Trouble - He's Seeing Old Flame
Country Star Crystal Gayle's Nightmare Brush With Death

National Examiner:
Boy, 12, Makes Teacher & 6 Classmates Classmates can refer to either:
Classmates.com, social networking website
Classmates (film), a 2006 Malayalam blockbuster director by Lai Jose, starring Prithciraj, Jayasury, Indragith, Sunil, Jagathy, Kavya Madhavan, Balachandra Menon … Pregnant
New Heartache for Evangelists: Jim Bakker Will Go to Jail - predicts expert on PTL PTL Praise The Lord
PTL Preterm Labor
PTL Parent Teacher League
PTL Pedro the Lion (band)
PTL Pass The Loot
PTL Photovoltaic Testing Laboratory (Arizona State University) Scandal
Secret tragedy haunts cheerful Sandy Duncan
How Katherine Hepburn conquered arthritis pain[:] secrets of how 80-yr-old superstar stays superfit
8 Million Americans Have Returned from the Dead - incredible new report
Why Fergie's baby will have a 'second mother'

Star:
Liz Taylor Battles Drug Problem in Hospital
Willie Nelson begs wife: Make friends with my pregnant mistress
John Denver, 44, weds actress, 27, in Rocky Mountain hideaway
Di's Secret Tips to Fergie: How to be a better more - even if it means defying the queen
Blooming Beauties: Pregnant Lisa Bonet returns to Cosby[;] Bruce Willis sobs in joy as wife Demi gives birth [photo caption: Lisa & husband Romeo Blue]
The Day Priscilla Presley woke up Nude in Bed with Richard Gere
New Crystal Gayle heartbreak
Special Emmy Ballot
Beatles & Ex-lovers Defend Lennon Against Sex & Drug Charges

Week of 9/6/88:
Globe:
Doctors Warn Liz: Dry Out or Die - as she heads for clinic
JFK Shocker: Oswald Didn't Fire Fatal Shot: Startling star·tle v. star·tled, star·tling, star·tles, v.tr., 1. To cause to make a quick involuntary movement or start., 2. To alarm, frighten, or surprise suddenly. See Synonyms at frighten. new evidence names 2nd assassin
$12M Lawsuit Costs Victoria Her Baby: Her husband is a monster, woman charges. Stork stork, common name for members of a family of long-legged wading birds. The storks are related to the herons and ibises and are found in most of the warmer parts of the world. saves bad boy Bruce's marriage
20 Simple Ways to Double Your Spending Power The power of legislatures to tax and spend. Spending power is conferred to state and federal legislatures through their constitution. Judicial Review of legislative spending varies from state to state, but the law of federal spending informs courts in all states.
Elvis' daughter flips for man twice her age

National Enquirer:
Cybill sees Red [in red ink red ink Health administration A popular term for financial losses. Cf in the Black. ] - 'Moonlighting' Making Deal to Costar Farrah
Newhart's TV Wife, 45, in Love with Hunk, 25
Kirk Douglas Tells All: My Romances with Rita Hayworth, Joan Crawford and Lauren Bacall - Hot Best-Seller
Kenny Rogers Devastated dev·as·tate, tr.v. dev·as·tat·ed, dev·as·tat·ing, dev·as·tates, 1. To lay waste; destroy. 2. To overwhelm; confound; stun: was devastated by the rude remark. - Pal Arrested for Murder
12 Reasons You Shouldn't Diet

National Examiner:
Girl, 7, Gives Birth to 20-Ounce Twins: Miracle babies are 'doing just fine'
Humiliation of vidous sex scandal shatters Priscilla & Lisa Marie: The inside story
Lonely UFO Aliens Are Stealing Our Pets
Feel 20 yrs younger instantly: 10 Hi-Energy Foods to Add Zip & Zest to Your Life
Love secrets of Robert Redford's new sweetie

Tragic story of newborn monster only a mother could love

Star:
Gary Coleman Blasts Parents for Making him a Star
Fergie's Crash Diet: Lose 50 lbs. in 6 Weeks[;] Plus Baby photos by Prince Andrew
The Secret Men in Dolly Parton's Life: She holidays with handsome hunks hunks, pl.n. (used with a sing. verb). A disagreeable and often miserly person. [Origin unknown.] in Hawaiian Paradise - but hubby Carl doesn't seem to mind
Soap Wedding of the Year: 'Restless' beauty weds 'General Hospital' playboy in $50 gown
Cher: Why I Like 'Em Young
Broken Romance with A.A. Counselor Drove Joan Kennedy Back to Drink
Lisa Marie Presley parties on anniversary of dad Elvis' death Fall Horoscope Special
Fall TV Heats Up : * Sneak preview of first Cosby episode, * Hagman wooing Victoria Principal back to Dallas ,* Exclusive photos of Dirty Dancing series

Week of 10/4/88:
Globe:
Dynasty Back Without Krystle
Ann-Margaret's Deathbed Vigil
Cher's new toy boy? [:] TV host catches her eye as bagel maker gets the boot
Royal wedding fever grips Monaco as - Elvis' Little Girl Falls for Grace's Little Prince
Miracle foods that prevent breast cancer
Hedy Lamarr Loses $300,000 in Jewels - and doesn't know where they've gone

National Enquirer:
Alan Thi>Lovebirds lovebirds, small parrots, traditional symbol of affection. [Am. Culture: Misc.] See : Lovers, Famous in Real-Life Romance

National Examiner:
Male Nurse Makes 5 Old Ladies Pregnant: Seniors fell hopelessly in love with silver-tongued Romeo[:] The inside story
Jim & Tammy Swindled - hoaxed & fleeced by bogus preacher
Flush out body poisons[:] Wonder Salad Dissolves Cholesterol Instantly
Jackee's knockout romance with boxing champ
Brides Fined for not Being Virgins
World's smallest man's desperate plea: 'I need a wife'

Star:
Agony & ecstasy of life with Liz - in his own words: Burton's Love Diaries Unearthed Unearthed is the name of a Triple J project to find and "dig up" (hence the name) hidden talent in regional Australia.
Unearthed has had three incarnations - they first visited each region of Australia where Triple J had a transmitter - 41 regions in all. After 25 Years: 'Elizabeth is an eternal one-night stand ... I love that woman so much I cannot believe my luck ... I want to make love to her & cherish her every minute of the day'
Gen. Hospital's 'Monica', 39, To Marry Her High School Sweetheart
Don Johnson's diet: Lose 25 lbs in 25 days[:] It's great for women, too!
How JFK Jr Beat Cocaine
Jackee quits 227
Fans Rally Round 'Broke' Tammy Wynette
Dirty Dancer Jennifer Grey To Wed Johnny Dep: Jump Street star pops question on bended bend·ed v. Archaic, A past participle of bend1. Idiom: on bended knee. On one's knee or knees, as in supplication or submission.. Adj. 1. knee.
Cybill Shepherd's Wacky Marriage[:] Plus Exclusive color photos of her twins at age one

Week of 6/15/93:
Globe:
Cheers Star Slapped With Sex Charges![:] Mailman Cliff dragged me into a bathroom and forced himself on me, sobs TV beauty [Photo caption: Her own Shocking Story]
From dirt-poor childhood to $20M mansion[:] Whitney's Very Private Photos[:] World Exclusive - Never Seen Before - Fabulous 3-Page Special
AIDS-stricken Malcom Forbes tricked Liz into marrying him![:] Billionaire Took His Secret to the Grave
Race War Rocks Oprah's Diner![:] Black cooks charge they are bullied by whites & she won't help 'em
Seinfeld, 39, falls for high school gal, 17 . [Photo caption: Budding Star at Sweet 16]

National Enquirer:
Whitney Jets to Hawaii With Sick Baby to Save Marriage ... and it works
Angela Lansbury's Gay Husband Revealed: Tragic secret of 'Murder, She Wrote' star's 1st marriage
Seinfeld, 39, in romance with high school girl, 17
Madonna's wild fling with hoop star Charles Barkley

National Examiner:
After Angel Saves Him From Fiery Mid-Air Crash ... Billy Graham Close to Death?
We're giving away $12,000 worth free![:] Stay Young Forever with Miracle Chinese Herb Ginkgo ginkgo (gĭng`kō) or maidenhair tree, tall, slender, picturesque deciduous tree (Ginkgo biloba) with fan-shaped leaves. [;] Docs hail Oriental fountain of youth
Revealed! Cruel Plot Made Lucci Lose Emmy for 14 Years
Amazing courage of the toddler with no limbs
They're living in U.S. lake[:] Jurassic Park Dinosaurs Are for Real
$200,000 Reward![:] Help Us Find This Missing Boy

Star:
Win $3,000 Fun-In-Sun Vacation For Two
Your Zodiac Diet Guide: Foods to eat and avoid
'Dallas' beauty Audrey Landers: My miracle twins
Cradle-Snatcher: Seinfeld, 39, flips for high school girl, 17
Princess Di Becoming a Catholic
 
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

http://voiceseducation.org/

http://www.voiceseducation.org/conte...second-edition


Man Behind the Myth from Walking Moon Studios on Vimeo.

Who was Michael Jackson really? Michael Jackson's work, life and his "troubles" are not what you thought they were.
Jackson was used and abused relentlessly by a media gone mad because any mention of his name drew crowds and cash.

Learn the truth of who Michael Jackson really was as we take a look at the story behind the myth.
 
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/black-journalists-call-public-forum-talk-show-hate

Black Journalists Call For Public Forum on 'Talk Show Hate'


mike_green.jpg

by Mike Green

When Dr. Laura Schlessinger assaulted the airwaves on Aug. 10 with a barrage of the "N" word, while responding to a caller who identified herself as a Black female, the popular radio host advice-giver ignited a firestorm of criticism that shocked her so much she publicly announced plans to retire her radio show.

Media publicized Dr. Laura's "apology," which sounded more akin to a defense of the blunt force with which she bombarded the public with multiple series of the "N" word than a sincere reflection of the harm she unwittingly caused. Dr. Laura said her new plans include transitioning to public arenas where she believes she will be "freer" to speak her mind. Hopefully, she will include speaking her mind directly to Black Americans, the vast majority of whom were offended by her tirade of racial slurs.

Today, the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), a group whose members and associates hold quite a different perspective regarding the use of the "N" word than Dr. Laura and her cohorts, released an official response calling for accountability by media personalities and their parent companies for the use of profane and offensive racial slurs.

NABJ Says Dr. Laura And Media Companies Must Be Held Accountable

2010-08-19-kathytimesnabjpresident.jpg

Kathy Times, NABJ President

WASHINGTON, DC (Aug. 19, 2010) -- The following is a statement from Kathy Times, President of the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) on the recent criticism of conservative talk show host Dr. Laura Schlessinger for using a racial slur on the air:

"I will never forget the first time I was called the n-word. In fact, a young white man in Alabama hit me with a double dose of hate and called me a n----- b----. It was 2002. It was my first day on a new job as an investigative reporter. It took a few seconds for the full impact of the slur to hit me. Then, it felt like I'd been sucker punched in the gut.
"I can imagine that is how the African-American caller felt when she and other listeners heard Dr. Laura Schlessinger use the n-word 11 times ... taken aback, shocked, and speechless.

"When will people learn it's never OK to use the n-word, no matter how many times it is uttered in the name of entertainment, sarcasm or disgust? Instead of helping one of her callers, Dr. Laura chose to go on a tirade that appeared to reveal deep-rooted thoughts on politics and black America.

"Dr. Laura apologized for using the offensive language. She does not have the right to use racial slurs on public airwaves. She says she will not do radio anymore, but there are deeper issues that must be addressed by the company that syndicates her show - Premiere Radio Networks. Why wait until the next on-air personality slips up?
"Is it time for the n-word and other racial epithets to be added to the list of seven dirty words (made famous by comedian George Carlin)?

"The use of those words hit broadcasters where it hurts them most -- on the bottom line with fines and lost advertising revenue. But the fear of losing ad dollars should not be the only reason to end this era of hate on the public's airwaves.

"It is past time for a movement to address 'Talk Show Hate.' As the president of the National Association of Black Journalists, my goal is not to change the inherent mindset of provocateurs and consumers of any controversial media platform, but instead to lead the charge in forums that educate those who dare to think for themselves.
"I believe most people are open to embracing people of all races based on the content of their character. We invite Dr. Laura and Premiere Radio Networks to join us in a conversation leading to change in the public discourse, which both embraces their right to free speech and our desire to end the use of racial slurs and epithets on the public's airwaves.

"By the way, that young white man who called me those terrible names eventually apologized and gave me an interview. I accepted the apology, but I'll never forget the venomous sting that my ancestors must have felt when their slave masters conjured up the n-word."
nabj_web_logo.jpg

The National Association of Black Journalists is an advocacy group established in 1975 in Washington, D.C.
NABJ is the largest organization of journalists of color in the nation, with more than 3,000 members. NABJ provides educational, career development and support to black journalists worldwide.

Follow Mike Green on Twitter: www.twitter.com/amikegreen2

This piece originally appeared on the Huffington Post and is reprinted with permission from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.

Direct source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-green/black-journalists-call-fo_b_687777.html.




 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/american-public-must-demand-honest-journalism

The American Public Must Demand Honest Journalism

Does the American Dream Have to Die With Michael Jackson?
Forbes Everett Landis

Do you think it is a good idea to keep silent about the attacks on one of the most visible achievers of the American Dream? Are we not forfeiting our children’s future into the hands of bullies? Is it not time for us to speak up about the damage opportunistic journalism is doing to our culture? --

Last year, the news of pop-superstar Michael Jackson’s premature death shocked the world. As I am a classical music fan, not a connoisseur of pop music or any of its stars, Jackson’s death did not immediately evoke any particular emotion in me. I just let it go.

youngmichaeljackson.jpg


But as the days went by, and as I passively soaked in more and more news reports on Jackson’s death, I began to feel increasingly uncomfortable. A man had passed away: What need was there for the media to so eagerly show humiliating images of how Jackson would have looked on his death-bed? I was prompted to look into the case more thoroughly.

After more than a year, although I am not a Michael Jackson fan per se, on closer inspection I have come to admire his scale of contributions and humanitarian messages espoused within songs of his. And despite my hitherto skeptical view of the sometimes frenzied remarks made by Jackson’s hard-core followers, I feel the need to say this :
To keep the American dream alive for our children, we should stop abusing our talented and creative spirits out of jealousy and misunderstanding.

Jackson had to deal with the media condemning him as strange, weird, and even labeling him a fr.eak, both figuratively and literally. My opinion about this is clear: Though at times, to subjective eyes, Jackson might have looked ‘different,’ half of this eccentricity was due to the fact that he was born to be an artist inevitably different from others because of his imaginative and creative nature, and half because he was forced into being so unconventional by a degree of media pressure and fame few, if any, have ever experienced. Being different from others does not equate being harmful to others. As long as one does not violate others’ human rights, one has the right to be him or herself. In a society that prioritizes human rights and freedom, I find no justification for hurtful attacks on people who are perceived to be ‘different.’ These kinds of attacks are especially sordid when they involve the spreading of knowingly false rumors for financial gain. After Jackson’s acquittal on alleged child related charges in 2005, several journalists, such as Aphrodite Jones, came forward to confess that most of the media in attendance intentionally put objectivity aside in covering the Michael Jackson case by fragmenting the facts divulged in court, presenting only anti-Jackson reports.

The human race has quite often owed its scientific or artistic progress to the “weird” and the “eccentric.” Let us consider, for example, Galileo Galilei, who was charged for openly discussing Copernican theory, a concept seen as sinful and roundly condemned at that time; later, of course, this theory went on to become the accepted standard of scientific understanding of the universe. We might also stop to consider how treasonable the very idea of democracy once was, how dangerous the aristocracy felt it to be; later, democracy became the world’s prevailing political philosophy. We can also remember that the concept of equality between : women and men, among different ethnicities, or diverse religions, was derided when it first emerged. Had she not thought differently from others, might Mother Teresa not have been a stay-at-home mom instead of traveling to the slums of India and risking her life for humanity?

Keeping the history of these exceptional ideas and people in mind, I can almost guarantee that if one had killed all the “freaks” among our Australopithecine ancestors 3.5 million years ago, our species might not have made it to the 21st century. We might very well have remained a much more primitive species, one without the use of fire and the wheel, let alone an orchestra, or democracy, or computers. Is it not, after all, diversity that allows for evolution?

In other words, "weirdness" is sometimes the inevitable result of an exceptional imaginative ability that sees no boundaries in search of all the creative possibilities. As long as such individuals do us no harm, we should let them be. It is our duty to be respectful of those who are different not only because every human being is entitled to freedom, but also because diversity is at the root of human survival; diversity or “difference” is what allows for new ways of looking at things and indeed for innovation and progress to occur.

To those who think that Jackson’s spoken voice was peculiar, I would say that I see no significance to it. The spoken voice cannot be uncoupled from the singing voice that so many lauded. It might also be helpful to consider this information in order to broaden understanding of the global context: there are countries where people respect those who speak softly, in a calm, non-aggressive manner. The American standard, where a loud voice is seemingly necessary to assertiveness, is not the only standard in the world.

To those who criticize the 'King of Pop' for purchasing Neverland, I pose this question: Would you have survived without buying a Neverland-sized residential property if you were in reality never able to explore any place alone without being horded by an ensuing media and public frenzy whenever you stepped out of your front door? A huge residence with a vast garden might have been the only possible way for this worldwide megastar to relax and enjoy some fresh air without constant intrusion from the public. In conversations such as with famed animal welfare activist Dr. Jane Goodall , he spoke of his love and concern for animals and nature, which he simply enjoyed surrounding himself with at his personal retreat. After all, Jackson earned his money through incredible hard work and a perfectionist work-ethic. In light of his Guinness record-making support of no less than 39 charities, it may very well be hypocritical to criticize his spending habits. It is noteworthy that Jackson regularly donated his share of proceeds from his concerts to charity and during his career, he gave away upwards of 300 million dollars to philanthropic efforts.

jacksonlyrics.jpg


Handwritten lyrics to "Innocent Man" (unreleased) by Michael Jackson

Having demonstrated that there is nothing inherently wrong with living unconventionally, the question now turns to whether or not Jackson ever harmed anyone with his behavior. Here I will discuss the child related allegations leveled against him. ---

In discussing the two instances of allegations Jackson was faced with, I would like to focus my attention primarily on the 1993 case due to the fact that the more recent (2003-2005) accusations ended with Jackson receiving a full legal acquittal on all counts, the extremely low credibility of the accuser’s mother being one factor in this exoneration. In other words, Jackson was found not-guilty so I believe we must discount this case.

Considering that the laws of most U.S. states set down one’s right to sue anyone without being counter-sued solely in retribution for one’s lawsuit, getting sued is relatively easy. Thus, the extortion of popular and wealthy persons is an increasingly attractive ploy for those seeking a quick buck. Fast and easy money may once have come at a personal price, that being distrust from one’s community. But, with cities growing ever larger and more impersonal, an individual’s local reputation is of gradually thinning importance, resulting in more room for thievery. To some mischief minded, the risk of exposure as an extortionist might thus seem lower when compared to the potentially enormous financial benefits of a scam. As a result, a millionaire, especially one whose professional value is greatly magnified by fame, is more vulnerable than ever. According to the National Center for Child Abuse and Neglect, in 1998, 71% of the abuse reports were revealed to be false or unfounded. The false accusation rate even rises to over 90% when a custody battle and money is involved (as was the case between the plaintiff’s parents in the 1993 allegations against Jackson, who was a friend of the child's mother). In the 1993 case, the charges never went to trial but were settled out of court.

The record illustrates that the financially troubled accuser’s father had previously approached Jackson’s representatives with a monetary request well before he sued for the alleged molestation, demonstrating that he would have refrained from filing suit in exchange for money. Would any parent with real care for justice and the well-being of his or her children make such a deal?

As evidence for my position, I present the recorded phone conversation in which the accuser’s father is heard saying that everything [is] going “according to a certain plan,” that he would "win big time” and that Jackson would be "ruined forever"...if he did not get what he wanted. In the same conversation when asked how this would affect his son, the father replied, "That's irrelevant to me..." This sounds far more like the words of a mercenary than those of a father concerned with justice for his son.

Geraldine Hughes, who had worked in the office of the prosecuting team in the 93’ case against Jackson, reveals what really happened behind the scenes, with all the details the media failed to acknowledge and report, about how the boy’s father very early on went to Jackson demanding 20 million dollars for a movie deal otherwise he would make claims of molestation. When Jackson refused, the boy’s father went not to the police, but to a civil attorney and not long after the claims leaked to the media. It was only after the coverage of the story really blew up that Jackson was strongly advised by his attorneys to settle the civil suit and a settlement was paid by the singer's insurance carrier. Concerns which factored in this advice to settle was the violation of Jackson's Fifth Amendment right to not testify against himself in a criminal matter; the damage relentless one-sided media coverage of the charges was doing to his reputation and career; his rapidly declining health from stress during this period and potential jury bias. Also to note is that statistics indicate that around 95 % of civil suits get settled out of court and pertinently, civil settlement cannot be construed as an admission of guilt.

After settlement of the civil suit, Jackson was prepared to fight in the criminal court. In any situation, a criminal case cannot be settled out of court. After the settlement was paid out, however, no criminal charges were ever filed by the boy’s father, and the 13-year-old boy at the center of the allegations refused to testify in a criminal case.

It should be emphasized that Jackson was never indicted even after an intensive 13-month investigation including interviews with over 400 witnesses in and out of the country, extensive searching of his residential properties, and even a 25 minute full-body examination. Two grand juries refused to indict the singer for lack of evidence, and in the six years before the statute of limitation had expired, no criminal charges were ever filed.

The FBI which had investigated the singer during the 1993 and 2003 charges also found no evidence against him , as was revealed when Jackson's FBI file was made public after his death.

Having discussed the mischaracterization of what people might dismiss as “weird,” and having made plain the falsity of the allegations made against Jackson, accusations that in my view look suspiciously extortionate, as highlighted above, I would now like to consider Jackson’s moral conduct with reference to the caricature presented of him:

Regarding integrity, Jackson’s deeds and lifestyle, apart from the media’s fabricated stories, remained innocent and appropriate. In fact, his decency made him look almost old-fashioned, even when he was young, when compared to many entertainers’ indulgence in sex, alcohol, or drugs. In interviews, Jackson indicated that he felt it highly inappropriate to remark publicly on his sexual life. This strikes me as an example of his dignity and modesty. However, this very reserve may ironically have fueled further baseless speculation about Jackson’s sexual orientation. I wish to ask : is publicly questioning a person’s sexual life not way more improper than that person’s choice of silence out of a desire for privacy regarding the same? The fact that Jackson was not involved in a multitude of sex scandals with women, a fact which should normally invite respect, seems unfairly to have been justification for the media to pathologize Jackson. It is beyond ridiculous to construct the lack of lasciviousness and scandal as itself scandalous and suspect.

jacskon_1958-2009.jpg

Michael Jackson 1958-2009

People who knew the entertainer have remarked that it was a rare thing for Jackson to curse, especially when he was younger.Only after suffering numerous hate campaigns founded on falsehoods did he insert a very small amount of profanity into his songs, in response to a world which had betrayed him so deeply. Even then, his use of profanity stayed away from vitriolic attacks, but came across more as an artistic expression of deep anguish in songs which described his frustration with the situation. For instance, songs such as "Scream" or "Tabloid Junkie", both from his HIStory album . Some lyrics from the latter song go thus :
“It’s slander with the words you use

...Assassinate and mutilate as the hounding media in hysteria

...You say it's not a sin, But with your pen you torture men, Then why do we keep foolin' ourselves

Just because you read it in a magazine, Or see it on the TV screen, Don't make it factual…”

Jackson also faced many accusations regarding his appearance and changed skin tone. But, turning this around, what might this suggest about those themselves who so scrutinized the way he looked? What does it say about their own biases and prejudices? And about the people who claimed to know details of every surgical procedure Jackson allegedly had, calling him a freak without even having seen him in person? Or who refused to acknowledge the pigment destroying disease Vitiligo which he was a sufferer of?

After the 2003 allegations, the media repeatedly displayed pictures of Jackson looking worn out, not out of questions about his state of well-being, but it would seem, simply in order to taunt him. Now while Jackson may have begun to look rather gaunt during the trial, does not taking somebody’s tired physical appearance as direct evidence of inner abnormality only reveal our own superficiality ? Maybe , just maybe anyone else would have looked equally fatigued had they suffered the anguish of having to relentlessly fight vicious and false allegations all the while being condemned in the court of public opinion even before being found guilty by the legal system. Whereas under the laws of the land, one is granted the presumption of innocence until they are actually found guilty.

On the topic of morality : Which is more admirable, giving people hope by regularly visiting and donating to hospitals and orphanages, or telling scandalous stories based on speculation or lies? Which is more despicable, pursuing an exceptionally rigorous dedication to artistic perfection, or giving in to jealousy and greed to bring down an artist? The tabloid press, of course, uses this strategy on most celebrities and public figures. One might argue that Michael Jackson had learned to use the press as cynically as it used him ; that he , especially in the early days, once believed that “all publicity is good publicity,” One might even go so far as to say that Jackson purposely flaunted his eccentricities to generate press and in turn album sales. He did, after all, have a fine artistic sense of the dramatic. Maybe so, but this seems true up to an extent only : it might be the case that being an international headliner he could not escape the tabloid press any where he went and so he attempted to make lemons into lemonade. Here my issue is what the media’s handling of Jackson devolved into, ultimately devouring him. And what this says about societal norms and ethics.

In this matter , critics have suggested that Jackson did not oppose false information adamantly enough. Pondering that charge, I suspect that having been abused by media intrusiveness from his early days in the spotlight, Jackson might have come to feel vulnerable and victimized. He reported feeling very uncomfortable giving press interviews since he said his words were often taken out of context and even misquoted. As he resignedly confided to an associate that the press would not highlight good things because to the press, good news did not sell. No matter what he did, or what he accomplished. Rather the accent was always on sensationalizing even the trivial, leaving him to deal with an equation where visiting the burns unit at a hospital where he had made donations and where he was casually inspecting the equipment got translated into outlandish headlines of ****** *****' bizarrely sleeping in an oxygen chamber. Realistically speaking, had Jackson attempted to fight every rumor reported or printed about him, he would be left with no time or even resources to do anything else. Instead he stated having to “run the race of endurance” to withstand all the assaults made against his name throughout his career. In the end ,we must ask ourselves, what is more faithful and true, labeling someone a freak without even having met them personally and without possessing any evidence of wrongdoing by that person? Or showing fortitude in the face of hostility and simply expressing who one really is by letting their work speak for itself ?

Some might argue that the attacks Jackson had to suffer from the media and from consumers can be justified as a natural price to pay for the fame and fortune. No, I say. That is too high a price being charged from a human being. Those who knew Jackson said that the 2005 trial and its coverage had a very devastating impact on him. Those attacks had after a point exceeded all justifiable limits . To live under such harsh scrutiny, what kind of psychological and emotional damage might that inflict on the recipient? May I note that he was not paid to endure pain, but for his relentless efforts and dedication to his craft.
The American media have disgraced themselves by displaying to the world the schoolyard bullying of a talented and creative soul with great achievements . Now consider how this public bullying of a legendary figure might present itself to a new generation of youth, how it might play out in their minds and affect their morale ... Might this type of public bullying not discourage youngsters of today from pursuing their own creativity, their own inner diversity, for fear that they themselves might incur such abuse ?

The coverage of Michael Jackson’s life poses among other things, these questions to America: Does fulfilling the American Dream require that one subject oneself to unending media intrusion, to lies about one’s self so that newspapers get sold, and where one unproven accusation is enough to undo years and years of achievement and all the hard work and initiative that would necessarily have been part of the process? Do you want your children to live in a world where pursuing the American Dream involves the risks of a nightmare of mistrust and exploitation?

I refer again to the journalists who later admitted their purposely distorted and biased reporting on the Michael Jackson child molestation cases. If we recall for a moment the enormous number of journalists who surrounded the Santa Barbara County courthouse, one can surmise that the handful of journalists who came clean about their deception makes up only a tiny fraction of those involved.

I suspect that there were hundreds more who remained silent and who knowingly bent the truth to sell papers and boost network ratings. I also suppose that there are multitudes of people who, having received one-sided information, once believed the larger than life Jackson to be no better than a freakish criminal, but who, after his death felt compelled to research the facts themselves, and have now come to see him just as one of us, a burdened human being and a caring parent, who also happened to be a uniquely talented artist and a devoted philanthropist, who had remained for many a global ambassador. Perhaps these now better-informed members of the public have come to doubt the veracity of the media itself, not just when it comes to Michael Jackson, but in general.

I speculate that there is a pervasive feeling that it is safer to say nothing when it comes to Michael Jackson for fear of being promptly stigmatized. However, we need to address the implications of such silent behavior. What does our silence about the attacks on one of the most visible achievers of the American Dream say? What does it say in light of the American Constitution's declaration of the inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness ? If we play it safe, we are forfeiting our children’s future into the hands of bullies. It is time for us to speak up about the damage opportunistic journalism is doing to our culture. As Edmund Burke once penned, “all it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”

The above article is used with permission. Forbes Everett Landis is a devoted parent who sees his mission in educational area in a global context.




 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence

http://voiceseducation.org/content/crumbling-cultural-story

A Crumbling Cultural Story

The unraveling of the myth that underpins our economic behavior

wifi_timessquare.png

Times Square by Josh Liba
by David Korten

Professional propagandists and advertisers use mass media and other instruments of cultural reproduction to control our minds and behavior, displacing authentic cultural stories with fabricated stories that support the interests of their clients. Most commonly, the goal is to get us to vote for a particular political candidate or buy a particular product.
By recognizing the nature and function of culture in shaping our understanding of ourselves and our world, we can develop substantial immunity to these mind control techniques.

The financial crash of 2008 has so exposed the underlying fallacies of the fabricated story that millions of people have been shocked out of the trance.

Culture is the system of beliefs, values, perceptions, and social relations that encodes the shared learning of a particular human group essential to individual survival and orderly social function. It serves as the interpretive lens through which the human brain processes the massive flow of data from our senses to distinguish the significant from the inconsequential, assign meaning, and shape our behavior: “This plant will kill you. That one is food.”

The cultural lens reflects both the individual learning of personal experience and the shared learning of the tribe, as communicated through its framing cultural stories. These stories, which the tribe’s storytellers traditionally passed from generation to generation, shape our collective identity and relationships. “This is who we are, what we value, and how we behave.”

Stories That Light Up the Dark

ny_times_square_at_night_fisheye_lense_04_334.jpg


The experiences of our ancestors offer us wisdom for surviving today's crises.

The processes by which culture shapes our perceptions and behavior occur mostly at an unconscious level. It rarely occurs to us to ask whether the reality we perceive through the lens of the culture within which we grew up is the “true” reality. We just take for granted that it is.

For five thousand years, successful imperial rulers have maintained their power in part by controlling the story tellers to communicate fabricated cultural stories that evoke fear, alienation, learned helplessness, and a sense dependence on a strong ruler for direction and protection.

This induces a cultural trance that suppresses our inherent human capacity for responsible self-direction, sharing, and cooperation. The falsified stories create an emotional bond between the ruled and their rulers while alienating the ruled from one another and the living Earth, eroding relations of mutual self-help, and reducing the ruled to a state of resigned dependence.

Corporate advertisers and PR propagandists have mastered and professionalized the arts of cultural manipulation. Their stories lead us to base our personal identity on the corporate logos we wear, the branded products we consume, the corporation for which we work, and the Wall Street-funded political party to which we belong. At a deeper level they secure our acquiescence to Wall Street rule with a story that goes something like this:
We humans are by nature aggressively individualistic and competitive and this is all to the good. Competition is a law of nature and the driver of progress and prosperity.

It is the civic duty of the individual to compete to maximize personal financial gain. The invisible hand of the unrestrained free market channels this competitive energy to maximize efficiency, drive innovation, and optimize the allocation of resources to grow the economy and thereby bring prosperity to all.

The public interest is nothing more than the aggregation of individual interests. Those who claim otherwise are socialists who would have government take from the productive to reward the lazy and irresponsible. They would limit our freedom and kill the engine of prosperity by taxing the wealthy and regulating the corporations that bear the risks of investing in the productive, job creating enterprises on which the prosperity of all depends. Since we are each the best judge of our self-interest, government regulation and taxes are an assault on individual freedom and distort society’s priorities.

The market rewards us each in proportion to our productive contribution. Therefore, do not condemn the rich out of envy. Rather honor them for their contribution to creating a strong and prosperous America.

In our great nation, anyone can succeed who applies himself. Failure is a sign of incompetence or a flawed character.

We hear elements of this story so often they run through our heads as a constant refrain telling us that money is wealth, those who make money are creating wealth, and that we can grow the prosperity of all by freeing the wealthy from taxes and Wall Street corporations from regulation.

The financial crash of 2008 has so exposed the underlying fallacies of the fabricated story that millions of people have been shocked out of the trance. It is a moment of opportunity to penetrate the veil of illusion maintained by Wall Street’s propaganda machine and spread public awareness of possibilities for a deep financial and economic restructuring to create the world of our shared human dream.

The above article was printed in Yes Magazine, July 5, 2011 and used here with permission

david_korten.jpg
David Korten (livingeconomiesforum.org) is the author of Agenda for a New Economy, TheGreat Turning: From Empire to Earth Community, and the international best seller When Corporations Rule the World. He is board chair of YES! Magazine and co-chair of the New Economy Working Group. This Agenda for a New Economy blog series is co-sponsored by CSRwire.com and yesmagazine.org based on excerpts from Agenda for a New Economy, 2nd edition. - See more at: http://voiceseducation.org/content/crumbling-cultural-story#sthash.wvIvzVCY.dpuf

 
Last edited:
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence

http://voiceseducation.org/content/we-need-new-codes-define-perimeters-free-speech

We Need New Codes to Define the Perimeters of Free Speech

yashmin.jpeg


Yasmin Alibhai-Brown (born Yasmin Damji is a Ugandan-born British journalist and author, who describes herself as a "leftie liberal, anti-racist, feminist, Muslim, part-Pakistani...a very responsible person." Currently a regular columnist for The Independent and the Evening Standard, she is a well-known commentator on issues of immigration, diversity, and multiculturalism.She is a founder member of British Muslims for Secular Democracy.

Those who say the battle is between freedom and suppression, understand neither. It is so much more complicated than that.

What must be kept private and what should be brought into the public domain? In this age of social media and super-technological snooping and a neo-religious belief in transparency, what are the limits of intrusion and of confidentiality? Old boundaries are deleted with the touch of a finger, old maps blown away and most Britons are wandering on a blasted heath without a compass, blabbing incoherently about freedom of speech and rights, as yet unable to agree on binding principles or a communal contract.

Celebs, fearful of being stripped naked and flogged for personal misdemeanours (sometimes only rumours), turn to judges for protection which then further infuriates their pursuers. Politicians are ever more jumpy, even paranoid. Understandably. In this secretive state, information used to lie tidily and quietly in the attics of power. Those who were privy to sensitive material ensured it would be undisclosed until it had no potency. Now it is all stored in capricious computers, easily broken into and dispatched round the world. They still try it on, though. An official banning order, placed on a story by, it is thought, the Ministry of Defence, has just been overturned. It concerns an SAS officer who is charged with sexual crimes against children.

Every day, existing rules are tested and shown to be anachronistic, obsolete even. In 2008, Max Mosley won his case against the News of the World for publishing details of his sexual preferences; nobody's business surely. Then this week he tried and failed to get the European Court of Human Rights to rule that the media had to warn individuals before exposing their private lives. Again the verdict seems fair. However, do newshounds have unbound rights to sniff around and reveal everything about famous people, just because they are famous? Yes, many would say because on the web, you can find out "protected" truths and also salacious, made-up stuff about all and sundry. I am only a columnist, but these days have to watch what I look like and say in public because everyone has a phone camera. Did anyone catch me having a mini-row with my man near the blueberries? Will it appear on YouTube? God I hope not.

social-media.jpg


Sanctimonious media folk protest against super-injunctions, those who seek them and the judges who grant them, all in the name of sweet freedom. I wonder how many of them would like to see their own closeted and furtive deeds put out for millions to consume or to have their phones hacked. Yet the journalists and their bosses are right too. It is disgraceful that those who have money and influence are able to buy privacy and stop investigations.

Jemima Khan, a keen supporter of Julian Assange and free speech, this week found herself caught up in one of those nasty, internet blizzards of lies, that she was having an affair with motormouth Jeremy Clarkson, something even a recently landed alien would find hard to believe. Now she calls for curbs, prompting some to charge her with hypocrisy. I think she has just found out how damned confusing this hotly disputed issue is. Hateful internet bullies think they are doing God's work. They want to reveal everything but their own names. Young people are picking up these habits. Soon there will be no safe place for anyone. I grew up in a small town where everyone knew everything. It was a prison without locks. A pharmacist even warned my mum that I had bought some Vaseline (for my cracked lips) and so must be having sex. Our global village is becoming just as gossipy and interfering and cruel.

Freedom of speech matters and we should not play games with it. We should stop muddling up celebrity shenanigans with serious attempts by our leaders to control information. Tales about footballers, racing bosses, media stars and affairs are of no consequence to the nation. It is important, though, for us to know about the finances of the Royal Family (exempted by the Freedom of Information Act) or the BBC, or bankers and tax-dodging businesses. For politicians, every word, act or choice can turn into a flaming controversy. With ruthless bloggers going for them, they have no privacy at all. The personal is the political and vice versa.

The PCC has just reprimanded the Telegraph for sending undercover reporters to secretly record conversations with Vince Cable, whose indiscreet words meant he lost his influence in Government and came across, well, as a man of many faces. Was the PCC right? I am not sure it was. Then came sorry David Laws, a clever man destined for high office. No more. He's been found guilty of expenses fraud. His supporters say he cheated in order to keep his homosexual life private. Yeah, sure. Now we hear allegations that Chris Huhne got someone else to take on his driving penalty points for speeding. Vicky Pryce, his economist wife, whom he left for another woman, says he did. She is now attacked for being vengeful. Wives of politicians are not allowed freedom of expression. Its gets more convoluted. Cherie Blair, who never understood that her weird antics were of public interest, also opined that a politician's wife had to stand by her man and, presumably keep his secrets. Fiona Miller put up with hubby Alistair Campbell, knowing he was fabricating "truths" to serve his master, Blair. Those who say the battle is between freedom and suppression, understand neither. It is so much more complicated than that.

People accept political manipulation and focus unduly on injunctions and sex scandals; most Britons believe in acting responsibly and yet are perilously indifferent to invasive internet blether. That same technology though is an extraordinary liberator and equaliser. Ours is both an exciting and dangerous world. In her incisive book about lying in private and public life, ethicist Sissela Bok asked way back in 1978 what would happen if truth telling "could not be presumed". Trust would vanish and with it, the fragile human ecosystem. We can't let that happen. New codes are needed. Law makers and upholders, the old and new media, and the people, need to came to a new settlement on freedom of expression and to define its perimeters. Remember anarchy is not liberty.

This article is used with permission of the Independent.

Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinio...ne-the-perimeters-of-free-speech-2284681.html




 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence

http://voiceseducation.org/content/bullying-not-just-playgrounds-anymore

Bullying: Not Just for Playgrounds Anymore

fall08_cyberbullying.gif

Mental and Physical Impact of Cyberbullying, fooyoh.com

Bullying is not just for playgrounds anymore. An alarm has been ringing across the cultures of an entire globe catching the attention of leaders and educators who desperately search for its cure in programs that teach sensitivity and empathy to youth. All of the educational materials define bullying and tell how to recognize its many forms -- verbal taunting, physical harm, racial and sexual prejudice, cyberbullying and more. Bullying is defined as "persistent unwelcome behavior." How do we know when a behavior is unwelcome? We feel it; it deeply rattles our sensibilities -- sometimes to the bone, or in a new discovery -- to the bones of an icon.

Bullying can intrude anywhere -- at home, at work, online, on the highway, on the playground... and now it appears to reach even into the afterlife. Bullying almost rose to new heights to take an even more sinister turn recently when Discovery Channel announced its plans to air Michael Jackson's Autopsy: What really killed Michael Jackson? There was such a backlash of outrage by the family, Jackson's estate, fans and the general public, that Discovery was forced to "postpone indefinitely" the crossing of that line. So for now, that human indignity was avoided and humanity is safe; or is it?

Is something really important being missed in the campaign against bullying? Is the subject of bullying being viewed through a lens that is too narrow? We might need to back up a bit, widen the focus and adjust the scope to a broader fisheye view. Has bullying permeated an entire ecosystem? A worldwide ecosystem?

What makes bullying possible is a culture that blurs the lines of humanity and human dignity. Bullying survives when an ecosystem supports it. When that ecosystem accepts the dehumanization and inhumane treatment of its constituents, an "anything goes" climate renders its' narrative as empty of humanity. People are irreversibly harmed in such a climate.

Parents, educators and clergy are wringing their hands in shock and outrage at the behavior of youth asking: "Where do they get these ideas?" and "Where does this kind of aggression and indifference in our youth come from?" They seem genuinely perplexed. They only need look to the culture. What kind of culture would consider, even momentarily, that an invasion into one's mortuary is entertaining? Or acceptable? Discovery's program was advertised as presenting a graphic synthetic cadaver with a real and currently practicing physician conducting the autopsy with voiceover commentary by one of Jackson's many personal physicians.

What kind of ecosystem made Discovery think that an international audience would have an appetite for viewing the re-enactment of an actual autopsy -- of the most well known icon of the twentieth century? Of someone who is still a beloved figure to millions around the world? What made physicians sign on to such a violation of the sanctity of human remains, virtual or otherwise? More celebrity medicine? All cultures have recognized the sanctity of burial and respect for the mourning of those who were loved, those who loved them -- and who love them still. Discovery's cynical promotional photo for the program featured a shrouded body on a gurney with Jackson's signature sequined glove protruding from under the sheet. Does this represent the standards of humanity that we want to continue into this new millennium?

In the wake of Discovery Channel's major faux pas, some hard and uncomfortable questions have been thrown up about the culture and its ecosystem. The very same culture that can't seem to get its youth to behave civilly toward one another -- in institutions built to nurture and grow young minds. Discovery and its board of directors are to be congratulated for their change of heart and eventual good sense in pulling the program but one wonders what would make them, or anyone else for that matter, think that a mock autopsy of Michael Jackson for our viewing pleasure, would be acceptable? Is it because Jackson was bullied most of his life and apparently some at Discovery thought it acceptable to take that agenda beyond his grave? Does the Discovery debacle mark yet another seminal moment in our culture?

A culture where sadistic behavior toward others is epidemic, a deeper look finds a whole system trending toward cynicism, human indifference and lack of empathy for others. Why are the fundamental principles of tolerance, compassion and human dignity missing? Why are special programs necessary for children to make human and humane connections? Why isn't compassion and empathy already hard wired into human consciousness? And as we evolve into the twenty first century shall we leave our humanity behind?

How does this humane disconnect become possible? When the natural world is ignored or avoided, children never interact with the place where life's beginnings take form and the value of life and alive and breathing sentient beings is learned. Our connections with nature and animals are what help us to develop heart and compassion for all beings. Statistics about animal cruelty and torture punctuate this alienation from the sanctity of life. Where is it being taught that life is precious and valuable and who is responsible for teaching it? Where do kids get the idea that bullying is permissible and that callously exposing someone's private life, secret struggles and woundedness publicly is somehow acceptable? Where indeed?

It is hardwired into our culture and it begins with words and images. They are the symbols and language that form a culture's narrative. They illuminate the culture's dominant pastimes and preoccupations. It is how those words and images are used -- their nuances, meanings, semantics, semiotics, linguistics and sometimes their archetypal and evocative nature -- that forms and informs -- the foundation of the cultural ecosystem. What is culturally acceptable in communication and behavior among and between humans is determined by its architecture and memes -- a kind of cultural lexiconography arises.

Images and words have punch. They comfort, evoke, challenge, inform, expel, motivate, embrace, alienate, destroy, uplift and so on. They can objectify or humanize. When people are dehumanized with images and words, all sentient beings inhabiting that ecosystem are affected. Words and images harm; and they can heal.

The Journals of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, of Family Psychology, and the British Journal of Developmental Psychology, tell us that bullying creates children who suffer from anxiety, depression, loneliness, and PTSD or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and are at risk for suicide, peer rejection, conduct problems, anxiety, behavioral difficulties, hyperactivity, academic difficulties, rule-breaking behavior, reactive aggression and are also at risk for problems in young adulthood -- psychiatric disorders and criminal offenses. The question then becomes, what kinds of adults does this produce?

Those same experts say that sibling aggression when not mitigated and aggression at home, can migrate to schools. Most homes, of course, don't feature violence as the dominant means of navigating life as an acceptable cultural norm -- or do they? The experts also say that the average 4 to 6 hours of television per day that children and teens watch, serves up 4 ½ violent incidents per hour. In the last 7 years, TV violence has increased by 75% with a 45% of that increase during the 8 P.M. "family hour" and a 92% increase an hour later. The Pew Research Center says 75% of respondents to their survey would like to see tighter enforcement of government rules on broadcast content with 69% of those in favor of higher fines for media companies who violate code. Journalistic codes abound but are rarely followed or enforced. There are no real consequences for code violations with media often citing the first amendment as the reason.

How is it that the cultural ecosystem on the one hand intervenes in child-on-child violence with campaigns like 'It Gets Better' while supporting a cultural ecosystem of inhumane treatment of people and violence as a means of conciliation and problem solving? Given the current cultural undertones we might ask: does it really get better? Does that premise work? And do our children believe it?

Remember Columbine? Columbine crossed a cultural line. With the causal theories swirling around that painful event in the collective psyche -- the guns, violence, video games, medications, "Gothic culture," or psychological pathology, experts have speculated about the whys. Harris and Klebold told us why in their words via journals left behind, that tell how they lived in a culture of exclusion, superiority, homophobia and ridicule by the jocks. And they also told us they could find nothing redeeming about society in general. While that is no excuse for their violence, it was their reason. They cited feeling disenfranchised, bullied, disillusioned and powerless. Columbine was retaliation against an ecosystem that they felt didn't support them and tolerated a climate of dehumanization, violence, tribalism and exclusion.

The recent teen suicides crossed a line of acceptability and jarred adults to awareness. In examining teen bullying, we learned of suicides by adolescents whose budding hormones and sexuality found their affections involuntarily extending toward the same gender. Confused and conflicted kids were bullied, called "fag" and other sexual epithets and sadistically "outed" on the internet by sneering peers. While their death certificates read "suicide," the real cause of death is homophobia -- and an intolerant ecosystem that dehumanizes them as people. Young and tender human beings barely out of childhood -- a captive audience required to daily visit an ecosystem that torments them -- are ostracized and terrorized simply for being different -- whether in style, interests, affections, habits, economics, race, intellectual capacity, beliefs, or that all important superficial attribute -- appearance.
18773571986655881.png
This drawing depicts the looking-glass self. The person at the front of the image is looking into four mirrors, each of which reflects someone else's image of him back to him. From: Looking glass self: Reference;http://www.thefullwiki.org/Looking_glass_self

In order to believe that the future 'gets better' children need hope. They need evidence. They have to be able to imagine a brighter tomorrow. Hope is emotive and conveyed through images and words and. their reinforcement. Cooley's Looking Glass Theory cites the reflection of self in others as informing the opinion of self. Most visual references and reflections in children's lives come from television and film. What human characteristics, and inspirations do they witness that tells them there is a bright tomorrow? Desperate Housewives is rated number one in viewership and sensual vampirism linking blood and sexuality dominates the screen in theaters. There are cops shows, bounty hunters, forensic investigators that illustrate the darkness in human nature while reality TV gives us a slice of life few of us experience, and that invokes and rewards tactical treachery -- then admires that treachery as laudable strategy.

Nightly news is never good news and altruism is highlighted rarely. Television in prime time around the dinner hour features the famous and showcases them solely to make sensational mischief and contemptuous commentary about their missteps. Nowhere is bullying more evident than in the cult of celebrity. That genre sexualizes and dehumanizes early -- reducing even young adults to non-human objects. Tabloidization of television and press brings us the daily and nightly ritual of impaling the famous or nailing them to the cross of public scrutiny solely for entertainment purposes.

Celebrities, sports figures and politicians' private lives are picked over like the bones of last night's dinner during tonight's dinner hour. That's not journalism; it's cannibalism. And it's well known among those A-listers, that whoever criticizes a jaundiced journalist or TV outlet becomes fodder for the next day's tabloid headline. Vocal dissenters are moved on deck to be the next one bullied in print and images. Youth are enamored of celebrities, watch their foibles daily exposed with glee and we wonder why our children bully?

When a culture dehumanizes its constituents, its heroic, iconic or beloved figures and devalues them, the rules change. Devaluing humans with repetitive desensitizing eventually make the outrageous possible -- genocide, racism, classism, sexism, Nazism and all manner of other ugly isms that humans can impose on one another. The relaxing or devaluing of what it means to be human is a dangerous and slippery slope as Discovery Channel has just reminded us. An ecosystem supporting disdain, exclusion, isolation, discrimination, humiliation, latitude for making humans the butt of cruel jokes, banishment, and bullying in the extreme provides a rationale for terrorism and eventually, war. Aggression, cynicism and tribalism unchecked leaches into the soil of a growing and advancing culture placing it precariously on shaky ground.

Illustrations that diminish the sanctity of real human beings may be witnessed in schools, business, corporations, governments, in the disappearing corporate perks and pensions, the insurance industry, the media and on Wall Street and Main Street alike. It's evidenced in the images and words we use to scribe and describe the human condition. The trend of insensitivity toward other humans feeds and encourages an ecosystem with severe consequences yet to be imagined, as we move forward in the new millennium. As respect for the uniqueness of life and each life diminishes, dignity and our humanity erodes in the collective consciousness in step with the cultural foundation. Indifference is a slippery slope that can become a grand slide of humanity toward the bottom of a trajectory that allows abominations to become the norm -- poisonous gas released in a subway in Japan, an attack on New York's World Trade Center. That too is bullying; the only difference is the scale. Where does this war against human dignity and sanctity begin? It begins at home. It may be friendly fire.

What is supposed to be a sanctuary, the family living room, plays host to fear, political fodder, bad news, the insider who betrays, the outsider with the inside story, and a kind of domestic terrorism that ridicules the famous or momentarily famous. Government, politics and leadership features adults-behaving-badly with name calling and bullying on TV as those we would like to look up to, deride and condemn each other in uncivil debates while breaking ethics codes behind the scenes.

For the younger crowd, TV shows feature hopeful idols performing in competitions that foster distant and future hope. Hope lives! But the failed auditioning contestants then become fodder for filler clips that make fun of those hopefuls -- at their expense. Judges sardonically and gleefully review and ridicule the performances. Reality shows reward underhanded schemers in rival groups while pseudo tribal overseers ostracize the throw away individuals voted out of the game and off the program.

With our current twenty-four-hour news cycle, the major outlets must fill dead time while competing with each other for viewers. The end game is commanding attention while global markets drive the networks. Newshound journalists are taught "if it bleeds it leads" and are encouraged to sniff out the blood in the big story. Interviewers are coached to "ask the tough questions" that are frequently crude, rude and invasive designed not to get information or truth, but to lead the interviewee where the host thinks the most viewers will follow.

Cable news outlets begin broadcasts with the requisite "breaking news" scrolling at the bottom of the screen and if something is not particularly sensational before the broadcast--it will be by its end. The pressures of competition and dead time does not allow for proper scrutiny or fact checking. The lead story is then repeated, speculated about by pundits, reviewed in voiceover clips with "experts weighing in." The constant repetition of that imagined truth in sound bites today converts it to "truth" by tomorrow. Accusations become fact, guilt is assumed, and the court of public opinion lowers its gavel.

The cultural "isms" that define humanity are uploaded to YouTube. Both amateur and real shock-jocks circle in the cesspools of human foibles like sharks. The humiliation of real people, begun by showcasing the famous, is now considered good copy and no one is exempt -- now apparently not even the dead. No, bullying isn't just for kids. We are far removed from Walter Cronkite standards and the investigative journalism that defined the culture of the twentieth century. "Gotcha" journalism and exploitive film sells -- or so they tell us.

What are we role modeling to our children? What ancient gladiator sport do we mimic when we publicly dismember those who stand on the public stage? What ancient form of torture and death do we parody when we repeat yet unexamined or unproven, salacious "allegations" each news cycle? When we neglect equal air time to the exonerated? And even when a falsehood is proven, we revisit the accusation with each subsequent sound bite? When we continue it even after death? People's lives are ruined in record time -- during their 15 minutes of fame. And we gleefully high five those first out with the scoop, scandal or expose`.

Does that cultural ecosystem support the meme that life, as it advances will improve? Does the investigations and desperations of housewives and others, the bad news, the shaming and blaming of "reality" and real celebrities reflect to our youth 'it gets better?' Does the cultural fare highlight the lofty side, the dignity and integrity of human nature? Does it inspire? Does it provide a healthy ecosystem for the little people who have to grow up in it?

Has the fact that a dangerous line was almost crossed escaped our attention? Does the image manufactured to take us subliminally across a line or its meaning have an iconic message? It may well be so. There was another image introduced into our culture that became the iconic opposite of human devaluation -- it came from NASA and showed us the reality that we are all humans sharing a precious and finite ecosystem. It was the "Blue Marble Earth" photo from Apollo 17 introduced into our culture in 1972. Forty years and a generation or two later, the hope for collective human dignity still doesn't have a clear picture. That is why words and images are so important. Have we just witnessed an ecosystem already trending toward dangerous turf narrowly miss trespassing into its own mortuary? Discovery Channel may have brought us to a significant crossroads. Or maybe Michael Jackson has.

Maybe it was his fans who as one voice, spoke loudly and clearly. Many children loved Jackson and his body of work; many children today are discovering him for the first time. And the real human being buried under all the unkind dark tabloid caricatures living in the cultural lexicon of the twentieth century, may be slowly coming to light in the twenty first. Discovery did the ethical thing by canceling the program. Their plan was not a good one. But it certainly reminds us about bullying. Never before in the history of media has a culture witnessed one human being so bullied. On a global scale. Michael Jackson is the poster boy for bullying. It wouldn't be the first time Jackson gave us an image that reflected ourselves back to us. Discovery almost crossed a line that we might want to ponder a bit further.

It may have sounded an urgent alarm at the beginning of a new year and new decade. Perhaps there is yet another toxic ecosystem caused by humans that needs cleaning up in order to save its' mammals? Will we hear the call just made by multiple thousands of voices stunned into speaking out for a renewed integrity? For a re-examination of what human dignity means? For the return of reason and respect? For a more humane narrative on this planet? Where do today's children and tomorrow's global leaders get the idea that bullying is acceptable? Good question. 'The tribe has spoken.' And the children are listening.

Written by: Barbara Kaufmann, is an award winning writer, peacemaker minister, healer and shaman who “writes to simply change the world.” Her One Wordsmith www.onewordsmith.com website is filled with humanitarian short stories. And her new website Inner Michael www.innermichael.com features her research and writing in tribute to a global humanitarian. It is a metaphysical look at a misunderstood genius and man of our times who, it turns out, was a spiritual messenger hiding in plain sight.

Published in the Huffington Post, January 11, 2011.
Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rev-barbara-kaufmann/bullying-not-just-for-pla_b_807389.html






 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition


Dedication



michael-meets-princess-diana-before-his-concert-at-wembley41-m-2.jpg





This work of art and love is dedicated to the memory of Michael Joseph Jackson and Lady Diana Spencer.

May your work on behalf of humanity finally be recognized for what it was—
art in the service of humanity. May your memory be indelibly written on the face of humanity’s evolution toward its own brilliance and in the volumes that chronicle the journey toward a more humane narrative on this planet.

May the lives and gifts that you so generously gave to and for the humans on this globe be held in
the highest honor and esteem they so richly deserve.

May we learn from the lessons you taught this world and may we also become worthy of your sacrifice.

May we soon come to understand that words can heal with the same magnitude that they harm.
And may the children of the future learn that now from you.

Rest in peace gentle and magnanimous spirits.
"We love you more."​



 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://www.voiceseducation.org/conte...second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/case-study-white-new-fallen-snow

Vitiligo does not discriminate!

Case Study: White as New Fallen Snow


istock_000000269724small.jpg

How Vitiligo and Michael Taught Me Compassion

I am a 52 year old white woman, and when I say white, I mean white like new fallen snow! I have Vitiligo. Vitiligo is a disease that can compromise your immune system and distort your whole appearance.

The summer before I was getting ready for college, I noticed some strange looking chalky patches that suddenly appeared on my hands. I was an olive skinned girl who never worried about sunburn and who tanned every summer to a golden mocha. Of course in those days of the early seventies we were slathering ourselves with baby oil never giving a thought to sunscreen. It never occurred to me to worry about my skin or the sun or my appearance beyond the occasional pimple and getting the latest fad in fashion and makeup.

I thought the spots were from the French fry grease at the fast food restaurant where I worked that summer to save up money for college. I was sure they were small burns from the fryer and would go away when the burns healed. But at college that fall, I noticed the spots not only had not disappeared, but had grown larger while new ones were forming on my elbows. I knew then that they could no longer be ignored.

I had never even heard of the word: “Vitiligo” but after my doctor visit, I soon became intimate with it as it became a huge feature in my world. An autoimmune disorder, I learned that Vitiligo can be genetically passed down in families but not always. My family has no history of Vitiligo. And it was autoimmune- what a heart-stopping betrayal! Everybody wants to be “comfortable in their own skin” but my own skin was damaging itself and damaging me! How can your own skin turn on you?

I began to read everything I could find on the disease. Vitiligo is an antibody that is in your genes when you are born and for some reason it gets stimulated to start destroying your melanoctyes which are the cells in your skin and hair that produce melanin. Melanin is what gives your skin pigment or color. There is lots of research being explored to discover what triggers Vitiligo and what determines how fast it spreads. It may be environmental factors, stress, physical factors like hormones and blood loss or most likely a combination of all of these. The medical community has established that the antibodies in Vitiligo completely destroy the melanocyte.

That means that my body sees my own cells as something foreign that needs to be attacked, destroyed and removed! There are some treatments that may help restore pigment in some cases but those treatments are not a cure. As of now, there is no cure. The treatments are very time consuming and involve taking a drug that can cause liver damage. I tried a few of these therapies early on when my white spots were not so widespread, but it was not very successful. I decided that I would rather have white spots which were not painful or really hurting me in any way, (other than sunburn, and strange glances and remarks from people) than risk damaging my liver and turning yellow from the resulting jaundice! Did I want to turn white or turn yellow? Were those my only choices?

Nursing was my college major and that influenced my decision to forego the drugs because I understood, medically, the reality of the side effects. I later tried the depigmentation therapy on my face to bleach out the remaining dark areas but it did not work very well for me. It affects everyone differently and it takes a lot of diligence and repeated treatments.

The National Vitiligo Foundation (NVF) is a lifesaving resource for people afflicted with this disease. They spearhead the research and search for a cure while providing education and resources for sufferers of this disease. Vitiligo is in the same category as other autoimmune disorders like Lupus, Reynaud’s, Diabetes, and some Thyroid disorders. Most people who acquire an autoimmune disorder develop more than one. I recently discovered that my Thyroid is also involved and I have mild Reynaud’s which is a disorder that affects the circulation in extremities like hands and feet. It makes one’s fingers and toes cold and discolored from poor circulation.

I learned at an NVF conference I attended that because melanocytes are completely destroyed by Vitiligo, there is zero chance of getting Melanoma in the areas that are white. Researchers are looking at a possible treatment for Melanoma using antibodies taken from the blood of people with Vitiligo. The thought is that maybe those melanoctye-destroying antibodies might provide a treatment or cure for cancer is a thought I like to hang onto because it would mean that something good could come out of this disorder.

There are emotional valleys for the person adjusting to the diagnosis of Vitiligo. Over time Vitiligo spreads and is not easy to hide in those stages. My face, hands, arms, and legs became covered with white patches and were a source of embarrassment for me. But the day came when I decided that I was not going to wear long sleeves and pants for the rest of my life! I did need to protect my skin however, because the depigmented skin has no protection from the sun. I found out the hard way how badly burned one can get from the sun if not extra careful. I sometimes think I alone keep the sunscreen industry in business. There are days I wish for a vat to dip myself into to decrease the time it takes to apply sunscreen and protect my skin because it’s necessary if I am going to continue the outdoor activities I love and enjoy. The evening is a better time for me to do things when the sun is not so intense and I forego things scheduled for daytime when the sun is bright. It does require lifestyle adjustments.

I often think how fortunate I was that I didn’t have to deal with this during my junior high and high school years. Being a teenager dealing with all of the hormonal changes, peer pressure and confusion is tough enough without harsh comments about one’s strange and changing appearance. I am sure I would have had to endure cutting remarks regarding my strange appearance. I did need to learn to deal with people staring and making comments especially during the summer months when my pigmented skin was darker in color and I was more exposed wearing summer clothes. I have heard some very bizarre, sometimes funny and occasionally hurtful comments.

I don’t think people intend to be mean but are surprised by someone’s (mine) appearance and don’t think before they speak. I imagine that I did look odd with white spots all over my skin. Children wanted to know if I was “like a leopard” or was I “part zebra?” Adults thought I had been burned and would ask “is it painful” or “is it contagious?” I think I actually liked it better when someone would actually speak to me about their curiosity and ask questions rather than just staring or worse yet snickering or whispering to their friends. Explanations had to be necessarily lengthy and that took up my time when I might have preferred to spend it in some other way.
I will never forget one of the saddest encounters I can remember with a woman who was from India who stopped me one day in a parking lot:

“I noticed the patches on your skin. Do you have Vitiligo?”

“Yes, I do. Are you familiar with it?”

“Yes. My sister who lives in India will never be able to marry because she has Vitiligo. There is a taboo surrounding it in that culture and no man would consider marrying a woman with the disease and whose appearance is marred and undesirable. When it comes to women, India places a lot of emphasis on beauty.”

I could not fathom that attitude nor imagine it to be true. I thought about how lucky I was to have met a man who looked at me and loved me without seeing a “spotted person” but saw a human being. Actually, he was more offended by people staring and snickering at me than I was. I was once stopped in a store by a woman who wanted to know how I had gotten such a bad case of poison ivy. I was baffled by that one until she added that she couldn’t believe how much calamine lotion I had on!

There was one incident where I noticed a lady staring at me which happened all the time, but this time she began following me in the grocery store and when it got a little creepy I turned to face her. She remarked that I “must be an amazing volleyball player to have so many brush burns on my knees and elbows from diving for balls.” I had to bite my tongue so I wouldn’t burst out laughing! I always feel bad for most of the people who make comments because they are so embarrassed when I tell them the facts. The most hurtful encounters are with people who don’t take the time to stop and ask but just stare, point or even laugh. There were times I would actually forget that I did look “odd” until I noticed someone staring or pointing and that would launch me right back into feeling self-conscious and awkward.

I realized too, that I was fortunate to be a white person with Vitiligo. I met several black people with Vitiligo at the NVF conferences I attended and learned how much more devastating it is for them. I was a white person who was turning whiter. They were black people who were becoming white. Not only did they have to deal with the physical changes, but they had to deal with feeling a loss of their race and identity. I cannot speak to this but I can certainly empathize with how much more difficult that must be to lose your ethnic roots, identity or race and to not only question your own identity, but have all that questioned by others.

The Famous Face of Vitilgo

That brings me to the most famous person to have Vitiligo: Michael Jackson. I was a big Michael fan from his early days with the Jackson Five and all through his solo career. He and I were the same age so I grew up on his music and dancing. I remember hearing for the first time the rumors that he was bleaching himself white; I thought that was crazy. I knew personally how difficult it was to try to use depigmentation as a treatment for Vitiligo so I couldn’t imagine how someone could actually bleach their entire body. I asked my dermatologist at one of my yearly visits in the late eighties if she knew anything about Michael Jackson’s skin color and she told me that it was known by most in the dermatology community that he had Vitiligo.

At first I was excited to think that I shared something in common with Michael Jackson. Then as the reality set in, the more I thought about it, the more I realized how horrible it must have been for him. Not only was he a black man, he was probably the most well known person in the world and someone who performed in front of millions of people. It was easy for me to just ignore the stares and go on with my life but how do you do that when you are in the spotlight all the time and subjected to ridicule and tabloid trash talk? I can understand why he tried to cover his Vitiligo up the best he could with makeup and clothes. Michael was known to be a very private person who didn’t want to divulge his medical condition to the world. I have a feeling he may not have received a lot of support from those around him, his professional contacts, and certainly not from the media. And when he did admit to having Vitiligo, so many hateful people in the media refused to believe it using ridicule and writing he “claims to have a skin condition.” Claims to? They accused him of trying to bleach his skin and become a white person. They called him a traitor to his race thinking he had betrayed the African American community of his roots. Who would chose a disease that betrays your own body, challenges your very identity and continually changes your appearance requiring medical treatment and makeup? How does someone who makes their living with their famous face and who faces a debilitating disease deal with that kind of ridicule and mocking from the press?

There were those in both the black and the white communities who turned against him simply because of his changing appearance. Hurtful words can be more painful than a physical attack. Michael endured far too many hateful, hurtful words. Many in the “media” claim that even with Vitiligo Michael would not have naturally turned so completely white. Well, I can verify that it is very possible. My Vitiligo started with me being mostly tan colored with white patches and spots, and gradually progressed to my appearing mostly white with tan spots to now being almost completely white except for a very few tiny tan spots.

Not only is a morphing appearance unavoidable with Vitiligo, but it is inevitable. Now that the antibodies have finished with my skin, they are starting on my hair. I have huge white patches in my hair, eyebrows and eyelashes. It is a cruel joke that the hair on my legs remains as dark as ever which looks even worse against the stark white skin! I can’t throw out that razor yet. And I now get stares and lots of questions about my hair.
Most people actually think I just have beautiful white skin now. I am sure Michael could have experienced a similar evolution of his appearance. He reportedly used the depigmentation therapy to help even out his skin color so he would not have to wear so much makeup. It is all so easy to understand if people were only not so quick to make hateful judgments or believe everything the tabloid media spews about celebrities.

I wish I could have understood better what Michael Jackson went through while he was still with us. I regret not letting Michael know in some way that I understood at least in part what he went through dealing with this disease. I regret not speaking up more then. I have now become a major defender of Michael Jackson promising myself that I will not let hateful words stand! I think too and I sincerely hope, that I have become more accepting of people’s differences because of my own personal struggles with appearance and acceptance. I try really hard to not make judgments about people without learning more about them. Without the challenge of Vitiligo in my life, and my connection to Michael Jackson I might not have that understanding; I might be a different person. Vitiligo and Michael Jackson taught me about compassion.

Discussion Questions

  1. What do you think about people who stare at those who look different? What makes people stare? What causes them to laugh or make fun of someone who looks different?
  2. What causes discomfort? Would you feel comfortable asking questions of someone who looks different? Could you discuss it with them? Would you initiate the conversation?
  3. What causes the sensitivity that makes humans feel shameful, embarrassed or humiliated? Have you ever felt that? What were the circumstances? Did it make you angry? Sad? Hurt? How did you handle your feelings?
  4. What causes us to see someone as “different” and then separate ourselves from them? Do you avoid people who are different? Are you uncomfortable around someone whose appearance is “different” or “abnormal?” Are there things that can be done to practice making ourselves and others comfortable? What are they?
  5. Does a disease like Vitiligo have emotional components? Why or why not? Imagine having a disease that affects your appearance. How would you feel?
  6. How do you feel about ethnicity? Racial pride? Racial prejudice? Is it important to keep and respect one’s heritage?
  7. What do you think causes people to “jump to conclusions” about other people? To label? Discuss labeling and labels.
  8. Have you ever been the target of ridicule? Of public ridicule? How did that affect you? Discuss.
  9. What constitutes a handicap? Are all handicaps obvious or visible? Do you consider yourself handicapped or sensitive to the handicaps of others? Can you imagine having physical or mental limitations? Do you think you are a compassionate person? Why or why not?
  10. What are the consequences of separating ourselves from others? Of making others unacceptable? Does it cause conflict? How and why? Does it cause suffering? Who suffers when intolerance is practiced?
  11. If you were in charge of creating tolerance in today’s world what is the first thing you would do? Could you convince others to join you in that mission? How would you go about it?
  12. Have you ever felt like you should speak out about or against something? Did you voice your opinion? Why or why not? How did that decision affect you? How did it affect others?
  13. How do you feel about blaming people for their own diseases? Would you blame someone for their own cancer? What about diseases which affect appearance like Vitiligo, Acne, or Anorexia? How about disfiguring illnesses that drastically change body or facial appearance? What about diseases that are not so visible like Diabetes? What about hidden diseases like mental illness or drug addiction?
  14. What would it mean if we could create a more humane and compassionate society and world? Could you describe what that world would look like? Can you list the changes you would notice in a world like that? Do this exercise as a brainstorming group.
  15. It has been said that it is important to leave the world a better place than you found it. Discuss what this means. Do you agree? If you agree, then what can you personally do to make it better?

Case Study written by: Joyce Frame

Joyce is a retired nurse living in Cincinnati, OH. She spent six years in the Navy after graduating from West Virginia University with her BSN. She now keeps very busy volunteering in many different areas, including feeding her very favorite Penguins every Monday afternoon at the Aquarium. She also works with the Assistance League of Greater Cincinnati to 'provide comfort, offer hope and encourage a feeling of dignity and self worth in adults and children' served through its programs. Joyce makes time to keep up with her love of tennis, reading, listening to music, and working in the yard.


 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/case-study-caricature

Case Study: The Caricature


Introduction/Premise

michael-jackson-foto1.jpg


Systematic media brainwashing over a period in excess of two and a half decades succeeded in turning a genuinely innovative musical genius and gentle man into a laughingstock -- a joke -- a caricature. A caricature is defined as “an exaggeration by means of often ludicrous distortion of parts or characteristics in art or literature.”

From the time his talent made him a household name in 1984 until his death in 2009, the public was conditioned to think of Michael Jackson in the following terms: “odd,” “freak,” “weird,” “bizarre,” “strange,” “***** *****,” “predator,” “pervert,” and “pedophile.” Propaganda and Inflammatory words did immeasurable violence not only to Mr. Jackson but to the world, depriving it of authentic, factual knowledge of a man who, while he has been called the ‘greatest entertainer the world has ever known,’ was also the most inexhaustible humanitarian and lobbyist for change in our cultural memory. Future generations have been cheated, too; Mr. Jackson’s next discipline was to be film direction, by his own admission, and the world will never know what further contributions he might have made had he been alive to make them.

Examined individually, and with a bit of common sense, each of the major stories contributing to the notoriety of a legend, make logical sense in the context of Mr. Jackson’s life. Taken out of context, embellished, and sensationalized, they paint a caricature, not a biography. An overwhelming preponderance of the parodies constructed about Mr. Jackson had a medical basis.

Narrative

When Mr. Jackson began his musical career, he was the “darling” of the national and international press corp. Feted for his radiantly pure vocal virtuosity, he was the planet’s most beloved child. His emotional eloquence when rendering songs far beyond his years and experience stunned audiences from the USA to Africa. His hyperkinetic energy while performing on stage and the joy he communicated lifted hearts and garnered worldwide attention when his contemporaries were still in elementary school.

Unlike many of his counterparts who lost their voices with the onset of puberty, Michael Jackson grew into an explosively-gifted adult whose recordings shattered world sales records. The Off the Wall and Thriller albums catapulted him into a class of global renown never before witnessed, releasing shockwaves in the journalistic world. Soon after that unparalleled feat, his face and name became a target for the gutter press. The original motivation behind the numerous fictions written about Michael Jackson remains a mystery but suggests many theories from racism to power struggles, to the underbelly of the music industry hidden behind the glitz and glamour.

jackson_gal_300x300.jpg


Prurient speculation about Mr. Jackson’s sexuality led to rumors that he was homosexual. An intensely private, shy, and spiritual person, Michael Jackson seldom disclosed information about his intimate relationships, believing discretion to be the attribute of a ‘gentleman’ in such exceedingly personal matters. Although he could easily have succumbed to the practice of taking advantage of adoring fans along the tour trail; he appeared, at least publicly, to pursue a celibate lifestyle. He spent his off-stage hours distributing gifts in hospitals and orphanages in every city he visited. Easily embarrassed, he never spoke about his sexuality nor did he deny being homosexual. Michael Jackson held a great deal of affection and respect for his fans, some of whom were gay. He kept his sexual orientation undisclosed to avoid alienating any of them.

An early fiction circulated in the tabloid press had Mr. Jackson taking female hormones to sustain the soaring vocals which permeated his recordings. Mr. Jackson recounted an incident in which a young fan asked him if it was true. He denied the rumor during the brief encounter. Stunned by the question, he did not volunteer that his four-octave range had been honed to a razor-sharp edge by more than thirty years in the music business, countless sessions with a vocal coach, and constant practice. The vocal apparatus is like any muscle; it responds to frequent exercise with strength and flexibility.

An exclusive report that Mr. Jackson slept in an oxygen chamber instead of a bed gained worldwide attention. The story originated when Mr. Jackson was seriously injured during the filming of a T.V. commercial. At the director’s suggestion, he waited at the top of a flight of stairs while pyrotechnics were exploded. A spark from one of those explosions landed in his hair, igniting it. Second and third degree burns to his scalp left him essentially bald at the age of twenty six.

Reconstructive surgery and multiple skin grafts were required to repair the burn damage. His consequent empathy for burn victims impelled him to donate the hyperbaric chamber along with the rest of his $1.5 million settlement to the Brotman Medical Center in Culver City to build and equip the Michael Jackson Burn Center. Tabloid media printed photographs of Mr. Jackson “hammering around” in the chamber along with the tale that he slept in it because he was afraid to grow old—on front pages around the world. Coupled with increasingly intrusive speculation about his sexuality and female hormones to maintain his high voice, the myths became progressively more and more sensational to sell more magazines.

Several papers claimed Mr. Jackson had built a shrine to Elizabeth Taylor in his bedroom. Mr. Jackson and Ms. Taylor’s sharedchild-star history was a firm foundation for their lasting and close friendship. He did have a tapestry made as a gift to his friend, but his bedroom, in fact his whole estate and his entire life were a shrine to reclaiming his, and the world’s, lost and long-forgotten innocence.

In the late nineteen eighties, a breaking story circulated that Michael Jackson was attempting to acquire The Elephant Man’s bones. John Merrick, a victim of a disfiguring disease causing facial tumors, was forced to make his living as a circus sideshow and ‘freak.’ A voracious reader, Mr. Jackson had been deeply moved by the story. He denied an interest in acquiring Merrick’s bones to Oprah Winfrey in 1993. “Where would I put some bones?” he asked with an incredulous chuckle.

The tabloid press displayed a dramatic and pervasive interest in Mr. Jackson’s multi-million dollar estate in Santa Barbara County. Jackson built a ranch with full scale amusement park rides, a live animal zoo, theater, and trains. He loved theme parks, but his worldwide fame made outings impossible. Mobbed by fans and paparazzi wherever he went, his spontaneous, unplanned appearance at an amusement park presented danger for himself and others. Mr. Jackson built his own miniature fun city to amuse himself and to share with sick and underprivileged children, calling it Neverland Valley Ranch in honor of his favorite children’s storyPeter Pan. He identified strongly with the character in Mr. Barry’s story, having lost his own childhood performing in clubs, recording studios, TV shows, and concerts.

05_neverland_gates.jpg


Tongue-in-cheek articles trumpeted the strangeness of Mr. Jackson and his Neverland Valley Ranch. He explained to the press that he put all the things he loved behind the gates of his multi-acre home to allow himself at least a taste of the freedom and normalcy that most of us take for granted. He happily shared his creation with children from inner cities and hospitals for regularly-scheduled field days of fun and adventure whether he was physically present or not.

People flocked to Michael Jackson like paperclips to a magnet, including fans of all ages who found him enchanting and children who recognized the child in him and found him fun to be around. Mr. Jackson was so popular and beloved that he was assailed by autograph-seekers, snapshot requests, and demands for hugs with which he often happily complied. While one or two or even ten individuals did not present problems, hundreds or even thousands of frenzied people rushing towards him quickly escalated into hand-to-hand combat. Mr. Jackson was forced to climb chain link fences or the rooftops of vehicles many times to avoid being crushed in the melees that accompanied his movements.

A polite and enlightened society usually frowns upon judging individuals by appearance; this etiquette was never granted to Michael Jackson. Frequently highlighted in the media, the change in Michael Jackson’s appearance occasioned the use of derogatory comments and belittling adjectives seldom used to describe any other person. Scandal sheets attributed the alterations to an unhealthy obsession for cosmetic surgical procedures. Over a period of several years, Mr. Jackson’s face had narrowed, making his cheekbones appear more prominent, his eyes bigger and his jaw squarer. His nose changed from a typically ethnic feature to a more sharply-defined shape, and his skin became paler. A humiliating case of acne prompted Mr. Jackson to change his diet and become a vegetarian. A strict vegetarian regimen markedly redistributes muscle mass, resulting in a re-molding of body shape and increased energy level. Other than two nose jobs, which Mr. Jackson acknowledged, he denied further face-sculpting surgeries to the end of his life.

He did, however, openly admit to several reconstructive surgical procedures and skin grafts to repair damage to his scalp from the serious burn injury mentioned previously. The goal was to remove scorched tissue in the hopes of reinstating hair growth. A balloon inserted under the flesh was inflated gradually over a period of months to stretch the damaged skin prior to excising and transplanting. Healthy skin was stitched over the injured area with a graft and allowed to heal before repeating the procedure. Stretching and pulling the skin at the back of the head can have the appearance of multiple cosmetic surgeries. It would have been an extremely lengthy, painful method of performing a facelift.

Tabloids hired facial surgeons who had never treated Mr. Jackson as a patient, but who offered expert diagnoses, comparing before and after photographs to create more copy for the tabloids. Akin to asking psychologists to give expert analyses about the mental health of a person to whom they have never spoken, another common occurrence in the life of Mr. Jackson, such opinions are as questionable as the papers printing them. A youthful, round-faced Michael Jackson prior to adopting a vegetarian lifestyle, the catastrophic burn injury, and resulting reconstructive surgeries was compared with poorly lit photographs featuring camera angles calculated to emphasize a hollow-cheeked, square-jawed, slimmer-nosed appearance. Media considered such proof conclusive evidence of surgical tampering though those opinions are easily deconstructed and discounted. Affectionately known as “Angelface” in Europe and Asia, to millions Michael Jackson remained beautiful until the day he died despite concentrated efforts to convince them that he was a bizarre-looking, other-worldly freak - not quite human.

The ever-increasing pallor of Mr. Jackson’s skin was seized upon as evidence of his suspected attempt to become white and abandon his African American heritage. News anchors and journalists castigated Mr. Jackson for erasing his beautiful mocha shade by skin bleaching. Finally, in 1993, after being skewered by the press for nearly a decade about a skin condition over which he had no control, Mr. Jackson confessed to Oprah Winfrey that he was a victim of a skin disorder. Mr. Jackson’s illness, Vitiligo, is a medical condition in which the chemical responsible for skin pigmentation and protection from the harmful effects of the sun slowly disappears leaving de-pigmented - not bleached - patches of increasing size and paleness. It is deeply disfiguring, especially in an African American or dark-skinned host. Michael Jackson, one of the most visible human beings in the world, was in effect becoming an Albino on the world’s stage. A handicap which should have aroused sympathy for a man who made his living in the spotlight and who could not control an illness that left his skin dangerously exposed to UV radiation while changing his color, was instead turned into a laughing matter by the media, including providing years of comedy material for late night talk show monologues.

In advanced cases, Vitiligo affects the entire body. Mr. Jackson’s make-up artist of 30-plus years attempted to cover the de-pigmented areas with dark make-up blending into Mr. Jackson’s natural mocha shade in its early stages. As the disease progressed, this solution became impractical; medical advice deemed it more prudent to de-pigment the remaining dark patches to blend with Mr. Jackson’s overall lighter (i.e. already de-pigmented) skin. The disease also required that he cover his skin at all times during daylight hours, even on cloudy days, with hats, masks, sunglasses, high UV factor make-up, long sleeves, and umbrellas in order to avoid contracting skin cancer. The press deemed him “weird,” “strange,” or a “germophobe” for exercising caution and following medical advice to protect his health from deteriorating further.

Common sense explanations were never explored when the press spotlighted Michael Jackson; only the sensational sells in that genre. The media openly accused him of lying about his facial characteristics and skin condition.
Later in 1993, Mr. Jackson’s skin condition became useful in supporting the outlandish media creation. The tabloid press, diametrically opposing its former position suddenly found his claims credible when the coloring of his genitals became important in proving his innocence regarding accusations about his interactions with a child. They literally drooled over the acquisition of the photographs of Mr. Jackson’s groin taken during a forced police examination. The going rate for the pictures was reported to be $3 million.

michael_jackson_wallpaper.jpg


Another media effort launched to persuade the public that Michael Jackson had proclaimed himself the ‘King of Pop’ and had demanded exclusive performing rights at President Clinton’s Inaugural Gala was aimed at painting Mr. Jackson as a megalomaniacal, spoiled brat overly enamored with his own importance. Numerous interviews and the documentary of his last musical venture, This Is It, dispel that myth and tell quite a different story. In them we meet a quiet, soft-spoken, polite, egoless, gentle man couching his requests in language intended to avoid bruising egos, coaching his collaborators to allow their talents to ‘shine,’ and embracing everyone who entered his personal space.

Public perception of Michael Jackson was significantly colored by the sheer scale, magnitude, and pervasiveness of the myths that spiral from fairly harmless, inane fantasies to increasingly misleading and harmful descriptions of a persona which bears no resemblance to accounts by those who knew Mr. Jackson personally. The misinformation may have even become a killing weapon by eroding and chipping away at a sensitive soul - an unequaled artist, humanitarian, and activist who possessed the ability to poignantly draw attention to the planetary and human condition and lobby for and mobilize agents of change. That Mr. Jackson possessed that ability and desire was proven more than once by the milestones of his life.

Through decades of sustained scrutiny upon a man who bore no resemblance to the manufactured and sensationalized version, the media defined a creature instead of a man; they drew a cartoon labeling it publicly “***** *****” and other derogations. This continuous and escalating psychological assault masquerading as journalism is reminiscent of schoolyard bullying. Few could have borne the repeated blows with equal grace and dignity; the fact that Michael Jackson endured them for decades is a testament to his strength and surety of purpose. Because of the relentless nature of the featured stories, much of the world envisions the tabloid version when the name Michael Jackson is mentioned. Despite the fact that it is a total fabrication, a fiction, a corrupt fairy tale that leaves one searching for any socially redeeming value, it endures. “If you hear a lie often enough, you start to believe it,” said Mr. Jackson who wondered, along with his admirers, why this cartoon was created by men and women who seemed to have abandoned the standards of truth, human decency, and ethics that once characterized a lofty and respected profession.

The historical picture painted of Mr. Jackson made it easy to doubt his integrity when the story broke in late 1993 that a child had accused Mr. Jackson of molestation. Most people did not immediately think that a beloved entertainer was the target of a shakedown; most of the world gasped and remembered all the fictions they’d read, shrugged their shoulders, and prepared to believe the worst. It was effortless because of all the previous associations and opinions based on tabloid biography. The news industry exploited Michael Jackson, making lots of money in increased circulation while convincing the public that he was some kind of oddity of nature.

Dehumanizing someone over time to make him easy prey for a malicious agenda is an old trick. It works well for ethnic cleansing and allowed the likes of Adolph Hitler to rid Germany of six million of its citizens. The fact that this type of public attack continues right here and now in modern culture should alarm every citizen of these United States, and for that matter, the world.

Rag journalists, by their own admission, delight in taking the tiniest whisper and splashing it in headlines four inches tall in order to be the first with the juiciest scoop. (See Tabloid Truth: The Michael Jackson Scandal a Frontline Special broadcast by PBS on February 15, 1994) For thirteen months Michael Jackson made headlines and money for the yellow press. The practice of milking and dramatizing stories to make them sensational to appeal to the lowest common denominator even leaked over into the mainstream press, once considered honorable. It became infected with the same frenzied hysteria as its tabloid colleagues causing some to dub this unrestrained monster medialoid. Unlike the tabloids which made no secret of their offers to pay large sums to anyone who would go on record making false statements for hire, respected journalists, broadcasters and newspapers still refused to pay their sources. However, they ignored the caution and professional ethics that once precluded them from quoting tabloids; they proffered the libelous material boldly quoting the questionable sources without apology. The common practice of investigating and verifying facts and sources was suspended indefinitely despite its current inclusion in the journalist’s code of ethics.

Nameless “reliable sources,” including security guards, maids, and housekeepers who were for sale at the right price or disgruntled employees who were asked to leave came forward to add to the tabloid tales. They were complicit in assisting to convict Michael Jackson in the court of public opinion. Tabloid editors were filmed and recorded saying: “it doesn’t matter if it’s true as long as we can get someone to say it’s true“ and “we practice a form of checkbook journalism, but so does everyone else in this business.”

Counter claims brought by Mr. Jackson for theft and extortion against these tell all sources were upheld in court judgments ordering the former employees to make restitution. Those who were fired for stealing items from Mr. Jackson’s home were fined thousands and required to pay his counterclaim legal fees. That didn’t mitigate damage done to his reputation. Words, once released into the public domain, cannot be retrieved. Injury inflicted by the willful printing of lies garnered by paying huge sums to the greedy and opportunistic cannot be estimated, nor can it be rescinded. Michael Jackson, reportedly a gentle and sensitive person, who sincerely believed that the “beauty, the innocence, the wonder of a child’s heart are the seeds of creativity that will heal the world” (Michael Jackson, Grammy Legend Award presentation, 1993) suffered mightily over the years at the hands of the unscrupulous.

The media censored any news that supported Mr. Jackson’s claims of extortion by those leveling molestation charges; court judgments in favor of Mr. Jackson were suppressed. Information that was deliberately withheld includes but is not limited to: the accuser’s father’s previous efforts at procuring financial backing from Mr. Jackson for a home remodel and movie deal, drugging a minor child, a tape recording that supports Mr. Jackson’s extortion claims, and the fact that Mr. Jackson’s insurance company settledover his objections. (Was Michael Jackson Framed by Mary Fischer, GQ, October 1994) A later book, Redemption, written by paralegal Geraldine Hughes who worked for the lawyer retained by the accuser’s father, exposed activities in her office that indicate Michael Jackson was framed. Yet again, these revelations were ignored by the press and never reported.

michael_jackson1.jpg


In early 2003, an English journalist who made his mark by interviewing Princess Diana sought out Michael Jackson for an exclusive interview. Martin Bashir vowed to present a fair, sane and real portrait of Michael Jackson, the man, in “Living with Michael Jackson.”Asking only honest and ethical treatment, Mr. Jackson gave Bashir unrestricted access to his life, including his children. Instead of a fair and unbiased portrayal, Bashir cut and pasted together a tabloid expose` complete with edited footage and voice-over narrative. Michael Jackson, ever the enthusiastic camera and film buff, had taped the interview for his personal use and his cameraman captured a far different portrayal when unedited. Mr. Jackson’s actual film was later made a documentary to refute the, once again, unfair and dishonestly manipulated caricature portrait of Michael Jackson. It was later learned that Bashir had been sanctioned in the U.K. for unethical practices. Far from being sanctioned in the United States for his slanted and sensationalized tabloid piece, Bashir was offered and accepted a position on Nightline with ABC News.

When Michael Jackson met the youth who would later accuse him, the boy had been diagnosed with terminal cancer and given only a few weeks to live. His dying wish was to meet Michael Jackson. Mr. Jackson called the child nightly from wherever he was in the world to tell him that he would not allow him to give up,encouraging him to take his chemo and visualize it eating up all the cancer cells like Pac-Man, and hang tough so that he could be his guest at Neverland Valley Ranch. The boy survived the chemo; he and his family were given free access to Mr. Jackson’s estate while he recovered his strength in what his doctors later dubbed a miraculous recovery. Bashir’s documentary revealed Mr. Jackson’s ministrations to the boy. Rather than portraying the relationship as a tender and inspiring story of survival, Bashir’s edits and voiced-over comments strongly implied sinister motivation on the part of Mr. Jackson. The boy’s mother consulted a lawyer after the broadcast complaining that Bashir had filmed her minor son without her knowledge or consent. The lawyer she consulted just happened to be the same one who had negotiated the settlement in the previously successful extortion attempt. The lawyer consulted the same psychologist and the same prosecutor nicknamed ‘Mad-Dog’ by his peers, whose personal dislike of Mr. Jackson was long-standing and well-known. Two grand juries had refused to allow him to bring criminal charges ten years earlier citing lack of evidence, which likely added fuel to his decade-long pursuit of Jackson; the goal was to bring Mr. Michael Jackson down hard.

Tom Sneddon, the DA in Santa Barbara County, although failing to procure indictments against Mr. Jackson on charges of child molestation in 1993, continued an open investigation during the ensuing ten years. He had followed Jackson all over the globe at taxpayer’s expense, trying to find a child to speak against Mr. Jackson; he found none. He had also activated a website soliciting evidence against Mr. Jackson so that he could prosecute citing that he was “the law” in Santa Barbara County. His single-minded purpose was called obsessive by many legal commentators.

After interviewing the young cancer survivor, Sneddon invaded Mr. Jackson’s home going through the entire compound and Jackson’s private quarters with 70 deputies. Videotape of the interview clearly shows law enforcement officers leading the boy. They appeared to have already judged Mr. Jackson guilty without benefit of legal process; the wording of the questions left little doubt of bias. The ranch was raided a total of three times. During a televised press conference, Sneddon openly mocked Mr. Jackson, to the amusement of the gathered press corps, showing disrespect for the man and the law by trivializing very serious charges. Once again, Mr. Jackson faced accusations of molesting a child, coercing the child with liquor, and conspiracy. This time, Sneddon succeeded in bringing his case to a jury and the ‘trial of the century’ played out in the small community of Santa Maria, California and in the tabloid and medialoid headlines.

The press conference exhibits gleefulness by Sneddon that betrays a personal vendetta but most media outlets ignored the critical commentary that followed. The trial itself and its coverage put to rest any distinction between media and tabloid journalism; Walter Cronkite style journalism appeared extinct. Throughout the long five month trial, the media focused on “dancing on vehicle roofs” and “pajama pants.” Standing on car roofs was a familiar gesture employed by Mr. Jackson often to avoid being trampled by fans and paparazzi as well as to wave and allow supporters and admirers to see him above the crowd. Bearing in mind that during the five months of the trial, those fans and his family constituted his only support, his acknowledgement is understandable. The notorious pajama incident was instigated by Mr. Jackson’s lead attorney who ordered his client to race back from a hospital visit to be in court on time because the judge would not allow extra time. Humorous anecdotes about the pajama appearance abounded. What relevance such anecdotes had on the legal proceedings was never fully explained.

Exculpatory facts relevant to The State of California vs. Michael Joseph Jackson were suppressed.A prior settlement from J.C. Penney for an alleged sexual assault on the mother when Penney’s security personnel followed her into the parking lot to detain her son for shoplifting was not given coverage. The children including Mr. Jackson’s accuser who corroborated her story, later admitted lying under oath; their admission was similarly ignored. Welfare fraud on the part of the mother of the accuser was later prosecuted. Accusations of detention by Jackson’s people were dismissed when the family’s trips in and out of the compound to go shopping and for full body waxes and dental visits courtesy of Mr. Jackson’s expense account were exposed. Evidence was entered thoroughly discrediting testimony from security guards and maids from a previous incident that included orders for restitution to Mr. Jackson. The mother’s tenuous hold on reality impeached the prosecution’s case, another fact that never found its way into the press coverage. Outrage and scathing testimony from previously-named alleged victims categorically denying any harm at the hands of Michael Jackson were disregarded. Both versions of the documentary were entered into evidence - Living with Michael Jackson and the rebuttal film Living with Michael Jackson: Take Two. The rebuttal weighed heavily in the jury’s decision to acquit Mr. Jackson.

A mainstream reporter considered a Jackson insider and expert has said about the intentional oversights with regard to Jackson:

This was not the first time I'd had a Jackson story suppressed. After Evan Chandler's suicide in November 2009 I was contacted by the Sun and asked to supply information about the 1993 allegations. I spent quite some time compiling my research, advising the newspaper of common myths and how to avoid them, being careful to source all of my facts from legal documents and audio/visual evidence.

When I read the finished article I was stunned to find that all of my information had been discarded and replaced with the very myths I had advised them to avoid. I alerted staff to the inaccuracies but my emails were not replied. The same inaccuracies appeared in every single article I read about the suicide.

The same bias manifested itself the following month when Jackson's FBI file was released. Across more than 300 pages of information there was not one piece of incriminating evidence -- but that's not the way the media told it. –Charles Thomson in The Huffington Post

The events above described by Mr. Thomson occurred after Mr. Jackson’s death, yet they illustrate that impartial, conscientious reporters may wish to report the truth, but editors and executives rewrite their stories to suit their own agendas or to follow precedence.

Aphrodite Jones, best-selling true-crime biographer and author of a library of criminal trials, tells a similar story of bias at the upper levels of the publishing world. A self-described once-rabid tabloid reporter, she met quite a different Michael Jackson at his trial from the one that was being consistently portrayed by her colleagues. Stunned by the discrepancies she witnessed between published accounts and the events transpiring in the courtroom, she decided to look into the transcripts and evidence herself and write a book based on the facts of the case. No editor was interested in a book about Mr. Jackson’s exoneration; forced to self publish, her account of media bias against Michael Jackson can be found in Michael Jackson Conspiracy.

Ms. Jones, after rethinking her tabloid-influenced view, became impressed with the demeanor of Michael Jackson. She saw no weird behavior or appearance as she sat in the press area during the trial. She describes a quiet, regally-attired, dignified man stoically bearing explicit mockery by media representatives inside the courtroom, unconcealed malignancy by witnesses and prosecution, and insidious ridicule by media hordes outside the courthouse. Remorseful that she had played a part in constructing the caricature and in damaging Mr. Jackson, Ms. Jones felt that the American public deserved the truth. Without her conscience and recognition of her complicity, her diligence and compassion for the battered and beleaguered defendant, and her sense of fair play in journalism, the public would still be unaware of the factors that contributed to the across-the-board ‘not guilty’ verdict of the jury in Santa Maria. Tom Mesereau, lead defense attorney, contributed the Foreword to Michael Jackson Conspiracy.

A serious legal proceeding that placed a man’s life, work, and reputation in jeopardy devolved into a circus. The trial ended with fourteen ‘not guilty’ verdicts. The media hordes were stunned into silence. Instead of examining how the verdict of complete exoneration had come about and what it meant, they almost unanimously ignored the trial outcome and continued to demonize Mr. Michael Jackson with the appellations ‘pervert,’ ‘predator,’ and ‘pedophile’ for the rest of his life. No one seemed to notice that fourteen counts were dismissed; all fourteen counts! Many, including Tom Mesereau, wondered if the trial was even warranted based on the evidence and testimony presented to the jury.

The cautionary tale here is the rush to judgment on the part of the public fed by reports published by an industry whose first and only allegiance by its own admission is greed and the accumulation of profit at the expense of people, truth, justice, and the civil rights of individuals thrust into the public eye by talent, fame, or public office. Accustomed to journalism being an ethical profession, we trust that sources are investigated for possible axes to grind by our reporters and television anchor persons, that accusations are thoroughly examined for possible extortionate motives, and that what we watch and read has been scrupulously vetted and verified prior to publication. As shown in this case study, this trust is misplaced. The destruction of unique and irreplaceable human lives by media wielding “pens mightier than swords” - and cutting as deeply - is unacceptable in a democratic society.
Despite being innocent and proven not guilty in a court of law, Mr. Jackson lived another four years bearing the onus of false charges despite it being a clear violation of his civil rights. Few voices raised an objection. Even after his death, the name Michael Jackson is seldom mentioned without the crime of which he was acquitted; his full exoneration is almost universally ignored. Mr. Jackson’s right to presumption of innocence was never observed; his actual innocence is questioned even now. Every mention of the unproven allegations is yet another violation of his civil rights. The right of the American public to be given the facts and to make up its own mind was blatantly thwarted under the “freedom of the press” umbrella.

Michael Jackson’s older brother, Jermaine, regularly sitting beside Michael as he stoically endured the trial proceedings, commented that he watched the light slowly fade from his brother’s eyes during the five-month ordeal. In an interview conducted after Mr. Jackson’s death, Tom Mesereau observed that the damage done to Michael Jackson’s spirit by the interminable days of the trial could not be estimated, but was, from his perspective “probably very great.” Michael Jackson was a global philanthropist and humanitarian who keenly felt injustice to others; he felt the world’s prejudice against him just as acutely. He is considered by many to be the greatest entertainer who ever lived. His contributions to social and ecological awareness and the fields of music and film are legion. He is an iconic figure woven into the tapestry of the twentieth century. But do we know the whole story?

What we can take away from this case study is: very powerful editors and broadcast network executives decide what we, the public, are going to read and watch. Their reports on the subject of Michael Jackson, specifically, pivoted for much of his life on ridicule, accusation, and character assassination instead of accurate information. Our highly-vaunted democratic process is held in the steel grip of media. How exactly are we to know the truth? And how much truth are we allowed to know on subjects of arguably more political and social relevance? Are we the consumers of a responsible media? You are the public. You decide.

Conclusions

Michael Jackson wrote, composed, recorded, and performed some of the most “glorious music in the pop canon” according to Sir Bob Geldoff who cited him with an award at the Brit (the equivalent of the Grammy) Awards presentation of 2000. Geldoff also said: “when Michael Jackson sings it is with the voice of angels and when he moves his feet, you can see God dancing.” The Guinness Book of World Records, in addition to his musical accomplishments, lists Mr. Michael Joseph Jackson as the ‘most charitable entertainer,’ supporting at least 39 separate and distinct charities and humanitarian efforts during his lifetime and donating in excess of $300 million in aid to multiple hospitals, the impoverished, ill children in every country he visited, and air-lifting supplies to war-torn Sarajevo. During his fifteen-year tenure, he opened his home to thousands of lives devastated by darkness, disease, disadvantage, or gang violence. He lent his voice and his songwriting talents to worthy causes, the most famous, but not the only, example being the We Are the World song and recording session. His musical contributions (whether recordings, short films, or live performances) abound with messages of hope, healing, unity, and planetary stewardship. In the words of Travis Payne, choreographer and contributor to the stillborn This Is It concert, his music “always spoke to humanity.” Michael Jackson was, and remains, “a global cheerleader” reminding us of who we are and the power we hold to heal the world.

A living example of following your dreams and not letting anyone turn you from your goal, many millions the world over heard and adopted his messages. Michael Jackson’s resolute strength and courage in the face of hardship inspires countless others facing obstacles in their own lives. He stood like a rock firmly embedded in the earth’s crust personifying love and compassion for those less fortunate even when that love was massively misunderstood and misrepresented. Mr. Jackson’s gifts to the world through hard work and an incessant allegiance to excellence comprise a worthy testament to his legacy. As shown in the documentary of his last project, he remained a humble, kind, polite, soft-spoken, gentleman even when surrounded by inconceivable wealth, fame, and the unchecked suspicion of others.

Mr. Jackson’s vocal coach of thirty years, Seth Riggs, spoke of his pupil only after Mr. Jackson’s death in 2009. Lauding his work ethic, perfectionist nature, and dedication to excellence, Mr. Riggs expressed his gratitude to have contributed to Mr. Jackson’s ‘genius.’ As a matter of fact, no one who knew or worked with Michael Jackson, whether in a recording studio, concert rehearsal, film set or humanitarian effort had a negative word to say about their encounter. All commended his humility, professionalism, awareness, intelligence, talent, gentleness, gallantry, and “generosity to almost a fault … of himself,” as his friend Dame Elizabeth Taylor told Oprah in 1993. Mr. Jackson was described by colleagues and intimates as “an angel walking the planet,” “a gentle spirit,” “a lovely soul,” “an absolute sweetheart,” “a very approachable man,” “the least weird man I have ever known,” and “the sweetest person I have ever met in my life.” Those words from those who knew him best contrast sharply with the caricature portrait by the media who knew him not at all. Yet sadly, that is not what most of the world remembers.

This is not just a case of violence and words; it is a case of relentless, all-pervasive violence and words. That assault over a lifetime, but particularly over the last ten years of his life, likely caused post-traumatic stress and the sleeplessness which ultimately led to Michael Jackson’s untimely death. Media intrusion and a total lack of respect for truth and decency played a large part in the destruction of a reputation, a career and a life. That coupled with a law enforcement official who ignored protocol and justice while harboring bigotry and personal vendetta and the careless actions of a physician administering a drug outside of his expertise in conditions not conducive to the patient’s survival made Michael Jackson’s death a question of when, not if. All involved are culpable.

What lessons can we learn from the example of Michael Jackson’s life?


  1. As consumers, we can and must learn that “just because you read it in a magazine or see it on a TV screen don’t make it factual” (Michael Jackson, Tabloid Junkie, HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book 1, 1995). We are too easily led. We trust that news media are trustworthy and practicing a minimal code of ethics. They are not. First and foremost, we need to be aware of the changes that have occurred in reporting the news.
  2. We, as the ultimate consumers of their product, must educate our journalists regarding what we will and will not tolerate in their profession. Although he was not the first of our brightest and best to be literally hounded to death, let’s make Michael Jackson the last whose life we sacrifice to greed. By not buying garbage news, we wield the power to eliminate the choke hold on our airwaves, horizon and psyche. We can starve the monster. Should we consider it?
  3. If we see unfairness or unethical practices in our television news or newspapers, we have a right as well as a responsibility to call our editors and broadcasters to task. Who loses when consumers bury their heads in the sand and ignore the elephant in the room? Democracy, it has been said, is not a spectator sport.
  4. Should we use intelligence and the power to discern when making choices about what we buy and read? What we choose to believe? What about the role of critical thinking?
  5. Some minimal standards in the profession of journalism based on human decency and truth in the market place should be legislated. All freedoms bear responsibilities. Freedom of the press is no exception.
  6. Law enforcement officials have a responsibility to remain impartial. Personal biases, vendettas and strong dislikes have no place in the enforcement of the law. Mockery of suspects is serious and unprofessional.
  7. Our national media must be reminded of its purpose. While magazines are in business to entertain and tabloids are in business to make money, our respected mainstream media does not share either of their goals. Our national media’s purpose is, and always has been, to inform! Should they be held to this task and standards?

Michael_Jackson_RIP.jpg

Discussion Questions


  1. How can we, as consumers, change the way our media covers celebrity?
  2. How can laws be constructed assist in the control of media bias?
  3. How can newspaper and broadcast media be held to a minimum code of ethics as doctors and lawyers are?
  4. What can be done to improve the Shield Law that protects journalists from being accountable for their actions in wielding their pens as weapons of destruction?
  5. How has the advent of the ‘information superhighway’ impacted the journalistic profession?
  6. How has the 24 hour news cycle impacted television?
  7. Given this account of media bias, inaccuracies and failure to report the facts: how do you feel as a consumer? Are you surprised? Outraged? Or unaffected?
  8. If you could change anything about this story, what would it be? If you had the power to request a change from the media, what would you say?
  9. If you were the target or subject of such storytelling, how would you feel? What would you do?
  10. If you agree with the media using these tactics, why do you agree? If you disagree, why? And what do you think can be done about it?

Source List


Tabloid Truth: The Michael Jackson Scandal - February 1994 (listed in the body of the text)
Was Michael Jackson Framed - GQ - October 1993 - Mary Fisher (listed in the body of the text)
Michael Jackson Conspiracy - Aphrodite Jones - (listed in the body of the text)
The Huffington Post - Charles Thomson (quoted in the body of the text)
Interview with David Nordahl, USA Today - 8/20/09
"Michael Jackson Conspiracy" by Aphrodite Jones and "Moonwalk" by Michael Jackson
Moonwalk: Michael Jackson 1988
Oprah Winfrey - Ninety Prime Time Minutes with the King of Pop - 1993



Case Study written by Jan Carlson:
Jan is a lifelong observer of the media and its manipulation of public opinion. A resident of the midwestern United States, she is a grandmother, wife and full-time employee. A student of music and its relationship to human emotion, Jan is an avid reader of philosophy, history, mythology and ancient cultures.




 
Last edited:
In light of the recent tabloid articles, I thought that this was appropriate to post.

http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/sensationalism-inflammatory-words-and-history-tabloid-journalism


[h=1]Sensationalism, Inflammatory Words and the History of Tabloid Journalism[/h]
war-of-the-worlds-by-robert.jpg
War of the Worlds by Robert Czarny
Ladies and gentlemen, this is Carl Phillips again, at the Wilmuth farm, Grovers Mill, New Jersey. Professor Pierson and I made the eleven miles from Princeton in ten minutes. Well, I . . . I hardly know where to begin, to paint for you a word picture of the strange scene before my eyes, like something out of a modern "Arabian Nights." Well, I just got here. I haven't had a chance to look around yet. I guess that's it. Yes, I guess that's the . . . thing, directly in front of me, half buried in a vast pit. Must have struck with terrific force. The ground is covered with splinters of a tree it must have struck on its way down. What I can see of the . . . object itself doesn't look very much like a meteor, at least not the meteors I've seen. It looks more like a huge cylinder. It has a diameter of . . . what would you say, Professor Pierson?
Ladies and gentlemen, I have just been handed a message that came in from Grover’s Mill by telephone. Just a moment. At least forty people, including six state troopers lie dead in a field east of the village of Grover’s Mill, their bodies burned and distorted beyond all possible recognition. The next voice you hear will be that of Brigadier General Montgomery Smith, commander of the state militia at Trenton, New Jersey.
Orson Welles read this script of War of the Worlds adapted from H.G.Wells’ novel of the same name during a CBS Mercury Theater on the Air episode in a famous incident that caused panic among the station’s six million listeners. The broadcast included a statement of its fictional origin at the beginning of the program but was timed to begin its earnest similarity to a news bulletin 12 minutes into the program to capture listeners from the more popular Chase and Sandborn Hour just as they cut away to dance music. Their show format was well known and featured the most popular radio personalities of the time. The timing and Orson Welles’ Mercury Theater program was designed to lure listeners away from their competitor at Chase and Sandborn as they channel-surfed during the dance music interlude on the program. It was a calculated and deliberate attempt to increase the listening audience and gain Welles’ infamy. It did both. Almost two million people believed an alien invasion was actually in progress and another one and half million were genuinely frightened by the news bulletin interruptions to regular programming that narrated the invasion of Martians on Planet Earth.
It was so convincing that some people grabbed firearms, herded their families into autos, and set out for the mountains. Gasoline was demanded at gunpoint and water towers were fired upon when they were mistaken for Martian space vehicles. In fact, the timing couldn’t have been more suited to paranoia and panic. This was just prior to World War II and Hitler himself derided the program citing it as evidence of the corruption inherent in Democracy. This incident is seen as watering down subsequent real incidents of horror such as the Japanese Attack on Pearl Harbor, Chernobyl and others.
This is not the first nor last episode of using sensationalism and crowd psychology and public hysteria for social manipulation and personal and corporate gain. The CBS network faced sanctions because of the irresponsible use of public airwaves after the program, but not censorship. In the end, this episode was about circulation, consumers and market share.
Sensationalism, crowd psychology and hysteria have given us the witch trials, McCarthyism, tabloid journalism, war propaganda, Hitler’s ‘solution to the Jewish problem, ‘ impeachment of a president, ruination from scandals, racism, genocide, misguided crusades, war and so many other ills foisted by humanity onto humanity. Fictional accounts sensationalized, presented as truth and “breaking news” in modern times have destroyed careers, lives and people.

salemwitchtrials.jpg
Salem Witch Trials
Those who question in words or print the Machiavellian nature and ethics of such means to predetermined ends and hidden agendas are themselves often equally vilified. Philosophers and writers who questioned the methods of the witch trials and convictions, for example, were imprisoned themselves when they spoke out against the religiously motivated violence of the Puritans who dominated the local culture at that time. Puritanical beliefs disallowed rights for children and unmarried or widowed women adding political motive to the trials as land holdings were forfeit by women accused.
Those who question the true intent of religious fervor and the divisiveness of any doctrine of separation are often considered dark figures in their own time only to be found brilliant with insight and wisdom at a future time. They too have been imprisoned, persecuted, vilified and in modern culture, subjected to "witch hunts" and “hits” which meant a price on their heads. Salman Rushdie suffered such an attack for writing Satanic Verses, denounced as heresy by Muslim Cleric Ayatollah Khomeini who declared a fatwa on him and called for his assassination.
Tactics to inflame and change sentiment have seemed politically motivated. The modern version appears to be purely driven by circulation and profit. Is this too, a modern-day hoax perpetrated upon an unsuspecting audience?
Hitler used hype, propaganda and a philosophy of inferiority from his bully pulpit to murder more than six million Jewish citizens. Sensational accusations both verbal and in print defined McCarthyism in the paranoid culture of the Cold War era as members of society were labeled “communist” or “traitors” to their homeland and persecuted with public verbal floggings and blacklisting.
Racism defined the decade of late fifties to sixties as leaders like Martin Luther King rallied for equality and an end to racial discrimination. Words inflamed then. And before that colonists found reason to label as “savages” the indigenous peoples of the Americas. This indigenous, racial, cultural, ethic “inferiority” is inflamed by words and by words committed to permanency in print or other means.
Religious persecution, envy, jealousy, hysteria and the need for attention feed the obsession for finding evidence of the deviloperating in people metaphorically and materially. It seems that human shadow finds reason to envy light in others and seeks to actively recruit and convert it to shadow. “Come to the dark side” says the character Darth Vader in the Star Wars saga- a modern version of an old villain and an old battle: the dark side of human nature vs. the light.
A modern darkside highlighting the darkness-light struggle of human nature can be found in media and in particular, in tabloid journalism. The salacious, sensational, darkest and most titillating news makes headlines and makes money for those who peddle the darkest and most unsavory side of human nature. What in the human does this speak to? And as humans and consumers, are we aware of it, its affects and impact on people? And if so or even if not, are we complicit in our own darkness?

wtl038383.jpg
Burroughs Welcome and Company Advertisement, 1895
The etymology of “Tabloid” in 1884 is from a trademark of the Burroughs Welcome and Company, a nineteenth century pharmaceutical company in England that produced medicine originally in powder form. The tabloid was a pill made by compressing the powder into small bullet-like pills called tabloids, tablets and later tabs. The oid suffix is from oeides meaning like. By 1898, tabloid was being used figuratively to mean a compressed form or small dose of anything. The small newspaper with condensed articles was nicknamed the tabloid.
Alfred Harmsworth (1865-1922,) the first Viscount of Northcliffe made his publishing fortune with an empire that rescued failing newspapers and transforming them into pop culture news tabs that he used to influence public opinion and bring down institutions.
In the context of journalism, “tabloid” referred to the size of the newspaper and its abbreviated content. It has since evolved to mean a sensationalized newspaper with sometimes barely truthful content and even to include television which highlights celebrity news and scandals.
The tabloid industry began in earnest in England and tends to emphasize topics such as sensationalcrime stories, astrology,gossip about the personal lives of celebrities and sports stars, and junk news. Often, tabloid newspaper allegations about the sexual practices, drug use, or private conduct of celebrities is borderline defamatory; in many cases, celebrities have successfully sued for libel, demonstrating that tabloid stories have defamed them. It is this sense of the word that led to some entertainment news programs to be called tabloid television. Tabloid newspapers are sometimes pejoratively called the gutter press.
Celebrities don’t always sue because of the time, energy and money investment in countering all the salacious tabloid libel because they realize that they would be in court almost every day. The tabloids count on that fact to escape culpability and are unscathed by the occasional judgment against them which is miniscule compared to profits and is “expensed” on balance sheets. The profit margin trumps the occasional lawsuit. The end justifies the means given the bottom line: that financial statements show profit.
Commonly called “Redtops” because of the identifying red headlines at the top, British tabloids tend to sensationalize and very aggressively pursue and feature celebrity gossip, hoaxes and take political positions. They often openly and boldly mock and ridicule the subjects of their stories.


American Tabloids
Tabloid journalism was exported to America where the papers are now featured in supermarkets at checkout aisles. American tabs are particularly notorious for their deliberate and over-the-top sensationalizing of stories.
The original American tabloid, The New York Sun, a gaudy example of the penny press made its debut on September 3, 1833 as the handiwork of Benjamin H. Day, a Springfield Massachusetts printer. Other specialty newspapers existed that had been around since colonial times but they were politically motivated and sold by subscription. Since most newspapers required subscriptions paid in advance and cost about ten dollars a year, the penny press became popular because for a penny a day, one could buy The New York Sun instead of a newspaper that might cost a week’s salary in advance for working families. In 1835, the New York Sunpublished a lengthy report about life on the moon discovered by a scientist with a powerful telescope, something it knew was fictional. Called the “moon hoax” that incident is famous in American journalism. Truth was not highly valued in the columns of The Sun where copy resembled simple and cheap romantic fiction.

james_gordon_bennett_sr.jpg
william_randolph_hearst_cph_3a49373.jpg
pulitzer-2-sized.jpg
James Gordon Bennett Randolph Hearst Joseph Pulitzer
The Sun’s success spawned knock-off competitors and imitators. The Herald was the brainchild of James Gordon Bennett who actually had been a newsman and he built his empire into the most successful and influential newspapers in history. He broke from the partisan press and favored sensationalism and sordid crime stories with flaming headlines. His son, known for his public outrageous escapades took over after Bennett’s death and featured both respectable news and salacious underground drivel and ran thinly disguised advertisements for prostitutes until William Randolph Hearst complained.
The younger Bennett commissioned reporter Stanley with a bent for drama to find missionary David Livingston in Africa. This story was a ploy by The Herald to create an international sensation by not just reporting the news but making the news.
Hearst joined that same tradition with his San Francisco Examiner that borrowed from the doctrine of sensationalism when it gifted the famous French actress Sarah Bernhardt with a wine and dine excursion that included a visit to an Opium Den, afterward writing up the lurid details for an expose` in his tabloid. Hearst hired Ambrose Bierce who wrote bitter contemporary columns that necessitated his carrying a pistol to protect himself from infuriated readers. He later hired women who would write expose`s about society’s ills gaining public sympathy (origin of sob story) that Hearst claimed as his mission: champion of the common man and protector of the weak.
Joseph Pulitzer’s New York World was Hearst’s competitor who hired “Nellie Bly” (pseudonym) who became one of the first famous female reporters. Pulitzer for whom the “Pulitzer Prize” is named was one of the top sensationalist journalists of his time selling crime, scandal and outrageous stunts. One of the most protracted circulation wars in journalism was waged between The New York World and The New York Morning Journal owned by Hearst. Both papers favored yellow journalism depicting life in New York: they had no hesitation in making news instead of reporting it. The movie Citizen Kane is a barely disguised biography of William Randolph Hearst directed by and starring Orson Welles.

36_globe.gif
Today’s tabloids such as The Globe, The National Enquirer and The Sun use extremely aggressive and mean-spirited tactics to sell issues. They are distributed through magazine distribution channels like weeklies and paperback books. The validity of the stories in these gutter press samples can be called into question.
The tabloids readily admit to practicing what is called “checkbook journalism” and tout its legitimacy and justify their use of it because ‘everybody practices checkbook journalism.’ This practice refers to paying for stories. There is willingness by tabloids to pay handsomely for information upon which to build their stories. They have publicly admitted that it doesn’t matter if it is truth; it only matters that somebody is willing to say it for a fee they are willing to pay. For a startling example of the tabloids own claim to checkbook journalism, see Frontline Episode “Tabloid Truth: The Michael Jackson Scandal.”
So, if someone is willing to say what the tabloid reporter is looking for—some salacious material about a celebrity or public figure to craft a story, the tab’s corporate headquarters willingly pay large sums of money to “sources.”
It doesn’t matter if it’s true. If it’s not true, they can always print a retraction; but meanwhile the headlines scream scandal and millions of papers sold make millions of dollars. In the tabloid business there are reporters and photographers, sources and ‘breaking news.’ The game is to get a sensational story about a celebrity before your rival can break the story. It’s a world devoid of meticulous fact checking, scrutiny of sources or ethics. The credibility of the source doesn’t matter because the tabloids operate on the letting the cat out of the bag principle. It doesn’t matter if the story is true, what matters are headlines that scream attention. The retraction can come later and is guaranteed to not be front page news but buried in the back of the paper.
In 1993 when the Enquirer, for example, was looking for someone to corroborate the story that Michael Jackson had molested boys, they contacted Ronald Newt Sr. because they learned that Newt’s twin boys spent time at Neverland Ranch as aspiring performers learning from Jackson, their mentor.
The Enquirer offered the Newt boys’ father Ronald, $200,000 to say that something untoward happened to his boys at Neverland with Michael Jackson. David Perell, Editor of the tabloid drew up a contract and the elder Newt refused to sign, saving it for evidence. In actuality, no children ever showed up to trade accusations about Jackson for cash after the scandal broke in 1993.
Ronald Newt said that the editor of the Enquirer coached the Newt family to “say he grabbed you on the butt. Say he grabbed you and touched you in any kind of way.” Perell also told the Newt family that he saw it as incumbent upon the Enquirer to take Michael Jackson down. He wanted to destroy him. He told us he “took all these other famous people down—all the major people that had scandals against them.” He said, 'We take these people down. That's what we do.'"
Celebrities learn to be on guard most of the time and on red alert in certain circumstances. It takes a sixth sense to be able to outthink a paparazzi or reporter dressed as a service or delivery personnel. It is well known too, that celebrities who badmouth tabloids or name names are punished for their indiscretions. Johnny Carson once belittled the Enquirer and found himself the target of a revenge assignment by one of its reporters. The paper tailed Carson for weeks until they got a photo of Sally Fields and him drinking champagne on his balcony. They then spun the story in the most malicious way to do the most damage.
For Brooke Shields’ and Andre Agassi’s wedding, the Globe tabloid surveyed the surrounding landscape and decided a helicopter could not get close enough so they rented a cherry picker—a machine with an aerial hydraulic lift that can reach a height of 100 meters or more. The photographer raised the cherry picker to overlook the wedding and got the pictures for the tabloid. There was nothing that Brooke Shields could do since the intruders were not on her property.
express-diana.jpg
Lady Diana Spencer was the most visible target of the paparazzi and the tabloid press. The tabloids even went so far as to rent a submarine at a cost of $16,000 in order to get a shot of Diana lounging on the beach with a new love interest after her divorce from Charles and her divorce from the royal family. She was considered the most photographed woman in the world during the 15 years she was prominent on the world stage.
Lady Diana’s life was scrutinized at every turn and marked by salacious stories in the British tabloids. She had to learn to court them and employ diplomacy with them to get them to lower their voices about her life and private affairs. The tabloids reported her every move and at any given time there were 14 to 20 reporters tailing her, something she, as a private person, was unaccustomed to. She complained to the queen who set up a meeting with the tabloid editors where they were asked to exercise some discretion and restraint. In fact, nothing changed.
Diana was painted as unstable, dull, ditsy, depressed, and crazy by the British tabloid media. They exposed her anger at Charles who had resumed his affair with Camilla Bowles during their marriage. Diana commented that her marriage was crowded with too many people and that included Charles’ mistress, the royal family and the media. Charles resented that the press was more interested in Diana than him and complained bitterly to his wife that his work as a head of state was not being taken seriously. Diana had not courted the attention; she was simply more interesting.
The tabloids exposed Diana’s post partum depression, a serious and common illness among new mothers. They portrayed her as mentally ill and unstable. She finally spoke frankly about it because she thought it might help others who were struggling with similar issues and to know their princess was flawed and shared a “commoner’s” illness. The tabloid press continued to portray her as unstable and misguided even as she championed the causes of children and an end to landmines as a viable strategy for war and conflict.
Diana knew that her royal children would be subject to the same treatment by the gutter press so she tried to be clever with a kind of cat and mouse game with them to garner favor. Diana saw this as a tactic; the queen reportedly saw it as scandalous betrayal of the royal family’s dignity. Diana learned to trade stories for coverage of her favorite charitable and humanitarian work. The efficacy of this kind of relationship with the press is something most celebrities question. Many claim their personal lives belong to themselves while their contributions to art and culture belong to the public.
The tone of the media changed and the gutter press became more aggressive when Rupert Murdoch began his influential tenure in media. A magnate of the Australian press, he set his sights on the acquisition of media all over the world and acquired significant numbers of media outlets on multiple continents.
Murdoch saw celebrity as a commodity to be tapped and exploited and his minions did exactly that with his acquisitions. His tactics, heavily criticized by the ethical press, politicians and celebrities, included becoming cozy with the leaders of countries and supporting their politics until he was in a position to influence those politics with his newspapers and television holdings which include British, Australian, American and other tabloid markets and the Fox Cable News Network.
In 2009 Murdoch was accused of using private investigators and criminal means to record and expose private messages among the celebrity and royal figures featured in his gutter press. His staffers illegally hacked phones, illegally accessed the target’s bank statements, confidential personal data including tax records, social security files and utility bills. Murdoch's News Group Newspapers paid about $1.6 million in out-of-court settlements to buy silence from public figures whose privacy had been invaded. Those targeted were cabinet ministers, MPs, Actors and sports stars.
The payments were secretly made and evidence was suppressed of hundreds more illegal actions by victims of News Group, the Murdoch company that publishes News of the World and The Sun. Police have initiated inquires into at least 31 reporters and senior executives who illegally accessed records of 2,000 to 3,000 people including senior politicians.
Murdoch's reporters resort to extreme deception and illegal means to garner stories. They have disguised themselves as a sheik to sting celebrities and notables, and even posed as a sports team investor in order to gain an interview where the coach badmouthed his players and was fired. Murdoch’s News of the World boasts on its website that it "offers the biggest payment for stories."

The Conversion to Medialoid
medialies_1.jpg

Medialoid is defined as mainstream media infected with tabloid journalism. The conversion occurred because the major news outlets began to relax some standards that had been in place since newspapers and television began. Some attribute partial blame to the O.J. Simpson and other celebrity trials, some to the arrival on the scene of a 24 hour news cycle that began when Ted Turner’s CNN did its first broadcast in 1980; some see it as an erosion over time. Somewhere along the evolution of journalism, the standards and the ethics of the profession and the media relaxed. In some cases they took a vacation; and in others that vacation is permanent. Many lament the loss of journalistic integrity and mourn the bygone days of the kind of professionalism embraced by Walter Cronkite who passed in 2009 and was for his 20 year tenure as a news anchor, considered “the most trusted man in America.”
Gossip columns began to show up in newspapers in the 1930s and the three decades between the 1960s and 1990s saw investigative reporting soar as underground newspapers flourished that were critical of government and contemporary social institutions. The alternative forms of journalism led to uncovering events and activities of government and other groups that normally went unnoticed. Those hot news decades: revealed Watergate, filmed the shootings at Kent State, saw conspiracies swirling around government and other institutions, outed organized crime, covered Black Civil Rights leaders and racial issues, captured riots and violence on tape, monitored the Viet Nam War, highlighted the Pentagon Papers, revealed Iran Contra and other events and saw the assassinations of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy. Investigative journalism changed the industry forever because it established a mindset of penetration that continues today.
The line of demarcation between the media and the tabloids began to blur in the nineteen seventies but in 1998 it disappeared completely. That year conservative blogger Matt Drudge released a story about a relationship with then President Clinton and White House Aid Monica Lewinsky after Newsweek Magazine declined to publish it. For the next year the American press all sounded like tabloids as Americans were subjected to detailed information about the president’s private sexual proclivities. The cast of characters and the investigation into the scandal grew wider as time went on until it ended with the impeachment of a president.
The O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson trials did little to dissuade the media from their trajectory toward tabloid journalism. The trials of celebrities attract a lot of attention. The Simpson trial was televised and the judge was seen as pandering to the cameras in his courtroom; the Michael Jackson trial was not televised but a previously serious venue, Court TV turned tabloid when it reenacted the daily court proceedings for its evening viewers.
Joining the ranks of tabloid and sensationalist television are programs like Hard Copy, Inside Edition, A Current Affair and their domestic and international clones. Reality TV tends to use the same tactics of sensationalism, crowd psychology and public emotional hysteria to gain and keep viewers. Reality TV began with game shows and candid camera type series, and captured more and more viewers with its soap or docudramas like Big Brother and Survivor. It films in a kind of fly-on-the-wall method and features ordinary people in ordinary circumstances, caught up in fluid and changing or extreme situations. The public’s apparent appetite for reality TV has spawned many new shows some of which are exploitive of their cast and that feature a voyeuristic look into people’s private lives. Jon and Kate Plus Eight exploited a Hmong immigrant and his eight children and made their very contentious and public divorce fodder for the tabloids.
Tabloid tactics of cut and paste journalism has leaked into the Internet Blogosphere as well. In a recent case, Andrew Brietbart, conservative Republican commentator and blogger who originally wrote for the Drudge Report, spliced a film of Shirley Sherrod addressing the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) in an attempt to paint this State Department Black woman as a racist and to embarrass the Obama Administration. The cable news channels picked up the story, did not fact check it but ran with it which triggered the NAACP and government officials to denounce her and call for her resignation. When the video of her speech was viewed in its entirety, it revealed the questionable journalistic tactics of the blogger and his agenda. It would seem it also might call into question the cable news cycle of repeating unverified information that seeks conflict but not all the facts. Sherrod reportedly plans to sue for damages to her livelihood and reputation. She is but one example of the casualties of tabloid reporting and media gone wild.

Effects of Body Bag Journalism
war-zone-2-journalist-cartoon.jpg

“If it bleeds, it leads” is often the standard that local and cable news stations use when deciding what and how to broadcast the news of the day on nightly or 24 hour cycle programs. The way news is now reported has increased the negative effects on children according to the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Those changes include:

  • television channels and Internet services and sites which report the news 24 hours a day
  • television channels broadcasting live events as they are unfolding, in "real time"
  • increased reporting of the details of the private lives of public figures and role models
  • pressure to get news to the public as part of the competitive nature of the entertainment industry
  • detailed and repetitive visual coverage of natural disasters and violent acts
While there are issues surrounding parental warnings about sex and violence, increasing concern surrounds news programming. Research shows that children tend to imitate what they see and hear in the news—a contagion called the copy cat effect. Chronic and persistent exposure to violence and aggression can lead to fear, cynicism, desensitization and dehumanization. While actual crime is decreasing, reporting of crimes has increased by 240% and comprises 30% of a broadcast. Media exposure for the average child now is 6 hours per day, more than any other activity except sleep.
A Joint Statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Medical Association, American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association summarized the effects of violence as follows:

  • Viewing violence can lead to emotional desensitization towards violence in real life.

  • Children exposed to violent programming at a young age have a higher tendency for violent and aggressive behavior later in life than children who are not so exposed.

  • Children exposed to violence are more likely to assume that acts of violence are acceptable behavior.

  • Viewing violence increases fear of becoming a victim of violence, with a resultant increase in self-protective behaviors and a mistrust of others.
The United States Surgeon General’s Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General also summarized the research in this area. A diverse body of research strongly suggests that exposure to violence in the media can increase children’s aggressive behavior in the short term with some studies providing long term evidence of violence.
The work championed by organizations such as Children Now, medical societies and others who call upon the FCC to revisit rules for journalism and programming clearly suggest that body-bag and sensationalized journalism bludgeons them into cynicism, resignation and fear. The more TV watched, the more exaggerated appears the level of crime in society and the stereotypes that accompany that sense of vulnerability as does the tendency to see the world as perpetually dangerous. When children are in the news, which is not often, about 40 to 50 percent of the stories feature them as perpetrators or victims of crimes. This encourages the stereotype of superpredators and encourages vindictive and violent responses to others. Fifty percent of children interviewed said they felt angry, sad or depressed after watching the news.

Oversight Bodies
firstamendmente.jpg

The first amendment right to free speech strikes grave trepidation in those who seek to make the media more humane and responsible. Censure is a hot topic as is the right to protect one’s sources. There are no official regulatory bodies that govern journalism and in the view of Columbia University, a solution is to implement a seal of approval that insures that media meets certain standard obligations. John Hamer of Columbia proposes something called the TAO of Journalism: Transparency, Accountability and Openness. Hamer says that anything other than some kind of standard for journalism and media is a double standard: “Journalists instinctively react negatively to anything that smacks of licensing, certification regulation, oversight—there is great resistance,” he said. “The attitude is, ‘Nobody can oversee us, we oversee everyone else.’ When you think about it, it’s just a massive double standard.”
The Society of Professional Journalists has a code of ethics for its members. While the ethical standards are admirable, few of their ranks follow their own ethics guidelines:
Journalists should:

  • Test the accuracy of information from all sources and exercise care to avoid inadvertent error. Deliberate distortion is never permissible.
  • Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing.
  • Identify sources whenever feasible. The public is entitled to as much information as possible on sources' reliability.
  • Always question sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Clarify conditions attached to any promise made in exchange for information. Keep promises.
  • Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context.
  • Never distort the content of news photos or video. Image enhancement for technical clarity is always permissible. Label montages and photo illustrations.
  • Avoid misleading re-enactments or staged news events. If re-enactment is necessary to tell a story, label it.
  • Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information except when traditional open methods will not yield information vital to the public. Use of such methods should be explained as part of the story
  • Never plagiarize
  • Tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience boldly, even when it is unpopular to do so.
  • Examine their own cultural values and avoid imposing those values on others.
  • Avoid stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance or social status.
  • Support the open exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.
  • Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of information can be equally valid.
  • Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
  • Distinguish news from advertising and shun hybrids that blur the lines between the two.
  • Recognize a special obligation to ensure that the public's business is conducted in the open and that government records are open to inspection.
Minimize Harm
Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect.

Journalists should:

  • Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
  • Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
  • Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
  • Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
  • Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
  • Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
  • Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
  • Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.
Act Independently
Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public's right to know.
Journalists should:

  • Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.
  • Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.
  • Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.
  • Disclose unavoidable conflicts.
  • Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.
  • Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.
  • Be wary of sources offering information for favors or money; avoid bidding for news.
Be Accountable
Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other.
Journalists should:

  • Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the public over journalistic conduct.
  • Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
  • Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
  • Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
  • Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
Conclusion
There appears to be no real conclusion to the dilemma presented by modern media, or is there? It seems clear that the media, journalism, and television may be entirely out of control in covering the goings on of leaders and celebrities in our culture. The death of Lady Diana, the protracted targeting and caricature-like inaccurate portrayal of Michael Jackson over decades, the impeachment of a president for private bedroom behaviors, the suicide of a White House Counsel Vince Foster because ‘Here in Washington ruining people is considered sport,’ the scandals and outings and name calling and epithets and the obsession with celebrity, getting the dirt and salivating over the prospect of being the first to break the juicy story is as much an indictment of the constituents (consumers) as the perpetrators of this misanthropic means of treating people in an increasingly impolite society.
We have seen evidence that this frenzy of voyeurism and the need to know all the gore or juicy details of someone else’s private life causes societal ills and does not benefit our children or our own humanity. Tabloid journalism kills people. Diana died in a car accident while being chased the multi-thousandth time by paparazzi. Michael Jackson was darkly exploited by the media for profit over years and was unjustly accused of unspeakable acts toward children in an extortion attempt, yet many still do not know he was innocent because his exoneration and the details were not widely reported. Journalists went for the sordid details of the accusations instead of the dismantling of its veracity through cross examination. The negative aspects of an event become the focus because that is what gets attention, that is what sells the product and keeps the gutter press in business.
Where are the lines drawn of civility, good taste, kindness, compassion, empathy, dignity, respect, professionalism and humane restraint? When consumers consume products without examining their own habits and the effects of those habits, or they thoughtlessly consume products that harm others regularly for profit, they are complicit in the demeaning and destruction of others and of their own humanity. When the humanity of others means so little, the whole race suffers dehumanization. The soul of humanity splinters as does the psyche. It’s a deep and haunting wounding that lingers and permeates the collective consciousness.
Increasing tolerance and psychological anesthesia toward the slaying of others’ images, reputations, livelihoods, life’s work and privacy becomes a cultural meme that indicts each of the members and it’s whole. When an industry tolerates the death of one global humanitarian and the slow slaying of another over time, and the consumers of that industry do nothing, more casualties will come. It’s inevitable. The editors of the tabloid press have admitted their culpability in the death of Lady Diana but nothing appears to have changed. Does this practice of using the avenue of communications and media to create larger-than-life personas built to pinnacles only to serve as fulcrums for their demise at our hands and minds, constitute nothing less than a modern day gladiator sport?
Both Princess Diana and Michael Jackson were globally recognized cheerleaders for humanity evidenced by their body of work. Both leveraged their fame to become global humanitarians and philanthropic stars. Had Bill Clinton been completely humiliated never to recover belying the comeback kid moniker he earned, the humanitarian relief response to Hurricane Katrina’s destruction of New Orleans, the response to 9/11, the Asian Tsunami and other disasters would have claimed more casualties because Clinton has the charisma to inspire and mobilize philanthropy. When asked, he stepped up to help. None of these globally recognized humanitarians turned their back on humanity when they had every reason to do just that. Humanity didn’t treat them very well.
The real question becomes: when we portray ourselves in this light of intolerance, demonstrate glee at the downfall of others, what do we do to our own psyches? What do we do to our own humanity? How does humanity lose both now and in the future from this brand of inhumane treatment? And how then do we create peace or a humane narrative on this planet for the humans who inhabit and inherit it? Maybe it’s a contemporary question worth looking into because it defines who we are as humans, it defines our humanity and it determines our future.
Text, Discussion Questions and Bibliography were written by: Reverend Barbara Kaufmann

Discussion Questions
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:
2a_cbldf_first_amendment_image.jpg

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law "respecting an establishment of religion." impeding the free exercise of religion, infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances.



  1. What does “freedom of speech” mean? What does it mean for/to you?
  2. What does “freedom of the press” mean? What does it mean for/to you?
  3. Do you regularly read any newspapers, magazines or periodicals? What do you read and why?
  4. Do you regularly watch certain TV programs? What do you watch and why?
  5. Do you listen to talk radio? What do you listen to and why?
  6. When you read publications, watch TV or listen to talk radio, what are you expecting from those media?
  7. How might media, journalism and television have a bias? Be slanted? Why would that happen? How?
  8. Do you expect the media to report the truth? Why or why not? How do you feel about media that invents or distorts the truth? How do you feel about being asked to be a consumer of non-truths?
  9. How do you feel about “checkbook journalism?” Is it fair? Legitimate? Morally right? Discuss.
  10. As a consumer of media, how are you impacted by that media? What are your expectations? Do you apply standards to the media? What are they?
  11. Do you believe the media are fair? Accurate? Humane? What examples can you give?
  12. As a consumer, do you feel you have a right to expect certain standards from media? What standards?
  13. As a consumer of media, do you feel you have some say or some power over what is printed or shared publicly? Or do you feel powerless?
  14. Do you have an opinion about corporate media? How do you feel about one owner owning most of the newsprint or airwaves? Explain. Do you feel it can be beneficial or detrimental to the consuner? How?
  15. Do you believe the media should follow its own guidelines with respect to what is published or reported? Why or why not?
  16. Do you feel that the public has a right to know what goes on in government? In the private lives of citizens? In the private lives of celebrities? Why or why not?
  17. Have you ever felt concern, pride, skepticism, disgust with what is being reported or how it is reported? Do you make your feelings known? How? Why do you or why do you not make them known?
  18. Many people have expressed their exasperation with media and how journalism and broadcasting has devolved from the high standards of the past that included fact checking and confirming sources and information from multiple sources before publishing something as fact. If people are fed up with the media how could they go about making their feelings known? How do you think that might change things?
  19. The media position is that they only provide what the public clamors for. You are the public. Do you feel powerless or powerful to change things? Would you consider changing your habits and your consumption of materials to support your position?
  20. In your opinion, is the media out of control? Why or why not? Should it change? How or why?
  21. Who do you believe media has the power to harm? Do you think it has harmed? How?
  22. Do you believe the media has constructed, hastened or created someone’s demise? If so, in what way? How do you feel about that?
  23. Do you believe the media has killed people? Why or why not? If so, how? How do you feel about that?
  24. Should the media target certain individuals? Why or why not? How do you feel about damage to an individual? Should the media be more humane? How?
  25. What does “fifteen minutes of fame” mean? Discuss. How would you feel and what would you do if it were your turn for the famous “fifteen minutes of fame” and the coverage was positive? What about a negative “fifteen minutes of fame?” Could that destroy your relationships? Your career? Your reputation? Your life? Discuss.
  26. Do you “vote with your dollars?” In other words, if something is sub-par to standards or needs restructuring how does the consumer go about letting the vendor know?
  27. If it were prudent to change media and how it is presented or consumed, how would you go about doing that while protecting the first amendment? Can it be done? How? Convene in groups and brainstorm ways this could be accomplished.


Bibliography
Guardian.Co.UK. “News of the World Phone Hacking,” Murdoch Papers Paid I Million Pounds to Gag Phone-hacking Victims, July 8, 2009
The Guardian is a tabloid newspaper published in the United Kingdom

Schaffer, Jack. “Murdoch’s News of The World Steps in It,” Slate Online Magazine, July 9,2009
Slate is a subsidiary of the Washington Post

PBS Frontline Documentary Series
Public Broadcasting Service’s film division produced a series of documentaries under the name Frontline

The Sunday Times
British Broadsheet Newspaper

Douglass, Susan. The Progressive: B-Net Reference Publications, April 1997
Jones, Clarence. Winning With the News Media: A Self Defense Manual when You’re the Story, 2005
A book by Clarence Jones Public Relations and Media Consultant

Cohen, Daniel. Yellow Journalism: Scandal, Sensationalism and Gossip in the Media, 2000.
Book: Twenty First Century Books publisher.

Kast, Marlise Elizabeth. Tabloid Prodigy, 2007.
Book: Running Press Publishers

Kearns, Burt. Tabloid Baby, 1999
Book: Celebrity Books Publisher

Huffington Post
American Online News Journal: Ariana Huffington Editor and Nationally Syndicated Columninst

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
National professional medical association dedicated to treating and improving the quality of life for children, adolescents, and families affected by mental and psychological disorders.

Children Now Amicus Brief and petitions to FCC
Children Now is a Research and Advocacy Organization that champions the rights of children

Columbia Journalism Review
Bi-monthly magazine publication of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism

Society of Professional Journalists
America’s most broad-based journalism organization, dedicated to the free practice of journalism and stimulating high standards of ethical behavior. Drafted journalism’s code of ethics and works to inspire and educate current and future journalists through professional development.

Princess Diana: “Editors admit guilt over death:” Telegraph.Co. UK Online Journal
Story by By Andrew Pierce, Published: 21 Aug 2007
The Telegraph is a British online journal

Wikipedia
Online Encyclopedia

Miriam Webster Dictionary
Collegiate Dictionary

Mixing It Up: Ishmael Reed, 2008
Book: Da Capo Press Publisher

“One of the Most Shameful Episodes in Journalistic History:” Charles Thomson, June 13, 2010
American Online News Journal: Ariana Huffington Editor and Nationally Syndicated Columninst

BBC Interview Martin Bashir
British Public Broadcasting Company, London

The Princess and the Press: Frontline Published Interviews with reporters speaking about Lady Diana:

  • Harry Arnold was royal reporter for The Sun, 1976-1990. He and his partner, photographer Arthur Edwards, were charged with getting the latest scoops on Charles and Diana.
  • Lord W. F. Deedes was editor of the Daily Telegraph (1974-1986) and currently is a columnist for the paper.
  • Arthur Edwards is royal photographer for The Sun and teamed up with The Sun's royal reporter, Harry Arnold, in covering Princess Diana and the Royal Family.
  • Roy Greenslade was editor of The Daily Mirror, 1990-1991, and assistant editor at The Sun for six years.
  • Glenn Harvey is a freelance photographer who covered Princess Diana.
  • Max Hastings was editor of The Daily Telegraph, 1986-1995.
  • Anthony Holden is the author of two books on Prince Charles.
  • Simon Jenkins was editor of The Times, 1990-1992.
  • Ken Lennox was royal photographer for The Daily Mirror, 1986-1994.
  • Andrew Morton is a royal reporter who has written several books on the Royal Family, including Diana: Her True Story, on which Princess Diana secretly collaborated.
  • Richard Stott was editor of The Daily Mirror, 1991-1992.
  • James Whitaker has reported on the Royal Family since the 1960s. He is The Daily Mirror's royal reporter.
  • Sir Peregrine Worsthorne is columnist for The Sunday Telegraph.
  • Friedman, Roger. Interview with Fox News




 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/w...second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/crumbling-cultural-story

A Crumbling Cultural Story


The unraveling of the myth that underpins our economic behavior

wifi_timessquare.png

Times Square by Josh Liba
by David Korten

Professional propagandists and advertisers use mass media and other instruments of cultural reproduction to control our minds and behavior, displacing authentic cultural stories with fabricated stories that support the interests of their clients. Most commonly, the goal is to get us to vote for a particular political candidate or buy a particular product. By recognizing the nature and function of culture in shaping our understanding of ourselves and our world, we can develop substantial immunity to these mind control techniques.

The financial crash of 2008 has so exposed the underlying fallacies of the fabricated story that millions of people have been shocked out of the trance.

Culture is the system of beliefs, values, perceptions, and social relations that encodes the shared learning of a particular human group essential to individual survival and orderly social function. It serves as the interpretive lens through which the human brain processes the massive flow of data from our senses to distinguish the significant from the inconsequential, assign meaning, and shape our behavior: “This plant will kill you. That one is food.”

The cultural lens reflects both the individual learning of personal experience and the shared learning of the tribe, as communicated through its framing cultural stories. These stories, which the tribe’s storytellers traditionally passed from generation to generation, shape our collective identity and relationships. “This is who we are, what we value, and how we behave.”

Stories That Light Up the Dark

ny_times_square_at_night_fisheye_lense_04_334.jpg


The experiences of our ancestors offer us wisdom for surviving today's crises.

The processes by which culture shapes our perceptions and behavior occur mostly at an unconscious level. It rarely occurs to us to ask whether the reality we perceive through the lens of the culture within which we grew up is the “true” reality. We just take for granted that it is.

For five thousand years, successful imperial rulers have maintained their power in part by controlling the story tellers to communicate fabricated cultural stories that evoke fear, alienation, learned helplessness, and a sense dependence on a strong ruler for direction and protection.

This induces a cultural trance that suppresses our inherent human capacity for responsible self-direction, sharing, and cooperation. The falsified stories create an emotional bond between the ruled and their rulers while alienating the ruled from one another and the living Earth, eroding relations of mutual self-help, and reducing the ruled to a state of resigned dependence.

Corporate advertisers and PR propagandists have mastered and professionalized the arts of cultural manipulation. Their stories lead us to base our personal identity on the corporate logos we wear, the branded products we consume, the corporation for which we work, and the Wall Street-funded political party to which we belong. At a deeper level they secure our acquiescence to Wall Street rule with a story that goes something like this:

We humans are by nature aggressively individualistic and competitive and this is all to the good. Competition is a law of nature and the driver of progress and prosperity.

It is the civic duty of the individual to compete to maximize personal financial gain. The invisible hand of the unrestrained free market channels this competitive energy to maximize efficiency, drive innovation, and optimize the allocation of resources to grow the economy and thereby bring prosperity to all.

The public interest is nothing more than the aggregation of individual interests. Those who claim otherwise are socialists who would have government take from the productive to reward the lazy and irresponsible. They would limit our freedom and kill the engine of prosperity by taxing the wealthy and regulating the corporations that bear the risks of investing in the productive, job creating enterprises on which the prosperity of all depends. Since we are each the best judge of our self-interest, government regulation and taxes are an assault on individual freedom and distort society’s priorities.

The market rewards us each in proportion to our productive contribution. Therefore, do not condemn the rich out of envy. Rather honor them for their contribution to creating a strong and prosperous America.

In our great nation, anyone can succeed who applies himself. Failure is a sign of incompetence or a flawed character.
We hear elements of this story so often they run through our heads as a constant refrain telling us that money is wealth, those who make money are creating wealth, and that we can grow the prosperity of all by freeing the wealthy from taxes and Wall Street corporations from regulation.

The financial crash of 2008 has so exposed the underlying fallacies of the fabricated story that millions of people have been shocked out of the trance. It is a moment of opportunity to penetrate the veil of illusion maintained by Wall Street’s propaganda machine and spread public awareness of possibilities for a deep financial and economic restructuring to create the world of our shared human dream.

The above article was printed in Yes Magazine, July 5, 2011 and used here with permission

david_korten.jpg
David Korten (livingeconomiesforum.org) is the author of Agenda for a New Economy, TheGreat Turning: From Empire to Earth Community, and the international best seller When Corporations Rule the World. He is board chair of YES! Magazine and co-chair of the New Economy Working Group. This Agenda for a New Economy blog series is co-sponsored byCSRwire.com and yesmagazine.org based on excerpts from Agenda for a New Economy, 2nd edition.





 
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

Easily embarrassed, he never spoke about his sexuality nor did he deny being homosexual. Michael Jackson held a great deal of affection and respect for his fans, some of whom were gay. He kept his sexual orientation undisclosed to avoid alienating any of them.

Actually Jackson denied being gay several times throughout his career.
 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence-second-edition

http://voiceseducation.org/content/memoirs-bullied-kid


Memoirs of a Bullied Kid

People Who Love Themselves Don't Bully Others

by Dan Pearce

Just to warn you, some of the things I am going to share with you today may make you uncomfortable, but the truth is often just that. Uncomfortable.

Perhaps the only image that needs to be shared in this discussion is this one, scanned in from my seventh grade yearbook. It was in 1993, and I’ll never forget the haste with which I permanently disfigured my own photo so that those in my future would never be able to see that hideous, fat loser from my past.
memoirs-bullied-kid-danoah.jpg


The image above is just one small symptom of a much larger problem, “bullying”

The recent news events about the drastic and tragic bullying going on have caused me to pause and lend incommodious thought to my younger years. You see, I haven’t always been the extremely confident and sexy man who you know as Single Dad Laughing. There was a large span of my young life when I hated myself, I hated my life, I hated the world, and my daily wish was that it would all end. Somehow. Some way.

Forgive the length of this post, but a real discussion about bullying is not something that can take place over a few paragraphs. Please read to the end; I have put everything I have into this message because I can no longer sit back and do nothing about this ongoing problem which is leading our children to kill themselves and others. I just can’t anymore. Not knowing what I know about it.

I’m sure your heart has raced, again and again, as you watch and read of these horrible events going on around us. Children retaliating. Children hurting. Children dying. This bullying is an enduring endemic right now, for which there are solutions.

I only hope that my words today will be potent enough to spread to hundreds of thousands, or if God is on my side, millions. I pray for the right words to help me do my part in the quest to drastically reduce these heart-wrenching events. I have faith that those who read this will have the courage to share it, look at it, and change it.

No part of me wants to write this. The truth of it is something I’ve never openly discussed, with anybody. It is something I’ve never had the courage to confront. It’s somewhere to which I have never allowed my mind to wander. And yet, it’s something that has probably had more impact on me than just about anything else in my past.

I was bullied.

Repeatedly, and without end.

Up until fifth grade, I had friends. I fit in. I was “normal”. We moved around a lot, but it wasn’t a big deal. I don’t remember any serious heartache or sadness during my first ten years of life.
But in fifth grade, all of that changed. In fifth grade, somehow a permanent target got placed on my back.

It was my first day at a new school. The desks were grouped into sets of four. At the beginning of class, the teacher introduced me to my pupils and assigned me to an empty seat. As soon as I sat down, the blond hair boy sitting across from me (we will call him John) snickered the words “hey fatty”, aimed at me, and just loud enough for the class to hear. The students around me erupted with impaling giggles. The teacher only said, “John, that’s enough”.

I felt my heart throbbing in my throat. I wanted to run crying from the room. Was I fat? I never thought so. Instead of crying, I forced myself to act unaffected and shrug it off.

Every bullied kid quickly learns that to do anything but shrug it off, will always make it worse.
By the end of that first day, John had marked me as his territory. He had a friend, Mike, and the two of them spent day one making sure I knew that I was unwelcome and unwanted. They called me every “fat name” they could think of, including fat-ass, fat-lard, and fat-boy. By the end of the day, they had rallied at least half of my classmates to refer to me simply as “Lardo”. I went home that first day and told my parents that “school was fine”. Then I went to my room and cried.

On day two, the “fat” comments got worse. Most of the class was now participating. Not one person defended me. Not one person stepped in. The teacher heard some of the worst of it, and never offered me assistance. At recess, I asked another boy where the bathroom was. He pointed to the entrance of the girl’s bathroom. Not realizing what it was, I went inside. Girls started screaming, and I ran back out to a playground full of pointing fingers and raucous laughter.

Day three. Worse. Day four. Worse. Day five. Worse.

Day six. I went home from school and began bawling uncontrollably to my mother. I remember it as if it was this morning. She kept asking me what was wrong. I finally mustered the words, “this one kid keeps calling me fat”. I didn’t tell her the whole truth. The real truth. She gave me a hug and told me it would be okay. Things would get better.

They didn’t. Day seven. Worse. Day 10 Worse. Day 30. Way worse.

Because, John and Mike never stopped. They never gave me a day off. And while their bullying hit maximum levels within a few days of school starting, the self loathing grew until I actually hated myself. You see, I actually began to believe that I was all those things. I believed I was fat. I believed I was ugly. And for me, every day it did get worse, because every day their words and their punishments took me to a level deeper and sadder than the day before.

It was by the end of fifth grade that I officially hated myself. My first day at that school was just seven weeks before we let out for the summer. It took only seven weeks to siphon out every droplet of love that I had for myself.

The next year brought no better days.

It got so bad, and my despair grew so deep, that by the middle of sixth grade the only thing I could do was wish that John and Mike would die. I would pray nightly for something, anything, anybody to come and kill them. I would fantasize about gruesome car accidents, fire-filled buildings, and random violence coming to my aid. I would not have cried one tear had those two boys ended up covered in dirt, resting eternally in pine boxes. In fact, I would have been happy. Very, very happy.

But, they never died. And my life got worse.

And then junior high hit. John and Mike kept dishing out their normal routine. I kept praying for them to die. God never did answer that prayer. At least not the way I wanted him to.

And I, the fat-ass, ugly, and worthless seventh grader, became a target for bigger, more vicious bullies. Little did I know that my life was about to get a lot worse.

Besides the bigger bullies’ ongoing determination to make sure the “fat names” grew harsher and wider-spread, they started in on new bullying tactics like sneaking up and cramming food from the floor into my mouth, knocking my lunch tray to the ground, throwing dangerous objects at me, tripping me with the intent to seriously hurt me, shoving me with the intent to seriously hurt me, and pushing me with the intent to seriously hurt me.

In eighth grade, I stopped crying at night.

I just went to sleep and prayed that God, the devil, anybody would kill those boys. I wanted them gone. I would have given anything for them to be gone.

In ninth grade, the girls started getting involved. The popular, “hot” girls started doing things like asking me out, then laughing in my face before I could answer. They would invite me to come to parties or hang-outs and then laugh some more when they saw that I had hopes that their invitations were sincere. It only took a few of these moments before I believed that any desire, by any girl, to hang out with me would always be a joke. At the end of ninth grade, a “hot” girl approached me in the hallway, and asked me if I wanted to see her breasts. Most teenage boys would be delighted. I just turned and walked away, having been hurt by this girl more times than I could count. She laughed and started yelling down the hall that Dan Pearce was a faggot.

Death. Sweet death. I would have given anything for it to come. To me. To them. It didn’t matter.
On the last day of school that year, some of the bullies on my school bus started pushing me toward the exit and out the doors. I fell backward and landed on my “fat ass”. I remember the laughter that erupted from the school bus windows when I hit the pavement. I remember my peers’ boisterous faces glued to each pane of glass. I remember looking up at the school bus driver as he said, “you guys knock it off and go sit down”. He then looked at me and said, “are you getting on or not?” I shook my head, quickly gathered my things, and ran somewhere. I don’t remember where. Anywhere but there.

I do remember hearing the squeak of the bus doors closing. I do remember the sound of the engine, revving as the bus pulled away. I do remember crying that day.

The school bus driver didn’t help me. In fact, never once did a single person ever help me. Never once did a single kind soul put their arm around me and show me love. Never once did a teacher comfort me when they witnessed it. Never once did a classmate speak up when they heard it. Never once did anybody do anything.

Because that day, the only thing that happened after that was a phone call to my mom to tell her I missed the bus. I’m sure she asked me how my day was. I’m sure I told her “fine”.

And the people who actually did love me, never knew that any of this was going on. Besides that one day in fifth grade when I came home bawling to my mother, I never told my parents . My siblings never knew. My best friend (and only real friend) didn’t even know because when he was around, the bullies left me alone. I wish he could have been around all the time.

Nobody knew that I wanted to die. Nobody knew that I had horrible and constant fantasies of death aimed at others. Nobody knew that I hated every teacher that never did anything. Nobody knew that I hated every classmate who refused to say a kind word to me for fear of becoming targets themselves. Nobody knew any of it.

What people did know was that I was “shy”. What people did know was that I was easily angered. What people did know was that I was constantly mean to my siblings. What people did know was that I was “fine”, and that that was going to be my answer any time they asked. People knew (because I constantly told them) that “I just wanted to be left alone”. And so they left me alone, the way anybody would leave a huffing porcupine alone.

Thank God that life improved for me, and in high school something inside of me changed.

Thank God that something in my life triggered a slow path to self-belief. Thank God that something changed. I don’t know what changed. I honestly don’t. What I do know is that I probably wouldn’t have made it through high school if the serious bullying had kept happening.

Sure, John and Mike shoved me against an occasional locker all the way to the end of our Senior year, but because of the change within me, because I suddenly found the courage to make new friends, and because I started to love myself again, the bullying ended, almost completely.

But this post is not about me. I only am using my story to put a face on the problem. I pray that I was sincere enough, and “real” enough, to help you understand what bullied kids go through, and what thoughts bullied kids think. Because it’s those thoughts that lead some kids to drastic ends.

It is terrifying to think of others thinking of me in those memories. I’ve spent my life trying to hide that I was ever that kid. Even the incredible, wonderful, handsome, intelligent person that I am now is not enough to guard me from my own dangerous thoughts when those memories come to the surface. Even as I’m writing this, I so desperately want to delete it and write something funny. But that’s what I’ve done my entire life. And change doesn’t happen when people with voices don’t use them.

I won’t delete it. Not this time. Instead, let’s talk about what we can do to end the bullying.

There are two people we need to discuss. The bullies and the bullied. Let’s start with the bullies.

I am going on thirty-one years old. I have spent the second half of my life studying self-esteem, self-love, and self-mastery. In the last several years, I have been blessed with the perspective to look back at those “horrible” years, and realize that the bullying I was receiving was simply the symptom of the bullying that the bullies were receiving in their own lives, whether it was their family, other bullies, or the “Perfection” going on around them. You see, I’ve learned one universal truth. People who love themselves, don’t hurt other people. The more we hate ourselves, the more we want others to suffer. Every bully that bullied me (and by the end of junior high there were at least a dozen of them) was a desperate and hurting individual. The victim of something going on around them. A soul that was probably crying in solitude as often as I was, even if the crying was silent.

And so, I will ask you now to not hate the bullies. Experience tells me that hating them, or being angry with them, will always make it worse. Instead, put your arm around them. Love them. Tell them that they are valuable. Tell them that you expect great things from them. They will stop the bullying. They will stop, because they will start to love themselves. And people who love themselves don’t bully others.

And with the bullies, it’s really that simple. If they actually believe that somebody loves them and believes in them, they will love themselves, they will become better people, and many will even become saviors to the bullied.

If you are a parent to a child who is less than kind to other kids, I’d very much suggest you read, You just broke your child. Congratulations (it follows here). In fact, every parent should read it. As much as we may not want to mentally go there, a lot of the problem may lie in us. If the problem doesn’t, the solution does. We all must understand that we have the obligation, as parents, to help our kids love themselves.
Now, let’s talk about the bullied. If you haven’t noticed, it’s not generally the bullies that are killing themselves, slaughtering their schoolmates, or building bombs in their bedrooms. It’s the bullied that are doing that. And my heart literally is pounding through my chest right now because I know just how easy it would have been to prevent most of these incidents. I also know all too well, the consuming thoughts that constantly go through the minds of the bullied.

Please.

So many kids would still be alive right now, if somebody, anybody, would have done something. So many beautiful, incredible, wonderful souls would still be walking among us if somebody, anybody, would have done something.

And what is that something that you and I must do?

Part of the answer is a mother putting her arm around her daughter over and over again, until she is not able to keep from telling the truth about why she is sad, quiet, or angry.

Part of the answer is a father starting a fun project or taking his son fishing for some one on one time. Enough hours under the hood of a car or on the bank of a river will alwaysbring out desperate truths.

Part of the answer is a grandfather taking his grandchild out for ice cream and simply asking how the other kids treat her at school. For some reason, good grandparents can usually cut straight to the point.

Part of the answer is a teacher doing more than simply telling the bullies to stop. The answer is a warm hand on her pupil’s shoulder, a listening ear, warm words of importance, and then finding a reason for the child to come back the next day, and the next, until that child knows that his presence is cherished.

Part of the answer is a youth director dedicating an entire night to the topic of bullying, and what each child can do when they are the ones being bullied, what to do if they see people being bullied, or what they can change if they realize that they themselves are guilty of bullying others.
And while each of those small parts of the answer are crucial, there is one big part to the answer.

Peers. Classmates. Fellow pupils. Did you know that you each have more power over healing the bullied and the bullies than anyone on earth. More than their parents. More than their religious leaders. More than their teachers. The majority of the answer lies in you, and it’s simple.

The answer is as simple as you having the courage to find the kid who just got bullied and telling her, “don’t listen to those guys. My friends and I are always talking about how awesome you are.”

The answer is as simple as you having the courage to then invite her to sit with you at lunch. And it will take courage.

The answer is as simple as you having the courage to find the bully, and in private telling him that you don’t understand why he’s doing that, because you always thought he was a bigger person than that.

The answer is as simple as you having the courage to find the bully, and in private ask her if she’s had a rough day. Care about her. Tell her you were wondering because of the way she was treating your classmate, and you feel she may be misunderstood. You will be amazed what you will learn.

The answer is as simple as you having the courage to find the boy who just got shoved or tripped and asking him if there is anything you can do to help him. You see, just knowing that you care will plant seeds for his own courage to blossom.

The answer is as simple as you.

The answer is as simple as you having the courage.

Do you have courage like that? I hope so. I don’t want to see any more kids die.

What it really all boils down to is that the answer is as simple as love. Repeated, and constant love.

In the arena of bullying, I can guarantee that any child who takes his own life, does so under the assumption that nobody actually values having her around. I can guarantee that any child who takes his own life or the life of another, did so because he had been brutally pushed to the edge of a cliff, and ultimately felt he had to choose between his life or the lives of his relentless pursuers, because somebody is going over the edge.

You see, the bullied aren’t blessed with the perspective of temporariness. The bullied aren’t blessed with the ability to think in terms of the future. The bullied have only one thing on their mind. Survival. And some bullied kids, unfortunately, are pushed so far, and want to remain living so badly, that they do desperate and illogical things to survive.

You know what else I can guarantee? That one person… just one person really loving and spending serious time with any of these kids who have taken these extremes could have made all the difference. I am not talking about five minutes or an afternoon. I’m talking about a long-term commitment to love.

The stories we see on the news… they are the extremes. The real truth is, way more of our children are being bullied and bullying others than we ever would like to admit to ourselves. Some bullied children receive it in small doses, some in life-ending amounts. Sometimes it’s as “minor” as making fun of clothes or name-calling. Sometimes it’s extreme physical or sexual abuse. No matter what kind of bullying is going on, it hurts, and it has lasting effects on our children.

So, please, I beg you. If you’re an adult, put your arm around your own kids. Put your arm around your neighbor’s kids. Put your arm around every kid you can. If you’re a student, put your arm around the bully and the bullied. You simply don’t know what person needs to feel like somebody loves her. You simply don’t know what person’s life you will save by showing him that, today, you care. And tomorrow you’ll still care.

Bullying needs to be openly discussed with every single child and teenager. If we don’t discuss it, it may be your child or your friend on the news being shot dead at school, or maybe, God forbid, the one standing behind the barrel of a gun. Every bullied kid that committed atrocities was someone’s kid. Every child that has been shot or killed was someone’s kid. Every child that has taken his or her own life was someone’s kid. Don’t let any of those be your kid. Don’t let any of those be your peers.

I am not being dramatic. This is a big and overwhelming problem. I hear over, and over, the parents of the victims say, “I never knew there was a problem.”

If we don’t, as a population, make this issue a priority, we will continue to see this horribleness get worse. We will continue finding our children hanging by their necks, lifeless in their closets. We will continue to see the drug problem get worse. We will continue to see the gang problem get worse. We will continue to hear of mass shootings. We will continue to have children who have no self-esteem. We will continue to have children who hate themselves. And they likely will carry that hate through their entire lives.

You see, I am one of the lucky ones. I am one of the ones who was able to figure out that life can get better. I am one of the ones who grew to love myself, believe I am attractive, and believe I am worth something. And, sadly, I am the exception. Most kids who are severely bullied, never grow up to be anything. Because nobody ever did anything to help them. Some of them don’t even live long enough to grow up at all.

Please. Today, do something to save our youth from this terrible disease. Today, find a child or a classmate who is timid, shy, closed-off, or sad and do something, anything to help him or her feel love. Today, change the future for somebody incredible.

Share this post. Share it with everybody you know, no matter if you’ve experienced the many sides of bullying or not. Immediately post it on Facebook and twitter, along with a personal plea for others to read it and share it themselves, and then do it again tomorrow. Make sure that this is read by every young person you know. If you are one of the young people, do your part to make this spread. If you are a teacher, read this with your classes. If you are anybody who has any influence over our youth, use it.

We all need to love our youth enough to help make a difference today. Our youth need to love each other enough to believe this message and then find courage to do something about it.
You never know who you will save, and all because you took five seconds to copy and paste a link. All because you had the courage to share the perspective of somebody who has been there, and cares. Sharing this has nothing to do with me or my blog. It has everything to do with the fact that change like this can’t happen without numbers. Let’s see if we can get half a million people sharing this on Facebook. That would be power to make change.

I believe we can, because I believe that you are as ready to put an end to these news stories as I am.

If I could give one message to the bullies, it would be this: You are incredible. You are bound for great things. You have the potential to be anybody you want to be. There are people who believe in you. There are people who love you. Be what we know you can be, even if you don’t believe in yourself right now.

If I could give one message to the bullied, it would be this: You are not alone. You are strong. You have a voice. You are beautiful. You are intelligent. There are many kids who want to speak up for you, but they don’t because they are afraid of becoming bullied themselves. There are many of us in the world who love you. I love you. You have the power to end this now. That power is in your voice. Find it. Once you use your voice, bullies want no part of you. If you feel that you lack the courage, fake it until you do. Finally, I know it’s hard to see a life that exists beyond high school. It is there, and it is beautiful.

If you are in school right now and are experiencing heavy bullying, and you ever need an understanding ear, I’m here for you. Send me an email. My address is at the top of this page. I can’t promise an immediate response, but I will respond.

And finally, everybody please leave a comment (even if anonymously). If you have ever been bullied, please share your experiences with it here. Most of the world doesn’t understand what it’s like to be in your shoes, and this is a great place to start finding your voice. If you have ever witnessed someone being bullied, please share your feelings about it here. If you have ever been the bully, please share your perspective. I won’t judge you. I love you. The true power of this post will come with what you share below.

I thank God that we are not our past. Any of us. We are our future and nothing else.

Dan Pearce, Single Dad Laughing

The above article is used with permission.

Source: sdl (Single Dad Laughing); http://www.danoah.com/2010/10/memoirs-of-bullied-kid.html

dan-pearce-single-dad-laughing.jpg


Dan Pearce is a writer and an artist who has been involved in a number of various careers. He is the founder of Single Dad Laughing and author of a new book, The Real Dad Rules.
 
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

It sucks that kids are going to such lengths as to taking their own lives because of bullying (and a lot of them are because they are gay and society is telling them they are evil/less-than/disgusting/other nonsense.)
(I'm an easy going guy, not one to get mad easily. However, any hate/rage/overly religious/disgusting comments against gay people gets me livid.)

Middle and high school can be an extremely difficult time for a lot of kids. I can't even imagine how much worse it is NOW in the social media age. When I was in high school, the extent of social media was simply email and message boards.

I really wish all those kids who took their own life really knew how much life gets better after grade school. Horrible people will always be in your life, but you aren't forced to sit amongst them once you graduate.
 
Last edited:
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence

Voices Education Project, Words and Violence, Third Edition - August 29, 2013 is here! Dedicated to Michael Jackson and Lady Diana, the third edition of Words and Violence is filled with new sections on music and art, curriculum activities and additional in-depth articles. http://voiceseducation.org/content/words-and-violence

For the third year, Voices has compiled a new edition of Words and Violence. The emphasis in this edition is on performing arts as a tool of communication. Learn more about the concept of story and the social responsibility artists have to their public. View excerpts of films made by award winning filmmaker, Ron Haese, who works to make the world a better place by inspiring kids to make the world a better place in which to live. Learn how music instructor and composer, Jay Thomas, has written music that is an anthem about bullying; and read how dance can tell a story.

Hip-Hop has been prominent in the music scene for the last few decades. Learn more of its history and meet Head-Roc, the Hip-Hop Mayor of DC. Words and Violence also features three of Head-Roc's videos in this edition.

Dance is a powerful tool for communication as well as offering an avenue to peace. Learn more about the Call for Peace dance troupe and their commitment to unite more than 26 dance company directors and performers representing more than 10 different cultures in a theatrical performance entitled “Dancing the Dream: A New Hope for Humanity.” Two memoirs in the form a case study round out this new edition: "If I Am Not for Me" by Joanna and "Black Girl Lessons" by Jamia N. Wilson.

A new annotated bibliography on Bullying has been added to this edition of Words and Violence.
 
http://voiceseducation.org/

http://voiceseducation.org/node/5981

Introduction to the Third Edition

THE PERFORMING ARTS AS EDUCATOR AND HEALER
This 3rd Edition of Words and Violence is, I think, our best work yet. We have invited some new contributors who work in the performing arts. The performing arts used as tools of communication and change by gifted artists, can have a staggering impact on lives. The arts and artists change the world.

From the Stage, to Theater to Film to Television… performing arts have historically served more as entertainment than education. That is changing. Art as a vehicle for informing, raising consciousness and brokering a new and improved world has opened minds and opened new vistas. When images are added to accompany words, the power of the work is amplified.

Live performances are powerful as the audience becomes part of the interchange to a new awareness. Dance uses another language to convey a message—the body becomes the palette or the original score or the script that tells story. Film combined with social media has real power. And like anything else that comes along and re-writes the “script” that is current reality and the world, there are advantages and dangers. The dangers and advantages are exponential because of the scope of the audience that may now be reached through these mediums. The opportunities are equally exponential.

The scope of impact and audience now available to artists makes it implicit that careful examination of the message, its impact and potential outcomes be responsibly considered in the making of performance arts and its impact on the audience. The implied responsibility begs the questions: Is this feature death dealing or life affirming? In other words, does it expand and contribute to dignity and humanity or does it contract and devalue humankind? Does it make the world better or bitter? Does it evoke and invoke human brilliance or foster human darkness? Human life and its conscious evolution hangs in the balance.

We all know the dangers and the impact of bullying. We have seen its effects and many of us have been touched by the losses it brings. Entire libraries have been written about bullying but bullying has not stopped and children are still hurting. Suicide is the number one cause of death among teenagers. We have done a good job of demonstrating how bullying harms. Libraries have been written primarily for educators and clergy and civic leaders trying their best to stem the tide of bully violence. But kids are still dying. What now?

Perhaps we need to look at the root causes of bullying and the cures. In this third edition of “Words and Violence” we invite the performing arts and artists to the inner sanctum to take on power, bullying and change as they perform the way to solutions.
~ Barbara Kaufmann, Founder Words and Violence


<footer id="book-navigation-2005" class="book-navigation" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, helvetica, verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21px;"></footer>
 
Last edited:
Re: Voices Education "Words and Violence" Curriculum - inspired by Michael Jackson and Lady Diana

Thanks windy :) For the all the Great articles from Voiceseducation.org
 
Back
Top