UPDATE : JFF to Remember MJ @ Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approved / $75 for Fans

Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I just hope the Estate will cancel this event and have a serious talk with the Jacksons regarding using Michael's name.

And I hope the kids' lawyer will talk to the Jacksons about using the kids as an attraction for their events, auctions etc. It's not right.

They think by using Katherine, the event will have more credibility. But these schemes are starting to have the opposite effect. They are tarnishing Katherine's name.

They use every time the name of Katherine but the master mind behind all this is Joe

you are absolutely right in each point.
-_-
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Furthermore all the recent events (belt, museum and now this celebration) made me believe that Joe doesn't accept the executors (well no surprise there as well as he has the lawsuit) and their power. To me it looks like even if the executors were willing to sit down and talk, Joe isn't...

I agree.

In my opinion, Joe Jackson doesn't just want to talk to the executors, he wants to replace them. WITH HIMSELF!

For Joe Jackson, there is no need for the 2 John's, because Joe Jackson can do their job, all by himself. (As if!)
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I have a BETTER question: Why won't the Estate 'executors' say clearly to the Jackson family: "Even though Michael left us in charge of the estate, considering you're being Michael's family, it would be good for us to work together and consult together to work on various projects to honor Michael and to keep his legacy alive?" How about THAT?

Regardless of what you all may think of the Jackson family, regardless of what they may have said and done, they are Michael's family. It's deplorable the Jacksons (ESPECIALLY Michael's parents--who birthed him) are expected to stay on a very short leash and cow-tow to the 'executors' and get slapped down with constant attitude of "Nope, can't do this", Nope, can't do that", "We OWN Michael's likeness...now step off you useless nuisance peasants". I'm not suprised the media is going along with this attitude, acting like lap dogs seeking comments of approval or disapproval from the 'executors' whenever any Jackson member makes any type of attempt to do anything in tribute to Michael; but for fans to go along with it without question is pathetic.

I think I can understand your post. I mean... it must be terribly difficult that someone else "owns" the name/image of your very own son/brother/father :doh: So yes, sure, they should work together for it is the very same man they should honor.

Unfortunately, all facts lead to just one thing and that is Mr. Joe Jackson's private agenda for commercial gain, for profit. That's what hurts the most. I understand they have to pay for the costs of any event, but... please... this one and the one of auctioning the signatures of the kids really show little (if any) respect for his own son/grandchildren.

It's such a sad situation, so much money involved, so many big egos, so many hidden agendas, so many lies and so little truth. I just hope the kids will be left out of this mess. They are not "things", they are not "attractions".
 
Last edited:
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I agree.

In my opinion, Joe Jackson doesn't just want to talk to the executors, he wants to replace them. WITH HIMSELF!

For Joe Jackson, there is no need for the 2 John's, because Joe Jackson can do their job, all by himself. (As if!)

Good point.
Each of his actions looks like a slap on the Estate's face.
I mean... it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know he needs the Estate approval :doh:
Maybe it's just his way to fight them.
Well, he can't do what he wants, BUT using the kids.
That's simply wrong.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I have a BETTER question: Why won't the Estate 'executors' say clearly to the Jackson family: "Even though Michael left us in charge of the estate, considering you're being Michael's family, it would be good for us to work together and consult together to work on various projects to honor Michael and to keep his legacy alive?" How about THAT?

Regardless of what you all may think of the Jackson family, regardless of what they may have said and done, they are Michael's family. It's deplorable the Jacksons (ESPECIALLY Michael's parents--who birthed him) are expected to stay on a very short leash and cow-tow to the 'executors' and get slapped down with constant attitude of "Nope, can't do this", Nope, can't do that", "We OWN Michael's likeness...now step off you useless nuisance peasants". I'm not suprised the media is going along with this attitude, acting like lap dogs seeking comments of approval or disapproval from the 'executors' whenever any Jackson member makes any type of attempt to do anything in tribute to Michael; but for fans to go along with it without question is pathetic.

all I can say to this post....WHY is it even in death the Jackson's still think that Michael is their cash cow.???? ALL Michael EVER wanted from his father was to be loved....NOT to be seen as a meal ticket. Joe keeps proving time after time that this is all he EVER saw Michael as. Do I think that Joe loved Michael...yes I do....but NOT only as a father should love a son...Joe loved Michael for becoming everything that he himself never was....the only difference is that Michael...WAS NOTHING like Joe.....and Joe couldn't stand that. ** Comment removed by StaceyMJ **
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I agree, he should be able to honor his son, BUT why does that honor come with a price tag. Why do folks have to buy expensive tickets so that Joe Jackson can honor his son?

HONOR is free, in my opinion.

It shouldn't be a price tag. In fact, I think this is tacky. I was hoping the family would gather as they all did several weeks before MJ's passing. I was hoping they'd honor him privately.

BUT...if there is going to be something more elaborate with friends, celebrities, etc. there is going to be a bill. It doesn't even seem right that Michael's estate, and therefore his children, should be paying for it. But if a third party and attendees are willing to, so be it.

I'm no Joe fan, but someone telling him yay or nay on using the name and likeness of HIS son on the anniversary of his death just doesn't seem right to me.

Did the family have to get permission to use Michael's likeness at his funeral?
Yeah, I know that's a stretch, but I just think the executors could be handling this situation better than making comments to the press bringing attention again to their power and Joe's lack thereof for this particular occasion.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Did the family have to get permission to use Michael's likeness at his funeral?

I don't like to get technical but by paying for the funeral costs (at forest lawn) including the clothing costs for family (as reported by the media), executors gave their implicit approval..
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I'm no Joe fan, but someone telling him yay or nay on using the name and likeness of HIS son on the anniversary of his death just doesn't seem right to me.

Actually it was MICHAEL, himself, who said no to his father.

He said NO to his father when he didn't include his father in his will. It would have taken Michael 2 seconds to write something in his will that would have given his father OFFICIAL permission to do "whatever," but for some reason, Michael didn't do that.

Family or no family, why can't Michael's wishes just be respected and upheld. That's the way Michael obviously wanted it, so why can't it just be that way?

Is it totally impossible for which ever family member to earn money for their various projects on their OWN merit?
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I don't like to get technical but by paying for the funeral costs (at forest lawn) including the clothing costs for family (as reported by the media), executors gave their implicit approval..
Obviously since they even funded their (the family's) clothes for the funeral .. that was a first for me too.. to make the deceased pay for their clothes.. letting Janet pay for the memorial clothes is one thing, but letting the dead to pay for their clothes is something else. I' would be hella ashamed of such an act but I guess it has to do with dignity and morals which some obviously lack
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Joe is always Joe. however i don't think he is a bad man. in his mind, he is MJ's father. of course he has right to do a tribute for his son.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I don't like to get technical but by paying for the funeral costs (at forest lawn) including the clothing costs for family (as reported by the media), executors gave their implicit approval..

how come some jackson family fans don't remember this when they go on hating excecutor on everything they do.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I am sick and tired of Joe and his money making schemes and cringe-worthy behaviour. He should go and sit in the corner and be very very quiet .
He makes me sick. He ruined Michael's life with his abuse and used Michael as a human cash machine when he was alive. No change on the latter then.
God bless the MJ3. I hope they are protected from the evil that surronds them.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Joe is always Joe. however i don't think he is a bad man. in his mind, he is MJ's father. of course he has right to do a tribute for his son.
BS, Joseph only cares about money he would do anything for money he would even sell his soul to the devil for money.
Give him money and there is not a thing a man like Joseph wouldn't do.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I think I can understand your post. I mean... it must be terribly difficult that someone else "owns" the name/image of your very own son/brother/father :doh: So yes, sure, they should work together for it is the very same man they should honor.

Unfortunately, all facts lead to just one thing and that is Mr. Joe Jackson's private agenda for commercial gain, for profit. That's what hurts the most. I understand they have to pay for the costs of any event, but... please... this one and the one of auctioning the signatures of the kids really show little (if any) respect for his own son/grandchildren.

It's such a sad situation, so much money involved, so many big egos, so many hidden agendas, so many lies and so little truth. I just hope the kids will be left out of this mess. They are not "things", they are not "attractions".

Hmmmm..last time I checked, the Michael Jackson Estate own Michael Jackson's image. So I don't know who you are referring to here.

John Branca, John McClain, Katherine Jackson and the three kids do not OWN MJ's image. I think people should understand the difference before personal property and an estate asset.

When Prince, Paris & Blanket, take over...then ...they will officially own their father's image. Until then...his image is own by his estate..in trust.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

It's getting pretty heated in here, can we just take a step back and cool it down please. :flowers:
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I don't like to get technical but by paying for the funeral costs (at forest lawn) including the clothing costs for family (as reported by the media), executors gave their implicit approval..

I know...my point was to show a case where approval should not be necessary. Of course, his family could use his likeness at his funeral. They definitely should not need anybody's approval, implicit or otherwise for the use of his likeness there. I'm not relating it to cost, but the use of his likeness in a particular instance.

Actually it was MICHAEL, himself, who said no to his father.

He said NO to his father when he didn't include his father in his will. It would have taken Michael 2 seconds to write something in his will that would have given his father OFFICIAL permission to do "whatever," but for some reason, Michael didn't do that.

Family or no family, why can't Michael's wishes just be respected and upheld. That's the way Michael obviously wanted it, so why can't it just be that way?

I'm just saying on the anniversary of his death, his family should be able to use his photos and name in celebration of his life without major controversy.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I know...my point was to show a case where approval should not be necessary. Of course, his family could use his likeness at his funeral. They definitely should not need anybody's approval, implicit or otherwise for the use of his likeness there. I'm not relating it to cost, but the use of his likeness in a particular instance.



I'm just saying on the anniversary of his death, his family should be able to use his photos and name in celebration of his life without major controversy.

Of course, that would be fine. But the fact that money is being made complicates things, which I'm sure the organisers/Joe are well aware of.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Of course, that would be fine. But the fact that money is being made complicates things, which I'm sure the organisers/Joe are well aware of.

absolutely correct..

Now I mentioned this before there are some pictures that are fair use or free to use under the approval of the photographers, generally publicity photos will fall under this category as well..

also you can use a celebrity's name for educational or informational reasons (to inform, educate or express an opinion) - such as I can shoot a documentary and call it "the truth about Michael Jackson" or any media can write a news story about Michael using his name - none of which would require an approval from the estate.


Now look to my posts, I have used Michael Jackson's name and I have his picture at my avatar (and signature).. and this is true for all of us here..

You don't see the estate telling me (or any of us if that matters) that I/we didn't get their approval, well simply because I'm/we're just using his name to express an opinion, I/we do not claim I/we represent Michael and I'm/we're not making a single cent using his name, image or likeliness.

also remember the justice4mj's interaction with the estate? they didn't ask them to change their name, they didn't ask them to close the website etc , they just asked them to stop selling t shirts with MJ on them.
 
Last edited:
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I'm just saying on the anniversary of his death, his family should be able to use his photos and name in celebration of his life without major controversy.

The problem is not using his name in celebration, the problem is using his name in celebration for the sole purpose of profiting from said celebration.

Why can't they do something "in celebration" that does not include profiting?

I mean, Michael opened up Neverland a zillion times and never charged a penny. Why can't they come up with a celebration that is not related to making a QUICK buck?
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Why can't they do something "in celebration" that does not include profiting?
then there would be no point in doing it lol
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

The problem is not using his name in celebration, the problem is using his name in celebration for the sole purpose of profiting from said celebration.

Why can't they do something "in celebration" that does not include profiting?

I mean, Michael opened up Neverland a zillion times and never charged a penny. Why can't they come up with a celebration that is not related to making a QUICK buck?

see that's the part few people don't want to understand.
simple example is Michael never charged to go to Neverlad,his concert tickets weren't that expensive ,heck he always kept some seats for underprivileged, i don't see that is happening here.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I don't think it would be good for Joe or anyone to be given full reign to do what he likes, it doesn't feel right for him or anyone to be able to make money from MJ's name apart from those MJ named in his Will..though Katherine is named in the Will, but still this is Joe also.

I do understand though that it does seem strange that his parents who biologically created him and gave him his name, aren't allowed to do an anniversary event in his name, this one time. Though it's the money that's the issue rather than the use of the name and image right? This event is suppoed to be to raise money for the Jackson Family Foundation Museum and Performing Arts Centre. An event does cost money to put on and the guy said they are hoping to break even...so how much money would they get for the Foundation anyway? It's just a shame the family can't work with the Estate in a civilised way. Why does everything have to be a fight. Couldn't they have agreed a deal with the Estate which gives them a portion of the money so this would have been ok?

Something I don't understand, and probably Ivy would be able to help here, is that there are Michael Jackson tributes going on around the world - concerts/club nights/conventions etc. that people have to pay for which use MJ's name - like there were after MJ died. There are going to be some more this anniversary. Some are organised by fans for example the Make a Better World Foundation - http://mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92159 These should have to be Estate approved too then yes? Will they have to be stopped?

I'm not just talking about the big events like the one that is supposed to be in Rome - (was that Estate approved? Travis and the TII dancers were supposed to perform there and Marlon was said to be involved) Or the Fanvention (What happened to that? Is that estate approved?) Or even for example this one that was in Malta last year - http://www.maltamediaonline.com/?p=11931 - the money went to charity.

I'm also talking about if a local club does a Michael Jackson night and charges entry, or if there is a small Michael Jackson tribute concert/event type thing somewhere, is this illegal without Estate approval? I don't think the Estate would know about an event in my local town..so that would just happen.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

And I think we cannot forget the fact that the family isn't even giving the executors the chance to say, "No." They are just doing thimgs on their own without even giving the estate the chance. If he is so business minded, you've got to go the proper people first. He seems to be missing that step.

Maybe the estate would be more willing to work with the family if they were aware. And if the family would stop throwing together things so haphazardly and actually sat down and planned something together instead rushing to put things out that has to be cancelled because of being ill planned they woud be more willing to participate as well.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

Maybe the estate would be more willing to work with the family if they were aware. And if the family would stop throwing together things so haphazardly and actually sat down and planned something together instead rushing to put things out that has to be cancelled because of being ill planned they woud be more willing to participate as well.

That would definitely be an appropriate starting point.

Instead of what we see now, which is basically EVERY man for himself.

i.e. Jermaine wants to do a tribute-by himself; Marlon participating in the Rome tribute, but Randy is against the Rome tribute; next up is Joe Jackson and the Jackson Family Foundation's Gary Project, something Randy says he and his siblings know nothing about and are not involved with.

So, in my opinion, before they can even attempt to sit down with the executors, they need to sit down with EACH OTHER and figure out what they want to do as a "family unity" and not each family member going off in a different direction, which to date, has lead nowhere. (Not that I see any of this ever happening. I just believe if they are looking for any sort of credibility, this would be a very good 1st step for the family to take.)
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I agree.

In my opinion, Joe Jackson doesn't just want to talk to the executors, he wants to replace them. WITH HIMSELF!

For Joe Jackson, there is no need for the 2 John's, because Joe Jackson can do their job, all by himself. (As if!)

Even if they are removed, Katherine has priority to be appointed administrator because she's a beneficiary or/and the guardian of the kids.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

@Rockin

they cannot control and monitor every single one out there. so there will be several things that happen without the approval of the estate that will take advantage of Michael's name. some events will happen and the estate will not even have an idea about it, but in Joe's case they are widely publicized.

"Money goes to charity" is the key thing that's protecting most of the events, that limits the estate's ability to sue or stop them as there was no profit involved. In order for a lawsuit people should "benefit" from the use of the name.

general info

As a general rule you will not need a release for the use of a person's name or image if your use is not defamatory, does not invade privacy and is not for a commercial purpose. For example, a celebrity's photo can be used in a news story without a release. Remember, however, that you often will need to obtain copyright permission from the owner of the photograph.

more detailed legal mumbo jumbo

Right of Publicity

The right of publicity grew out of the general principles of invasion of privacy that prohibited the appropriation of a person's name or likeness to gain some benefit. Within the past few decades, the right of publicity has emerged as an independent type of claim that can be made when a person 's name or likeness is used for commercial purposes. Although the right of publicity is commonly associated with celebrities, every person, regardless of how famous, has a right to prevent unauthorized use of their name or image to sell products. The right of publicity extends beyond the commercial use of a person's name or image and includes the use of any personal element that implies an individual's endorsement of a product, provided that the public can identify the individual based upon the use.

The right of publicity extends to a performer's identifiable voice. For example, in two separate cases, advertisements that used vocal performances that sounded like singers Tom Waits and Bette Midler were found to violate the singers' rights of publicity. In both of these cases, the advertising agency had sought permission from the performer and when it was not granted, the singer's voice was deliberately imitated--a good example of what not to do. As rule of thumb, if the performer 's voice mimics a well-known performer, either accidentally or intentionally, avoid using it.

In many states, the right of publicity survives death and can be exercised by the person's estate.
 
Last edited:
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

I'm no Joe fan, but someone telling him yay or nay on using the name and likeness of HIS son on the anniversary of his death just doesn't seem right to me.

Did the family have to get permission to use Michael's likeness at his funeral?
Yeah, I know that's a stretch, but I just think the executors could be handling this situation better than making comments to the press bringing attention again to their power and Joe's lack thereof for this particular occasion.
THANK YOU!! I would be ticked off myself if I was being treated by the people who are supposed to be running my dead relative's estate like the Jacksons are being treated.

Michael knew his family before Branca, McClain and any others came into his life over the years. Many people on here automatically want to dismiss the Jacksons as greedy and opportunistic when they raise certain issues or do things without the estate's say so. While some members of the family have made questionable (yeah and even stupid) comments and actions, the entire family loved Michael, they are grieving for Michael and the way they are being treated as if THEY killed Michael is totally disrespectful. And for the record, even though Michael may have been carrying the load for the family at times, alot of Michael's more serious problems came from outsiders who successfully played the divide and conquer game. They knew of Michael's problems with Joe etc. They knew Michael outgrown being part of the Jackson 5/Jacksons. Even though in the beginning, Michael had a few good people within the industry working for him, as he gotten from being just a famous singer to the most famous entertainer in the world many of these people in the entertainment industry slithered into his life taking advantage of his kindness, naievity and insecurities and put that man through hell....MORE hell than Joe could ever put Michael through. And I'm not just referring to ones who were obvious snakes, I'm also referring to the ones who were wolves in sheep's clothing. Upstanding on the outside and sinister and calculating on the inside. These ones who were smiling in Michael's face while stabbing him in the back, while setting him up, while serving as sources for alot of salacious and harmful gossip about Michael which has been spread and accepted as truth for the past 17 or more years...even NOW a year after his death.

People want to talk about Joe and the rest of the family seeing and treating Michael like a cash cow? What about these vultures in the industry, who although they had and have money, there can NEVER be too much money to have? What about Michael's OWN words when he called alot of these people "charlatans" who steal from and cheat their artists and strong arm them with a 'rule or ruin' philosophy? Not to mention the media, who were and still are willing participants and who are always on call for the next 'expose' and 'scandal' they can make on Michael for the right price. Michael has made alot of these people in the industry and in the media rich. These jerks are the ones who REALLY saw Michael as nothing but a cash cow. And don't get me started on the people who entered into Michael's life only to falsely accuse him and ruin his reputation and put his life and freedom in jeopardy. People on here are so busy spouting off and looking at the Jacksons with a critical eye, the Jacksons are the LEAST to worry about when it comes to greed and crookedness and the ability and THE MEANS to do real lasting harm to Michael. People on here can say what they want, but Michael's family did not put him in his grave. THAT is a fact!!

I had to let it out because I for one have had enough of this crap!!
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

People want to talk about Joe and the rest of the family seeing and treating Michael like a cash cow? What about these vultures in the industry, who although they had and have money, there can NEVER be too much money to have? What about Michael's OWN words when he called alot of these people "charlatans"
u expect that of others not your own family. all they have to do it play by the rules that michael set. nothing more. its not hard.

if the family want to do something then work with the estate but OH that means they wont be able to make any money out of it will they.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

THANK YOU!! I would be ticked off myself if I was being treated by the people who are supposed to be running my dead relative's estate like the Jacksons are being treated.

Michael knew his family before Branca, McClain and any others came into his life over the years. Many people on here automatically want to dismiss the Jacksons as greedy and opportunistic when they raise certain issues or do things without the estate's say so. While some members of the family have made questionable (yeah and even stupid) comments and actions, the entire family loved Michael, they are grieving for Michael and the way they are being treated as if THEY killed Michael is totally disrespectful. And for the record, even though Michael may have been carrying the load for the family at times, alot of Michael's more serious problems came from outsiders who successfully played the divide and conquer game. They knew of Michael's problems with Joe etc. They knew Michael outgrown being part of the Jackson 5/Jacksons. Even though in the beginning, Michael had a few good people within the industry working for him, as he gotten from being just a famous singer to the most famous entertainer in the world many of these people in the entertainment industry slithered into his life taking advantage of his kindness, naievity and insecurities and put that man through hell....MORE hell than Joe could ever put Michael through. And I'm not just referring to ones who were obvious snakes, I'm also referring to the ones who were wolves in sheep's clothing. Upstanding on the outside and sinister and calculating on the inside. These ones who were smiling in Michael's face while stabbing him in the back, while setting him up, while serving as sources for alot of salacious and harmful gossip about Michael which has been spread and accepted as truth for the past 17 or more years...even NOW a year after his death.

People want to talk about Joe and the rest of the family seeing and treating Michael like a cash cow? What about these vultures in the industry, who although they had and have money, there can NEVER be too much money to have? What about Michael's OWN words when he called alot of these people "charlatans" who steal from and cheat their artists and strong arm them with a 'rule or ruin' philosophy? Not to mention the media, who were and still are willing participants and who are always on call for the next 'expose' and 'scandal' they can make on Michael for the right price. Michael has made alot of these people in the industry and in the media rich. These jerks are the ones who REALLY saw Michael as nothing but a cash cow. And don't get me started on the people who entered into Michael's life only to falsely accuse him and ruin his reputation and put his life and freedom in jeopardy. People on here are so busy spouting off and looking at the Jacksons with a critical eye, the Jacksons are the LEAST to worry about when it comes to greed and crookedness and the ability and THE MEANS to do real lasting harm to Michael. People on here can say what they want, but Michael's family did not put him in his grave. THAT is a fact!!

I had to let it out because I for one have had enough of this crap!!

MJ didn't want his family to run his affairs,not in life even less in death..get over it.
 
Re: UPDATE : Jackson Family to Remember Michael at Anniversary Celebration Event / Not Estate Approv

The problem is not using his name in celebration, the problem is using his name in celebration for the sole purpose of profiting from said celebration.

Why can't they do something "in celebration" that does not include profiting?

I mean, Michael opened up Neverland a zillion times and never charged a penny. Why can't they come up with a celebration that is not related to making a QUICK buck?

Because, with the exception of Janet, Michael's siblings and their families are not rich, nor do they have prospects of making money that do not in some way involve Michael. This was true while Michael was alive and is still true. The only difference is that when Michael was alive he could say "No". (and he usually did)
 
Back
Top