FD1998
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2013
- Messages
- 380
- Points
- 28
Doesn't "Don't Matter to Me" already count for that?
Don’t Matter To Me is from 2018, so it is part of the 2010s decade.Doesn't "Don't Matter to Me" already count for that?
Nope. It was released in 2018.Doesn't "Don't Matter to Me" already count for that?
That's not your wish mate, that's a collective wish of everyone on the forumthey better release a radio friendly banger with a video.
my wish: Chicago 1945 and a music video with studio footage from that session.
Songs and albums are almost always released on Fridays.Who announces anything on a Friday? It's the day news go to die. You announce something on a Friday when you don't want people to know about it.
This is inappropriate and total a shit postBonus disc:
-Hydraulix
-Mamacita
-Let me let go
-Runner up
-Black Widow
-Soldier Boy
-Water
-Monster (demo)
-Breaking News (demo)
-Keep Your Head Up (demo)
too many new songs man, the estate cant hire another impersonator just yetBonus disc:
-Hydraulix
-Mamacita
-Let me let go
-Runner up
-Black Widow
-Soldier Boy
-Water
-Monster (demo)
-Breaking News (demo)
-Keep Your Head Up (demo)
Jason? Is that you?This is inappropriate and total a shit post
Even though these songs arent MJ they are amazing songs i dont care what anyone says especially Hydraulix and Let Me Let Gotoo many new songs man, the estate cant hire another impersonator just yet
So are Faith, Monkey, Father Figure by George Michael, Sign Your Name by Terence Trent D'arby, Sussudio by Phil Collins and so many more. I don't understand your point. Let's just not label them as MJ's songs.Even though these songs arent MJ they are amazing songs i dont care what anyone says especially Hydraulix and Let Me Let Go
And when did I label them as mj songs?So are Faith, Monkey, Father Figure by George Michael, Sign Your Name by Terence Trent D'arby, Sussudio by Phil Collins and so many more. I don't understand your point. Let's just not label them as MJ's songs.
That guy is just a trollAnd when did I label them as mj songs?
Not you, but the Estate labeled JM as MJ. The thing is you were saying you didn't care what anyone was saying about those songs. TBF nobody had been really debating about how good or bad JM's songs were, but about the Estate's mistake of labeling JM as MJ. Hence my remark not to label JM's songs as MJ's.And when did I label them as mj songs?
Sure, I've been trolling since 1998 on this forum.That guy is just a troll
everyone has known those were JM songs for a decade and the estate is no longer calling them mj songs? Pointless comment to make.Not you, but the Estate labeled JM as MJ. The thing is you were saying you didn't care what anyone was saying about those songs. TBF nobody had been really debating about how good or bad JM's songs were, but about the Estate's mistake of labeling JM as MJ. Hence my remark not to label JM's songs as MJ's.
Estate still officially consider them as MJ tracks, the reason they gave for the removal was that talking about them was distracting fans from all the other awesome stuff they are doing.everyone has known those were JM songs for a decade and the estate is no longer calling them mj songs? Pointless comment to make.
"...all the other awesome stuff they are doing."Estate still officially consider them as MJ tracks, the reason they gave for the removal was that talking about them was distracting fans from all the other awesome stuff they are doing.
I don't buy that at all, otherwise they would have removed them as Xscape discussion was ramping up prior to release.Estate still officially consider them as MJ tracks, the reason they gave for the removal was that talking about them was distracting fans from all the other awesome stuff they are doing.
It's the Estate's official stance though.I don't buy that at all, otherwise they would have removed them as Xscape discussion was ramping up prior to release.
It might be their 'official stance' but it is clearly out of embarrassment and not wanting to own up to fake songs? If the estate have the removed Cascio tracks which is likely to be now permanent and are not actively parading around calling Cascio tracks MJ songs I don't see the problem.It's the Estate's official stance though.
Because some people seem to have forgotten how to crack jokes. I would have never thought my bonus disc joke would trigger a serious discussion about JM lol.Why are we talking about Cascio tracks in the Thriller 40th anniversary thread?
Acknowledging the tracks as fake would thus open them up to legal repercussions. I understand they deserve it, but from a business standpoint, they will never publicly call the Cascio tracks frauds.It might be their 'official stance' but it is clearly out of embarrassment and not wanting to own up to fake songs? If the estate have the removed Cascio tracks which is likely to be now permanent and are not actively parading around calling Cascio tracks MJ songs I don't see the problem.
a carousel is something used in web design. It's not the name of a song in this case.It seems that the first track is revealed in the link.