That's one of the key factors that make the case either a planned murder or a planned escape... Can LAPD still recover it?..
responding to:
Can we please talk about how security camera footage went missing on the day Michael died and the LAPD has yet to get recover it? This definitely sounds like something was planning, murder or hoax.
This is one of the things that leans me toward the idea of this all being a 'ruse' of some sort.
Why. well...
1. Because in the video I posted the other day where the fan was sitting outside all night, the night he came home, she said the security team was bigger than normal (more of them) and that they were acting agitated and not being friendly as normally.
That indicates to me they were likely in anticipating mode and that they were likely preoccupied.
2. After the ambulance took MJ out of the house, the security team's (Chief in particular)'s one job was to guard the surveillance tape which would answer any and all questions about who came and went and at what times
3. Even if they turned it over to police which I do not believe,; they would have had every reason and right to keep up with the case to make sure the police didn't lose it
When it comes to the police 'losing' it or whatever, I do not believe it on its face.
Why
1. because the police had every incentive to protect and preserve the single piece of evidence that could potentially keep the wrong person from being accused and get the right person or at least provide necessary evidence
2. MJ was not only a national treasure but certainly an L.A. treasure and their past mistakes would potentially make them look really bad and potentially incite another L.A. riot if they fumbled the "Michael Jackson" sole piece of defining evidence
3. Michaels lawyers didn't relentlessly pursue locating it nor did Conrad Murray's lawyers do so which I believe if they had we would know it because both sides owed a great debt to the public's right to know NOT to mention the incentive to keep fans from bugging them until eternity
Well what about the "murder" theory?
To that I say, Michael did several ";posthumas" things that make that theory very 'iffy'
1. Dave Dave (and remember Chris Tucker saying that Dave was M's nickname?)
2 Two more of M's friends in addition to Chris were, Teddy Riley and Akon, remember what they said? Its as though MJ wanted his friends to give us hints
3. Some ''posthumas'' musical 'hints' one of them being This Is It where there was the big ''to-do'' about how they found it in a box recorded during the Thriller era and how it was recorded on one track which is simply not the truth. He can't sing lead and background on one track. Then it ended up being Paul Anke getting all this attention for This Is It (because he was a co-writer) and who "coincidentally" released an album with Sony a few weeks prior and the next thing we know, Paul Anke is performing it all over the place as a "promo" of sorts for his new Sony released Anthology introducing a classic artist to a new generation -generating revenue for all involved
4. The 'jig' served double duty as "hype" about the "death of Michael Jackson" at the same time as promotion for Paul Anke's brand new Sony release.
5. And the Michael album. Remember who was one of the main producers? Teddy Riley! Yes, Mr, "I believe he's alive"
6. Opis None - remember that? They claimed it was a remix of Destiny which if you listen more carefully, or better yet play them both at the same time, you will see it is not. Its like a jam up of Destiny, Can't Let Her Get Away (storyline/someone in ''hot pursuit'' of someone on foot) and snippets of conversations with a bunch of people conducting a surviellance of someone (I know that sounds crazy but that's exactly what it sounds like, such as when the woman's voice says as though she's surprised by what she sees when she says, "that was some random shit") NONE of which I would ever have noticed had I not attempted to use the song as a "white noise" meditation (which I suggest you all do) because I had been convinced that its just a jumble of random sounds, no, not so.
MJ seems to me to have made some changes we didn't know about which included a new relationship with Sony, and with John Branca and with his "God Forsaken" catelogue, which if he's like normal people may have decided somewhere along the line, if they want the thing bad enough to kill me for it let me let them have it on my terms where I can still profit from the good faith investment.
I know its a stretch but I enjoyed it and figured someone here may also. Iām actually finding it a bit amusing to consider. Re-look at the 2 Daves I posted. Itās actually pretty much a hoot
Cāmon someone with a whole contradictionā¦itās totally fine with me