Latest on MJJC

The $1 billion last waltz of Michael Jackson: This Is It film set to break box-office records

elusive moonwalker said:
considering randy tabloidarellie is the mails main MJ expert im not even gonna bother with this article. this paper are hateful as u can get when it comes ot mj so why ppl actually think this paper knows the sealed contract details of the film i dont know. just another tabloid article
Click to expand...


:clapping::punk:
 
RainbowAngel said:
What about crying whales? ;-) I like that line too. And I used to sing "what about dolphins" instead of "what about all those things" because I didn't know the lyrics!

~~~~~

I don't like AEG and SONY screening the movie for only 2 weeks!!! It's so unfair. They are using every dirty strategy to earn more profit. The movie should be shown for at least 2 months! It should be given the chance the challenge the box office records of Lord of the Rings or even Titanic.
Click to expand...



The more stays at the cinemas, the more money the estate will gain (i.e. 90% goes to the estate after $135M mark has been exceeded). On the other hand the profit from the DVD sale will be shared by the three parties equally. Which of these do you think SONY prefers?
 
Oh my Gosh I really hope so, it´s Michael Jackson after all, these are not the 80s anymore but it´s Michael Jackson anywayz.

But it´s only two weeks... how much can it take on box office?

Here in my country I don´t know how much they are selling tickets for This is it, I don´t have my ticket becoz they say I can buy my ticket the same day I´m going to see the movie XD
 
Pascal09 said:
The more stays at the cinemas, the more money the estate will gain (i.e. 90% goes to the estate after $135M mark has been exceeded). On the other hand the profit from the DVD sale will be shared by the three parties equally. Which of these do you think SONY prefers?
Click to expand...

the court docs inregards to the contract are sealed and if they got leaked it wouldnt be the mail/epress getting the exclusive.theres no point even discussing it like its fact
 
Every time I've got my self settled and looking forward to the movie I read an article like this and it just brings tears to my eyes.

The argument I have with myself is the same old one, why? This is something we should have witnessed live. Just reading about the performance of Dirty Diana, if true, seems amazing.

I would have gone four times by now and remember the adrenaline and buzz from his previous concerts. That's what I want to be feeling now not tears running down my face.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top