mjj19582009
Proud Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 196
- Points
- 18
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ASP_tAtT79s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Quincy Jones Blasts ‘Haters’ Over ‘P.Y.T.’ Remake Criticism
T-Pain received a lambasting from Michael Jackson’s fans for remaking the King of Pop’s classic “P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing).” The Auto-Tune King issued a fiery response to his critics and now the song’s original producer, Quincy Jones, is taking aim at those who have a problem with the reworked record.
“Today with Facebook and Twitter and everything, I have never seen so many haters in my life,” the 77-year-old legend exclusively tells Rap-Up.com. “But it’s people sitting in their basements with their pants on the ground, just being haters. I don’t get it, man. That means they don’t have a life.”
The update of the 1983 smash from Thriller was produced by T-Pain and Mervyn Warren and appears on Quincy’s tribute album Q: Soul Bossa Nostra, in stores Tuesday. The music maestro doesn’t take issue with the way the song was redone. “The freedom in music is do what you want to do,” he shares. “I don’t think anybody should sit there and say you shouldn’t do that or you shouldn’t do this. That’s not up to me to say.”
While T-Pain said that he recorded the song at Mr. Jones’ request, Quincy offers a different take. “They volunteered. I didn’t choose them. I didn’t produce this,” he says. “Six years ago, Timbaland came to me with one of his assistants in South Beach and said, ‘We’d like to do a hip-hop tribute to all your old songs.’ I said, ‘Great, man. That’s a very big honor ’cause I’ve worked with a lot of the hip-hoppers anyway and have always been behind them.’”
Jones took a back seat when it came to putting together the project. “I just sat down with guys that were my friends and they called and asked me questions and so forth. I’m there for them, but I said use your own voice, but make it better than the one we did.”
I agree that he takes too much credit for the MJ projects and downplays the role Michael played. For some reason, he seems to have developed a hateful attitude towards MJ over the years, particularly in recent years. In the past he used to be more complimentary. He started to become more negative about MJ at a personal level earlier on, but used to still praise him as an artist. Now he is making offensive claims about both. These latest comments are again very annoying. For him to basically say MJ was just a singer and a dancer is just ridiculous.I honestly can't figure out why Quincy Jones takes so much credit for Michael's albums. What did he do? Song selection? Let's give him part of "Off the wall",and that's it! "Thriller" was Rod Temperton and MJ, and "Bad" was pure MJ. Even "We are the world" is pure Michael, remember the disastrous Quincy-Jones-led Haiti Project? /facepalm
Well, that's in the eye of the beholder. When you look at his entire career, not just as a producer but also as, among other things, a composer and arranger, and the influence his work had, I can easily see why people would call him a genius.I didn't say Quincy did nothing, Michael clearly used his insight, experience and connections to make his first solo steps. But he is by no means a genius
I'm sorry but what reason do you guys have to bash him like that? All he said was that the estate is trying to make money and he doesn't blame them. He also said it is not his business anymore, he simply replied to a question, because he was asked.
I would assume he is bitter about all the bashing and hate he has gotten from the community. I don't know a single person who's had a part in Michael's life, who hasn't gotten hate from us.My issue is more with the "MJ was just a singer and dancer" comment. He knows damn well that is not true. For Q to produce Billie Jean, Beat It, WBSS and most of those classics, Michael had to write them first...
I would assume he is bitter about all the bashing and hate he has gotten from the community. I don't know a single person who's had a part in Michael's life, who hasn't gotten hate from us.
I didn't. I actually agree with you about not attacking MJ for it, but was simply giving my opinion on why he might've said such a thing.Don't try to reverse it. Quincy has bad-mouthed MJ in interviews several time in the last years. He actually made below the belt remarks about him both as an artist as a person. Before that I did not see any fan criticize him. And if he has a problem with MJ fans he should say so, not bash Michael who never said a bad word about him.
I didn't. I actually agree with you about not attacking MJ for it, but was simply giving my opinion on why he might've said such a thing.
Yep, totally agree. I wish one of these interviewers would just call him out on that.I think the annoying thing about Quincy's comments is that he further perpetuates untrue myths about MJ. There are already enough ignorant people out there thinking MJ did nothing on his albums just sang whatever Quincy brought to him and told him to sing, no need to further feed that myth, especially because it's simply not true.
I don't think Quincy needed Michael at that point in his career. He had already worked with people like Ray Charles, Frank Sinatra, Count Basie and Aretha Franklin at that point. His name was firmly established. All the success he enjoyed with Michael did give his name a huge boost, but he was already very highly regarded before that. Quincy's work post-Bad has been pretty lacklustre, but let's not forget he was already in his late 50s at that time. Not every artist can sustain a similar level of quality throughout their career. I'm not sure why you'd say he wasn't much of a songwriter just because he focused on jazz & r&b tunes - several of which did really well on the charts actually. But it is definitely true that he should not be getting credit for songwriting with regards to MJ's work.Michael did need Quincy at that phase of his career and certainly he could be and was grateful to him for a lot of things. But Quincy needed Michael just the same and should be just as grateful to Michael IMO. Yes, he was a big name already in jazz and soundtrack making (just like Michael was already a big name before Q), but in popular music Michael was and remains his best and by far most influential act. And if it was just because of Quincy, as so many people like think, how come he could not get anywhere near that level with any of his other acts? It's not like he did not try with people like Tevin Campbell, Tamia etc. Just compare Q's work on those albums and singles with the stuff he did with Michael! Quincy was a great producer, but Michael had to write that classic material first to make him shine. Actually Quincy himself wasn't much of a songwriter - at least not in popular music. When you look at his own albums that are not jazz but more in the direction of popular music - even those do not have many songs written by him. He was a great producer, arranger and organizer with great connections in the industry. I'm not taking away those things from him. But he shouldn't try to take away songwriting credits from Michael either and reduce him to "just a singer and dancer" when he knows damn well that is not true.
Totally agree. It seems to be a frustration to him that MJ always gets brought up whenever he's interviewed. Then again, so are Ray Charles and Sinatra, and he never seems to slam them. Perhaps there is resentment over the fact that MJ decided to part ways with him after Bad. If so, that's ridiculous. It's also strange, because you would expect that resentment to have come out earlier, whereas Quincy did not seem particularly negative about MJ until the 2000s.Michael always gave him credit. I don't know why it's so hard for him to give credit to Michael.
Supposedly MJ let him listen to Dangerous before it was released, and supposedly Quincy told him it was a great record.Does anyone know if there is any interview out there where Quincy shares his thoughts on Michael's post-bad albums? I'm really curious!
Agreed. For someone who called MJ his 'little brother' he seems to be incredibly ignorant and spiteful. Sad, really.Supposedly Michael was his friend whom he dearly loved, so to trash him just to get back at his fans would be childish. He should then just say "MJ fans are crazy" or whatever, but that's not what he said. He attacked Michael both as an artist and as a person. It has nothing to do with MJ's fans IMO. It has a lot more to do with Q's ego.
Yep, totally agree. I wish one of these interviewers would just call him out on that.
I don't think Quincy needed Michael at that point in his career. He had already worked with people like Ray Charles, Frank Sinatra, Count Basie and Aretha Franklin at that point. His name was firmly established. All the success he enjoyed with Michael did give his name a huge boost, but he was already very highly regarded before that.
I'm not sure why you'd say he wasn't much of a songwriter just because he focused on jazz & r&b tunes - several of which did really well on the charts actually.
Actually Quincy himself wasn't much of a songwriter - at least not in popular music.
Totally agree. It seems to be a frustration to him that MJ always gets brought up whenever he's interviewed. Then again, so are Ray Charles and Sinatra, and he never seems to slam them. Perhaps there is resentment over the fact that MJ decided to part ways with him after Bad.
With 'needing Michael' I was thinking of his artistic reputation, in response to the discussion that arose before about whether he was a genius or not. I think his work with Michael without a doubt enhanced his reputation (and most certainly his fame and the size of his bank account), but I think he would be called a genius by many regardless of it. He did benefit a lot from their partnership though, and I totally agree that it's ridiculous that he trashes Michael the way he does.Depends on what we mean by "needing Michael".
I know that he was revered before Michael but I think Thriller alone probably sold more than Q's entire catalogue with other artists. Then add Bad and Off The Wall too... I know that commercial success is not everything, but when it comes to royalties I'd guess most of the royalties Quincy gets comes from his work with Michael. At least I don't remember any other truly blockbuster hit record from the rest of his catalogue.
And while he was always respected within the industry, but Michael gave him an even bigger fame - also outside of the industry. Whether he "needed" that fame or money or not only he could tell, but maybe he should give a bit more respect to Michael without whom that would not have been possible. Michael always gave him respect and love. He never trashed him.
I get your point, but I disagree that you will rarely find a tune that he wrote on most of his commercially oriented albums. On 'Body Heat', for instance, which hit #6 on the pop charts, he co-wrote 4 of the 9 tracks. 'The Dude' is the only album that comes to mind right now on which he did not write anything.Actually, this is what I wrote:
I know he has a huge jazz/soundtrack catalogue and I know he wrote more music there, but when it comes to his "pop" records he mostly relied on other songwriters' talents. Even on his own "pop" albums you will rarely find a tune that he wrote.
Yeah, who knows... It does sound plausible.Maybe that, or maybe he feels oveshadowed by MJ. While he is always asked about Ray Charles or Sinatra too, but if you had to ask people on the street to say the title of an album that Quincy Jones produced I bet most would not say a Ray Charles or Sinatra album but one of MJ's albums. Maybe he doesn't like that because he feels there's more to his career. But of course this is just speculation and none of it justifies some of his comments.
Does anyone know if there is any interview out there where Quincy shares his thoughts on Michael's post-bad albums? I'm really curious!
I read in Joseph Vogel's book "Man In The Music" that Quincy Jones called the Dangerous album "a masterpiece."
I get your point, but I disagree that you will rarely find a tune that he wrote on most of his commercially oriented albums. On 'Body Heat', for instance, which hit #6 on the pop charts, he co-wrote 4 of the 9 tracks. 'The Dude' is the only album that comes to mind right now on which he did not write anything.
Oh I agree that he was not an incredibly prolific songwriter on those albums, I only responded to your point about rarely finding a song he wrote on one of his commercial albums. Except for 'The Dude', I think he (co-)wrote songs on all his commercially oriented albums.On Back on The Block he co-wrote three songs out of 11. On Q's Jook Joint he fully wrote one song and co-wrote two songs (on one of those two songs he only wrote the lyrics) out of 12 songs. And most of those were rehashed from his old material anyway. I don't see him as a prolific songwriter on his "pop" albums.
The wizard Quincy, after BAD, was going to recreate another Michael Jackson - with Tevin Campbell: cute hearttrob of early '90s - because all you need is Quincy's genius and masterful guiding hand ... Let's see where they are now (just on fb likes):
Michael Jackson - 74,493,306
Tevin Campbell - 311
:busted:
I didn't. I actually agree with you about not attacking MJ for it, but was simply giving my opinion on why he might've said such a thing.