samhabib
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 1,652
- Points
- 0
Re: New Song Snippet - Another Day Featuring Lenny Kravitz (Merged)
Michael only independently wrote two songs on Invincible. So there goes the theory that he was visualising while writing Invincible - there are more songwriters on the lead track then there are on the complete BAD album! So whatever he was 'visualising', he'd only be 'visualising' a percent of each track!
I've never known a music video to actually change the sound of a record. Beat It and Billie Jean are masterpieces. With or without their videos.
2000 Watts isn't. And no 3D glasses will make me see it any clearer. What are you suggesting? That only music with big budget videos supporting it is any good? Amy Winehouse didn't have big budget videos for her Back To Black album. That didn't stop it being critically and commercially lauded.
If you like the song, good. I don't. I'm not trying yo convince anybody else to agree with me.
Just a little note here about INVINCIBLE.
*
Many people are influenced by the media hype. Thriller indeed was a revolutionary album thanks to the new sound, the original concept of a video story like Thriller and Beat it. The moonwalk, etc. Also, when Michael had his hair and head burned during the pepsi commercial, everyone thought he was going to die, so that event boosted record sales.
*
However, don't get fooled by the hype created by the media, that is to say not much hype during INVINCIBLE era. INVINCIBLE was so badly promoted that it gave impression that it was a weak album. Without much promotion it sold 7 000 000 albums the first year (with only one video at that time - YRMW).*
*
Now imagine if there were videos for other songs. Can you only imagine the video for THREATENED? I believe that many new fans even don't know the guy speaking in the beginning of the song, but it comes from a cult series TWILIGHT ZONE from the 80s. Can you only imagine how 2000 WATTS video could look like - electrifying! Michael had a lot of ideas and probably to do things in 3-D, which SONY refused due to the high costs michael's ideas demanded.*
*
When Michael writes a song, he does more than that, he visualizes it, and without a proper video our imagination is WEAK!
*
What if THRILLER video was simply sang without any dance or story, the same for BEAT IT, don't you think that THRILLER too could have been a weak album? What if there was no moonwalk during BILLIE JEAN performance? I bet those songs would still eb great, but not as much as what Michael made us see! He made us visualize his music, and unfortunately he didn't have that opportunity with INVINCIBLE.
Michael only independently wrote two songs on Invincible. So there goes the theory that he was visualising while writing Invincible - there are more songwriters on the lead track then there are on the complete BAD album! So whatever he was 'visualising', he'd only be 'visualising' a percent of each track!
I've never known a music video to actually change the sound of a record. Beat It and Billie Jean are masterpieces. With or without their videos.
2000 Watts isn't. And no 3D glasses will make me see it any clearer. What are you suggesting? That only music with big budget videos supporting it is any good? Amy Winehouse didn't have big budget videos for her Back To Black album. That didn't stop it being critically and commercially lauded.
If you like the song, good. I don't. I'm not trying yo convince anybody else to agree with me.