144000
Proud Member
I'm not sure I understand all your questions in reference to my post.
You make it sound like I have some issues with hardcore fans?
I don't think it's in sony or the estate best interest to cut out M's fanbase core to focus on 15 yo kids or occasional listeners at all.
But why ignore them?
Isn't this adding even more audience?
I hope they'll restore once for all M's image/name (well they have to) and focus ALSO in the younger generations who didn't have the chance to enjoy him when in his prime but only when he was facing hell,they deserve to experience him like many of us did,but in a different way.
Oh ya,all artists have detractors,problems with their record companies,drug problems,some died,some almost died,ended up broke,in jail,they came back...as you said if the product is good chances are they'll live on somehow.
No the decline of the music industry doesn't affect only those who cheat,steal,suck..
unfortunately.
There are a lot of true amazing artist that got cut out and lost it all because they were not cool young and hot, they were not mainstream,they were unlucky,or were not understood by their own audience,didn't sell much even if they were amazing..and without them their less mainstream record companies failed as well.Unfair yes.
well...i'm curious...could you name some of those artists that were not cool, young and hot, and who were unlucky..and name some of their songs?
because i can name an act whose faces were never seen, but their songs were so great, that they became a huge success story. have you ever heard of 'steely dan'?
what i'm saying is..though it may seem like an unpopular opinion...the industry isn't as random as you say. if the song is good, the artist can do well.
there was an american idol, who was older than the normal age, but won, anyway...but as soon as his songs became unmemorable...he disappeared.
i'm never said that the general public should be ignored. they never were. everybody in the world always knew who MJ was. what i am saying is, the loyals have more power than the impression you seem to give. i didn't say you had a problem with them, but it did seem, you underestimated them. that's not the same as saying you have a problem with them. i'm just giving the loyals more credit.
i'm just saying, that the rumours of MJ's legacy being in jeopardy, are greatly exaggerrated. sony deal, or no sony deal. because, we all agree..MJ's music has proven to have too much power, through thick and thin, and breaking all the rules that are supposed to apply to the industry.
i have seen haters tap their feet to 'billie jean'.
nobody has any power to resist a quality song, no matter what.
a fantastic artist, is one thing. but the great song, is THE thing. and the great song, kept MJ's loyal fanbase loyal, and kept MJ on the map.
anyway, doing the right thing, by somebody, should never be discounted. keeping your nose clean, and not cheating, does go a long way, to take a person, or a label, in a positive direction. that, AND, a great song.
if you wanna go far, bet on those things, in life. money comes second. betting on doing just anything for money is not a good bet.
MJ represented not putting money first. and his songs are the greatest, and he didn't fit the mold. and he's the most successful. truth is, he neverhad to worry about his audience, or the configuration of it. his career demise rumours have been exaggerrated for years. his audience numbers being diminished, has been a rumour, exaggerrated. for years. i don't care how people tried to make it look..being upstanding, has worked for MJ.
even if you think you've seen somebody who didn't cheat, and was wrongly cheated out of a career, the overwhelming majority of non cheaters stand a better chance at a career than cheaters, or those who did another person wrong.
money has a magic way of escaping those who do just anything for it. so that really doesn't benefit anybody.
Last edited: