MJ's estate goes after Janet

People who have no understanding of the music industry and Copyrite laws should not even attempt to write a story about it
 
I don't get it either why does she want to be reimbursed? is that how they do it in the US have the deceased person pay for everything?



Usually the decease does pay for their own funeral and burial arrangement. It is usually done by the person's life insurance. The average family cannot pay $10,000 for a funeral, that is consider the low end.

So, Michael paying for his own funeral is not usual. Most rich people end up paying out of their own pocket for their funeral so not to burden their family.
 
LOL!!! How Ridiiiic?!

MJ and Janet swapped dance moves and song phrases all the time. Like Rythym Nation, MJ let Janet borrow some of the choreography he was preparing for Captain EO.
I mean is the phrase and melody in itself patented or copyrighted?
I guess these execs don't understand the meaning of a family bond. I know MJ would not be happy about this.
 
I don't get it either why does she want to be reimbursed? is that how they do it in the US have the deceased person pay for everything?

SHE DIDN'T WANT TO BE REIMBURSED! She's a wealthy woman!! Why would she need it back if she paid that amount from her pocket???
 
Not true, Janet doesn't own any song rights to my knowledge of course she's able to perform, and sing it since it's her song too per say.. but it's owned under Mijac publishing, which belonged entirely to Michael and now the estate. Michael owns some of her song. Anyhow ET is making a mountain out of a molehill with this one, it's a whole load of bull.

She's credited as co-writer and producer so technically she owns rights to the song as well. It's under Epic but if she wants to she can put it on her GH album. It's her tracks just as much as it's MJ's. And MJ doesn't own any of her songs.
 
I guess every other family can have their wealthy deceased pay for their funeral, that is except the Jacksons!
Geee, I won't be suprised if some start to say that MJ was paying for Janet's life.:smilerolleyes:
 
I don't see why people are treating Michael Jackson as a product and not a person.

Janet is his baby sister. They shared a lot of things in life, a few words from a song is nothing to get ruffled feathers about.
 
I highly doubt this has any merit... If this was true, Mjs estate would be going for hundreds of artists:

Sophie Ellis Bexter 'Murder on the dancefloor' - sounds like 'blood on the dancefloor'

Metronomy - Heartbreaker - includes the line 'That Girls a heartbreaker', as does Mjs.

Faith Hill/Boyzone/PCD - The way you love me.

Steps (puke) - The way you make me feel.

and a million more I cant be bothered to write out...

What are these tabloid idiots going to come up with next? That MJs estate are going after EVERY musician ever inspired by Michael to wirte and and perform therefore owing them a buck... and conesquently causing the music industry as we know it to never be the same again and all music rights owned by the estate, and the world implding and o my god DEATH AND DESTRUCTION OF THE UNIVERSE...wooooo....*breath*

Ok I just laughed out loud right there!

What about the 'Rock Witchu' merchandise at her official store? - http://janetjackson.store2.livenati...st?artistName=Janet+Jackson&sourceCode=JJAWEB

The line they are talking about isn't even the same, its just similar... there surely would be lawsuits all over the place between different artists if this was truely an issue :doh:
 
Agree. I was upset with Janet over that. And Also I mad because Michael died 5 months ago, and now she decides she wants to do an interview because her number 1's cd dropped today for publicity.

they should go after her for trying to boost her career by doing an interview where she talks about 'her family interventions'

someone should ask janet were n't the interventions planned when katherine's calls to mj to demand money or ask him to tour with the brothers fall on deaf ears ? :smilerolleyes:

"he was in denial, we tried to help ", janet the only one in denial is you and your family, he was a commodity to you . go back and speak about the midget who "takes me to places I've never gone before"
pathetic indeed.:smilerolleyes:
 
they should go after her for trying to boost her career by doing an interview where she talks about 'her family interventions'

someone should ask janet were n't the interventions planned when katherine's calls to mj to demand money or ask him to tour with the brothers fall on deaf ears ? :smilerolleyes:

"he was in denial, we tried to help ", janet the only one in denial is you and your family, he was a commodity to you . go back and speak about the midget who "takes me to places I've never gone before"
pathetic indeed.:smilerolleyes:



Of everyone in that family, Janet never once used Michael as a "commodity". She build her career with her own talents and never used Michael's position to help herself. So to say that Janet saw him as a commodity is just wrong, plain and simple.

I also find the comments rather two-face about Janet. On one hand you if Janet talk not long after Michael's death like his other siblings, you would had called her a media whore and just wanted to promote herself. She waits almost 5 weeks after his death to do a major interview and it is suddenly, she should had spoke up sooner and she is promoting herself. I do suggest you make up your minds. You cannot have it both ways.

As for the intervention stories, Janet never gave a date when these actually happen. She also never said that Michael cut them off or he was in denial. When asked she only said that "I wish he was here to tell you himself" and maybe he was in partial denial.

Also, she could had meant that there was time where she was worried about Michael and thought he maybe on something. Michael did have the habit of cutting himself from the world, have to reminded to eat, and tended not to sleep. This sounds like someone who may had a drug problem, so Janet checked on him. That is pretty much what an intervention is, despite popular belief. She may of had added the the entire family to save face.

We do not know, but Janet is not the type who would lie for the sake of family. They maybe some truth to her statement, but we may never know.
 
they should go after her for trying to boost her career by doing an interview where she talks about 'her family interventions'

someone should ask janet were n't the interventions planned when katherine's calls to mj to demand money or ask him to tour with the brothers fall on deaf ears ? :smilerolleyes:

"he was in denial, we tried to help ", janet the only one in denial is you and your family, he was a commodity to you . go back and speak about the midget who "takes me to places I've never gone before"
pathetic indeed.:smilerolleyes:

Wow :( If she had released a CD next year or the year after there would still be questions about her brother. I see Janet doesn't get a break from some people here.
 
they should go after her for trying to boost her career by doing an interview where she talks about 'her family interventions'

someone should ask janet were n't the interventions planned when katherine's calls to mj to demand money or ask him to tour with the brothers fall on deaf ears ? :smilerolleyes:

"he was in denial, we tried to help ", janet the only one in denial is you and your family, he was a commodity to you . go back and speak about the midget who "takes me to places I've never gone before"
pathetic indeed.:smilerolleyes:

How did I know you would say this? LOL. I have a very serious question to ask...Do you personally know the Jackson family? And have they ever wronged you in the past?
 
Last edited:
they should go after her for trying to boost her career by doing an interview where she talks about 'her family interventions'

someone should ask janet were n't the interventions planned when katherine's calls to mj to demand money or ask him to tour with the brothers fall on deaf ears ? :smilerolleyes:

"he was in denial, we tried to help ", janet the only one in denial is you and your family, he was a commodity to you . go back and speak about the midget who "takes me to places I've never gone before"
pathetic indeed.:smilerolleyes:

You sound like a fool :lmao:

Do you know Janet personally? No.
Do you know the Jackson family personally? No.

The only person in denial are MJ's fans PERIOD you obviously never encountered someone with a drug problem before. It's not easy to sway them into thinking what they're doing is wrong.
 
You sound like a fool :lmao:

:hysterical: Why did you even respond to such nonsense. Gurl, If I get banned it will because of this thread. Azara (my alter ego) is gonna act a fool up in here if SMJ reads another stupid comment.
 
:hysterical: Why did you even respond to such nonsense. Gurl, If I get banned it will because of this thread. Azara (my alter ego) is gonna act a fool up in here if SMJ reads another stupid comment.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
:hysterical: Why did you even respond to such nonsense. Gurl, If I get banned it will because of this thread. Azara (my alter ego) is gonna act a fool up in here if SMJ reads another stupid comment.
As long as you steer clear of this poster's anti-jackson family posts, you'll be fine. I just find myself constantly defending the family against this someone who is in the dark as much as everyone else here.
 
Rihanna better get her cheque book ready. :smilerolleyes:
 
janet is the LAST jackson to use mj for publicity.. i stake my name on it. u don't know her so don't go there. simply do not go there.

wait till the interview comes out before u start running urmouths. honestly
 
I wonder what Michael would say if he knew how utterly rabid some of his fans are?

The Jackson family bashing needs to stop.

Channel all that negative energy into something positive. Play with a child, volunteer at a shelter, save an animal. Anything but the hate mongering. Damn!
 
Back
Top