Justice_MJ
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 388
- Points
- 0
Re: Michael - The Great Album Debate (Only Go Here if You Want To Continue The Conspiracy)
If Sony really cares for future Michael Jackson releases, they will need to stop putting songs on the albums where one can only identify Michael's voice with a LOT of imagination...
What did the estate say? Something like we, the fans, are the judges, right? So listen to us, damnit!
All we are asking for is a bit of respect toward the greatest entertainer and his art! That's all we want!
And I agree, it says nothing that other artists didn't comment about the authenticity of the songs. It would be their death blow in the musicbiz if they ranted against one of the biggest companies...
Thank you, love is magical, for being so considerate. It's HER post.Annie, Justice_MJ started his/her post with "I think" and ended with "my opinion". It can't be more obvious that what he/she said is his/her OPINION. I honestly don't know what more he/she could say to tell people that the above post is not FACTUAL STATEMENT, but his/her OPINION. An opinion doesn't need to be factually accurate.
Anyway, even if the album is deemed a commercially viable project; it did indeed underperform according to Billboard and SM 05's informant.
The first posthumouse release of Michael Jackson. The first Michael Jackson album in nine years performed substantially below expectations.
If Sony really cares for future Michael Jackson releases, they will need to stop putting songs on the albums where one can only identify Michael's voice with a LOT of imagination...
What did the estate say? Something like we, the fans, are the judges, right? So listen to us, damnit!
All we are asking for is a bit of respect toward the greatest entertainer and his art! That's all we want!
And I agree, it says nothing that other artists didn't comment about the authenticity of the songs. It would be their death blow in the musicbiz if they ranted against one of the biggest companies...