Daniel.San has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - LMP on Oprah 21/10/10 All Discussion Here - UPDATE Video's Start On Page 63 - in the Michael Jackson News forum of MJJCOMMUNITY - OFFICIAL FORUM.
This thread is located at:
http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=97107&goto=newpost
Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************
---Quote (Originally by mystygrl)---
In my opinion, Lisa has reveal her true motive for doing this interview.
Oprah: "You have made a conscientious decision to talk now, why?"
Lisa: "...I was usually PROMOTING something...I wanted to sit and really have a conversation about things that are more on a personal level now out of the way before I DO have an ALBUM COMING OUT, which I will sometime next year."
Oprah: "You didn't want to be in the position of PROMOTING AN ALBUM and having people ask you about Michael Jackson".
Lisa: "Exactly".
First of all, how can someone be married to the most popular human being that has ever lived, GLOBALLY KNOWN, and NOT be questioned about the relationship? NONSENSE!!! Whenever the name, Michael Jackson is mentioned Lisa Marie will be thought of---today, tomorrow and for all eternity!
Second, whether her new album is coming out this year or next and despite anyone's opinion about her as well as what she has to say about her relationship with Michael, JOB ACCOMPLISHED!
And, what is that? By doing this interview on Oprah, she has just set the platform for huge attention to the releasing of her upcoming album! It's plain and simple, keeping her name in the media. In addition, I found out from someone that her Twitter account is now being bombarded with responses.
Wow, what perfect timing on her part! This year the world is expecting an MJ album release and she wants to give heads up about her release sometime, next year??? So, what is this interview really about? Is she in competition with her Ex or is she riding upon his fame since she was married to him? Let's be honest. The public never acknowledged Lisa Marie, in this high fashion, UNTIL she was linked with Michael. It appears that being married to Michael Jackson made Lisa Marie more famous than being the daughter of Elvis Presley.
Third, she speaks about "manipulation". But, in my opinion, with this interview, who is doing the "manipulation", now. This is a very vulnerable time for all who love Michael. People who are fond of him, especially his fans, are always open to hearing all they can about this wonderful and loving human being.
I wish I could find a very old interview from my collection where it was mentioned that SHE was the pursuer. When the first allegations erupted in Michael's life it was mentioned that Lisa kept sending him cards and balloons to get his attention. And, she succeeded! If you are wondering, yes this "old" interview was given long before she and Michael appeared on Diane Sawyer when Michael talks about how they met.
My question is: How is it you say that you are a private person but seek the attention of someone VERY public? Please give me a break!
Also, let us not forget that Lisa, HERSELF, had a drug problem. You know, all that talk in the past about her trying to save him? Well, sarcastically, I want to add that maybe it was Michael who was trying to save her, which is why her emotions for him are STRONGER than ever and will always be.
Lisa was emotionally unstable prior to marrying Michael, which in my opinion caused her to give up on him so easily. So, did she really love him? The truth rests between her and God.
But, what is love? 1 Corinthians 13:4-8: "Love is long-suffering and kind, ...does not behave indecently, does not look for its own interests...Love never fails".
Based upon Lisa's actions toward Michael does she define the "love" that 1 Corinthians 13:4-8 mentions?
Last, but not least, in my opinion if TRUE love was present in the marriage, it would have never ended and even more so if the union was a godly one.
---End Quote---
This is absolutely ridiculous.
Ridiculous, you say? Please do not insult my intellect!!! I can respect the fact that you disagree with what I have stated. Everyone here is entitled to their own opinon. However, I do believe it is possible to disagree by utilizing better choice of words. Don't you think? So she sat down with Oprah, talked at length about her relationship with Michael Jackson and gave a clear insight to the marriage for which (up until now) been answered very harshly or been made unclear by both herself and Michael. Clear insight? Perhaps, that's your opinion. However, if you were reae
Do you not understand the point she's making in her initial statement?
Again, please do not address me with disrespect or belittle me with such an approach? She wanted to give the interview away from any album promotion.
Oh I see and STILL she takes the time to mention that she has done promotions in the past and next year there will be an album. :doh: There was no link between this interview and any body of work she has planned in the future.
NO LINK? Oh really??? Then, why even bother to mention that she had an album in the works at all? Did not Oprah state on her official website, the following:
FOR THE FIRST TIME: LISA MARIE PRESLEY SPEAKS OUT ABOUT THE DEATH OF EX-HUSBAND MICHAEL JACKSON?
Why not drop ALL references to past promotions as well as a future music due out and simply discuss the relationship between them? :doh:
Look to other Jackson family members (most notably, Janet) and you can say the same thing about their interviews. Janet used to steer clear or try to keep Michael out of any interview she gave which was intended as a promotion for an upcoming album.
My reason for coming to this thread had NOTHING to do with Janet. Janet is Michael's sister and Lisa was Michael's wife; two completely different relationships.
She would sometimes talk about Michael if asked, but would also be very blunt and attempt to get the course of the interview back on to it's supposed topic (which was her own career). Now if Janet came out, sat down with Oprah, Geraldo or ANYONE and said that this interview is purely to talk about Michael and get everything out in the open so that when it does come time for promotion of future work, the issue will be left alone, would you really question her motives? In my opinion, Janet is not the topic of this discussion. I thought the title of this thread and therefore, there is no need to respond to your question.
Again, my concern is not a sister and brother matter; it's a husband and wife issue. Also, I do not place celebrities on pedestals. I am not a "yes" person to everything they may accomplish.
Don't be silly.
Don't be silly? Please do not address me in such a manner. If you disagree perhaps before you speak you can take the time to better communicate whenever you are dissatisfied with what someone states. Just to add, sometimes as humans we need to take a look in the mirror and simply apply the golden rule: Do unto others as you would have done unto you.
Last, but not least, you have your opinions and I have mine to which we are entitled. Perhaps, what can be learned is to provide constructive criticism instead of using abusive language to get one's views across.
For the record, I do not dislike Lisa. However, I am in total disagreement with some of the things she has said and done in connection with Michael.