Latest on MJJC

Janet Jackson: 'Michael represented everything to me'

elusive moonwalker said:
:rofl: and she believes everything thing that number 1 brother randy would tell her about the druggie.but shhh dont mention she didnt she him in years but she knows he was defo on something. thats what she really thinks of her bother. cant wait till murrays witness list is released
Click to expand...

THIS.............and you know a bunch of them including her will be top of the list. January is gonna be interesting for sure.
 
elusive moonwalker said:
:rofl: and she believes everything thing that number 1 brother randy would tell her about the druggie.but shhh dont mention she didnt she him in years but she knows he was defo on something. thats what she really thinks of her bother. cant wait till murrays witness list is released
Click to expand...

Many fans haven't met Michael but they could tell he was on something at times like around the MSG performance, If she hadn't seen him doesn't mean she didn't talke to other people who had regular contact with him, she was worried, what's so wrong with that? Look how Michael died, propofol is something, it was administered to him for sleep but that is still a drug, all in all her suspicions weren't completely wrong.

Murray's witness list won't help him. He was the doctor who decided to give his patient anesthesia to sleep at home without the proper equipment. If he tries to say Michael was an addict it still won't help his case because he would be admitting to another crime.

These are nice words Janet has about her brother and people still find a negative in it :rolleyes:
 
Moulin Rouge said:
Many fans haven't met Michael but they could tell he was on something at times like around the MSG performance, If she hadn't seen him doesn't mean she didn't talke to other people who had regular contact with him, she was worried, what's so wrong with that? Look how Michael died, propofol is something, it was administered to him for sleep but that is still a drug, all in all her suspicions weren't completely wrong.

Murray's witness list won't help him. He was the doctor who decided to give his patient anesthesia to sleep at home without the proper equipment. If he tries to say Michael was an addict it still won't help his case because he would be admitting to another crime.

These are nice words Janet has about her brother and people still find a negative in it :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I 100% agree especially they say this with bad grammar lol. The MJJ Community isn't a community anymore...

They think they KNOW everything that goes on the family personal lives..
 
Moulin Rouge said:
Many fans haven't met Michael but they could tell he was on something at times like around the MSG performance, If she hadn't seen him doesn't mean she didn't talke to other people who had regular contact with him, she was worried, what's so wrong with that? Look how Michael died, propofol is something, it was administered to him for sleep but that is still a drug, all in all her suspicions weren't completely wrong.

Murray's witness list won't help him. He was the doctor who decided to give his patient anesthesia to sleep at home without the proper equipment. If he tries to say Michael was an addict it still won't help his case because he would be admitting to another crime.

These are nice words Janet has about her brother and people still find a negative in it :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
What you don't understand is that Michael was on medication at times....NOT TO GET A HIGH. He had legitimate reasons for being on prescription meds from time to time. Although he wasn't a decrepid, he did have 2 auto-immune diseases he was going through. One of them was lupus and during the early 2000's (including around the MSG time) Michael was going through a lupus flare-up that he had to go on a medication call Predisone (sp?). It made Michael bloated. If people remember he was abit heavier during those times--although far from fat---but he was thicker than usual. And of course during that time he looked and appeared loopy. Hello! Side effects!! It can happen to anyone who's on medication.

Michael also had an ongoing physical pain from the scalp burn from 1984, an injury to his back during a performance in the late 1990's, etc. The man was in alot of pain. He dealt with it the best he could AND if you must know, he took pain-staking measures to deal with his medical issues without the use of Western medicine; but with a natural way. Michael made an effort not to repeat what happened to him and prescriptions in 1993.

For me, this is not about being 'in denial' or not wanting to face the facts about Michael. What angers me is family and so-called friends either doesn't bother or conveniently forget to mention these facts as to why Michael was on meds from time to time. They just keep talking about 'addiction', 'denial', and 'intervention'. Therefore, adding fuel to the fire that supports the myth that Michael was this long-time drug addict whose death was 'inevitable' (one of Lisa Marie's favorite words) and Michael was partially responsible because he 'asked' and 'demanded' Propofol. There are people and of course media who are using the words of Janet, Lisa Marie and now Katherine (God bless her) to justify insulting Michael with addict and junkie labels.

Whatever interventions they may have done; whatever problems they felt or heard or believed Michael may have had with prescriptions, NONE OF THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL'S DEATH ON JUNE 25TH! ESPECIALLY, SINCE HIS AUTOPSY STATED THE ONLY DRUGS IN HIS SYSTEM WAS THE ONES THAT WERE GIVEN TO HIM THAT NIGHT BY HIS 'DOCTOR'. AND HIS ORGANS WERE HEALTHY.
 
enlightenu said:
What you don't understand is that Michael was on medication at times....NOT TO GET A HIGH. He had legitimate reasons for being on prescription meds from time to time. Although he wasn't a decrepid, he did have 2 auto-immune diseases he was going through. One of them was lupus and during the early 2000's (including around the MSG time) Michael was going through a lupus flare-up that he had to go on a medication call Predisone (sp?). It made Michael bloated. If people remember he was abit heavier during those times--although far from fat---but he was thicker than usual. And of course during that time he looked and appeared loopy. Hello! Side effects!! It can happen to anyone who's on medication.

Michael also had an ongoing physical pain from the scalp burn from 1984, an injury to his back during a performance in the late 1990's, etc. The man was in alot of pain. He dealt with it the best he could AND if you must know, he took pain-staking measures to deal with his medical issues without the use of Western medicine; but with a natural way. Michael made an effort not to repeat what happened to him and prescriptions in 1993.

For me, this is not about being 'in denial' or not wanting to face the facts about Michael. What angers me is family and so-called friends either doesn't bother or conveniently forget to mention these facts as to why Michael was on meds from time to time. They just keep talking about 'addiction', 'denial', and 'intervention'. Therefore, adding fuel to the fire that supports the myth that Michael was this long-time drug addict whose death was 'inevitable' (one of Lisa Marie's favorite words) and Michael was partially responsible because he 'asked' and 'demanded' Propofol. There are people and of course media who are using the words of Janet, Lisa Marie and now Katherine (God bless her) to justify insulting Michael with addict and junkie labels.

Whatever interventions they may have done; whatever problems they felt or heard or believed Michael may have had with prescriptions, NONE OF THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL'S DEATH ON JUNE 25TH! ESPECIALLY, SINCE HIS AUTOPSY STATED THE ONLY DRUGS IN HIS SYSTEM WAS THE ONES THAT WERE GIVEN TO HIM THAT NIGHT BY HIS 'DOCTOR'. AND HIS ORGANS WERE HEALTHY.
Click to expand...


Quoted for truth...

It hurts, really really bad when Michael is labeled a drug addict or one in denial, with all his problems he had to face. In 2001-2003, he also was being challenged and destroyed by Sony and their refusals to promote Invincible, the singles he wanted and all that. People really seem to be forgetful of that or just want to add their 2 cents to start an argument and defend the people they love. Michael, on the one hand, deserves to be defended, 'cause none of us will ever really get to understand all that he had endured, and still managed to smile and abstain from painkillers at times, even though the pains, whether emotional and mental and physical bothered him so. His problems were serious and intense, yet he was that strong for so many years. So all of you repeating how yes, he was addicted several times in his life, consider all this, put yourself in his place and then think how you would have survived any differently, if you had survived, and how it is fair to go on TV and tell he was this and that, when tabloids of the worst kind keep doing that, and when his children open the TV to watch what's being said about his father and that he is not here to protect them. Keep thinking how many people destroyed him in life and now ruin his memory and honestly conclude whether it's fair or not.
 
Last edited:
enlightenu said:
What you don't understand is that Michael was on medication at times....NOT TO GET A HIGH. He had legitimate reasons for being on prescription meds from time to time. Although he wasn't a decrepid, he did have 2 auto-immune diseases he was going through. One of them was lupus and during the early 2000's (including around the MSG time) Michael was going through a lupus flare-up that he had to go on a medication call Predisone (sp?). It made Michael bloated. If people remember he was abit heavier during those times--although far from fat---but he was thicker than usual. And of course during that time he looked and appeared loopy. Hello! Side effects!! It can happen to anyone who's on medication.

Michael also had an ongoing physical pain from the scalp burn from 1984, an injury to his back during a performance in the late 1990's, etc. The man was in alot of pain. He dealt with it the best he could AND if you must know, he took pain-staking measures to deal with his medical issues without the use of Western medicine; but with a natural way. Michael made an effort not to repeat what happened to him and prescriptions in 1993.

For me, this is not about being 'in denial' or not wanting to face the facts about Michael. What angers me is family and so-called friends either doesn't bother or conveniently forget to mention these facts as to why Michael was on meds from time to time. They just keep talking about 'addiction', 'denial', and 'intervention'. Therefore, adding fuel to the fire that supports the myth that Michael was this long-time drug addict whose death was 'inevitable' (one of Lisa Marie's favorite words) and Michael was partially responsible because he 'asked' and 'demanded' Propofol. There are people and of course media who are using the words of Janet, Lisa Marie and now Katherine (God bless her) to justify insulting Michael with addict and junkie labels.

Whatever interventions they may have done; whatever problems they felt or heard or believed Michael may have had with prescriptions, NONE OF THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL'S DEATH ON JUNE 25TH! ESPECIALLY, SINCE HIS AUTOPSY STATED THE ONLY DRUGS IN HIS SYSTEM WAS THE ONES THAT WERE GIVEN TO HIM THAT NIGHT BY HIS 'DOCTOR'. AND HIS ORGANS WERE HEALTHY.
Click to expand...

SPEAK IT!!!!!:clapping:
 
enlightenu said:
What you don't understand is that Michael was on medication at times....NOT TO GET A HIGH. He had legitimate reasons for being on prescription meds from time to time. Although he wasn't a decrepid, he did have 2 auto-immune diseases he was going through. One of them was lupus and during the early 2000's (including around the MSG time) Michael was going through a lupus flare-up that he had to go on a medication call Predisone (sp?). It made Michael bloated. If people remember he was abit heavier during those times--although far from fat---but he was thicker than usual. And of course during that time he looked and appeared loopy. Hello! Side effects!! It can happen to anyone who's on medication.

Michael also had an ongoing physical pain from the scalp burn from 1984, an injury to his back during a performance in the late 1990's, etc. The man was in alot of pain. He dealt with it the best he could AND if you must know, he took pain-staking measures to deal with his medical issues without the use of Western medicine; but with a natural way. Michael made an effort not to repeat what happened to him and prescriptions in 1993.

For me, this is not about being 'in denial' or not wanting to face the facts about Michael. What angers me is family and so-called friends either doesn't bother or conveniently forget to mention these facts as to why Michael was on meds from time to time. They just keep talking about 'addiction', 'denial', and 'intervention'. Therefore, adding fuel to the fire that supports the myth that Michael was this long-time drug addict whose death was 'inevitable' (one of Lisa Marie's favorite words) and Michael was partially responsible because he 'asked' and 'demanded' Propofol. There are people and of course media who are using the words of Janet, Lisa Marie and now Katherine (God bless her) to justify insulting Michael with addict and junkie labels.

Whatever interventions they may have done; whatever problems they felt or heard or believed Michael may have had with prescriptions, NONE OF THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL'S DEATH ON JUNE 25TH! ESPECIALLY, SINCE HIS AUTOPSY STATED THE ONLY DRUGS IN HIS SYSTEM WAS THE ONES THAT WERE GIVEN TO HIM THAT NIGHT BY HIS 'DOCTOR'. AND HIS ORGANS WERE HEALTHY.
Click to expand...

preach it .but some people are never gonna learn,for them what family is saying is gospel and whatever is in the autopsy is another conspiracy.
 
enlightenu said:
What you don't understand is that Michael was on medication at times....NOT TO GET A HIGH. He had legitimate reasons for being on prescription meds from time to time. Although he wasn't a decrepid, he did have 2 auto-immune diseases he was going through. One of them was lupus and during the early 2000's (including around the MSG time) Michael was going through a lupus flare-up that he had to go on a medication call Predisone (sp?). It made Michael bloated. If people remember he was abit heavier during those times--although far from fat---but he was thicker than usual. And of course during that time he looked and appeared loopy. Hello! Side effects!! It can happen to anyone who's on medication.

Michael also had an ongoing physical pain from the scalp burn from 1984, an injury to his back during a performance in the late 1990's, etc. The man was in alot of pain. He dealt with it the best he could AND if you must know, he took pain-staking measures to deal with his medical issues without the use of Western medicine; but with a natural way. Michael made an effort not to repeat what happened to him and prescriptions in 1993.

For me, this is not about being 'in denial' or not wanting to face the facts about Michael. What angers me is family and so-called friends either doesn't bother or conveniently forget to mention these facts as to why Michael was on meds from time to time. They just keep talking about 'addiction', 'denial', and 'intervention'. Therefore, adding fuel to the fire that supports the myth that Michael was this long-time drug addict whose death was 'inevitable' (one of Lisa Marie's favorite words) and Michael was partially responsible because he 'asked' and 'demanded' Propofol. There are people and of course media who are using the words of Janet, Lisa Marie and now Katherine (God bless her) to justify insulting Michael with addict and junkie labels.

Whatever interventions they may have done; whatever problems they felt or heard or believed Michael may have had with prescriptions, NONE OF THAT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL'S DEATH ON JUNE 25TH! ESPECIALLY, SINCE HIS AUTOPSY STATED THE ONLY DRUGS IN HIS SYSTEM WAS THE ONES THAT WERE GIVEN TO HIM THAT NIGHT BY HIS 'DOCTOR'. AND HIS ORGANS WERE HEALTHY.
Click to expand...
thankyou for writing this.....:clapping::clapping:
 
^^ It doesnt matter. Why does it have to be negative? Naturally people are going to bring up her past comments. This has been the first public comment that Janet has made, that has been remotely positive about Michael so yea fans are going to bring other comments she has said in the past because most of them have been negative about Michael.



Memefan said:
Nicest thing she's said about MJ since he passed.

After watching the kids' interview earlier this week, I don't care what any other member of the family says about MJ...I am just happy these three will keep his memory alive by reminding folks what a good man & father he was to them.
Click to expand...

Well said, agree.
 
strawberry45220 said:
there is nothing wrong with being happy, is she happy about lsong Michael no, she is overall happy with her life, nothing wrong with that all and if you have a problem with that I am truly sorry some people have a miseable life.
Click to expand...

let's just be real about this whole thing, or it will never be solved.

i realize some members aren't here, anymore, and i understand both sides...to an extent.

there's sort of a twilight zone thing going on here.
it shouldn't be foreign that a member might be befuddled that someone can smile for so long after such a loss. and i think it's a real feeling, by a real person, and it shouldn't be stifled.

on the other hand..i can see where some say that we should march on.

but i feel like there is a psyching out process going on in this subject matter. as if people are being trained to be a certain way about discussing these matters, by each other. and that shouldn't be happening.

i have lost my father, and he wasn't murdered. and that was 17 years ago. and i was fairly close to him, yet losing him is still a reason why i sometimes have a hard time smiling. does that make me a miserable person? no. i have my peace times..my good times..but i shouldn't have to smile like Janet to avoid being called a miserable person.
 
Last edited:
144 said:
let's just be real about this whole thing, or it will never be solved.

i realize some members aren't here, anymore, and i understand both sides...to an extent.

there's sort of a twilight zone thing going on here.
it shouldn't be foreign that a member might be befuddled that someone can smile for so long after such a loss. and i think it's a real feeling, by a real person, and it shouldn't be stifled.

on the other hand..i can see where some say that we should march on.

but i feel like there is a psyching out process going on in this subject matter. as if people are being trained to be a certain way about discussing these matters, by each other. and that shouldn't be happening.

i have lost my father, and he wasn't murdered. and that was 17 years ago. and i was fairly close to him, yet losing him is still a reason why i sometimes have a hard time smiling. does that make me a miserable person? no. i have my peace times..my good times..but i shouldn't have to smile like Janet to avoid being called a miserable person.
Click to expand...


Did I say you live a miserable life if you don't smile, I said and this imo if you have a problem seeing somebody happy than yes something is wrong with you, you heard the old saying misery loves company? do you like seeing like seeing people in pain or something? cause I don't and I don't need to see people bent over with grieft to prove they love somebody , which is what the poster was trying to say I guess.
further more Janet already explained that smiling is defensive mechinicasm for her, and it doesn't have nothing to do with moving on she even said exactly what you said some days you have your at peace somedays your not, somedays are harder,
 
Moogisland said:
Janet, Lisa Marie and Katherine (his own mother) have all confirmed his PROBLEMS with drugs. It is quite clear he had an addiction to pain killers and needed help. None of these 3 have specifically called him a 'drug addict'.

I don't know how anyone can pretend he didn't have a problem.

Some you MJ fans need to wake up. Like seriously.
I've been a fan for years, but now he's gone, many truths have come out. And he's not entirely the man he portrayed. He was in denial about plastic surgery (cause he thought he was ugly), he lied about using products to whiten his skin to cover the bloches from his vitiligo etc etc. FFS, even in the trial he had porno mags and we learnt he drunk wine even though he said to his fans he didn't drink.

I still love Mj and his music. But seriously, some of you need to wake up and accept he wasn't exactly the angelic figure he portrayed himself as. I think he was a bit messed up.
Click to expand...

:blink:



:doh:
 
strawberry45220 said:
Did I say you live a miserable life if you don't smile, I said and this imo if you have a problem seeing somebody happy than yes something is wrong with you, you heard the old saying misery loves company? do you like seeing like seeing people in pain or something? cause I don't and I don't need to see people bent over with grieft to prove they love somebody , which is what the poster was trying to say I guess.
further more Janet already explained that smiling is defensive mechinicasm for her, and it doesn't have nothing to do with moving on she even said exactly what you said some days you have your at peace somedays your not, somedays are harder,
Click to expand...

yes, you did say what you claim you didn't say. and you're wrong. because you think somebody has a problem with happiness, because they are startled at Janet's disposition.
 
Moogisland said:
Janet, Lisa Marie and Katherine (his own mother) have all confirmed his PROBLEMS with drugs. It is quite clear he had an addiction to pain killers and needed help. None of these 3 have specifically called him a 'drug addict'.

I don't know how anyone can pretend he didn't have a problem.

Some you MJ fans need to wake up. Like seriously.
I've been a fan for years, but now he's gone, many truths have come out. And he's not entirely the man he portrayed. He was in denial about plastic surgery (cause he thought he was ugly), he lied about using products to whiten his skin to cover the bloches from his vitiligo etc etc. FFS, even in the trial he had porno mags and we learnt he drunk wine even though he said to his fans he didn't drink.

I still love Mj and his music. But seriously, some of you need to wake up and accept he wasn't exactly the angelic figure he portrayed himself as. I think he was a bit messed up.
Click to expand...

so you believe everybody but Michael. please never serve jury duty. and hope to god, you're never on the receiving end of a judgment call. and, among other things, you don't read rules before coming to fansites.
 
Last edited:
144 said:
so you believe everybody but Michael. please never serve jury duty. and hope to god, you're never on the receiving end of a judgment call. and, among other things, you don't read rules before coming to fansites.
Click to expand...
Word of the day, and what's mind boggling is that she is getting away with blatant disrespect towards Michael numerous times
 
Last edited:
Moogisland said:
Janet, Lisa Marie and Katherine (his own mother) have all confirmed his PROBLEMS with drugs. It is quite clear he had an addiction to pain killers and needed help. None of these 3 have specifically called him a 'drug addict'.

I don't know how anyone can pretend he didn't have a problem.

Some you MJ fans need to wake up. Like seriously.
I've been a fan for years, but now he's gone, many truths have come out. And he's not entirely the man he portrayed. He was in denial about plastic surgery (cause he thought he was ugly), he lied about using products to whiten his skin to cover the bloches from his vitiligo etc etc. FFS, even in the trial he had porno mags and we learnt he drunk wine even though he said to his fans he didn't drink.

I still love Mj and his music. But seriously, some of you need to wake up and accept he wasn't exactly the angelic figure he portrayed himself as. I think he was a bit messed up.
Click to expand...

Moogisland said:
What is there to take from Michael. He didn't tell us anything and when he did it was half truths.
You ask such a dumb question, cause 'Everybody' happens to be his own mother, sister and ex-wife.
I think they know a little bit more about him than YOU!!

And rules? Yeah, your the one, along with many others attacking Janet, when the rule is not to insult other family members.
Click to expand...


...and you are a troll.

GTFOH...MJ did not owe you, nor I, anything. He had a right not to share everything with the public.

I haven't read Janet an interview where Janet discusses her past drug issues. MJ did....live from Neverland ...Dec 1993.



And that is why Janet will always be a failure....because of stans like you.
 
Moogisland, you better control your frustrations. Who needs to wake up is you. It could be anyone, not just Michael Jackson, that are entitled to their privacy. He did not need to tell anything he didn't want to you or anyone. He always strived to be a good example for people, and he made a difference in the lives of many, in spite of his many pains. If you heard of this word before, that is. Nobody has a right to delve into somebody else's medical problems that are derived from life's problems and make them public, go on TV and put them on blast and pretend like they know them, even though they don't really. It's unacceptable to do that to a dead person who happened to be family.

Jackson did not proclaim himself to be an angel or anything, and he said so himself. I wonder if you could do or endure the things that Jackson did in his life and with that much dignity. He was a way way much better person than you, that is for sure, you just pretend to get real, putting people here on blast, and your attitude proves just that, including that you're a bit messed up yourself. Before calling out on others, look in the mirror and get to know yourself, for obviously you've serious knowledge gaps when it comes to others, and meanness is derived from ignorance.
 
Last edited:
Alma said:
Moogisland, you better control your frustrations. Who needs to wake up is you. It could be anyone, not just Michael Jackson, that are entitled to their privacy. He did not need to tell anything he didn't want to you or anyone. He always strived to be a good example for people, and he made a difference in the lives of many, in spite of his many pains. If you heard of this word before, that is. Nobody has a right to delve into somebody else's medical problems that are derived from life's problems and make them public, go on TV and put them on blast and pretend like they know them, even though they don't really. It's unacceptable to do that to a dead person who happened to be family.

Jackson did not proclaim to be an angel or anything, and he said so himself. I wonder if you could do or endure the things that Jackson did in his life and with that much dignity. He was a way way much better person than you, that is for sure, you just pretend to get real, putting people here on blast, and your attitude proves just that, including that you're a bit messed up yourself. Before calling out on others, look in the mirror and get to know yourself, for obviously you've serious knowledge gaps when it comes to others.
Click to expand...

^^ This.

I think there are fans who think he was an angel, but I don't think most of us think that. But he wasn't more messed up than most people are, despite of his life being much harder than the average person's.

So he watched porn? So what? It's not like the vast majority of men in this world don't do that. So he drank alcohol? So what? It's not like many people in this world don't do that. (In fact, a certain amount of alcohol is healthy, according to doctors.) I never had the impression he was an alcoholist, or something - and there's no proof of something like that.

As for bleaching his skin. The media always accused him of bleaching his skin because "he didn't want to be black". That's a big fat lie and we all know that. We also know that he used creams to even out his skin and make blotches disappear. We know that's one form of treatment for vitiligo patients. I thought when Michael said he didn't bleach his skin it's obvious he meant: he didn't bleach his skin to want to be white (like the media accused him of doing). That's what he meant and I thought it's obvious by now, at least for fans. Apparently it isn't. Yes, he could have been more accurate about it, but 1) he is not owing the public an explanation about everything he does, 2) it's something he was obviously embarassed to talk about, so he just wanted to quickly get over such questions in interviews, 3) like Macaulay Culkin told Larry King, Michael wasn't great at expressing himself accurately in interviews and that brought a lot of misunderstanding of him. You can clearly see that in Bashir's interview that if there were subjects those embarassed him he didn't give accurate answers, just wanted to quickly get over it - even if he could have done a lot to defend himself with a more accurate and elaborate answer. One thing that jumps to my mind is when Bashir asked him if he didn't go to jail in 1993 because he paid Chandler off, and Michael answers with a "yes". But it's not true! The settlement was only to settle the civil trial, it had nothing to do with the criminal trial! Michael could have and should have elaborated this, instead he gave an answer which wasn't true and even made him look guilty. Even if the answer he gave wasn't true, he did not "lie". Noone lies to make himself look guilty. He just wasn't a good communicator when he wasn't in his comfort zone and that's it. Same about what he said about skin bleach.

He didn't lie about that he just didn't elaborate on it. He told a long time ago that he had vitiligo and that's why his skin is turning white. And it's true, since if he hadn't had vitiligo he wouldn't have to use creams to whiten his splotches.
What else do we want? That people didn't believe him is not Michael's fault.

According to Michael's long-time friend David Nordahl the media KNEW very well that Michael had vitiligo and STILL chose to write BS about him bleaching his skin to turn into a white person. They KNEW and still wrote BS. So what Michael could do about it?

I don't think anything of the above makes him a "messed up" person. If so, then 90% of this world are made of messed up people.
 
Last edited:
family stans will always have an excuse and blame mj for everything. i guess mj didnt feel the same about his sister after she lied to him for 10 years about not being married. just a thought

He didn't lie about that he just didn't elaborate on it. He told a long time ago that he had vitiligo and that's why his skin is turning white. And it's true, since if he hadn't had vitiligo he wouldn't have to use creams to whiten his splotches.
What else do we want? That people didn't believe him is not Michael's fault.
Click to expand...
when its written all over the autopsy report and when his eldest son has the disease aswell u still get haters looking for excuses. mjs knocks two birds down with one stone when hes not even here and haters still live in denial

I haven't read Janet an interview where Janet discusses her past drug issues. MJ did....live from Neverland ...Dec 1993.
Click to expand...

yeah info about her stealing her chiefs indentity for false prescriptions and him sueing and wining the case

VALTREX AND OPIATE BETA BLOCKERS aka genital herpes and meds u give an addict to prevent them from getting high even if they shoot up.
 
Last edited:
Well good luck to her, somehow I don't see many people in Europe and the rest of the world beside US and maybe Japan being interested in any thing Janet Jackson, leave alone a world tour tbh. But hey she gotta do what she gotta do. She should go for it, if that's what she wants.
 
Memefan said:
...and you are a troll.

GTFOH...MJ did not owe you, nor I, anything. He had a right not to share everything with the public.

I haven't read Janet an interview where Janet discusses her past drug issues. MJ did....live from Neverland ...Dec 1993.



And that is why Janet will always be a failure....because of stans like you.
Click to expand...

Again with the name-calling. SMDH
 
Moogisland needs to be set straight! if you gotta school an alledged MJ fan about Michael truly having vitiligo then we all know a fraud when we read their posts! sick and tired of some Janet fans posing as though they are truly Michael fans when all they do on the board is disrespect the hell out of the man on A BOARD DEDICATED TO HIM! None of you would be taking any crap from anyone going a Janet board and dissing her so don't come here and do it to Michael!

Some of you really think you're slick! don't play around with Michael Jackson fans!
 
Last edited:
ExoticPrincess said:
Moogisland needs to be set straight! if you gotta school an alledged MJ fan about Michael truly having vitiligo then we all know a fraud when we read their posts! sick and tired of some Janet fans posing as though they are truly Michael fans when all they do on the board is disrespect the hell out of the man on A BOARD dedicated to him! None of you would be taking any crap from anyone going a Janet board and dissing her so don't come here and do it to Michael!
Click to expand...

good post
 
I think everybody needs to get a grip seriosuly this thread wasn't even about drugs so why keep bringing up in every Janet thread ex , she's going on tour *** inserts ** she's going on oprah to talk about drugs. so why get mad when someone doesn't agree with you, seriosuly ?
and moongisland seriously Michael or anybody else is not required at all to talk about their health, he didn't even have to talk about his personale life at all,
 
144 said:
yes, you did say what you claim you didn't say. and you're wrong. because you think somebody has a problem with happiness, because they are startled at Janet's disposition.
Click to expand...

no and that person has issues period.
 
ExoticPrincess;3095318 said:
Moogisland needs to be set straight! if you gotta school an alledged MJ fan about Michael truly having vitiligo then we all know a fraud when we read their posts! sick and tired of some Janet fans posing as though they are truly Michael fans when all they do on the board is disrespect the hell out of the man on A BOARD DEDICATED TO HIM! None of you would be taking any crap from anyone going a Janet board and dissing her so don't come here and do it to Michael!

Some of you really think you're slick! don't play around with Michael Jackson fans!
Click to expand...
Àmen! U see ppl getting banned for nothing, yet people like Moogisland who is a Janet fan, gets away time after time with disrespecting Michael Jackson. This really makes u think, I even reported her numerous times and so did other still nothing happened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top