We all know that this is true, however, when there is a trial in the works, you can't really say it how it is sometimes because it could be violating some sort of rule, or it could turn out to be a false accusation in the end [I am not saying this is the case here, but I am speaking in general.] There's a reason why some people are uneasy to talk about things when a trial is approaching--fear of violating court orders, etc. It's all very touchy, and people are right to be careful.
With that being said, I think it's obvious that Murray is the one responsible for this. There is no way, logically, that they could somehow acquit him. Being a doctor, he holds primary responsibility for his patient...and if he shows even the tiniest bit of negligence, it's pretty much over.