Roxanne
Proud Member
most societies throughout the history of the human race have been run by men
but what if all the world leaders were women do u think the world would be different than it is today ?
i honestly think that it would. it'd be sooooo much better. if we take a look at world history we wont see a single war started by women. all wars all disasters have been started by men.
men are by nature violent creatures. women have all the sensitivity and humanity to make this world a better place. (of course i am talking in general. theres always exceptions on both sides.) heres an article that i happened to read recently and that gave me the idea to start this thread.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/23308727/?GT1=10856
i didnt copy and paste coz its pretty long but heres a small part of it :
"If we were in charge, things might actually change. Instead of posturing, we’d have cooperation. Instead of gridlock, we’d have progress. Instead of a shouting match, we’d have a conversation. A very long conversation. But a conversation nonetheless. Everyone would just hold hands and sing “Kumbaya.”
Or would they? What would it be like if women ruled the world, I began to wonder?
Would anything really change? Would the world be a better place? My hunch was that more women in public life would, in fact, make things better.
After all, more women already have.
It’s easy (and perhaps a bit facile) to argue that men haven’t done such a great job. The last century was the bloodiest in human history, and so far, this one has been a tale of war, terrorism, religious extremism, abject poverty, and disease. I’m not saying it’s all men’s fault. But let’s just say, they’ve been in charge, and it doesn’t seem we’re much closer to finding answers to these profound and vexing problems."
but what if all the world leaders were women do u think the world would be different than it is today ?
i honestly think that it would. it'd be sooooo much better. if we take a look at world history we wont see a single war started by women. all wars all disasters have been started by men.
men are by nature violent creatures. women have all the sensitivity and humanity to make this world a better place. (of course i am talking in general. theres always exceptions on both sides.) heres an article that i happened to read recently and that gave me the idea to start this thread.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/23308727/?GT1=10856
i didnt copy and paste coz its pretty long but heres a small part of it :
"If we were in charge, things might actually change. Instead of posturing, we’d have cooperation. Instead of gridlock, we’d have progress. Instead of a shouting match, we’d have a conversation. A very long conversation. But a conversation nonetheless. Everyone would just hold hands and sing “Kumbaya.”
Or would they? What would it be like if women ruled the world, I began to wonder?
Would anything really change? Would the world be a better place? My hunch was that more women in public life would, in fact, make things better.
After all, more women already have.
It’s easy (and perhaps a bit facile) to argue that men haven’t done such a great job. The last century was the bloodiest in human history, and so far, this one has been a tale of war, terrorism, religious extremism, abject poverty, and disease. I’m not saying it’s all men’s fault. But let’s just say, they’ve been in charge, and it doesn’t seem we’re much closer to finding answers to these profound and vexing problems."
