woohoo, I miss you much, etc.
uke:Well, I'm old enough to remember The Jacksons. It's not the same with Mike solo to me. It's like I'd like to see The Beatles if it were possible, but not George, Paul, John, & Ringo individually so much. There's something thats missing in the solo shows. Bad was great, but the later tours ones tended to have too much lipsyncing. I feel a concert should be live, and not Memorex. (That's an old commercial, if you didn't get it.
) I still think a tour with Prince would be better than one with Janet. Now a Janet tour with Madonna would be more interesting since they like bondage so much, lol. Throw in Millie Jackson as the opening act, lol. Or a family show with all the siblings like the Vegas one in the mid 70s would be cool. But then again I don't know what kind of skits they can perform now. :tease: Well, I'm old enough to remember The Jacksons. It's not the same with Mike solo to me. It's like I'd like to see The Beatles if it were possible, but not George, Paul, John, & Ringo individually so much. There's something thats missing in the solo shows. Bad was great, but the later tours ones tended to have too much lipsyncing. I feel a concert should be live, and not Memorex. (That's an old commercial, if you didn't get it.
I'm a music fan, not a popularity fan. That's the problem with the music industry today. I don't really care if he'll sell more tickets, if that's the only criteria for a tour he can tour with Lil Wayne and The Cheetah Girls instead. I like Janet, but it wouldn't really work. They would have to have two separate shows (which would be rather expensive to produce in their case with the big productions and all), where the the brothers would have one. Unless they do some sort of Ozzfest type of thing with other acts.
