Its not that we say its wrong when you defend Michael.
Its just that some peoplen here defend Michael when its not necessary. Most problems occur when there is a thread thats do with Michael and another artist.
We are all fans here, of course we are. Otherwise we wouldnt be here.
Some of us here just feel that other fans love for Michael causes them to be unfair to other artists at times. Thats all.
well..i think people cannot distinguish between peoples' emotions and track record. MJ is the best selling artist..he revived the industry twice. and that's something no other artist did, in more than fifty years. the emotions of the fans reflect that. other artists didn't compare..and when we get ral about that, some don't like that...but..that's how we feel.
i'm sure, when Elvis was burning up the charts, more than other artists, the fans back then, reflected that, too, compared to other artists at that time.
then there is character. if an artist exhibits great character, the fans reflect that. if the artist doesn't, the fans reflect that, too.
and some felt that Elvis might have gotten away with things, that MJ couldn't get away with, according to the media..so..the fans reflected that, too.
and..if Chris Brown, for example, does something, and the media is less severe to him, than to Michael, who wasn't found guilty of anything..the MJ fans will reflect that too.
if the media was less severe with Mj, the fans might have been less exhuberant in being overprotective of him...
it's about reflecting...that's all. it has been more necessary to protect MIhcael, because everything against him was like gout..and severe..and unnecessary...so..the fans gave back what was thrown.
and if everybody seems to be chasing Michael's money, like being exhibited in tmz reports, these days..we're gunna question those people..when we know they should be self sufficient. getting on a money chasing bandwagon arouses suspicion.