It was not a "flat out lie," I was talking about religious peoples in general, not strictly JW, and comparing how JW are perceived in my area. I don't know (or care) where Pace's or MJJLatvia's areas are or how JW are treated there (that will be their own thing to disclose), but around here they're a pervasive force. And no they don't believe in the Hell Evangelicals believe in [those are the ones preaching that you're going to Hell, etc], but they do believe everyone who isn't affiliated with them is somehow "of the Devil/profane," and therefore "doing it wrong." So while the abrasive "you're going to Hell" which is typical of Evangelicals is missing, there is implied superiority in the JW message, and that bothers me when it makes its way towards my property (which I like to think of as a no religion zone).
So lies and misinformation were not told here. Perhaps things were put in unclear terms, but in regard to both, it's really "same difference" as far as I'm concerned, they're both insinuating you're not living your life right as per their beliefs when nobody asked their opinion on it.
MJJ7777 said:
its just hard seeing some attitudes on an MJ board of all places. I always see this kinda stuff on an MJ board and yes after sometime when you think you're dealing with the kind people whom you esteem to be of a certain character (Knowing we've all seen what Michael went through with public opinion and the press' mishandling of facts, I thought as MJ fans we all learned from that and we saw the world through a different pair of eyes, I thought the ability to be less judgmental and more empathetic was what set us apart from so many other groups of fans... I thought we all got the same message from Michael's life and work and everything he stood for but I thought wrong, way wrong ) and they let you down by forming and spreading opinions based on carelessly unchecked facts, it does begin to feel like a sort of persecution...theres alot of hateful cults people could sit around and lament about but no its always lets trash talk JWs.
I'd like to remind the world at large that being a Michael Jackson fan does not compel me to act a certain way. I will act however I see fit, as I am my own person and do not base my personality or beliefs upon the personality or beliefs of musicians I listen to. I'm not prone to brainwashing, whether religious or secular. Michael was his own person who lived his life in the way he saw fit and had his own opinions regarding various topics, and I am my own person with VERY different views from his (one of which is showing little sympathy when groups of people who go around soliciting on private property or littering public property implying they're better than everyone else and will be "saved" while the others either rot in some fiery pit or undergo some unknown fate complain because others don't like them very much). With that said, I was merely drawing comparisons between two groups of people who see it fit to go porch to porch badgering their neighbours (around my area, evangelicals and JW). The former will blatantly tell you of your damnation, the latter will insinuate you're "not doing it right" regarding life. How is going door to door touting your beliefs tolerant of the world around you in any way? That's what we have churches for, so your lot can go and congregate in peace without being bothered/bothering anyone and speaking on your message to a willing audience to your little hearts' content.
If T.N.A., Respect77, or I were intolerant against religion, we'd advocate for the complete destruction of churches everywhere. I have yet to see that argument come up. The only thing we think is that JW (and religions with similar recruitment methods) are negatively perceived because they see it fit to go around preaching unto unwilling ears and leaving their pamphlets where they're not wanted. That's not an intolerant statement.
What is intolerant, however, is threatening to kick someone out of a church for making a video which just depicted werewolves, etc. in a frivolous way.
I find it funny that religious people often draw on the "intolerance" card when the very principles of pretty much about any given religion are all about intolerance.
I'm about the most tolerant person you'll ever meet. Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law basically sums up what I believe in--however, your right to do what you will ends where mine begins, and if I don't want to see your religious things outside your religious setting in a country which separates church from state, I am within my right to take up that position. Let church things remain in church.
And, once again, I am left with some junk upon my porch.
Just as an aside, I'd be equally annoyed if someone went door-to-door preaching politics to me or leaving political pamphlets at my door without my expressed interest in them, so my stance is not expressly an anti-religion one. I'm against people thinking their views on a given thing are better than others' enough to trespass on their property and will by leaving unwanted information/wasting time.