I just read another review(good) that implied family shows up wanting money or pressure to do shows. So it sounds like it's in there.
Amir Williams and Raymone sound like villains in the piece.
I can't tell you because I haven't read the book or seen the movie yet. I personally don't have a problem with navi being Mexican. I will have a problem with it, if it's in any way pitiful acting or reduced to caricature and parody.and this is why this movie will be the train wreck because his family has been trashed for decades when they are not the root of the problem......
how were they pressuring Michael to do shows when Michael Jackson himself wanted to book more shows at that 02 arena for a concert series than any performer who preceded him.....he wanted that distinction, and thus the 50 shows were booked.......
and for a person of mexican descent to portray a man who was black shows just far how things got way outta hand and fast........
The bodyguards' book wasn't the only account telling the Jacksons were pressuring Michael with money and doing shows,business associates in 2006-2008 stated that there wasn't anything wrong or odd with him, they were the ones putting the oddness and tension in the room bothering Michael and pressuring him. Some fans of the family not wanting to accept the facts, that's another story.
and this is why this movie will be the train wreck because his family has been trashed for decades when they are not the root of the problem......
how were they pressuring Michael to do shows when Michael Jackson himself wanted to book more shows at that 02 arena for a concert series
The bodyguards' book wasn't the only account telling the Jacksons were pressuring Michael with money and doing shows,business associates in 2006-2008 stated that there wasn't anything wrong or odd with him, they were the ones putting the oddness and tension in the room bothering Michael and pressuring him. Some fans of the family not wanting to accept the facts, that's another story.
and this is why there's never going to be an accurate depiction of this man's life because everything is compartmentalized into each segment of his career based on the way things had evolved, and it's all based on the point of reference and who gets to tell the story
how did his family pressure him to do anything.......nobody or no fan has any concrete proof that was the case, how can they pressure him to do anything from 2006-2008 when he wasn't even in the country and was living a half a world away.
and at the end of the day, the real reality is that there wasn't any money in the end, Michael Jackson after 40 years of performing found himself a half a billion in the whole, and that's why he was in position where he had to agree to do a concert series he was not ready or capable to perform after not having done a concert series in 12 years.......
that's the only reason he did it......his family had nothing to do with that
the man hadn't recorded an album with his brothers since 1984 after Thriller so I'm supposed to believe that his brothers were banging on his door every day for 25 years to force him to perform with them
his brothers were not pressuring him to do shows as much as pressure in of itself force him to sign up for those 02 concerts.......
his business partner manager who help stage that auction in 2008 offered that opportunity for him to regain footing by agreeing to the 02 concerts. It wasn't even about his brothers......
He was estranged from his family for years after Thriller, not because of his family trying to greed off of him, heck he and Randy Jackson started their own music publishing company MIRAN back in 1980-1981......it was opportunists who greeded off of him and sought to separate him from his family once he reached the pinnacle of his career with Thriller.
Jermaine Jackson did a number of interviews in the mid 80s/early 90s that I know these bodyguards don't know anything about where he said how opportunists were already looking to divide and exploit the family during that time.
This movie will gloss over allot of realities when in reality, if things were where they should have been, Michael Jackson would not have been forced to sign up for these concerts, he would have been on cruise control and schedule future concerts when he was truly ready to do them
when a person finds themselves in that big a deficit, family is not the cause of that.
The best depiction of Michael Jackson was by the late Wylie Draper who hit MJ to a T and was a technically trained dancer to boot.
why can't a black person portray...
it's because...it would not look right, it wouldn't fly
I don't even post here anymore. Just came to see if there were any reviews about the movie. But you are grossly incorrect. His family was pressuring him and have pressured him throughout the years for various projects. They got him into various lawsuits for failed or botched projects. Heck even Janet was on TV talking about how they were trying to get MJ to tour. N every few years Jermaine would put it in the press that they were going on a reunion tour.
The biggest issue with the Jacksons(MJ included) is that they lack good business sense and/or have a knack for dealing with shady/incompetent people.
Yes it would. All black people aren't dark skinned
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Meanwhile, as Katherine stated in a deposition at the AEG trial, she as his mother wasn't even told about the full extent of MJ's problems as she "didn't like bad news". I guess her own peace of mind was more important than helping MJ.
Just to be precise, here it is from the LA Times's reporting about her testimony.
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/22/local/la-me-ln-katherine-jackson-asked-about-son-20130722
What I wanted to clarify is that it is nonsense to say that "his family are the ones who were always there for him while all his friends abandoned him", just because it was the family with him in court in 2005. IMO that they were there in 2005 was the bare minimum from a family that lived off MJ as much as they did. And even in that situation there were family members who were two-faced (*cough*Rebbie*cough*).
Elizabeth Taylor was there for MJ in 1993 in a way that mattered while Katherine cared more about not wanting to hear bad news, and Liz was also there for him in 2005. She never hesitated to defend him. Not showing up with him at trial every day does not change her support. I am sure there were also some other friends whose support never ceased but they were quietly supporting him from behind the scenes.
So from all that, from Elizabeth's support as compared to Katherine's in 1993, you managed to pick on two words to cling on? LOL.
I wasn't just talking about quiet support. I was also giving a very specific example in Elizabeth who gave more support - and effective support that mattered - to MJ in 1993 than his own mother did who was more worried about not wanting to hear bad news.
No one said anything about Rebbie saying something about MJ's fans so WTH? I was talking about her two-faced support to Stacy Brown during the trial while that guy was out there trashing MJ. And there were a couple of other instances in this family's history where some members seemed to have no problem with embracing people who were trashing MJ in the worst possible ways.
That's not "name-calling", those are facts as invonvenient as they may be for family fans. Blame the family for these not fans who point them out.
Elizabeth Taylor was there for MJ in 1993 in a way that mattered while Katherine cared more about not wanting to hear bad news, and Liz was also there for him in 2005. She never hesitated to defend him. .
Jackie wrote Can You Feel it, a staple song from the Jacksons
Michael and Jackie wrote Can you feel it not Jackie alone
@Bringing Brighter Days
You have an idealized view of the Jackson family and you are in denial about all their dysfunctionalities as the reason behind MJ's distancing himself from them and you always try to blame mysterious "outside sources" instead as if MJ was just some kind of mindless doll that did not have his own will and intentions.
That is also how the family always addressed the fact that MJ was not so happy to meet them at times. They blamed it on bodyguards and personal assistants and accused them of "keeping MJ away from them" as if it wasn't MJ paying those people and telling them to keep his family away. He had his good reasons to do so and IMO it is disrespectful to dismiss and ignore those reasons and pretend that they were not legit reasons. You must be in serious denial about the family's behavior when you do not see those reasons. And they have nothing to do with outside forces. They only have to do with the family's behavior with him.
And no one denies the brothers' contribution to the J5 or the Jackson's success but that doesn't make them entitled to MJ's solo success and money. It also does not make them entitled to force MJ into tours or performances if he did not want them.
But if he had signed up to the tour that his family was trying to pressure him into then it would have been alright?
And BTW, you can actually be grateful for this movie because it cherry picks the real story in a way that it wouldn't put his family into a bad light. That's how the content of this movie is censored compared to the book, not the other way around.