Yes, there is the concept of "forgiveness." In that, I'm sure Michael was a better person than I am! I'm just not there yet. . . . I believe forgiveness is important, but the person "forgiven" should have some understanding of his/her wrong-doing? The person should apologize? Make reparations, as possible? Without that understanding, I can't see much has been learned? I've not heard Murray apologize, for anything . . . not even to the Jackson family, even though he told police he administered the fatal dose of propofol and caused enormous grief for so many.
As I said earlier, in terms of "innocent until proven guilty," this is very different from Michael's situation where he WAS innocent, and always said that he was. Murray has already admitted to police, giving the fatal dose, and in that sense he IS guilty of that. He already SAID he did it, so it's different. . . . . What remains are the charges, in terms of what level of homicide it will be.
People who judged Michael did so because of false-accusations and tabloid garbage. With Murray, he's not denied killing Michael. He said he DID. I find that very different. It's not ok to judge a person, unless you are on a jury. Personally, I think it IS ok to make judgments about a person's actions, especially if they are known to be true.