I'd hope that Louis might feel compelled to look into this in more detail following these responses.
If Louis did a documentary where he credibly probed these cases (which would be a first in the mainstream!) I'm certain his influence would change many people's opinions on Michael for the better. Course it wouldn't surprise me either if he did one suggesting Michael Jackson fans were nutty and disconnected from reality, sort of like the way he portrayed scientologists in his movie.
I have bee saying this for the longest.Oh, so Geller was linked to getting Bashir in on the documentary gig? I must have misremembered. I thought he was linked to Theroux. Everyone hanging around Michael at that time just irritated the hell out of me, I know that much!! I never trusted any of them...Geller, Chopra....Boteach.....fake friends, all of them and Bashir screwed Michael over, really good.
Yes, Wade Robson is the lowest of the low as far as I'm concerned......he's actually worse than Chandler and Arvizo, in my estimation.
He can not make Jackson's fan look nutty. We deal in FACTS which they (haters) can not debate with creditability.I'd hope that Louis might feel compelled to look into this in more detail following these responses.
If Louis did a documentary where he credibly probed these cases (which would be a first in the mainstream!) I'm certain his influence would change many people's opinions on Michael for the better. Course it wouldn't surprise me either if he did one suggesting Michael Jackson fans were nutty and disconnected from reality, sort of like the way he portrayed scientologists in his movie.
IF he ever did a documentary that credibly probed the cases then I would be very, very surprised. He has laid his cards on the table and it's clear that he has already made his mind up about the allegations. His tweet stating that the Chandler case was plausible and his mention of Robson and George is worrying to me. It sounds like a guy who has already done some deeply flawed research into the subject. I hope he's not planning a new documentary on this subject because right now I'd bet a large amount of money that it would be seriously negative and biased. We should all direct him to read the books by Geraldine Hughes, Aphrodite Jones and Mary Fischer. Not to mention direct him to honest pro-MJ websites. Daily Michael is a good source for factual Robson material. Sadly there are a number of websites these days that specialise in taking the legal documents and presenting a grossly biased and unrealistic view of what they mean. To the unitiated these can appear well researched web spaces and I could imagine a lazy journalist relying heavily on them to save time and effort.
And if he do something this stupid, he will lose big time and will look more like a fake media person who is trying to bank off MJ who has been gone for 9 years. He can open that can of worms if he want to and there will be enuf counter debate to shut him down. All others have fail and he will to if he does such a thing. He better let dead dogs lay.IF he ever did a documentary that credibly probed the cases then I would be very, very surprised. He has laid his cards on the table and it's clear that he has already made his mind up about the allegations. His tweet stating that the Chandler case was plausible and his mention of Robson and George is worrying to me. It sounds like a guy who has already done some deeply flawed research into the subject. I hope he's not planning a new documentary on this subject because right now I'd bet a large amount of money that it would be seriously negative and biased. We should all direct him to read the books by Geraldine Hughes, Aphrodite Jones and Mary Fischer. Not to mention direct him to honest pro-MJ websites. Daily Michael is a good source for factual Robson material. Sadly there are a number of websites these days that specialise in taking the legal documents and presenting a grossly biased and unrealistic view of what they mean. To the unitiated these can appear well researched web spaces and I could imagine a lazy journalist relying heavily on them to save time and effort.
Oh, so Geller was linked to getting Bashir in on the documentary gig? I must have misremembered. I thought he was linked to Theroux. Everyone hanging around Michael at that time just irritated the hell out of me, I know that much!! I never trusted any of them...Geller, Chopra....Boteach.....fake friends, all of them and Bashir screwed Michael over, really good.
Yes, Wade Robson is the lowest of the low as far as I'm concerned......he's actually worse than Chandler and Arvizo, in my estimation.
Oh, so Geller was linked to getting Bashir in on the documentary gig? I must have misremembered. I thought he was linked to Theroux. Everyone hanging around Michael at that time just irritated the hell out of me, I know that much!! I never trusted any of them...Geller, Chopra....Boteach.....fake friends, all of them and Bashir screwed Michael over, really good.
Yes, Wade Robson is the lowest of the low as far as I'm concerned......he's actually worse than Chandler and Arvizo, in my estimation.
Did they try to incriminate Michael in 1985 or 1986?
Can anyone provide more information about this?
dam2040;4232367 said:Not sure any great detail, but it pretty much debunks itself. We think the guy touched kids, but he's getting a hi-five from the president so we'll let it slide? Come on..
ILoveHIStory;4236835 said:What’s mindblowing is that people think Michael Jackson fans would still support him if there was credible evidence of guilt.
NOBODY knows more about Jackson’s trials than his fans. They can quote evidence & trial transcripts all day. They know the cases inside out & backwards.
Goddess4Real;4236858 said:Yuuuuup and we have receipts!!!!!!! also I read on Taj Jackson's twitter account this.....
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Looking into starting a funding page for this MJ doc. I never wanted to do this because I know the media will have a field day with a Jackson asking for money. But to do it right and timely, it will unfortunately take funding.</p>— Taj Jackson (@tajjackson3) <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3/status/1083476484717572096?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Look I get that they want to do "the" doco to clear MJ's name.....but by the time they get this organised etc, the damage will be done. Why don't they just go to the media the same way they do when promoting themselves (tv shows, books....didn't Jermaine say that Wade and Joy helped him with his book??????) and put Rob$on and $afechuck etc on blast! Staying quiet doesn't work anymore!
Michael Jackson - FBI Investigative Files Released:
1/ https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/stories/2009/december/jackson_122209
2/ https://vault.fbi.gov/Michael Jackson
By https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com:
The Wade Robson Allegations (summary version)
https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2018/09/23/the-wade-robson-allegations/
The 1993 Chandler Allegations (summary version)
https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2018/09/23/the-1993-chandler-allegations-summary-version/
The 2005 Arvizo Allegations (summary version)
https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2018/09/23/the-2005-arvizo-allegations/
Jason Francia (summary version)
https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2018/09/23/jason-francia-summary-version/
By DAILY MICHAEL : http://dailymichael.com/lawsuits/robson-v-estate
By VINDICATING MICHAEL : https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com + VERITAS PROJECT: https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/veritas-project/
By MJ TRUTH NOW: https://mjjtruthnow.wordpress.com
By CHARLES THOMSON: https://twitter.com/CEThomson + http://www.charles-thomson.net/index.html
By MJJ JUSTICE PROJECT: https://mjjjusticeproject.wordpress.com
ABOUT THE CHANDLERS by - https://turningthetableonthechandlerallegations.wordpress.com
+
The Journal of Michael Jackson Academic Studies | ISSN: 2452-0497
Dynamic, Influential, Inclusive, Cultural, Explorative, Unique: http://michaeljacksonstudies.org