Designated thread for Jackson brothers interviews 2013.

Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

It's incredible the way Jermaine is lying.. I always think about the audience in those kind of situations.. that they just have no idea that they are being lied to.. right in the face.. let's say they meet a fan afterward who says: "no, what Jermaine was telling you there was bs... " Who will they believe... I agree with the member who said Jermaine likes to make himself look important!!
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Crazy how he wants to make it a race thing too. Saying they want u to believe a black man killed a black man. Well...Jermaine that's what happen. Murray did killed MJ he admitted given MJ the Propofol and they both black...so? He may think others were involved but, Murray still gave MJ the propofol. So, what the hell that gotta do with being black?
 
An interview with guardian that includes a lot of interesting stuff

The Jacksons: 'People have tried to tear down our family name'
They are famous as the most dysfunctional dynasty in showbusiness. But now The Jacksons are back with a new tour, and brothers Tito, Jackie, Marlon and Jermaine are keen to set the record straight
Share 7


inShare
0
Email

Paul Lester
The Guardian, Thursday 21 February 2013 13.57 EST
Jump to comments (0)

The Jackson Five (clockwise, from rear left): Jackie, Marlon, Tito, Jermaine, and Michael with theit parents Joe and Katherine in 1970. Photograph: John Olson/Getty Images
Three of the five original members of the Jackson 5 are waiting for the Guardian in a boardroom at the Grosvenor Hotel on London's Park Lane. Tito, 59, is wearing a deerstalker like a funked-up Sherlock Holmes and puffing away on a gold electronic cigarette. Jackie who, at 61, is the oldest Jackson, is the one whose face and light, high-pitched speaking voice most resemble his legendary younger brother's. And Marlon, 55, the closest in age to Michael and the latter's playmate on the road when the boys bestrode the earth, is the moustachioed one who for some reason keeps slipping into a mockney accent.

But where's 58-year-old Jermaine? Ah, here he is, making a late superstar entrance that befits his status as the most famous living male Jackson, the one who was in Celebrity Big Brother and who had solo hits. He is rail-thin – Michael-thin – and, with his low-fade hair and black leather jacket/tight-jeans combo, cuts an impressive figure (although he is the only one not wearing shades). No wonder Marlon does a drum roll on the boardroom table when he strolls in.

"You don't have one, you don't have two, you don't have three, you have four Jacksons," he announces as Jermaine takes his seat for this interview to publicise the brothers' Unity tour, their first since 1984.

There was some hubbub in the hotel lobby when it transpired that the four surviving members of the biggest boyband in history had entered the building. But how did it compare with the reception 40 years ago, when, as the Jackson 5, they were charting all over the world with those dazzling Motown fusions of Smokey Robinson melody and Sly Stone energy such as I Want You Back, the Love You Save, Never Can Say Goodbye and I'll Be There? Or to 30 years ago, when, as the Jacksons, hits such as Can You Feel It? and Walk Right Now made them, along with Earth Wind & Fire, the planet's leading purveyors of symphonic boogie and hi-tech disco? If they walked down the street now, would there be anything like the commotion they caused in 1973 or 1983?

"It's the same effect for me, with all the beautiful women," says Marlon. "They'd want autographs, take pictures."

"It's like we're having photo sessions all the time – right, guys?" posits Jackie.

How crazy was life back then?

"It was too much."

Marlon remembers flying into London in 1971, and the pilot warning them that there were 10,000 fans waiting at the airport. So, what happened when they landed?

"We got attacked! By the beautiful British women."

Tito's memories aren't so fond.

"I got caught outside the limo," he recalls, faux-cigarette vapour trailing from his mouth. "I was riding on top because they were so anxious to get away from the fans they forgot me. I was banging on the roof!"

"I was like, 'Tito's on top, Tito's on top!'" gasps Marlon. "Michael had on a scarf and they were pulling it one way and another, choking him. They were grabbing our hair, trying to get a piece of us."

Jermaine has so far been quiet, but apparently he was the Jackson the ladies most wanted a piece of back in the day. And rumour has it Michael and Marlon were there when it happened.

"Jermaine made Michael and I hide under the bed," complains Marlon. "We were little so we did as we were told."

He thinks back to the "people sleeping in the hallway … They'd crawl in between the floors through ventilation shafts to try to get to our rooms." Tito would check into a hotel and go to crash out, only to find strangers in his bed. Every evening on tour, the group's security would sweep their closets for stowaways. But one night, Jermaine managed to sneak in a girl.

"And I'm on top of her," he says, picking up the story, "trying to get a little kiss."

A little kiss, right.

"And she's like, 'I feel something. Somebody's touching my leg.'" This is Marlon now, and he's giggling like he's back in that bedroom, under the covers with Michael, amazed at the (rather creepy in retrospect) experience they have just shared. "She felt three hands!"

More giggles. I ask whether they think One Direction fever or Biebermania are as intense as the fandemonium directed at the Jackson 5 and the feeling is that neither reach quite as deep. Marlon recalls going to an African village, where it was all grass huts and no running water, and they knew about the Jacksons. Similarly, Jermaine was in Senegal, "way out, where they didn't have TV or radio", just after Obama got elected, and while there was little or no awareness of America's first black president, as soon as they clapped eyes on one of R&B's royal family, the children of the village "started running and screaming".

The Jackson saga is one of colossal triumphs. But it has also been, in terms of scandal, tumultuous. The word drops like a small bomb. In the aftershock there is hushed but frenzied chatter. Marlon seems the most intrigued.

"You want to say 'tumultuous'? I want to get to this tumultuous stuff!"

OK, but first, was it a blessing having massively successful siblings such as Michael and Janet out there on the frontline, deflecting a lot of the attention away from them? They take this slightly the wrong way.

"No, no," replies Jermaine, "the Jackson 5 was the foundation of all of this."

"There wouldn't have been no Janet – there wouldn't have been no Michael – without the Jackson 5," agrees Marlon, who has a series of questions of his own. "What is Janet's last name? What is Michael's last name? What is Jermaine's last name? It's about the Jacksons. Now I'm not going to stereotype you, but there have been many journalists who have written about those 'tumultuous' things you just mentioned, that just aren't true."

Which have been the most hurtful?

Jermaine leans forward, not quiet any more. "We are pissed off," he says, "and I'm going to tell you why. They accused my brother of those false allegations of child molestation. To hear them in court saying all those horrible things … They knew he didn't do them, but they wanted to tear down his name and this family's name."

They have a theory about the vilification and hounding of their brother – as Jackie puts it, "it was all about the catalogue". That should read "conspiracy theory": they make connections between Michael's record company Sony and his continued acquisition of chunks of Sony/ATV Music Publishing – he bought a 50% stake in 1985 – and the doctor (Conrad Murray) who was found guilty in 2011 of the involuntary manslaughter of the King of Pop. But these must surely be far-fetched. Still, there's no denying the determination to find an alternative, grander explanation for his death beyond overmedication.

"Bottom line? They killed him," declares Jermaine. Who killed him? Sony? "The black man killed the black man." Hold on: is he saying that Murray was a stooge of the record company? "The doctor was just a finger to a bigger hand."

The theorising comes thick and fast. It's a bit scattershot. There are digressions about Michael's introduction to Demerol, the painkiller he was allegedly addicted to when he died, by his friend Elizabeth Taylor. Particularly wild is the strand about the raiding of Neverland, as police tried to find evidence of Jackson's child molestation, on November 18, 2003, the exact same day as the release of his Number Ones compilation album. The brothers' contention is that the more popular Jackson became and the more control he had over Sony/ATV's catalogue, the more they sought to reduce his power.

"It was the biggest album he ever could have had," says Jermaine, "probably bigger than Thriller. And they put this crap out about him, on the same day of its release? That's no coincidence."

It must have been difficult watching these events unfold. "Especially," says Marlon, "when you know [the accusations] are not true. Then on top of that, I'm going to put you in this situation: out of nowhere thousands of police cars come to your home, ransack your house, and rip everything up."

"They stole money, too," points out Jermaine. "$800,000 in cash."

"And no one's reprimanded – they just walk away," presses Marlon, perhaps alluding to the fact that the police entered areas not on the original search warrant, without reprisal.

Jackie was at Neverland shortly after the raid. He says Michael showed him all the bugs. "They were listening in on him all the time. I couldn't believe how he was treated."

Was it a sort of crucifixion? After all, Michael was, to many, a pop messiah. The brothers, practising Christians – except for Jermaine, who converted to Islam in 1989 – are uncomfortable with the analogy.

"I wouldn't say that," winces Jackie. "No one's bigger than God or Jesus. But everywhere Michael went, every country, when he left the airport people would line up on the freeway just to get a glimpse of him."

He possessed the charisma of a religious figure. But was he less saint than pariah? "I'll just say this," says Jermaine with a flourish. "God blessed him because he knew what Michael was going to do with his talent. He was a voice for children who were starving, and he brought the world songs like We Are the World, Heal the World and Man in the Mirror. Everything he did was for the betterment of mankind. You mentioned Jesus. Look what he did when he walked the earth. He did all those miracles and they still found a way to nail him up on that cross."

Did they find it hard to keep their heads while Michael was losing his mind?

"We never got involved in those kind of things," says Jackie when asked whether they experimented with drugs.

When the inquiry leads to groupies, Jermaine inadvertently says something offensive. "We love women. We're not faggots." Marlon corrects him: "We're not gay." Jermaine responds: "Faggots, gay. Whatever you call it."

"There's nothing wrong with it," decides Marlon. "I have gay friends."

If anything, the Jacksons are outspoken to a fault, whether it's Tito telling me how much he spends on luxury cars or Jermaine revealing that his wife has given him permission to take another wife. Such candour is rare given their stature and the scrutiny they have endured these past four decades.

"We talk about anything, because we know the truth," offers Jermaine.

Is there anything they won't discuss? "Well, you would know by now," grins Marlon, "because I've got an eject button right here."

Laughing and joking, they seem grounded, considering their reputation as music's most dysfunctional family.

"Do you think we're crazy?" asks Marlon. "We're not dysfunctional."

What about the false story (gossip site TMZ published a rare retraction) that emerged last year alleging that Janet slapped Michael's 14-year-old daughter Paris around the face? "That's not true," confirms Jermaine.

Or the one about Jermaine and younger brother Randy (a member of the group from 1975 to 1990) fighting over custody of Michael's three children and the subsequent disappearance in mysterious circumstances of the brothers' mother Katherine?

"That's not true."

Care to elaborate?

"The guy who's around them became a little too hands-on," he explains. "He started off as a driver and suddenly he's trying to run business and picking attorneys. And my mother went to get rest in Arizona and he reported her missing because she went missing from him. That's all that happened. And the Janet thing – listen, you know how these young kids are tweeting and tweeting, so Janet was just trying to take the phone from Paris, telling her, 'You need to stay off the phone.' Janet would never do that [ie slap her]."

So they're still in touch with Michael's kids?

"I'm in touch with all my nieces and nephews," insists Marlon.

Garrulous, playful, the Jacksons are not the clammed-up interviewees you might imagine. I tell them I was expecting a tense encounter. They are pleasantly surprised.

"No! Really?" says Jackie, smiling. "You see? Don't believe everything you read."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/feb/21/people-tried-tear-down-jackson-name
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

IF you ask me Jermaine is full of shit...we all KNOW that their was NO 100 shows scheduled...Michael didn't even want to do 50 never mind 100....and then for Jermaine to sit their and lie his ass off about the granny napping incident...practically calling the kids liars...that right there made me want to punch him in the face. It is the ADULTS in that family that seem to have a problem telling the truth....not the children. They think we are dumb...and that Paris and Prince made up those tweets for no good reason...and that Marlon cried during that interview because he didn't know where his mother was and no one had called him. So let Jermaine keep up with his lies...in the end it only makes HIM look dumb...not the children that are telling the truth...the ADULT that is nothing but a liar.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

That Guardian interview...:blink: Seriously, What did I just read? They really don't know how to explain things at all! Just make things worse. And boy, do they love living off the Jackson 5 glory days, that MICHAEL actually made famous Jermaine. Let's keep it real!
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Jermaine revealing that his wife has given him permission to take another wife.

Looks like Jermaine finally found the right woman for him! :smilerolleyes:

"Jermaine made Michael and I hide under the bed," complains Marlon. "We were little so we did as we were told."

Funny how Jermaine didn't mention in his book that it was him who told Michael to hide under the bed...
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Do not try to understand this family. They are a complete mess.



tumblr_mdxt67va7v1qh7ov5o2_r1_250.gif
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

I don't understand them at all.
 
OK, but first, was it a blessing having massively successful siblings such as Michael and Janet out there on the frontline, deflecting a lot of the attention away from them? They take this slightly the wrong way.

"No, no," replies Jermaine, "the Jackson 5 was the foundation of all of this."

Oh The Delusional One strikes again :smilerolleyes:

"There wouldn't have been no Janet – there wouldn't have been no Michael – without the Jackson 5," agrees Marlon, who has a series of questions of his own. "What is Janet's last name? What is Michael's last name? What is Jermaine's last name? It's about the Jacksons. Now I'm not going to stereotype you, but there have been many journalists who have written about those 'tumultuous' things you just mentioned, that just aren't true."

I'm sorry Marlon, but without Michael there would be J4 back in Gary Indiana, perhaps still trying to break in to industry.


"Bottom line? They killed him," declares Jermaine. Who killed him? Sony? "The black man killed the black man." Hold on: is he saying that Murray was a stooge of the record company? "The doctor was just a finger to a bigger hand."

:smilerolleyes:

The theorising comes thick and fast. It's a bit scattershot. There are digressions about Michael's introduction to Demerol, the painkiller he was allegedly addicted to when he died, by his friend Elizabeth Taylor. Particularly wild is the strand about the raiding of Neverland, as police tried to find evidence of Jackson's child molestation, on November 18, 2003, the exact same day as the release of his Number Ones compilation album. The brothers' contention is that the more popular Jackson became and the more control he had over Sony/ATV's catalogue, the more they sought to reduce his power.

Are they blaming Taylor now?




"They stole money, too," points out Jermaine. "$800,000 in cash."

and Jermaine wants that money back where it belong to, his pockets


If anything, the Jacksons are outspoken to a fault, whether it's Tito telling me how much he spends on luxury cars or Jermaine revealing that his wife has given him permission to take another wife. Such candour is rare given their stature and the scrutiny they have endured these past four decades.

Jermaine, just make sure you practice safe sex, MJ is not here to take care of another one of your kids.

"We talk about anything, because we know the truth," offers Jermaine.

:hysterical:
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Oh how I wished that there would be one interview where the journalist confronts them with all the lies.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Jermaine revealing that his wife has given him permission to take another wife.
My first thought reading that was "Someone neuter him ASAP, PLEASE!" We don't need no more babies u can't pay for Jermaine! :ermm:
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Jermit - Keep on sitting in that Lotus position AND KEEP LYING cause that is all it seems you do! If you know the truth then tell the truth !??!
cicada.jpg
This truth is YOU .
 
Last edited:
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

When the inquiry leads to groupies, Jermaine inadvertently says something offensive. "We love women. We're not faggots." Marlon corrects him: "We're not gay." Jermaine responds: "Faggots, gay. Whatever you call it."

WOW! I'm surprised that Jermaine, being so worldly and everything, is still using the "F" word that gay people find so offensive.

Didn't he get the memo that nobody uses that word any more. Guess not!

I wonder how many people he's gonna alienate when they read this article?
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

WOW! I'm surprised that Jermaine, being so worldly and everything, is still using the "F" word that gay people find so offensive.

Didn't he get the memo that nobody uses that word any more. Guess not!

I wonder how many people he's gonna alienate when they read this article?


Where is TMZ when you need them? They'd spread a reference like that all over the place and Jermaine would be so blasted he wouldn't be able to show his face. Of course, he'd just deny he ever said it and the "hand" did it.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

I came back to correct myself.

I should have said not only do gay people find that particular word offensive, I think folks in general find that word offensive also.

@gerryevans - Yeah, Jermaine would just say that the tabloids are picking on him (and the Jackson family). LOL! The same tabloids who pay him for his interviews.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

He would say, "they" are trying to destroy our family by spreading false statements. He would put the blame on the reporter who interviewed them.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Oh how I wished that there would be one interview where the journalist confronts them with all the lies.

They won't as that guardian journalist, for example, loved the brothers because they gave such good copy. He was just afraid they were going to be discreet and guarded as everybody in public life with any sense is when talking on the record. To be brutal all the media are interested in is if they can get a good story out of you which is why they hated mj as he so rarely allowed access to himself.

Garrulous, playful, the Jacksons are not the clammed-up interviewees you might imagine. I tell them I was expecting a tense encounter. They are pleasantly surprised.

"No! Really?" says Jackie, smiling. "You see? Don't believe everything you read."
They are so clueless considering they've been in the music business and public life for decades - they think they are being paid a compliment - by a journalist of all people. They don't realise they're just being used. Everyone says mj was childlike and naieve and this and that, but i find the brothers far more childlike or rather immature in their behaviour - they act like i would expect one direction to act, joking around, without a care, indiscreet (and probably libellous).

That interview wasn't a car crash, it was a motorway pileup. They're so ridiculous with their stupid theories my head hurts. Seems aeg are off the hook re mj's death, it's all sony's fault. And eliz taylors.
 
Last edited:
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

If anything, the Jacksons are outspoken to a fault, whether it's Tito telling me how much he spends on luxury cars or Jermaine revealing that his wife has given him permission to take another wife.


If I were married to him I would want him to as well.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Where is TMZ when you need them? They'd spread a reference like that all over the place and Jermaine would be so blasted he wouldn't be able to show his face. Of course, he'd just deny he ever said it and the "hand" did it.

If Michael would have said something like that, it wouldn't be only TMZ reporting it but all the newspapers on front page. That shows how unimportant, offensive and out of line Jermaine is.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

If anything, the Jacksons are outspoken to a fault, whether it's Tito telling me how much he spends on luxury cars or Jermaine revealing that his wife has given him permission to take another wife.


If I were married to him I would want him to as well.

Actually take this from a Muslim person like me - the above comment is so offensive as well.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Actually take this from a Muslim person like me - the above comment is so offensive as well.

My comment offensive or Jermaine's?
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

The sad thing is that Michael's children have to see this kind of stuff and hear it too. I hope they have minds of their own. They are ungrateful and unappreciative with everything Michael did for them. The foundation of that family was Michael.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

Bubs that statement you wrote above: Oh The Delusional One strikes again , should go before each and every Jermaine comment.

By the way, where did he "gay" label come from. I know about the words homosexual & why faggot was used before, but who started the term "gay." The term does not seem to explain what the word refers to. Did it mean that these were "happy" people.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

I've got the feeling media interview the brothers on purpose to help them to spread more lies. The Jacksons are indeed a disfuntional family, Michael himself told that "unity tigh, my ass." Where the hell Jackie got Michael was gonna do in 100 shows in the O2? And I don't believe at all Michael was composing with them, the song Jerms was singing is Fly Away.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

My comment offensive or Jermaine's?

LOL, of course Jermaine's comment. I was trying to say " his wife has given him permission to take another wife." was offensive.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

I've got the feeling media interview the brothers on purpose to help them to spread more lies. The Jacksons are indeed a disfuntional family, Michael himself told that "unity tigh, my ass." Where the hell Jackie got Michael was gonna do in 100 shows in the O2? And I don't believe at all Michael was composing with them, the song Jerms was singing is Fly Away.

Oh that is one of Jermaine the Delusional One 's lies.
This is from Jack:sun: from 2008
"It is just the timing, so what we've been doing is working on the music and all the logistics. It is going to be more like a family affair, Janet's going to open and, of course, the original Jackson 5 ... Michael, Randy and the whole family ... We're in the studio, we're planning on being out there next year."

and if you watched their Jackson dynasty thingy, they went to studio too, and if you remember, they cancelled many of their Unity concerts because they went to studio.
They seems to be spending awful lots of time in studio, but since at least 2008 - 2013, nothing has come out.

Do you honestly think, Michael who worked best of the best out there, would go to studio with brothers?
Did you see what brothers did in the studio while they were filming Dynasty thingy?
Nothing, just messing.
Brothers needs someone, who tells them what to do and how to do it. Michael wasn't going to take that role again with them.
 
Article about Jermaine's comment

Jermaine Jackson: “faggots, gays, whatever”
February 22, 2013 by Andrew S. Hinkinson | 11 people have commented so far
From today’s interview with The Jacksons in The Guardian:
When the inquiry leads to groupies, Jermaine inadvertently says something offensive. “We love women. We’re not faggots.” Marlon corrects him: “We’re not gay.” Jermaine responds: “Faggots, gay. Whatever you call it.”
“There’s nothing wrong with it,” decides Marlon. “I have gay friends.”
Jermaine Jackson was quite happy taking the money of “faggots, gays, whatever”, wasn’t he? I think his brother’s quick intervention might’ve been a genuine attempt to police Jermaine’s homophobia but it was expressed in front of a journalist, so there was no possibility of the damage being undone. People waited years when Michael was alive for these now old men to tour; in 2013, I could happily go the rest of my life without them showing their faces again.
I am always saddened when men like Jermaine open their mouths and offend my community with hateful words. They were alive in the US at the time of segregation and open hostility towards black people and, frankly, if Jermaine is too thick to recognise that words like ‘n***ger’ and ‘c**n’ are no different in the degree of dehumanisation they reveal and legitimise to words like ‘faggot’, there’s no hope for him.
Mind, note how we must asterisk those words of hatred towards black people even when deploying them to highlight how wrong they are. We are not yet at a stage anywhere in the world, even in Europe, where we would type ‘f***ot’ for fear of comments being removed by moderators. It is progress that racism is largely so very taboo we cannot even reference the words of oppression in full; it is a sign that we still have mountains to climb when universal horror is not expressed over anti-gay language.
Racism, sexism, homophobia and other bigotries share the same fundamentally rotten core: a fear of the other, which leads to dehumanising language and physical violence. When one group of people with experience of prejudice cannot recognise that all prejudice is wrong but instead openly turn the generalised weapons of hate used against them onto other groups, it frustrates me.
The irony is, there are more black people, gay people, women, transsexuals, poor and disabled in the world than there are white, privileged, heterosexual men. And yet we still allow that tiny minority to rule over and infect us with violence and hateful words because we are largely divided and turn on each other. Without absolute unity of purpose, we make fragmented, piecemeal progress. Two steps forward—hello, Jermaine—two steps back.
Way to go, Mister. I guess, being rich, you think you’re a member of the dominator culture rather than one of its victims but there are thugs in the world who still see you as less-than because of the colour of your skin. If you don’t like that—and why the heck would you?–why do you think it’s acceptable to diss people like me for loving members of our own sex?
And there was nothing ‘inadvertent’ about Jermaine’s outburst. You don’t accidentally express homophobic language.

http://spicycauldron.com/2013/02/22/jermaine-jackson-faggots-gays-whatever/
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

LOL, of course Jermaine's comment. I was trying to say " his wife has given him permission to take another wife." was offensive.

Phew, i do try not to offend, so I thought I had better double check. LOL
 
Skavlan is recorded in Sweden. After the interview the brothers later that night made a surprise appearance at Wyclef jean´s concert and sang a few songs with him. I don´t know if they think you can do whatever in Sweden or in Scandinavia and that it won´t get outside the country boarders here.
What they told Skavlan was not believed by him or the audience in that studio. Marlon and Tito also did an interview with a Swedish morning paper, and there they continued their lies.
 
Re: The Jacksons exclusive interview 2013 about MJ death...

That article from Andrew S. Hinkinson ^^ I would like to see him take the same form of outrage & stance when words like P---, M---, J---, weird, strange, bizarre, is used to refer to Michael Jackson. Don't get me wrong I agree with him standing up and decrying what Jermaine called these people, but he cannot decry discrimination/injustice simple because it is against his group^^. Injustice & discrimination are universal words and should be treated as such. In the same way he makes reference to Jermaine not liking it if people use the word c--n, etc., he should apply that analysis to himself & decry the labels used against anyone or group, including Michael.

This is the problem I have with people. We tend to focus on bad things that affect us, our group, our family, but say nothing or don't care, when the same bad things happen to others. It is only when you deal with discrimination/injustice in a universal way & not peace meal that we will see lasting change among all people. It is hypocritical to call out Jermaine when he uses discriminating/offensive/unjust labels about people who like same sex relationships, while at the same time being indifferent about reporters who use discriminating/offensive/unjust labels for Michael or any other person in public life.
 
Back
Top