Controversial MJ Documentary Leaving Neverland [GENERAL DISCUSSION THREAD]

I believe the truth will come out one day. There will be justice. But I have no idea about the timescale or the specifics.

Probably a long time because the media love to drag on crap and made up stuff about Michael. it's all really sad. i hope Michael is in an better place. i just feel sorry for his family and us fans. :(
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In the first few weeks of blue tick propaganda for Leaving Neverland, a staggering number of the shills posting fawning comments turned out to have financial relationships with HBO &amp; Channel 4.</p>&mdash; Charles Thomson (@CEThomson) <a href="https://twitter.com/CEThomson/status/1146157723194732550?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">2. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I have been doing research lately, despite all the evidence that has been provided by the fans of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> it seems that I have done a mistake, I can not longer defend <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WadeRobson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WadeRobson</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/JamesSafechuck?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#JamesSafechuck</a>, sorry but <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> was innocent</p>&mdash; Damian Craig Carter (@DamianCraigCar1) <a href="https://twitter.com/DamianCraigCar1/status/1146280911253704706?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So, on scale of 1 to 10, how cool is <a href="https://twitter.com/USEmbassySJJ?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@USEmbassySJJ</a>? <a href="https://twitter.com/tajjackson3?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@tajjackson3</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/BJackson82?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BJackson82</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MJFam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MJFam</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/10YearsWithoutMichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#10YearsWithoutMichaelJackson</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MichaelJackson</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BillieJean?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BillieJean</a> <a href="https://t.co/zOct51qvlb">pic.twitter.com/zOct51qvlb</a></p>&mdash; Ika Ferrer Goti&#263; (@IkaFerrerGotic) <a href="https://twitter.com/IkaFerrerGotic/status/1146201368744603648?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">2. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">So does this mean decades from now some pissed off music executive will recruit Michelle Obama to help give credibility to a movie saying that Taylor Swift was really some sort of sexual abuser?</p>&mdash; John Ziegler (@Zigmanfreud) <a href="https://twitter.com/Zigmanfreud/status/1146291126581760000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Celebrating the King of Pop! <a href="https://twitter.com/lavellesmithjr_?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@lavellesmithjr_</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/RodrigoTeaser?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RodrigoTeaser</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MJInnocent?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MJInnocent</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/HonorMJ?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#HonorMJ</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/10YearsWithoutMichaelJackson?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#10YearsWithoutMichaelJackson</a> <a href="https://t.co/kU7Fj7FpOw">pic.twitter.com/kU7Fj7FpOw</a></p>&mdash; Larissa Silva (@MadameVox) <a href="https://twitter.com/MadameVox/status/1146082371084726273?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">2. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
^^^ what's up with Taj's tweet there? What is the story with it.

I'm not sure but I saw an article about Taylor Swift being unhappy about who has the publishing rights to her music, with MJ being mentioned as another example of someone having owned publishing rights to another artist's music. Maybe MJ is being made the bad guy again, I'm not sure.
 
WannaScream;4262042 said:
I'm not sure but I saw an article about Taylor Swift being unhappy about who has the publishing rights to her music, with MJ being mentioned as another example of someone having owned publishing rights to another artist's music. Maybe MJ is being made the bad guy again, I'm not sure.
Yep. Any excuse to drag MJ, they will take.

<samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Do you feel the same way about all the black artists whose music Paul McCartney bought the rights to? <br><br>Or is it only the black guy owning Paul McCartney&#8217;s music that pisses you off? <a href="https://t.co/iJxmZuDmmB">https://t.co/iJxmZuDmmB</a></p>&mdash; Charles Thomson (@CEThomson) <a href="https://twitter.com/CEThomson/status/1145262233074712576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

</code></samp><samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jackson participated in &amp; won an auction that McCartney was also free to participate in. And McCartney would have been worth far more at the time.<br><br>Criticism of Jackson buying that catalogue only ever translates to: &#8216;He was uppity&#8217; / &#8216;Who did he think he was?!&#8217;<br><br>It&#8217;s pure racism.</p>&mdash; Charles Thomson (@CEThomson) <a href="https://twitter.com/CEThomson/status/1145276469272293376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </code></samp>
 
Anna;4262048 said:
Yep. Any excuse to drag MJ, they will take.

<samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Do you feel the same way about all the black artists whose music Paul McCartney bought the rights to? <br><br>Or is it only the black guy owning Paul McCartney’s music that pisses you off? <a href="https://t.co/iJxmZuDmmB">https://t.co/iJxmZuDmmB</a></p>&mdash; Charles Thomson (@CEThomson) <a href="https://twitter.com/CEThomson/status/1145262233074712576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

</code></samp><samp class="EmbedCode-container"><code class="EmbedCode-code"><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jackson participated in &amp; won an auction that McCartney was also free to participate in. And McCartney would have been worth far more at the time.<br><br>Criticism of Jackson buying that catalogue only ever translates to: ‘He was uppity’ / ‘Who did he think he was?!’<br><br>It’s pure racism.</p>&mdash; Charles Thomson (@CEThomson) <a href="https://twitter.com/CEThomson/status/1145276469272293376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 30, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </code></samp>

I agree &#128175; % with Charles Thompson. Pure racism!!!
 
I know it hurts, but it's true. No use trying to pretend otherwise. That's just the way it is.
Well, he is also going to have the label of being "set up" and lied on as well by conartists. So anyone who wants to THINK what they want, so be it because it does not make it true. Still, MJ being called that is just an OPINION, NOT FACT.
 
This could be interesting....

I hadn't realised he owns Radar...
In 2004, Epstein and Zuckerman committed up to $25 million to finance Radar, a celebrity and pop culture magazine founded by Maer Roshan. Epstein and Zuckerman were equal partners in the venture. Roshan, as its editor-in-chief, retained a small ownership stake.

Epstein was also a longtime acquaintance of Prince Andrew and Tom Barrack. Trump said of Epstein in 2002: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.
(Wiki)

Jeffrey Epstein Documents Could Expose Powerful Politicians, Businessmen
Topline: A federal appeals court Wednesday ordered that 167 documents in a lawsuit that alleges famously well-connected financier Jeffrey Epstein participated in a sex-trafficking ring should be unsealed&#8212;and that many of his powerful friends could be named.

In its 27-page decision, the court cited the public&#8217;s right to access the case information outweighed the privacy of certain individuals, &#8220;including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well&#8208;known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.&#8221;
Virginia Guiffre (now Roberts) filed the lawsuit against Ghislane Maxwell, alleging that she had used her as part of a sex trafficking network of underage girls to Epstein and a number of his famous friends, including his lawyer Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew. Both men denied the accusations.
Dershowitz has supported unsealing the documents, according to the Daily Beast.
The documents will not be immediately available, as anonymous individuals involved in the case have two weeks to file appeals.
The court advised the documents be read carefully. &#8220;We therefore urge the media to exercise restraint in covering potentially defamatory allegations, and we caution the public to read such accounts with discernment,&#8221; wrote the court in its decision.
Key background: Epstein had previously been charged in 2007 in a 53-page indictment. As the Miami Herald revealed in its investigative series &#8220;Perversion of Justice,&#8221; Epstein managed to escape all federal charges through a plea deal that gave him and all of his co-conspirators immunity, with all documents being sealed. Epstein ended up pleading guilty to one state prostitution charge in Florida. He then registered as a sex offender and paid unspecified restitution to three dozen victims identified by the FBI.

The contentious plea deal was orchestrated by U.S. attorney Alexander Acosta, now President Trump&#8217;s secretary of labor. The Miami Herald&#8217;s reporting prompted calls for Acosta to resign, but he has remained in his Cabinet post.

In February, a U.S. district judge determined federal prosecutors, including Acosta, broke the law by failing to notify victims before Epstein pleaded guilty to the Florida prostitution charge. That decision could potentially nullify Epstein&#8217;s plea deal, opening him up to new federal charges. But prosecutors are challenging this ruling.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisett...ould-expose-powerful-politicians-businessmen/

This quote from the above seems rather ironic : (I guess Radar won't be reporting....)

We therefore urge the media to exercise restraint in covering potentially defamatory allegations, and we caution the public to read such accounts with discernment

And USA today said this about the Epstein court docs: (Which no press have EVER said about court docs relating to allegations against MJ)

Materials submitted by parties to a court should be understood for what they are. They do not reflect the court's own findings," the decision warned. "Rather, they are prepared by parties seeking to advance their own interests in an adversarial process.
....
Lawyers for Giuffre, Dershowitz, conservative blogger Michael Cernovich and for media organizations, including USA TODAY's parent company, have supported unsealing the records in the case against Epstein. They argued the material should be made public so the victims and the public can examine the legal handling of the evidence and charges..

The appeals court ruled that the summary judgment motions and the court's ruling in Giuffre's lawsuit against Epstein should be unsealed first, subject to "minimal redactions."

Other sealed records in the case are to be released after the lower court reviews them individually, considers redaction arguments from the parties in the case, and ensures that the files "do not become vehicles for defamation," the appeals court ruled.

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/...charges-ordered-unsealed-by-court/1638668001/
 
Last edited:
If Jordan does, this will come back on his kids if it does not get him. He can have a kid that will be falsely accused or something worst. It never fails.

As things stand now by the time his son is an adult paedophilia would have become legal. Geffen is on a mission
 
Well, he is also going to have the label of being "set up" and lied on as well by conartists. So anyone who wants to THINK what they want, so be it because it does not make it true. Still, MJ being called that is just an OPINION, NOT FACT.
Fans will label him as being set up and lied on, not the wider public or the history books. His name and legacy is permanently and heavily tainted, unless the truth comes out.
 
I said this before but shortly after MJ died i read on this forum a person who said he/she saw a show with Larry King there Larry King said he had seen a show there Jordan did speak up and said he was not abused but Evan was in the same show and said he never forced him to say anything. That was in the middle of a thread about something else and everybody was in shock and could be a total lie ofcourse it was just a strange lie (why Larry King) and the person did not start a new thread. I have tried to contact Larry King about this but received no reply. Does anyone have the whole youtube video for the &#8221;Inside Neverland&#8221; special interview with Jermaine Jackson shortly after MJ died? So why doesn&#8217;t he speak up now? A: because it was a lie. B: He thinks it is not worth it and sees how Brett Barnes is beeing treated. But it is not impossible. I mean Brandi Jackson did get to do a tv interview in an Australian show but the interviewed was rude and they had Dan Reed on the same show and it got almost not attention at all so it is exactly what they would have done especially in the media climate around or after the trial.
 
Fans will label him as being set up and lied on, not the wider public or the history books. His name and legacy is permanently and heavily tainted, unless the truth comes out.

I really hope the truth comes out. this whole world did Michael wrong. and anyone can say what they like but i believe it's the reason because Michael was black man. there's no other way to it. they do the samething in history books. it's really sad. goes to show you racism still exist. i totally believe that stuff is in some people blood. yes it is teach but sometimes i believe that stuff is in some people blood. poor Michael. really hope he in a better place. this world was too much for him. :(
 
Fans will label him as being set up and lied on, not the wider public or the history books. His name and legacy is permanently and heavily tainted, unless the truth comes out.

I disagree when it comes to the history books. History books can not say it was a fact either. They can just bring up he was accused. As for the wider public, I think that is based down age, race, gender, etc; and yes, there will be the "questions" but it still will never be a fact and I do not considered his name "heavily tainted", yes, he took SOME hit but NOT HEAVILY.
 
I believe the truth will come out one day. There will be justice. But I have no idea about the timescale or the specifics.
Now, I agree with this. It is going to come out. The thing that "hit" MJ was the settlement to Jordan. Yes, the Chandlers were proven to be liars but the "settlement" is the cloud.
 
Well, he is also going to have the label of being "set up" and lied on as well by conartists. So anyone who wants to THINK what they want, so be it because it does not make it true. Still, MJ being called that is just an OPINION, NOT FACT.

Exactly!
 
Now, I agree with this. It is going to come out. The thing that "hit" MJ was the settlement to Jordan. Yes, the Chandlers were proven to be liars but the "settlement" is the cloud.

The truth will come out if the media stop spreading lies and listen to the facts. but we all know the media loves to write awful things about Michael since the 80's. the media is full of racist people. i feel sorry for anyone who has deal with this. but Michael has to be the only one in history as i seen who been treat it awful by the media since he been on this earth. always gotta talk bad about Michael dead or alive. nothing good. they still call him *****. like show some respect. this really bad because his kids and his family are gonna have to deal with this for the rest of their lives. that's the sad part of all of this. i hope Michael, his family, his friends, and us fans get justice i actually been feeling like Michael for the past 4 months now. this kind of like what he had to go though. and imagine doing this for 18 years?! that's one the reason why Michael didn't do much in his life because of these stupid lies etc. i mean imagine if none of this stuff never happen, he probably would of did much more. not saying Michael didn't do alot on this earth than he already did just he could of did much more also his death. it's all really sad.
 
Last edited:
I disagree when it comes to the history books. History books can not say it was a fact either. They can just bring up he was accused. As for the wider public, I think that is based down age, race, gender, etc; and yes, there will be the "questions" but it still will never be a fact and I do not considered his name "heavily tainted", yes, he took SOME hit but NOT HEAVILY.

Sorry to say it but the "history books" can say whatever they like.
History is being written as we speak - history is documented in the news every day, and just look what the news media has been saying about MJ over the last few decades. They control the narrative.

Anybody could write a book saying anything they like about Michael Jackson and there's very little the MJ Estate could do to stop it. We've already seen this happen in LN.

For many people LN was factual. There were reports on Twitter of at least one school in the USA using LN as a CSA educational film(!) and presenting it as factual.

A history book doesn't necessarily need to document facts accurately - and many don't already!! History books authored by Americans are notoriously inaccurate on the subject of World War II, for example. US schools even used the Pearl Harbour film as an educational film, which is totally absurd!

As long as the readership find the content acceptable then it can and will be accepted without many questions asked.

we're seeing this with MJ and allegations, even now.

LN was represented and accepted as fact.
Jacobshagen was presented and accepted as fact.
the stories from McManus are reported and accepted as fact.
the acquittal in 05 is now considered by many to just be blip - an injustice that has now been exposed as such, now there is "proof" MJ was actually guilty.

It's not hard to believe all of these could be used as fact in a history book. Once one person documents it in this way it will spread and there's very little can be done to correct it.
 
Sorry to say it but the "history books" can say whatever they like.
History is being written as we speak - history is documented in the news every day, and just look what the news media has been saying about MJ over the last few decades. They control the narrative.

Anybody could write a book saying anything they like about Michael Jackson and there's very little the MJ Estate could do to stop it. We've already seen this happen in LN.

For many people LN was factual. There were reports on Twitter of at least one school in the USA using LN as a CSA educational film(!) and presenting it as factual.

A history book doesn't necessarily need to document facts accurately - and many don't already!! History books authored by Americans are notoriously inaccurate on the subject of World War II, for example. US schools even used the Pearl Harbour film as an educational film, which is totally absurd!

As long as the readership find the content acceptable then it can and will be accepted without many questions asked.

we're seeing this with MJ and allegations, even now.

LN was represented and accepted as fact.
Jacobshagen was presented and accepted as fact.
the stories from McManus are reported and accepted as fact.
the acquittal in 05 is now considered by many to just be blip - an injustice that has now been exposed as such, now there is "proof" MJ was actually guilty.

It's not hard to believe all of these could be used as fact in a history book. Once one person documents it in this way it will spread and there's very little can be done to correct it.
We are seeing people questioning LN now. There MANY who see LN a LIE as well. This will NEVER be a nailed in stone about MJ being a pedo. Sorry. Even the stuff u are listing, there are many others who are disputing it even many are even viewing this as a pick on a black man who is gone and how society loves to try to convicts blacks even when given "not guilty" verdicts. so you see, this is NOT cut and dry as u all seem to suggest. That is my point. A person can TRY to document something but it wont be and will be challenge by others with facts. That is where MJ stand.
 
History is being written as we speak - history is documented in the news every day, and just look what the news media has been saying about MJ over the last few decades. They control the narrative.


Also, the media still has power but no where near the "power" they use to have in the past due to the internet, social media, etc. they is why a lot of media print is going out of business and others are going social but when they say something, it can be debated with social media and what WE are saying.
 
Also when the train station story came out the media didn't even say anything. see? the media loves to talks bad about Michael even when he's not with us. Michael was a successful talented black man and they hate that that's why they trying so hard to erase his legacy. but they can't. Michael basically the king of the world. he's not jesus but you get what i'm saying. :laughing:
 
Last edited:
What interview was it again that Dan Reed talked about doing projects that turn him on again?
 
there are many others who are disputing it even many are even viewing this as a pick on a black man who is gone and how society loves to try to convicts blacks even when given "not guilty" verdicts. so you see, this is NOT cut and dry as u all seem to suggest. That is my point. A person can TRY to document something but it wont be and will be challenge by others with facts. That is where MJ stand.

Exactly.(y)
 
I wonder if I can ask for some advice please. I am not someone who uses social media but I am a member on the Steve Hoffman music forum and have tried to challenge the allegations as much as I can.

I can argue the most of the allegations quite effectively but recently I was asked to explain the Jason Francia settlement. To be honest I had completely forgotten about this. Does anyone have any ideas on the best way to challenge this particular allegation please? Is there anything obvious that helps to discredit this case please?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">From the Michael Jackson Estate in support of the French fans' lawsuit against Robson and Safechuck. <a href="https://t.co/mV6jvggITk">pic.twitter.com/mV6jvggITk</a></p>&mdash; andjustice4some (@andjustice4some) <a href="https://twitter.com/andjustice4some/status/1146568058867052544?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">3. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BoycottSundance?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BoycottSundance</a> founded by a real convicted Sex Abuser who was eager to fast track a Slime, Slander and full of disgusting proven lies Hit Piece on a Deceised Michael Jackson eagerly sponsored by snake <a href="https://twitter.com/Oprah?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Oprah</a> the entire Media, Twitter Blue ticks, and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/metoo?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#metoo</a> now keeping stumm! <a href="https://t.co/54mMbthK5k">https://t.co/54mMbthK5k</a></p>&mdash; Maria Hassell (@MeYouUsMJFAM) <a href="https://twitter.com/MeYouUsMJFAM/status/1146835130805366784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">4. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>

<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is the best part of Bill Whitfield's interview with Australian news TV about <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MJinnocent?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MJinnocent</a><br>Thank you <a href="https://twitter.com/MJBODYGUARDS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MJBODYGUARDS</a> - You are The Man!&#128074;&#128074;&#127999;&#128074;&#127998;&#128074;&#127996; <a href="https://t.co/QHXiio7a9c">pic.twitter.com/QHXiio7a9c</a></p>&mdash; Eyes Wide Open (@ZoroastersChild) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZoroastersChild/status/1146748992279252993?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">4. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">French lawsuit against Wade and James. Interview with the lawyer of the three French fanclubs, Emmanuel Ludot. If my translation is right, LaToya will attend? <a href="https://t.co/LinyKMoFHa">https://t.co/LinyKMoFHa</a> <a href="https://t.co/BlZ1tL6Gly">pic.twitter.com/BlZ1tL6Gly</a></p>&mdash; MsFlyingFairy (@MsFlyingFairy) <a href="https://twitter.com/MsFlyingFairy/status/1146684798674583552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">4. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="de"><p lang="und" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/f7MYvHAG3q">pic.twitter.com/f7MYvHAG3q</a></p>&mdash; MsFlyingFairy (@MsFlyingFairy) <a href="https://twitter.com/MsFlyingFairy/status/1146685214929932288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">4. Juli 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
https://9now.nine.com.au/today/mich...ok-place/e3b93805-5a18-4e86-95df-1d02bd8327b1

Michael Jackson's bodyguard calls popstar's accusers liars

Michael Jackson&#8217;s bodyguard has branded the men accusing the late popstar of abuse &#8220;liars&#8221;.

Appearing on Today, Bill Whitfield, who worked for Jackson from 2006 until his death in 2009, said the allegations made by Wade Robson and James Safechuck in the documentary Leaving Neverland were absolutely false.

&#8220;I normally do not watch Michael Jackson documentaries, certainly if they are from individuals that were prior to me or individuals who hadn't met him,&#8221; he explained.

&#8220;But when I heard the documentary [Leaving Neverland] involved a point in time in which Mr. Jackson was under my watch, I had to tune in.&#8221;

Jackson&#8217;s former bodyguard knew instantly Robson and Safechuck were &#8220;certainly lying&#8221;.

&#8220;I just immediately found, realised, these guys were certainly lying or certainly not being truthful about certain dates which they say they had seen Mr. Jackson,&#8221; Whitfield said.

When interviewer Tom Steinfort asked Whitfield to clarify if he believed the men were &#8220;liars&#8221;, he responded saying, &#8220;Absolutely&#8221;.

&#8220;I don't know what evidence they had,&#8221; he explained. &#8220;I watched a documentary like everybody else, I didn't see any evidence.

&#8220;I saw cut up pictures, one of the pictures certainly looked Photoshopped to me. It looked like they went through everything they needed to go through to make it believable.&#8221;

Allegations of abuse marred Jackson&#8217;s reputation while he was still alive, and have only mounted since his death and the release of Leaving Neverland. Nonetheless, Whitfield was adamant that Jackson&#8217;s legacy would not remain tainted.

&#8220;There will come a time the majority of people, I believe, will see this all as a farce and certainly a scheme to make some money,&#8221; he said.

http%3A%2F%2Fprod.static9.net.au%2Ffs%2Fc1b57e2f-523a-4239-881b-f7cc393c531a


Speaking about his time working for Jackson, Whitfield said that he did not personally see anything to make him believe any of the abuse allegations.

&#8220;I knew Mr Jackson personally, very well, and no, I don't believe any of those allegations are true,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Certainly, those [allegations] are things which I have heard about prior to going to work for him.

&#8220;At the time I was a single father myself and former law enforcement so I certainly paid attention, just to see if any of those things were true.

&#8220;Had I seen anything such as that, one: no, I would not have continued to work for him, and two: I certainly would have come forward with anything I had seen.&#8221;

This year marks a decade since Michael Jackson, then 50, was found dead in his Los Angeles mansion after overdosing on prescription drugs. Apparently stress was a contributor to his death, according to Whitfield.

&#8220;Being privy to some of the conversations he was having &#8211; I do feel that stress certainly played a major part,&#8221; he said.

In 2014, Whitfield himself published a book about his time working with Jackson, entitled Remember the Time: Protecting Michael Jackson in His Final Days.

&#8220;I think a lot of them [the public] knew who the King of Pop was, but I wanted to give a behind-the-scenes, what I witnessed of the man, of the person, of the father,&#8221; Whitfield said of his book.

Despite recent public uproar in reaction to the abuse allegations, which saw some outlets banning Jackson&#8217;s music, Whitfield said he believes the allegations are quickly losing their potency.

&#8220;I see more and more that those stories are starting to die down and people are starting to do their research and starting to see there is another side to these allegations or these boys' story,&#8221; he explained.

&#8220;I think it's been falling apart slowly but surely.&#8221;
 
Back
Top