144000
Proud Member
during the american super bowl, this time around, last night(as of this writing) for 2011, Christina Aguilera messed up the lyrics. but, her voice kicked ass. this adds a layer to a popular topic of discussion..lip synch vs. live.
the point i want to make for this thread is not about hate or love of live performance or lip synching. it's about art. art cannot be put in a box. it's about the end result. what do you feel, when you just have experienced the performance, BEFORE you get total knowledge on how it was conceived.
Christina was live. Whitney Houston was lip synched from a few years ago, but both audiences reacted from the gut..before the intellect took over. both audiences were enthralled...and with Christina, they didn't know how to react. they interrupted her, with noise, when they realized she botched the lyric. but when it was over, men cried, and the audience was enthralled, because if it hadn't been for the fact that there was a lyric, it would have been considered a perfect performance.
i hope people understand where i am coming from here...it's not about whether or not you hate the concept of lip synch, or live that is(subjectively) botched. it's about the end result.
also..this isn't about whether people are right or wrong, about what they witnessed, technically speaking. somebody 'covered' for Christina, by tweeting that she covered for a 'remix'.
it's apparent that Christina doesn't like to lip synch.
there also have been lip synch performances(no particular artist is being targeted for this sentence) that achieved the highest positive visceral reaction.
the conclusion? it's about a case by case basis..and...the end result, and how your VISCERAL reaction goes.
does anyone understand where i am coming from...and do they agree with me? i just would like to see how this discussion goes. if it weren't for her performance tonight..i wouldn't be able to post this. but it's been something i've been wanting to express, all along. i think this is a wide ranging topic..so i'm not gonna go and restrict what people want to say about it..aside from..i hope we respect each other...
love yall...
the point i want to make for this thread is not about hate or love of live performance or lip synching. it's about art. art cannot be put in a box. it's about the end result. what do you feel, when you just have experienced the performance, BEFORE you get total knowledge on how it was conceived.
Christina was live. Whitney Houston was lip synched from a few years ago, but both audiences reacted from the gut..before the intellect took over. both audiences were enthralled...and with Christina, they didn't know how to react. they interrupted her, with noise, when they realized she botched the lyric. but when it was over, men cried, and the audience was enthralled, because if it hadn't been for the fact that there was a lyric, it would have been considered a perfect performance.
i hope people understand where i am coming from here...it's not about whether or not you hate the concept of lip synch, or live that is(subjectively) botched. it's about the end result.
also..this isn't about whether people are right or wrong, about what they witnessed, technically speaking. somebody 'covered' for Christina, by tweeting that she covered for a 'remix'.
it's apparent that Christina doesn't like to lip synch.
there also have been lip synch performances(no particular artist is being targeted for this sentence) that achieved the highest positive visceral reaction.
the conclusion? it's about a case by case basis..and...the end result, and how your VISCERAL reaction goes.
does anyone understand where i am coming from...and do they agree with me? i just would like to see how this discussion goes. if it weren't for her performance tonight..i wouldn't be able to post this. but it's been something i've been wanting to express, all along. i think this is a wide ranging topic..so i'm not gonna go and restrict what people want to say about it..aside from..i hope we respect each other...
love yall...
Last edited: