"Breaking News" All General Discussion Here [Merged]

What do You Think Now???

  • Now im Sure Its Michael!!!

    Votes: 89 21.4%
  • I Still Think its Not him!!!

    Votes: 223 53.7%
  • I now think that its Michael, but still have my doubts!!

    Votes: 24 5.8%
  • Im Confused!!!!

    Votes: 79 19.0%

  • Total voters
    415
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

I played it for my Mother, Father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, granny, grandad, neice, nephew and all my cousins and they all said that's Michael Jackson. So that sums it up then.
 
I CAN´T BELIEVE IT:
TMZ POLL-ARE THEY CRAZY????THIS IS 10000000% NOT MICHAEL!!!!!
Is it Michael?
81%Yes
19%No
Total Votes: 131,707
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

So, you're going to deprive yourself of a great DVD set because of a song that has NOTHING to do with Vision?

I lol'd.

You do that.

Keep buying their products, show them that it really doesn't matter how hard they rip off the fans. If we're lucky, we'll see even more Jason Malachi tracks next year. Maybe they'll even get Navi to star in the videos.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

Im going to bed now, I'm hoping for some sort of statement from someone in the morning. Perhaps something from Gaz or Smooth or someone?
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

I played it for my mom (she has been a fan since the 70's and loves Michael and Janet) and she said she heard Michael at parts but the verse as she put it "just does'nt sound right, it's not michael"

Ok I understand Sony being afraid of releasing demo's because the market for that is us, not the average music buyer. But if indeed Breaking News is fake and potentially others on the album why didn't they just say it to begin with and have someone like Austin Brown and the other 3rd generation jacksons complete it.

I wish this nightmare would end :(
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

I played it for my Mother, Father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, granny, grandad, neice, nephew and all my cousins and they all said that's Michael Jackson. So that sums it up then.

I guess the general public is just as torn as we are then. :)
 
Re: MTV Magnifies and Decodes New "Michael" Album Cover

These were fun times.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

It's fake with a tiny bit of Michael once in a while. What if Sony is testing the waters to see if it's safe or not to try and fool us? Perhaps they have a few songs ready to go using some impersonator, and that's why this isn't an actual single. Perhaps now that they see they can't fool us, they will put out some statement saying it was a mistake. Then they will secretly pull all the tracks which include an impersonator from the album.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

I just cancelled my order, as much as it pained me to do so.

I refuse to buy an album that is not 100% Michael; that's what I'm paying for. Until an announcement is made as to the veracity of these claims, I intend to download the album when it is released.

Sony has fobbed us fans off for years, releasing compilation after compilation; making their money from us who will buy anything to add to our collection and they have the audacity to think they can please us with a hashed up song featuring some cheap imitator? I don't think so.

As stated above, until they clarify/rectify this issue I will not be buying any album that is released.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

So some are deciding not to buy the album because of a track or two not being really Michael... What about the other songs that will be Michael?? not supporting them because of the couple tracks??
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

I played it to non-fans and they liked it and though it was Michael. Good job Sony. They won.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

So some are deciding not to buy the album because of a track or two not being really Michael... What about the other songs that will be Michael?? not supporting them because of the couple tracks??


I think that's pretty self explanatory...pay for a album that consist of at least one song NOT sung by Michael Jackson himself? Only the fucking little ad libs alittle? And god knows,maybe even more songs....The whole damn album is called MICHAEL, really..it's starting to make me so mad when i think about it.

MICHAEL? Really $ony?

You sure you didn't mean JASON? Shiiiiiiiiiiit. Hell no that i will buy that.
 
André89;3059759 said:
You do that.

Keep buying their products, show them that it really doesn't matter how hard they rip off the fans. If we're lucky, we'll see even more Jason Malachi tracks next year. Maybe they'll even get Navi to star in the videos.

Why wouldn't I buy a Michael Jackson DVD? Who cares what is on the album, it has nothing to do with the DVD. If BN is fake, so what? I don't see a BN music video on the Vision set list.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

I think that's pretty self explanatory...pay for a album that consist of at least one song NOT sung by Michael Jackson himself? Only the fucking little ad libs alittle? And god knows,maybe even more songs....The whole damn album is called MICHAEL, really..it's starting to make me so mad when i think about it.

MICHAEL? Really $ony?

You sure you didn't mean JASON? Shiiiiiiiiiiit. Hell no that i will buy that.

I know!!! It's so frustrating!
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

Why wouldn't I buy a Michael Jackson DVD? Who cares what is on the album, it has nothing to do with the DVD. If BN is fake, so what? I don't see a BN music video on the Vision set list.


Vision? Who do you think the profits goes to? Ah yes....


Phony $ony.

Wanna suport them any longer? I sure don't friend.
 
Re: "Breaking News" Fake Song Talk Here Including Poll

I just love the song... and to me it very much sounds like MJ, singing in a different voice. Singing with the false breath is typically his...but who knows for sure?
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

this couldn't possibly stop me from getting the dvd. Fans punishing themselves by depriving them of MJ's music is only going to tarnish his legacy even further. Reject the crap that isn't MJ, and then buy the DVD that we all know is MJ.

HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY PULL THIS CRAP?!!!!!!!!!!
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

Okay, this is my opinion.

I strongly dislike everyone associated with MJ's name except his children.

They are all vultures, leeches and money hungry pigs.

Once Michael Jackson's diehard fanbase turns on all of them, it's the biggest mistake that $ony, MJ's estate and family could make.

They are a gigantic clusterfuck, they are mishandling his legacy and his dealings. They are all at war with one another and none of them are right.

All I know is that we need Michael back, he was always in control of his career. He knew when to tell people to **** off.

PS: The song reminds me of the Man In The Mirror DVD. I honestly picture that guy who played him singing it, because 80% of the lyrics are sung by an imitator.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

Sony is tarnishing the legacy here.

To me, Michael is not part of that legacy; its not Michael Jackson.

EDIT - Started a new hashtag on Twitter: #fuckyousony

:)
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

Vision? Who do you think the profits goes to? Ah yes....


Phony $ony.

Wanna suport them any longer? I sure don't friend.

I'm aware. However, one song, that MIGHT BE REAL, doesn't sound like a good reason to deprive oneself of a legit and great MJ product. But whatever, your losses, not mine.
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

BREAKING nEWS IS CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE ON THE WEBSITE!!!!

what does this mean???????
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

this couldn't possibly stop me from getting the dvd. Fans punishing themselves by depriving them of MJ's music is only going to tarnish his legacy even further. Reject the crap that isn't MJ, and then buy the DVD that we all know is MJ.

HOW COULD THEY POSSIBLY PULL THIS CRAP?!!!!!!!!!!


Buying the dvd means giving money to Sony, i surely don't want that, i really don't. It's the same when i found out a rapper that i apreciated (Dmx) was a huge participator of dog fights (the animal kind of dog fights,not airplanes) i immediately pushed his albums aside and sold my ticket to a upcoming show of his.

NEVER ever do i wish to support such lowlives, no thanks!!!!
 
Re: "Breaking News" General Discussion Here

Why doesn't everybody relax, nobdoy knows for certain anything yet, everybody is speculating and nobody is using any common sense, people think please. What makes sense, really i have been trying to spell out what should be obvious but it's making me tired. Okay one last time here it is: Which of these seem more plausible:

1. The lead vocals are not sang by Michael but an impersonator-

this means that sony spent $200 million on 100's of songs and then when it came to the big launch of their first album they chose a song that wasn't near finished and got an impersonator in to do the lead vocals in doing so ignoring all the finished songs and taking a huge risk that family, friends, fans or the public might notice it thus killing the album and rendering their whole investment worthless. Huge risk considering they could have just picked another song. Infact they could stuck with that song but just picked another one for the teaser and nobody would be any wiser until they bought the album.


2. Michael just sounds a little different on the this single like he did on escape or 2000 watts.

Which is more credible, really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top