Petrarose
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2009
- Messages
- 9,574
- Points
- 0
I mean Mike worked for MJ right? Did they even mention Mike in the book? or I missed something? I am asking because the way they went to the ABC interview felt like they basically worked together at those LV, virginia, NJ period of time. However, in the book, it make people felt like only 2 people mainly worked for MJ. How come Mike just disappear? Initially, I thought MIke is the one who made the OJ comment and got fired (I am bad remembering last name). Then, I find out the Mike in the book is another guy. Then, where is Mike Garcia during those time of period? It felt like he just vanish. I know he dropped out this project but how come they didn't even mention him if they all work together so closely to protect MJ during that time?
I see what you are saying now. Maybe they made an arrangement with him that they would not mention his name and if they do there will be trouble? Maybe he was the guy the fans were asking if they should buy the book, and he told them he could not advise them and he was not involved in the book.
Someone who read that Mariority (spelling) book. Did she say some of the same things the bodyguards said in this book, since she got some of her information from their material. Also, didn't the bodyguards say that they met with some guy and he took their document--that was way back before they had a publisher.
Scaredofthemoon I know for me, there are a number of reasons which I listed before, but also, I generally don't like books where people talk about themselves on a personal level--I usually say in my head "who cares about what you did." Since I was about 6 I never liked books in the first person. As soon as I saw the "I" I would say oh no, boring. Back then, 6-year-olds could read very well. Also generally I don't like books people write about other people's private lives. In my head I feel they are gossiping or not creating anything, but just using what someone else create--you know like a parasite. (That is why I have a big bias against journalists/reporters which has nothing to do with how they treated Michael.) However, I would read books about people from other decades/centuries mainly to see what the daily life was like back then, or I would read a book about the professional challenges/achievements of a leader--you know a scholarly type of work that shows the person's accomplishments. I don't read as much as I used to.
I think some don't like the idea of "you work for me and then you talk about my personal situation which you uncovered while you were working for me."
Anyway, it seems those who read the book came away with something valuable and that is the most important thing to me.
Last edited: