oh yeah HammerDon't forget MC Hammer. :cheeky:
oh yeah HammerDon't forget MC Hammer. :cheeky:
But see, that's the thing. The media and music industry is DESPERATELY looking and wanting someone to be the NEW Michael Jackson--even if that person is a female. They had the real thing; but didn't appreciate it, rejected it, turned their backs on it, ridiculed it, etc. Now he's gone and they realize what a genious Michael was and what a phenomenon he was and how he set the world on fire. The industry and media and public misses that pandemonium and excitement and mania that Michael gave them. They want their replacement.Seriously, media... give it up. You couldn't replace MJ in life and you certainly won't do it in death. He's an untouchable legend.
But see, that's the thing. The media and music industry is DESPERATELY looking and wanting someone to be the NEW Michael Jackson--even if that person is a female. They had the real thing; but didn't appreciate it, rejected it, turned their backs on it, ridiculed it, etc. Now he's gone and they realize what a genious Michael was and what a phenomenon he was and how he set the world on fire. The industry and media and public misses that pandemonium and excitement and mania that Michael gave them. They want their replacement.
But see, that's the thing. The media and music industry is DESPERATELY looking and wanting someone to be the NEW Michael Jackson--even if that person is a female. They had the real thing; but didn't appreciate it, rejected it, turned their backs on it, ridiculed it, etc. Now he's gone and they realize what a genious Michael was and what a phenomenon he was and how he set the world on fire. The industry and media and public misses that pandemonium and excitement and mania that Michael gave them. They want their replacement.
But see, that's the thing. The media and music industry is DESPERATELY looking and wanting someone to be the NEW Michael Jackson--even if that person is a female. They had the real thing; but didn't appreciate it, rejected it, turned their backs on it, ridiculed it, etc. Now he's gone and they realize what a genious Michael was and what a phenomenon he was and how he set the world on fire. The industry and media and public misses that pandemonium and excitement and mania that Michael gave them. They want their replacement.
I love Beyonce - but NO.
No one will ever be like Michael. Too bad not many appreciated him when he was still here.
Wrong title, supposed to be:
"Beyonce's new album is being compared to dog feces,"
I guess I wonder why people weren't saying he was an inspiration before he died.
But see, that's the thing. The media and music industry is DESPERATELY looking and wanting someone to be the NEW Michael Jackson--even if that person is a female. They had the real thing; but didn't appreciate it, rejected it, turned their backs on it, ridiculed it, etc. Now he's gone and they realize what a genious Michael was and what a phenomenon he was and how he set the world on fire. The industry and media and public misses that pandemonium and excitement and mania that Michael gave them. They want their replacement.
My album is just like Michael Jackson in his prime. Which means it's as good as OTW, Thriller, Bad, Dangerous, History, Blood On The Dance Floor and Invincible!!!
I read that in context. Only 'cos the repetitive amount of 'Let's laugh at anyone that mentions Michael Jackson and the slightest bit of competiton in their articles' did I say something like I did.If you actually read the quote in context, it's not saying it will be as good as or better than MJ's music in his prime, merely that it will sound like it, i.e. reminiscent of it. It comes right after a sentence about instrumentation and general sound.
Well lets face the facts
Everyone, even little kids know MJ and thriller, Dont stop, Beat it, Billie Jean ect
Now in even 10 years kids probably wont know any beyonce songs maybe 1 or 2 but just like 99% of singers she'll dissapear, There won't be another MJ. Lady gaga's closest but even her songs are rarley shown on music channels anymore
I don't think that's true for Beyonce. She has already been around for 13 years (scored her first hit "No No No" back in 1998 with DC) so there's no reason to believe she won't be around for another decade. Her popularity certainly hasn't decreased. Also, most kids nowadays know at least 1 DC song from ten years ago so who's to say they won't know any Beyonce songs ten years from now?
People said the same thing ("they won't last more than a decade") about Madonna and Britney when they first came out. Both have proved their critics wrong.
I like Beyonce although I've never bought any of her albums, nor do I know all of her songs. She seems like a nice person and she's released some great songs (Ring The Alarm and Why Don't You Love Me are my personal favourites). There is only one problem I have with her and that is overexposure. She needs to take a long break and give the public some time to miss her. She's in the news almost every day and it is getting tiresome, it's like she's being forced upon us. I have noticed the Beyonce-overkill has turned some people off of her. It could backlash in the future and this would be the only threat to her career I can think of. She certainly has the talent, looks and personality to last long in this business.
I agree with you that there will never be another Michael Jackson but I don't see how Lady Gaga is in any way close to him. As a matter of fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Beyonce's future career lasts longer than Gaga's. The latter is more famous for her gimmicks than her music but she has gone so far already, it becomes increasingly difficult to top herself in that respect. I hope and expect that the public will eventually grow tired of the "eccentricities" and focus more on her music, which mainly consists of good but unoriginal pop songs. Lady Gaga is a talented singer, piano player and songwriter but I'm afraid she will forever be compared to her predecessors (Marilyn Monroe, Madonna, David Bowie, etc.) and therefore she will never really be considered a legend in her own right, unlike Michael.
People are losing their mind.
If you actually read the quote in context, it's not saying it will be as good as or better than MJ's music in his prime, merely that it will sound like it, i.e. reminiscent of it. It comes right after a sentence about instrumentation and general sound.
There is a difference.
everybody wanting a piece of michael jacksonmichael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael, michael,
everybody want everything to be related to michael when it comes to selling their things.
Make your own ffs.
everybody wanting a piece of michael jackson