*How is saying “Michael is Innocent” with court documents, facts and evidence not enough , when you have brain dead people who actually believe that Michael is guilty without a shred of evidence or proof and based on nothing except manipulation, innuendo and fake allegations? The evidence is geared toward the fact that Michael IS Innocent, much more than guilt. I have seen NOTHING that has ever been shown to point to guilt.
*How is it a false equivalency to compare these allegations to Bowie or Presley? Is it because you don’t want to compare these two men who are your favorites? Is it because you ACCEPT or don’t care about what Bowie and Presley did because the victims were female? The bottomline is that they were actually involved sexually with MINORS who were females. Presley was actually involved SEXUALLY with a 13-14 year old GIRL, Priscilla. I don’t know all details about Bowie, will have to do more research. No one is trying to make things up about these men, people are basically pointing out the HYPOCRISY of how these two white mens’ actions seem to be accepted and not vilified. It’s racist and sickening.
*When Evan Chandler first asked Jordan if Michael had abused him, Jordan looked at him and laughed. Let’s not forget that this only happened after Evan had asked Michael for money to finance his projects. Michael REFUSED. Strangely, the only OTHER person that I have ever heard say that the Evan Chandler recording sounded like a “concerned father” is Dieann Demond. Wow, how convenient and coinencedental for you to say the exact same thing!!Hmmm! FTR, no rational person would listen to that recording from Evan and think he was “concerned” father. What “concerned” father would say “if I go through with this I WIN BIG”. Nothing about wanting justice for his so-called “abused” son. Nothing about wanted to physically hurt his son’s so called “abuser”. David Schwartz, Jordan’s step-father was actually the one who secretly recorded this Evan Chandler rant. On the recording, David asks Chandler, “what about Jordan, don’t you care about him?” Chandler answers that he doesn’t care WHO GETS HURT.” Now tell me again if THAT sounds like a “concerned” father.
* You say fans tell people to listen to Charles Thomson, Danny Wu, Razorfist, etc. You say they have strong arguments but are not perfect. The bottomline is that their arguments are based on FACTS-court documents, evidence, timelines, etc. The haters and people involved in the scam have nothing except innuendo, rumors, manipulations, fake accusations, etc. These people have not presented any facts. Rational people go by REAL EVIDENCE, not graphic and fake scripts.
*I’m trying to figure out what your “questions and doubts” about Michael’s pacifist image and creativity has to do with anything. Are you saying that these things affect whether you are a fan or not? That is very strange. Do you do that with every artist that you listen to or just when it comes to Michael Jackson? Btw, describe what you mean by “pacifist” image. Are you speaking of Michael’s philanthropy, humanitarianism, goodness, kindness toward people? Explain YOUR definition of “pacifist image”.
* As for originality in Michael’s work, he is just as original as any other artist that you may listen to. He has ALWAYS acknowledged his studying other great artists an being influenced by them. How original was Elvis? How original was Sinatra? How original was Prince? and the list goes on and on. ALL artist “borrow” from other artists.I’m sure if we went back to the Classical era, we would find that Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, etc. “borrowed” notes, chords, from other composers. What really bothers me and other MJ fans is the hypocrisy and DOUBLE STANDARDS that people like you perpetuate upon Michael. It’s really sad and disgusting.
