jackie11
Proud Member
Heya i would like to know how much tabloidism (if thats a word lol) there is in your country, or if anyone knows if its worse in The UK and The US?
Jackie xx
Jackie xx
Well you can't prove a negative. Let's say a tabloid makes up a story about you being a bank robber. They can't prove you're a bank robber, but you can't exactly prove you're not one either. So there's no case. Tabloids know what kinds of stories to print that won't have them sued for libel or slander. But some stars have sued. Clint Eastwood is one. I think he sued the Enquirer and won.Why nobody sues them for total BSs?
The Jackson Family should be more interested in MJs legacy and not only in his asset and administering... of MJs money.
Well you can't prove a negative. Let's say a tabloid makes up a story about you being a bank robber. They can't prove you're a bank robber, but you can't exactly prove you're not one either. So there's no case. Tabloids know what kinds of stories to print that won't have them sued for libel or slander. But some stars have sued. Clint Eastwood is one. I think he sued the Enquirer and won.
Lots of celebs (in the US) have sued tabloids and lost, because they couldn't prove their case. Elizabeth Taylor is one. They've also sued paparazzi and lost. But paps have sued and won cases against celebs who have attacked them or broken their equipment. If it was that easy to win against a tabloid, don't you think they've would have gone out of business by now or more celebs would have sued?That is not exactly true at least in the US.
If someone unequivocally states that I am a bank robber I can sue them. Unless they can prove I'm a bank robber they will lose - I have no duty to prove that I'm not a bank robber.
Same here and they add their twist to it with translation.Here they just copy paste the UK tabloids :smilerolleyes::smilerolleyes::smilerolleyes:
Well Michael probably believed that by suing them you just give them more attention and that's true, and it would have again taken so much time away... but I think Michael should have sued one or two succesfully and send a message...Why nobody sues them for total BSs?
Tabloids/gossip existed since the Hedda Hopper days in the 1920s. If it's been around all this time, they're not going anywhere. People like mess. People gossip about other people they work with or hang around and sometimes what they say isn't true.But the thing is PEOPLE MUST STOP BUYING AND READING THEM!!!
Rupert Murdoch owns News Corp. which owns Fox and The Sun as well as just about any Newspaper in the world. But I don't think Murdoch tried to destroy Michael's public image through tabloid press because MJ denied a meeting with one of the Bush presidents. Michael did accept an award from President Bush (41) in 1990. Plus, Murdoch doesn't care that much about the Bush family that he'll destroy anyone who upsets them. Murdoch will work with whoever is in positions of power (like the US Presidency) to create a government-media partnership. He doesn't care about party or last name or anything like that. He's a total power whore who'll work with anyone.The Sun is the worst. I heard the chiefman or something is the guy who owns FOX channels. Isn't he? Michael rejected to attend some sort of meetings offered by president Bush 1 and 2. Bush was elected thanks to Fox TV.
........ Fishy..
We have notified our Korean fans not to post any articles from the Sun anymore since Michae passed away.
The Sun make us sick. Tell him to go to H*ll.
Yep same here, sources are always The Sun or something like that. So basically it's just as bad.Here they just copy paste the UK tabloids :smilerolleyes::smilerolleyes::smilerolleyes:
I think the UK tabloids are way worse. A lot of the stuff they come up with is just insane.