michael4eva
Proud Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2011
- Messages
- 533
- Points
- 0
No one can do what mike did, that is blindly obvious
Well no michael was obviously not giving it everything in these or any of his rehersals in the pas (as no great performer does, they mark it all out)althought there were moments in dangerous rehersals, bad and in that short clip of michael stepping it up and going to that higher level closes to live time..
This is all in respone to the people that say ''yes he would have given it much more on stage, than rehersals''' but he will be slower and there will be noticeable differences to past shows..that is a given
This clip did indicate how the overall show would go I think.It would be like James Brown at 50 and i am sure mike learnt all this, maybe from him in regards to changing your focus and agenda on stage at a different age or decade perhaps..
If you look at every great performer,song n dance, they all adapt their performance as the years go on and the dance aspect etc diminishes(maybe not the voice).They manage to still obtain that form and that level of excellence but at the same time compensate other things to make it all appear as previous decades...It's such a difficult thing thing to doa and explain really, and imo james brown has been at the forefont of how to do it..sammy davis still adapted over the years and kept it all there but his world and time was singing mainly , tapping segments and maybe other things that weren't too taxing, i e impressions..I always go on about james brown and the many connections he had with mj and it goes deeep...so he has to be brought into the mix on this 1...if you don't know about james brown on a certain level you not a proper fan of mike as a performer/musician ..the list goes on.thatjust my opinion...king heroin n the boss peeps, educate yourself if you don't know about other levels of james brown lol
James brown took that adaptation to another level and applied it into his 70's and exceptionally well,His mc used to say to the audience in his later years ''you won't get it all , but you'll get a portion of it''...that really explains part of jb and mj's philosophy of performing.He also said on the jonathan ross show in refernce to his dancing something along the lnes of being being blind and not knowing where he was going, hitting the wall..but as i got older i saw and knew where i was going''..a strange analogy but it really sums it up as good as anything really...... You are more aware of limitations and also of your body , mind and one's self and your capabilities as through the years your nuture and evolve and understand yourself as a as a dancer /performer and become older and wiser as a person.When you are young, you just have all this energy to burn here there and everywhere and may be alot of things better, but one difference is the wise owl of a performer.it would be more about precision of moves and conserving energy whilst giving bursts of what he has always done at certain times, at the same speed etc.
In your 50's is when i think it is the last age range to pull it off and of a song or dance man to reminise the hay days.....James brown did his last fully full glimpses of his prime in his 50's imo, i mean for one he did the last splits around that time and the knee dives....but he had more soul in a way after that and some of those on concerts were as good as any because he had thing he never had before...after this tour,,, mike would have still given as good as any time one off performances..but this was 100 percent his last tour...because he gave so much more on stage than his teacher, he had a luxury of a long breks in between tours but also he had it worse, for example more intensity to the body and mind simply because of him stepping it all up a level...so this would have definatelly been his last tour, he knew that because of the legacy of performances on stage and how it awould all compare.he compares alot to his hey day , thriller i reckon..not just his music albums..A michael jackson concert/ tour wouldn't work in his 60's..ya''ll know that right
As these masters got older as dancerss n performer,they realised it won't be the same level as before...bad was hyper in all senses, dangerous was too but there was a little bit more adaptation and compensation..not a whole lot,..history there were more compensations that were more obvious and more numerous...
tii would have been on that sort of level with some more adpations and changes to reflect the man and capabilitites in order for him to give a 'michael jackson concert'...
Well no michael was obviously not giving it everything in these or any of his rehersals in the pas (as no great performer does, they mark it all out)althought there were moments in dangerous rehersals, bad and in that short clip of michael stepping it up and going to that higher level closes to live time..
This is all in respone to the people that say ''yes he would have given it much more on stage, than rehersals''' but he will be slower and there will be noticeable differences to past shows..that is a given
This clip did indicate how the overall show would go I think.It would be like James Brown at 50 and i am sure mike learnt all this, maybe from him in regards to changing your focus and agenda on stage at a different age or decade perhaps..
If you look at every great performer,song n dance, they all adapt their performance as the years go on and the dance aspect etc diminishes(maybe not the voice).They manage to still obtain that form and that level of excellence but at the same time compensate other things to make it all appear as previous decades...It's such a difficult thing thing to doa and explain really, and imo james brown has been at the forefont of how to do it..sammy davis still adapted over the years and kept it all there but his world and time was singing mainly , tapping segments and maybe other things that weren't too taxing, i e impressions..I always go on about james brown and the many connections he had with mj and it goes deeep...so he has to be brought into the mix on this 1...if you don't know about james brown on a certain level you not a proper fan of mike as a performer/musician ..the list goes on.thatjust my opinion...king heroin n the boss peeps, educate yourself if you don't know about other levels of james brown lol
James brown took that adaptation to another level and applied it into his 70's and exceptionally well,His mc used to say to the audience in his later years ''you won't get it all , but you'll get a portion of it''...that really explains part of jb and mj's philosophy of performing.He also said on the jonathan ross show in refernce to his dancing something along the lnes of being being blind and not knowing where he was going, hitting the wall..but as i got older i saw and knew where i was going''..a strange analogy but it really sums it up as good as anything really...... You are more aware of limitations and also of your body , mind and one's self and your capabilities as through the years your nuture and evolve and understand yourself as a as a dancer /performer and become older and wiser as a person.When you are young, you just have all this energy to burn here there and everywhere and may be alot of things better, but one difference is the wise owl of a performer.it would be more about precision of moves and conserving energy whilst giving bursts of what he has always done at certain times, at the same speed etc.
In your 50's is when i think it is the last age range to pull it off and of a song or dance man to reminise the hay days.....James brown did his last fully full glimpses of his prime in his 50's imo, i mean for one he did the last splits around that time and the knee dives....but he had more soul in a way after that and some of those on concerts were as good as any because he had thing he never had before...after this tour,,, mike would have still given as good as any time one off performances..but this was 100 percent his last tour...because he gave so much more on stage than his teacher, he had a luxury of a long breks in between tours but also he had it worse, for example more intensity to the body and mind simply because of him stepping it all up a level...so this would have definatelly been his last tour, he knew that because of the legacy of performances on stage and how it awould all compare.he compares alot to his hey day , thriller i reckon..not just his music albums..A michael jackson concert/ tour wouldn't work in his 60's..ya''ll know that right
As these masters got older as dancerss n performer,they realised it won't be the same level as before...bad was hyper in all senses, dangerous was too but there was a little bit more adaptation and compensation..not a whole lot,..history there were more compensations that were more obvious and more numerous...
tii would have been on that sort of level with some more adpations and changes to reflect the man and capabilitites in order for him to give a 'michael jackson concert'...