Can't see an easy answer to this AI thing. Like any human invention it's going to have positive applications and also very negative ones, imo. From the i newspaper, 21 April 2023, I can find these stories:
1 - Liam Gallagher is happy with an AI project that has created a new 'Oasis' album. A band called Breezer has created it under the name AIsis. Liam is quoted as saying, 'It's mad as f**k, I sound mega ...'
2 - A German tabloid, Die Aktuelle, has printed an interview with Michael Schumacher using quotes generated by AI. You could argue that everyone would know those quotes are fake since Michael, afaik, is still in a deep coma. But it still sucks that they did that. Fgs, that's just gross.
3 - Big article on AI in the art world. Lots of arguments raging.
Otoh, you get this:
"Veracity Protocol say that the technology ... has the potential to be used more extensively in the future to authenticate genuine works and identify forgeries, establish provenance, provide valuations, and facilitate displays."
Otoh, there is also this:
Art historian / art dealer Bendor Grosvenor says, "I'm wary of anything which asks us simply to trust the machine ... I'm also wary of anything which begins, 'simply by taking a picture with your phone', Because it's more complicated than that. The authenticity of the Mona Lisa is as much about the materials that lie beneath the surface as the image which appears on top.'
Maybe none of that stuff is relevant to Michael. I can wrap my head around TII or demos being released but I can't get my head around AI. It just feels ethically wrong.
Ngl, I can't make this analogy work. People being influenced by someone's work is entirely different, imo.