Unpopular opinions about MJ’s music?

Billie Jean shouldn't make Michael's top 20
I'll never get why Billie Jean is Michael's most famous song. Sure, it's not a bad song but I could name dozens of other songs that are better than it lol.
The Invincible out takes are better than the majority of what was included
That seems to be the general consensus, not really an unpopular opinion tbf.
 
I'll never get why Billie Jean is Michael's most famous song. Sure, it's not a bad song but I could name dozens of other songs that are better than it lol.
Isn't it the video and Motown 25? I think BJ - and Thriller - are both really good songs but I think they are so deeply embedded in people's minds bc of the videos and the iconic dance routines. I prefer the videos / dance routines for Beat It, SC and Bad but you can't copy those dance moves so easily. Maybe BJ (and Thriller) are more famous bc of the moonwalk and the zombie dance.

I doubt this qualifies as an 'unpopular' opinion but I can't even remember the last time I listened to BJ or Thriller. They're just not on my radar.
 
Ok controversial. I don't like any of the performances that try to recreate the videoclips. I find Smooth Criminal, Beat it, the way you make me feel and thriller very boring live.
I also dislike songs like earth song and heal the world live because of the theatrics.
I agree with twymmf....its just walking the stage back & forth until the dance break
 
I'm a firm believer that his performances of TWYMMF are for the ladies and I cannot tell you how much I, a lady, appreciate them. The Bad tour Wembley performance of it is one of my favorite performances period. I am beyond weak for him in it 🥵 I'll spare you the rest of my very impassioned thoughts on this matter. But it's very possible that are just not performances that can be appreciated the same way by men 🤷‍♀️
 
I'm a firm believer that his performances of TWYMMF are for the ladies and I cannot tell you how much I, a lady, appreciate them. The Bad tour Wembley performance of it is one of my favorite performances period. I am beyond weak for him in it 🥵 I'll spare you the rest of my very impassioned thoughts on this matter. But it's very possible that are just not performances that can be appreciated the same way by men 🤷‍♀️
I have nothing against the chasing itself but it is boring from left to right and back again.

Like with Thriller it would have been more interesting with a big elaborate set. They could have built a set of stairs for them to climb up to a higher level, construct a sort of fake car as in the video etc. They did it with the tank in earth song so it is all not impossible.
It all would probably hamper the flow of the show too much.

Some of these things from the looks of it were done better on this is it, it looked like the illusion of big expansive sets was created very well.
 
I'm a firm believer that his performances of TWYMMF are for the ladies and I cannot tell you how much I, a lady, appreciate them. The Bad tour Wembley performance of it is one of my favorite performances period. I am beyond weak for him in it 🥵 I'll spare you the rest of my very impassioned thoughts on this matter. But it's very possible that are just not performances that can be appreciated the same way by men 🤷‍♀️
I have nothing against the chasing itself but it is boring from left to right and back again.

Like with Thriller it would have been more interesting with a big elaborate set. They could have built a set of stairs for them to climb up to a higher level, construct a sort of fake car as in the video etc. They did it with the tank in earth song so it is all not impossible.
It all would probably hamper the flow of the show too much.

Some of these things from the looks of it were done better on this is it, it looked like the illusion of big expansive sets was created very well.
Bc I'm me I have to disagree with both of you. :D

The jazzy arrangement he uses for the start of TWYMMF - it would have been beyond awesome if he had done the whole song like that. Just him and his awesome voice. Do not wanna start the whole debate about live vocals here but I see no reason why he couldn't have sung this live since he wouldn't be moving much (although good luck with trying to keep Michael from dancing along to his songs, lol).

That said, the set and the staging for TWYMMF on TII did look awesome. I've seen fragments of other versions but they don't hold my attention (hm, OK, maybe I *am* agreeing with f&m, lol) but in the film it was gorgeous. It was very nicely edited, also, which helps to make it more visually interesting. Plus, Michael looked badass in it ...
 
I'm a firm believer that his performances of TWYMMF are for the ladies and I cannot tell you how much I, a lady, appreciate them. The Bad tour Wembley performance of it is one of my favorite performances period. I am beyond weak for him in it 🥵 I'll spare you the rest of my very impassioned thoughts on this matter. But it's very possible that are just not performances that can be appreciated the same way by men 🤷‍♀️
I agree! But to me it's most hot on the HIStory tour. soooooo fucking sexy
 
Yeah true, the intro to TWYMMF is awesome, that has never tired me either. Again MJ shows how expressive he is, he even dances when he is singing a cappella and it looks brilliant.
Actually one of my favorite little moments comes from TWYMMF live on the bad tour

Check out at about 25 sec. A single spin then he sorts of point to the ground with 1 arm/finger and bops his head. I cannot explain such things but it looks super cool.
 
I agree! But to me it's most hot on the HIStory tour. soooooo fucking sexy
Ohhh it's incredible on the HWT! Also I think most of the ladies on here would agree with you :) but I am a lunatic for the Bad tour. Still, I adore the HWT performance of it too!!!

Yeah true, the intro to TWYMMF is awesome, that has never tired me either. Again MJ shows how expressive he is, he even dances when he is singing a cappella and it looks brilliant.
Actually one of my favorite little moments comes from TWYMMF live on the bad tour

Check out at about 25 sec. A single spin then he sorts of point to the ground with 1 arm/finger and bops his head. I cannot explain such things but it looks super cool.
I.... I cannot even allow myself to open that right now. It will destroy (in the best possible way) my entire day lol. I'm actually not kidding. Any further detail on this will make me sound completely unhinged so that's all I'm going to say 😂
 
Yeah true, the intro to TWYMMF is awesome, that has never tired me either. Again MJ shows how expressive he is, he even dances when he is singing a cappella and it looks brilliant.
Actually one of my favorite little moments comes from TWYMMF live on the bad tour

Check out at about 25 sec. A single spin then he sorts of point to the ground with 1 arm/finger and bops his head. I cannot explain such things but it looks super cool.
This ties in quite nicely with the discussion about Michael's ambitions to be in film. I watched the bit you flagged up and it is awesome. It's exactly the sort of thing I love from Michael and I think it's part of why I was never fussed on the film thing. I get so much from him as a dancer. All this morning I've been running a little gif in my head - gold leotard, as it happens, lol. But the leotard is not the point. It's all about him moving his right hand up and across his body. It's such an elegant, graceful moment. As his hand moves through space, the lightness of the movement, like his hand is weightless ... just mesmerises me.

And this bit here is the same. Different energy, of course. This is faster and more dynamic. But just as hypnotising to watch (over and over). It's the sharp execution, the sassiness, the precision of his placement ...

um, could somebody stop me! I feel like writing an essay, lol.

Anyway. I liked this bit. So thanks for flagging it up. I'll stop now! :D
 
I can’t think of a more expressive pop dancer.

TWYMMF is MJ being cool and confident. He tells us I am the man and I am the center of attention, you can’t take your eyes off of me, I will get that girl! It is swagger, it is cocky.

He easily changed that around for other songs. Human nature is erotic, stranger in Moscow is sensual/ethereal, thriller (video, how he dances around the girl) is creepy yet playful, beat it is forceful and billie jean is just taking the piss. It’s a showscase, it is Michael saying i’m the greatest dancer you’ve ever seen.
 
I can’t think of a more expressive pop dancer.

TWYMMF is MJ being cool and confident. He tells us I am the man and I am the center of attention, you can’t take your eyes off of me, I will get that girl! It is swagger, it is cocky.

He easily changed that around for other songs. Human nature is erotic, stranger in Moscow is sensual/ethereal, thriller (video, how he dances around the girl) is creepy yet playful, beat it is forceful and billie jean is just taking the piss. It’s a showscase, it is Michael saying i’m the greatest dancer you’ve ever seen.
This is my favorite comment you've ever made, I think. I want to pin it somewhere on the board forever 😍
 
I really don't like bumping threads that haven't had replies in over a year, but I'll say this:

We do not need an anniversary album for every 20-year/25th-year/30th-year milestone after the release of an MJ album. Especially considering that a good portion of unreleased music that is expected by fans to be on these potential re-releases are already available via YouTube/downloading services to the public (especially outtakes that most fans wanted on Dangerous 25, when the topic of that was still popular).

Also, given the broad definition of unreleased material (which can range from written lyrics but no recordings to demos to completely finished songs) and how little information the MJ estate offers regarding MJ's unreleased material (and how little they give unreleased material altogether...), it's hard to know how many songs are even finished or eligible for release. Which is why I believe that a large multitude of anniversary re-releases that would live up to fans' expectations would be unrealistic. And, in my opinion, not necessary. And if there are many songs eligible for release sitting in the MJ estate's vaults, I'd honestly rather have another full-fledged occasional posthumous album like Xscape than an anniversary re-release anyway.

We don't need Dangerous 35. We don't need Invincible 25. We don't need Thriller 75 or Bad 50 or Off the Wall 85 one day. There doesn't need to be an anniversary re-release for every milestone of an album. And, at this point, our expectations for the estate shouldn't be that high anymore.
 
Don't think I've said anything in this thread - although I love live music, I've never been impressed by any live performance of Thriller or IJCSLY. I mean this purely vocally - the chorus in particular just doesn't have enough power.

We do not need an anniversary album for every 20-year/25th-year/30th-year milestone after the release of an MJ album.
Indeed. Especially when each re-release sounds WORSE than the version before. I find it insulting that they think I'd want to keep buying new inferior versions of stuff I already own.

Truth be told, the only reason Sony are doing this is so they can keep claiming Thriller has more an more sales. It's ok guys, it's already the biggest selling album, and nothing will ever catch up, so you don't need to worry, the record is safe, lol.

And, in my opinion, not necessary. And if there are many songs eligible for release sitting in the MJ estate's vaults, I'd honestly rather have another full-fledged occasional posthumous album like Xscape than an anniversary re-release anyway.
This. Stop using a handful of new songs as an excuse to clock up another sale of a legacy album. If the new songs are that good, just release them as a new release, and let them stand on their own two feet.
 
I believe I have another unpopular opinion. I prefer Ricky Lawson on drums over Jonathan Moffett. 🤷
 
I don't know if this is an unpopular opinion, but I think that a lot of MJ's creative choices were far too commercial-leaning, and they have negatively impacted his artistic legacy.

For example, everything to do with Pepsi - changing the lyrics to Billie Jean and Bad to be about drinking Pepsi, allowing fans to own Someone Put Your Hand Out only if they buy enough cans of Pepsi - all these decisions only diminish their impact of the songs as works of art rather than as commercial products.

The reason why MJ's songwriting capabilities aren't valued as highly as, for example, Lennon and McCartney, is because The Beatles didn't make the kind of commercial deals that MJ made. The fact that The Beatles songs only started to appear in TV commercials when MJ had bought ATV shows the lack of value he placed on songs as works of art rather than as products.
 
Y
I don't know if this is an unpopular opinion, but I think that a lot of MJ's creative choices were far too commercial-leaning, and they have negatively impacted his artistic legacy.

For example, everything to do with Pepsi - changing the lyrics to Billie Jean and Bad to be about drinking Pepsi, allowing fans to own Someone Put Your Hand Out only if they buy enough cans of Pepsi - all these decisions only diminish their impact of the songs as works of art rather than as commercial products.

The reason why MJ's songwriting capabilities aren't valued as highly as, for example, Lennon and McCartney, is because The Beatles didn't make the kind of commercial deals that MJ made. The fact that The Beatles songs only started to appear in TV commercials when MJ had bought ATV shows the lack of value he placed on songs as works of art rather than as products.
Those are business choices, not creative choices. And you can blame Joe and Motown for teaching that.
 
the kiss with Tatiana on stage was good for his image and should've been repeated as often as possible
even Michael himself kissed Lisa on stage
 
The reason why MJ's songwriting capabilities aren't valued as highly as, for example, Lennon and McCartney, is because The Beatles didn't make the kind of commercial deals that MJ made. The fact that The Beatles songs only started to appear in TV commercials when MJ had bought ATV shows the lack of value he placed on songs as works of art rather than as products.
I doubt this is the reason. Because Bob Dylan made commercials advertising stuff and he's considered by the boomer rock press to be the greatest songwriter. In general, rock music (mainly blues based, not really prog or metal) was always taken more seriously than other types of music in the rock magazines. Mike's music is considered R&B or dance music. Dance music (disco, funk, house, electronic, etc.) is usually not given the same importance as what was called singer-songwriter like Paul Simon & James Taylor. Those acts also did not have an old Vegas/Broadway showbiz style image. Early Elvis Presley is usually praised more than 1970s Vegas Elvis, which is sometimes made fun of and so was some of his 1960s soundtrack songs.
 
I doubt this is the reason. Because Bob Dylan made commercials advertising stuff and he's considered by the boomer rock press to be the greatest songwriter. In general, rock music (mainly blues based, not really prog or metal) was always taken more seriously than other types of music in the rock magazines.
This is true, but I think that what I said certainly contributes to his perception as a songwriter.

If you place such little value on a song you've written (Someone Put Your Hand Out) that you're willing for it to be heard only once someone's drank enough teeth-rotting juice, how do you expect anyone else to take your abilities seriously?
 
This is true, but I think that what I said certainly contributes to his perception as a songwriter.

If you place such little value on a song you've written (Someone Put Your Hand Out) that you're willing for it to be heard only once someone's drank enough teeth-rotting juice, how do you expect anyone else to take your abilities seriously?
Like all of those rock acts who did commercials for beer companies? 😂 Anyway, taken seriously by who? Magazines like Rolling Stone & Spin? What difference does that make? It's not like they often rate Tin Pan Alley or songwriters who wrote for movie musicals. The rock media doesn't usually praise people like Diane Warren either, she's mostly known for adult contemporary hits or Barry Manilow. Which is not the cool music. Barry Manilow is not in the Rock n Roll Hall Of Fame (started by the founders of Rolling Stone magazine) and unlikely ever will be. Barry literally wrote jingles for commercials, not just changing the words to his existing songs. Jagger/Richards are praised as songwriters and they sang for cereal
 
Jagger/Richards are praised as songwriters and they sang for cereal
Looks like this jingle was done pretty close to the beginning of their career, not when they had made it big. Looking at the comments the consensus seems to be that it was written by Brian Jones not Mick or Keith. So I'm not sure if it's really comparable to the situation with Michael where he was a hugely successful star (the entire reason they wanted him for the ads, obviously) plus he took his big hits of the day and diluted the lyrics to fit the advert.

This is true, but I think that what I said certainly contributes to his perception as a songwriter.

If you place such little value on a song you've written (Someone Put Your Hand Out) that you're willing for it to be heard only once someone's drank enough teeth-rotting juice, how do you expect anyone else to take your abilities seriously?
I'm conflicted about it. I don't like the fact that he messed with his own songs and diluted them for an advert. Otoh, I can understand him wanting to build a business empire and develop other income streams. The pop business is unpredictable and even the most successful artist can find themselves out of fashion. A successful advert can generate a huge amount of money. He worked really hard to build his brand and be highly visible. I'm really old-school about this so I don't really like the fact that he did it but I also admire his business smarts which were phenomenal - at least in the 80's.
 
Back
Top