Mister_Jay_Tee
Proud Member
Bad vs Good.What does broke and woke mean?
Bad vs Good.What does broke and woke mean?
Even though we don't know what it sounds like?Innocent Man is the most important unreleased song for the soundtrack
it should be played everywhere
Innocent Man
"Innocent Man" (also known as "An Innocent Man" and "The Innocent Man") is an unreleased song by Michael Jackson scrapped from the HIStory: Past, Present, and Future, Book I album. The song was first aknowledged by the artist himself during the Mexico deposition in November 1993.[1] Jackson...michael-jackson.fandom.com
To be honest, I wouldn't see the film if they did this. It would just mean they were just namedropping new people who have nothing to do with MJ, it would make the whole thing just a load of shit.Still think price of fame with a possible secondary duet with The Weeknd. (Just like LNFSG)
the Elvis soundtrack had Doja Cat and EminemTo be honest, I wouldn't see the film if they did this. It would just mean they were just namedropping new people who have nothing to do with MJ, it would make the whole thing just a load of shit.
I think a new album containing a mix of all of the above would be most appealing.Broke, Big Standard Reissue of MJ Singles, most of them incredibly popular already.
Woke, A few big MJ hits to propel streaming for those songs higher, a small collection of Unreleased songs & lesser known material from key albums and outtakes, And, a few original songs newly recorded by Jaafar Jackson to highlight his talent.
especially BTM Mikes MixAny unreleased tracks have to be of a decent standard too, some of the stuff on T40 was pure garbage.
I didn't know that, but now you've told me it makes me cringe. It's totally pointless and reeks of desperation.the Elvis soundtrack had Doja Cat and Eminem
If you saw the movie, you'd know it. Because the Doja Cat song was in the movie. To me, the movie was kinda more about Colonel Parker than Elvis. He's still getting his 50%. Also, the real Parker didn't have the accent that Tom Hanks used. I don't think the real Parker would have gotten anywhere in the southern USA during that time if he really sounded like Hanks. Especially in the country music field, which is what he was doing before Elvis. Colonel Parker might have sounded like that when he first got to the USA though. Some immigrants lose their original accent after awhile. Sidney Poitier said he worked hard to get rid of his Jamaican accent.I didn't know that, but now you've told me it makes me cringe. It's totally pointless and reeks of desperation.
And, well you could always buy a "Doja Cat" album if you wanted that. But Elvis fans like Elvis.
really? I can't believe itIf you saw the movie, you'd know it. Because the Doja Cat song was in the movie.
And that's fine. If they wanna release a remix album, they should release a remix album. And the people who like remix albums can buy it/judge it on merit.we could expect a remix album produced by DJ Khaled.
Maybe it'll be like TII OST - with an additional bonus disc with few tracks like original versions of HT/Another Day/MTS.It's gonna be a soundtrack so it should mirror what already scores the film.
It is. During the movie too, and not only over the ending credits like some soundtrack songs. I think it played around the time the Big Mama Thornton character appears.really? I can't believe it
true but if they don't include it, others will say they are trying to hide somethingI don't want You Are Not Alone anywhere on the soundtrack. I get that it was a massive hit, but with the controversy surrounding the person that wrote it, I think it would be best not to include it. Same goes for Cry and One More Chance.
Which makes no sensethe Elvis soundtrack had Doja Cat and Eminem
If I had to pick one of the three, it would be You Are Not Alone.true but if they don't include it, others will say they are trying to hide something
If you've ever seen a Baz Luhrmann film it makes perfect sense , I mean they had Britney Spears Toxic in that film.Which makes no sense
Have you seen Moulin Rouge? Or Romeo & Juliet? It makes all the sense in the world for meWhich makes no sense
We must think alike ^^^^Have you seen Moulin Rouge? Or Romeo & Juliet? It makes all the sense in the world for me
On that note. I had an idea that may be interesting: They re-release 'Michael' with new mixes of the tracks on there more faithful to MJs original vision (bc tbh i do not like how BTM or HT turned out, and I wish it was someone else other than Akon on HMH but thats just me), with some new unreleased tracks like CGYWOOM, Dreams Away, etc.. Call it like 'Michael: 2024 Edition' or something along those lines. If taylor swift can do it, why cant the MJE? very bad and unrealistic idea ik, just wanted to throw that out there lmao.Maybe they'll just re-release the "Michael" album and replace the Cascio tracks with "Billie Jean", "Beat It" and "Thriller". lol
Taylor Swift is not the same thing. She re-recorded her earlier albums because she didn't own the masters to them and still doesn't. They're not remixed unreleased songs, and not the original recordings either. If people want the versions they originally heard, they'll have to buy Taylor's original albums and not the new versions. The difference is that Taylor gets more money if the re-recorded versions are bought and/or streamed or if companies want to license certain songs. She has no control over the original albums.If taylor swift can do it, why cant the MJE? very bad and unrealistic idea ik,
Yeah, I meant the comparison in the sense of re-releasing the album with new mixes. Wasn't a great analogy on my part.Taylor Swift is not the same thing. She re-recorded her earlier albums because she didn't own the masters to them and still doesn't. They're not remixed unreleased songs, and not the original recordings either. If people want the versions they originally heard, they'll have to buy Taylor's original albums and not the new versions. The difference is that Taylor gets more money if the re-recorded versions are bought and/or streamed or if companies want to license certain songs. She has no control over the original albums.
Only the name of "Michael" album can afraid fans !. This album doesn't have any special things [especially remember that fake songs] and releasing this project can remind some bad moments for fans ... . When estate have some semi complete projects like "HIStory 30" or another anniversary albums , this is not a good idia to drop an infamous album ! ... .On that note. I had an idea that may be interesting: They re-release 'Michael' with new mixes of the tracks on there more faithful to MJs original vision (bc tbh i do not like how BTM or HT turned out, and I wish it was someone else other than Akon on HMH but thats just me), with some new unreleased tracks like CGYWOOM, Dreams Away, etc.. Call it like 'Michael: 2024 Edition' or something along those lines. If taylor swift can do it, why cant the MJE? very bad and unrealistic idea ik, just wanted to throw that out there lmao.