Tito opens up to VIBE

Moulin Rouge

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
3,330
Points
0
Location
USA
http://www.vibe.com/content/long-convo-withtito-jackson

So did you hear the one about Tito Jackson? From Eddie Murphy’s hilarious 1983 Delirious routine to late night talk show monologues, over the years there have been no shortage of jokes when it comes to the most obscure Jackson brother. But a full re-evaluation of the 56-year-old guitarist may be in order. His underrated talent was on display on the The Jacksons: A Family Dynasty. The man credited with forming the Jackson 5 is a serious musician who takes his ax game and outside business pursuits seriously (peep his Tito Jackson Signature Hat Collection).

As part of VIBE’s week-long tribute to Michael Jackson—marking the 1st year anniversary of the King of Pop’s June 25, 2009 death—Tito opens up about his thoughts on the legacy of MJ; his very first solo album; the early days of the Jackson 5; and his unabashed passion for the blues.--Keith Murphy

micheal-jackson-6.jpg



VIBE: What are your thoughts about how some of the harshest critics of your brother changed their tune about Michael after his death?

Tito: It makes me feel good because I always knew that my brother was the greatest entertainer that we’ve ever seen. He was something special. This was [something I saw] way before the music and Motown; I’m talking about back in Gary, Indiana. I think Michael got to a point where they didn’t understand the heights that he had reached. When you are so high there is nowhere else to go but down. And the same people that put you at those heights are the very people that will bring you down. Michael had no reason to hate anything or hurt anyone. I think a lot of people knew who my brother actually was but they chose not to give him that credit or that respect.

But that outpouring of love and respect has to be bittersweet for your family.

What hurts me more than anything is that I wish he were here to see the gratitude that the world has for him. When we don’t understand that kind of love or caring for people we tend to think that there’s more to it than meets the eye, when it’s actually simple and pure.

His critics now have to go hide. The world showed how much Michael is loved. Now that he’s not here anymore, we will never have another one. [Everyone remembers that] little kid who was eight years old on The Ed Sullivan Show. But I remember him from five years before that, I remember when he was not even in school singing like a bird. It would make you shake your head [in disbelief.]

When was the last time you saw Michael before his death?

My mom and dad had an anniversary gathering for their 60th year. And we all were there—the children, the grand kids…we all got together at a restaurant for a dinner. This was in L.A. and that was the last time I saw Michael. The last thing he told me, he always would give me a hug and I’d tell him I love him and he would tell me he loves me more. Those were the last words I heard from my brother.

What were your thoughts on This Is It?

I can’t watch that movie. I haven’t seen it. It’s still too soon.

The Jackson 5’s 1968 audition for Motown has now become the stuff of legend. What do you remember most about that moment in time?

I remember Michael was like Kobe Bryant to the Lakers. That’s what he meant to the Jackson 5. We were all talented—Jermaine, Jackie, Marlon and myself. But we knew with Michael on our team we weren’t going to fail. We knew we were getting that deal. Before the audition we were at the Apollo doing a show and we had the choice of either doing the Motown [audition] or staying in New York and going on the Dick Cavett Show. Half of us wanted to stay and do that and the other half wanted to go and do Motown. If we did the Cavett show we would have been seen nationally. There would have been more than just Motown; we could have attracted maybe three or four record companies. But we decided on Motown because we have been following that label forever. Our whole style was Motown.

The irony is Gordy didn’t even want to take the audition, right?

Yes! Berry Gordy didn’t want to have nothing to do with the Jackson 5 because he had already caught hell from social workers with Little Stevie Wonder. He wasn’t used to working with children in the business and he didn’t understand it too well. His thinking was, “What do you mean the kid can’t do background vocals because he has to take a two hour break now? [laughs] What am I going to do with five kids?”


Okay, so I was having a debate with some other Jackson fans about what was the best Jackson tour. I picked the 1981 Triumph tour over the 1984 Victory tour. What’s your pick?

[Laughs]. That’s funny, because I think the Triumph tour was our best tour. Besides the Victory tour being the biggest Jackson’s tour and having the biggest effects and biggest returns and playing in huge stadiums, it wasn’t the best Jackson show. Remember, the ticket price was an issue. The price back then was $29. They thought that was so high…the press rode us really hard about that. But a week or two later, Madonna came out with tickets for something like $60. That justified our price. But what I really hated about the Victory tour was that Jackie wasn’t onstage with us for a lot of the dates. He broke his leg. I don’t think the world saw the Jackson brothers at their best.

Are there any plans for the Jackson brothers to tour again in the future?

I think you will see the Jacksons onstage. You will see a different type of group with a different sound. We will be missing the voice of Michael, that’s for sure. But we will still have the same Jackson harmonies and vocals from the brothers. We’ve been performing all our lives. We love what we do. I think that Michael would want us to continue the legacy.

Overall, are you happy with the way the Michael Jackson estate has been handled?

So far it’s been positive. But really, my brother has only been gone a year and so everything that has been done prior to his passing is what it is. We’ve built this on the strength of the Jackson 5, Michael, and Janet. The world will continue to hear Jackson music. The song is not over yet for the Jacksons. We have a lot of music in us.
 
good interview overall, but it bugs me how all the Jacksons turn questions about Michael Jackson music and legacy into answers about the Jacksons music.
 
good interview overall, but it bugs me how all the Jacksons turn questions about Michael Jackson music and legacy into answers about the Jacksons music.
Well, Michael is a Jackson. His career didn't start with Thriller NOR as a solo artist. His career started at 5 years old with his older brothers as the Jackson 5 BEFORE they hit it big at Motown. After his first solo album as an adult, he was still apart of the Jacksons making albums and touring with his brothers. The Jacksons (which Michael was the lead singer of and scored hits with) as well as Michael's legacy as a solo artist is indeed intertwined and cannot be separated nor ignored.
 
Well, Michael is a Jackson. His career didn't start with Thriller NOR as a solo artist. His career started at 5 years old with his older brothers as the Jackson 5 BEFORE they hit it big at Motown. After his first solo album as an adult, he was still apart of the Jacksons making albums and touring with his brothers. The Jacksons (which Michael was the lead singer of and scored hits with) as well as Michael's legacy as a solo artist is indeed intertwined and cannot be separated nor ignored.

it can be seperated and ignored in the minds of some, and not in the mind of others. fans can't go on telling other fans how to feel.

after all, fans are fans of who they want to be fans of. how the artist or artists affect the fans is the business of the artist, and the business of the individual fan. what one fan feels is not the business of what another fan feels. and neither Michael, nor a fan that sees only Michael, should be blamed for whatever affect is transferred.

same is the case with any or all of the other brothers and/or, sisters and the fans.

it is never about biology. it's about the relationship between the musician, or musicians, and the fans, no matter what. it's about entertainment. i mean, i suspect people don't have this problem with Jonas or Hanson or anybody else, so i don't see why it should be a problem with the Jacksons.
 
it can be seperated and ignored in the minds of some, and not in the mind of others. fans can't go on telling other fans how to feel.

after all, fans are fans of who they want to be fans of. how the artist or artists affect the fans is the business of the artist, and the business of the individual fan. what one fan feels is not the business of what another fan feels. and neither Michael, nor a fan that sees only Michael, should be blamed for whatever affect is transferred.

same is the case with any or all of the other brothers and/or, sisters and the fans.

it is never about biology. it's about the relationship between the musician, or musicians, and the fans, no matter what. it's about entertainment. i mean, i suspect people don't have this problem with Jonas or Hanson or anybody else, so i don't see why it should be a problem with the Jacksons.
I wasn't trying to tell other fans who to like more or less. I was merely stating facts regarding Michael's career began with his brothers and continued with his brothers during early adulthood until he finally reached the point of going solo without his brothers.

That Michael and his brothers as the Jackson 5 and as the Jacksons have contributed greatly to music history; of course Michael as a solo artist----his accomplishments speaks for itself.

That's history, music history--and people need to be reminded of that. It's human nature for people to downplay or outright ignore any facts that contradicts the opinion they insist upon having about another person. And I see that REPEATEDLY when it comes to Michael. In fact I saw that exact human nature as I was looking at the various specials on Michael last night...how certain facts about his life, finances, circumstances around his death, his autopsy....were INTENTIONALLY left out while certain people and certain opinions were included in these programs to keep the reporting of Michael at the angle they wanted. And I see it when it comes to Michael's family--how that human tendency works. Some fans feel they have to downgrade Michael's family to show how much more of a fan they are of Michael. It's no different NOR better than fans of Janet downgrading Michael to show their fandom of Janet. Or those who condemn Michael because they felt he 'abandoned' his family when he went solo.

The bottom line is when its obvious that facts are being overshadowed by opinions I will post something whether its to defend Michael or members of his family. Now if some want to take that as me trying to tell others what to think, that's way too far-fetched--and quite frankly, THEIR problem not mine..
 
Thanks for posting! :flowers:

I love Triumph and Victory tour! Wish i was there..:heart:
 
I wasn't trying to tell other fans who to like more or less. I was merely stating facts regarding Michael's career began with his brothers and continued with his brothers during early adulthood until he finally reached the point of going solo without his brothers.

That Michael and his brothers as the Jackson 5 and as the Jacksons have contributed greatly to music history; of course Michael as a solo artist----his accomplishments speaks for itself.

That's history, music history--and people need to be reminded of that. It's human nature for people to downplay or outright ignore any facts that contradicts the opinion they insist upon having about another person. And I see that REPEATEDLY when it comes to Michael. In fact I saw that exact human nature as I was looking at the various specials on Michael last night...how certain facts about his life, finances, circumstances around his death, his autopsy....were INTENTIONALLY left out while certain people and certain opinions were included in these programs to keep the reporting of Michael at the angle they wanted. And I see it when it comes to Michael's family--how that human tendency works. Some fans feel they have to downgrade Michael's family to show how much more of a fan they are of Michael. It's no different NOR better than fans of Janet downgrading Michael to show their fandom of Janet. Or those who condemn Michael because they felt he 'abandoned' his family when he went solo.

The bottom line is when its obvious that facts are being overshadowed by opinions I will post something whether its to defend Michael or members of his family. Now if some want to take that as me trying to tell others what to think, that's way too far-fetched--and quite frankly, THEIR problem not mine..
nobody ever thinks they are telling people how to think.

i think you're taking the feelings of posters the wrong way..

people are aware of what Michael did, in this case...and aware of what the Jacksons did, in this case. they are aware he had solo hits in the family years. that has nothing to do with what was being expressed. the song 'Bad' has nothing to do with 'I Want You Back'. saying that is not comparable to what the media said about Michael. blurring the line between fact and opinion is all too easy.
 
Last edited:
That was nice. I've always liked Tito. But honestly, I wonder how it feels to always be asked about someone else? Like to know that the only reason (or main reason) people want to talk to you?
 
Tito also gave an interview to InTouch magazine
http://www.intouchweekly.com/2010/06/remembering_michael_he_definit.php

Remembering Michael: “He definitely wasn’t gay,” says Tito

MichaelJackson0625.jpg

As the world honors Michael Jackson on the first anniversary of his death today, his older brother Tito tells In Touch exclusively how his brother’s legacy should live on forever with his fans — and his children. “I want them to remember that their father was a genius!” Tito tells In Touch of Prince, 13, Paris, 12, and Blanket, 8. “My brother was the greatest entertainer who ever lived, in every way. He was electrifying, he did things that we hadn’t seen before, he had ideas no one had thought of before.” Tito says that Michael’s good works far outshadow the rumors that plagued his brother, especially with regard to his sexuality. “As far as I’ve always known, my brother had more sex than I did with women,” :wild:says Tito. “He definitely wasn’t gay. He was not a rugged, beer-slinging type of man. Michael wouldn’t beat you up; he would beat you with his brain.” As far as Tito is concerned, Michael should be remembered for his generosity of spirit. “My brother was a gift to us from God,” says Tito. “He gave us great music, he left a lot of great gifts and videos behind and the donations of his estate — those are beautiful things. That just shows you the heart and the respect he had for the unprivileged, people that weren’t as blessed as he was. Michael hoped for a world free of pain and misery, and I hope it transforms from a dream to a reality for him.”

Permalink | Posted: June 25, 2010
 
Michael sure it put it on Lisa Marie.. they have been divorced for years.. she has remarried.. what 4 times and she still has that "really' special feeling for him...even in death...

maybe that is why she lashed out so a few years ago...
 
Back
Top