The Very Creative and Complex Michael Jackson

CherubimII

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
6,831
Points
113
Cognitive Psychologist; Author
Posted: March 6, 2011 11:49 AM

After the Show: The Many Faces of the Performer

"Do I contradict myself? / Very well then I contradict myself, / (I am large, I contain multitudes.)" - Walt Whitman


Recounting his recording sessions with the young Michael Jackson, famed record producer Quincy Jones remembers that "Michael was so shy, he'd sit down and sing behind the couch with his back to me while I sat with my hands over my eyes -- and the lights off." What a contrast from his onstage extroverted, charismatic and bold performance!

In the CNN.com article "The confusing legacy of Michael Jackson," Todd Leopold discusses the perplexing combination of seemingly contradictory traits displayed by Michael Jackson. In explaining his many sides, Jackson biographer J. Randy Taraborelli essentially throws his hands up in the air in exasperation as he tries to make sense of the apparent contradictions:
I think that when you're talking about Michael Jackson and you try to analyze him, it's like analyzing electricity, you know? It exists, but you don't have a clue as to how it works.
Creativity researchers aren't so confused. They have long-ago accepted the fact that creative people are complex. Almost by definition, creativity is complex. Creative thinking is influenced by many traits, behaviors, and sociocultural factors that come together in one person. It would be surprising if all of these factors didn't sometimes, or even most of the time, appear to contradict one another.

As creativity researcher Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi notes in his 1996 article for Psychology Today entitled "The Creative Personality," creative people "show tendencies of thought and action that in most people are segregated. They contain contradictory extremes; instead of being an "individual," each of them is a "multitude."

To me, some of the most fascinating contrasts are those found in creative performers -- those who are constantly on stage and in the public eye. Out of Csikszentmihaly's list of 10 complex personality traits of creative people, which were based on interviews with a wide variety of creative people, I think these three are the most relevant to creative performers:
Creative people have a great deal of physical energy, but they're also often quiet and at rest. They work long hours, with great concentration, while projecting an aura of freshness and enthusiasm...This does not mean that creative people are hyperactive, always "on." In fact, they rest often and sleep a lot. The important thing is that they control their energy; it's not ruled by the calendar, the dock, an external schedule. When necessary, they can focus it like a laser beam; when not, creative types immediately recharge their batteries. They consider the rhythm of activity followed by idleness or reflection very important for the success of their work.
Creative people tend to be both extroverted and introverted. We're usually one or the other, either preferring to be in the thick of crowds or sitting on the sidelines and observing the passing show. In fact, in psychological research, extroversion and introversion are considered the most stable personality traits that differentiate people from each other and that can be reliability measured. Creative individuals, on the other hand, seem to exhibit both traits simultaneously.
Creative people's openness and sensitivity often exposes them to suffering and pain, yet also to a great deal of enjoyment... Being alone at the forefront of a discipline also leaves you exposed and vulnerable.
These three seeming contradictions -- energy/rest, extroversion/introversion, and openness/sensitivity -- are not separate phenomenon but are intimately related to one another and along with other traits form the core of the creative performer's personality.

All three are also linked to what Elaine Aron refers to as a highly sensitive personality (HSP). HSP's make up 15-20 percent of the general population and tend to be more aware than others of subtleties, get more easily overwhelmed when things get too intense or there is too much sensory input, are easily affected by other's moods, and are deeply creative and moved by arts and music. Some of the most creative people have very high levels of sensitivity.

A recent study illustrates this point... to read more click on link below
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/scott-barry-kaufman/creative-people_b_829563.html

The evidence is clear: for a large majority of performers, in some of the most extroverted forms of performance, there is a great ability to juggle multiple faces and a need for downtime and reflection. New psychological research is showing just how intertwined and prevalent Openness to Experience, flow, abnormal perceptual experiences, and extroversion/introversion contradictions really are in creative people, especially artists.

Hopefully by combining methods, such as self-reported experiences, peer reports, and more objective tests, we can shed more light on the many complexities and seeming contradictions found in creative people of many different flavors, and by so doing counter common black-and-white stereotypes about people in general.

In a world filled with hate, we must still dare to hope.
In a world filled with anger, we must still dare to comfort.
In a world filled with despair, we must still dare to dream.
And in a world filled with distrust, we must still dare to believe."

— quote by Michael Jackson
 
Last edited:
"Consciousness expresses itself through creation.
This world we live in is the dance of the Creator.
Dancers come and go in the twinkling of an eye
but the dance lives on. On many an occasion when I am dancing,
I have felt touched by something sacred.
In those moments,
I felt my spirit soar and become one with everything that exists.
I become the stars and the moon.
I become the lover and the beloved.
I become the victor and the vanquished.
I become the master and the slave.
I become the singer and the song.
I become the knower and the known.
I keep on dancing and then,
it is the eternal dance of creation.
The Creator and the creation merge into one wholeness of joy.
I keep on dancing — until there is only ... the dance."

quote by— Michael Jackson (from the book Dancing the Dream)
 
..."Michael was so shy, he'd sit down and sing behind the couch with his back to me while I sat with my hands over my eyes -- and the lights off." What a contrast from his onstage extroverted, charismatic and bold performance!

... The important thing is that they control their energy; it's not ruled by the calendar, the dock, an external schedule. When necessary, they can focus it like a laser beam; ...

Thanks for posting, definitely good to read although I personally don't seem to understand why people seem to have such a hard time understanding these polarities.

When you write a song and try to duplicate what 'it' is you feel inside and what 'it' feels like to you- it's a process to get where you want it to be. And you don't necessarily want people watching along the sidelines.
You have a vision of what you want 'it' to be- and you want to present people with that result, not necessarily the process. That's the 'magic'- people see it and think it's this effortless beauty, a dancer gliding along, how beautiful.

And sometimes it can feel like you're being inhibited when you try to record something and already have 5 people watching on and judging what they hear, while you're actually developing the sound. I completely understand his 'sing in the dark' type tendencies.
Some music just calls for it- just you and the music. You're not performing the song 'toward' someone physically present (although you very well may imagine yourself an audience- and he actually said that to Bashir, that he visualize the audience to create something), you're recording it. That is a huge difference.

And performing something is a totally different animal all together- that 'focussing of energy like a laser beam' that the article spoke about. You focus 400% of it onto your audience, so that your audience has a chance to absorb maybe 70% of what it is you actually mean.
It also means delivering something that might have come 'through' you if you will, not necessarily from you, not everything is autobiographical. It's like the great actors that can 'turn it on and off' at will.

Michael had an incredible stage presence that he could switch on and off at will- and that stage presence is what is lacking in mainstream music business- that laser beam to be able to reach someone in the last row.

I don't find these polarities surprising at all, we all have rather different sides to us.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting, definitely good to read although I personally don't seem to understand why people seem to have such a hard time understanding these polarities.

When you write a song and try to duplicate what 'it' is you feel inside and what 'it' feels like to you- it's a process to get where you want it to be. And you don't necessarily want people watching along the sidelines.
You have a vision of what you want 'it' to be- and you want to present people with that result, not necessarily the process. That's the 'magic'- people see it and think it's this effortless beauty, a dancer gliding along, how beautiful.

And sometimes it can feel like you're being inhibited when you try to record something and already have 5 people watching on and judging what they hear, while you're actually developing the sound. I completely understand his 'sing in the dark' type tendencies.
Some music just calls for it- just you and the music. You're not performing the song 'toward' someone physically present (although you very well may imagine yourself an audience- and he actually said that to Bashir, that he visualize the audience to create something), you're recording it. That is a huge difference.

And performing something is a totally different animal all together- that 'focussing of energy like a laser beam' that the article spoke about. You focus 400% of it onto your audience, so that your audience has a chance to absorb maybe 70% of what it is you actually mean.
It also means delivering something that might have come 'through' you if you will, not necessarily from you, not everything is autobiographical. It's like the great actors that can 'turn it on and off' at will.

Michael had an incredible stage presence that he could switch on and off at will- and that stage presence is what is lacking in mainstream music business- that laser beam to be able to reach someone in the last row.

I don't find these polarities surprising at all, we all have rather different sides to us.


That's so true, thank you for this awesome interpretation. I too didn't understand from the article their over-analysis on an artist's antagonistic traits. They're heightened at a very creative being, true, but if it's Michael J., then it's out of this world to them.. not to mention eerie, so as not to say 'bizarre'... Which I just did, lol.
 
I so enjoyed reading all of your comments, and I agree with them.
Thank you.
Michael_Jackson_52163.jpg
 
Yes, lovely Wetten Das signature, Cherubim.. Are the flowers daffodils, right?.. Lovely how my sister was praising the beauty of the daffodils we're currently having at home. They're delicate and looking like tender bells.

Found this interpretation on their symbolism which I find beautiful:

"Symbolizing rebirth and new beginnings, the daffodil is virtually synonymous with spring. Though their botanic name is narcissus, daffodils are sometimes called jonquils, and in England, because of their long association with Lent, they’re known as the “Lent Lily.” Lore connecting the daffodil to not only a sign of winter’s end but a lucky emblem of future prosperity is found throughout the world. In Wales, it’s said if you spot the first daffodil of the season, your next 12 months will be filled with wealth, and Chinese legend has it that if a daffodil bulb is forced to bloom during the New Year, it will bring good luck to your home."

http://www.teleflora.com/about-flowers/daffodil.asp
 
Back
Top