The inside story of why MJ's touring business is now bigger than ever- the Bilboard cover story

claudiadoina

Proud Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2011
Messages
4,316
Points
0
Location
Bucharest, Romania
This is an excerpt. For the complete story, buy this week's issue of Billboard.

In the fall of 1987, not long after the release of his blockbuster album Bad, Michael Jackson and his longtime lawyer/adviser John Branca piled into a van to see the Los Angeles debut of Cirque du Soleil at the Santa Monica Pier.

They took a van, with Branca driving, despite the fact that Jackson had gifted Branca with a Rolls-Royce, and their journey was briefly stalled after Branca headed in the wrong direction on the congested Interstate 405. But the pair eventually made it to the show. Cirque du Soleil was 3 years old at the time, and true to its inspiration in the circus, was housed in a tent on this visit to Los Angeles. Jackson could hardly contain his excitement to watch the Quebec troupe perform, Branca recalls.

"After the show, Michael said to me, 'Branca, we have to go backstage and meet the cast,'" he says. "I couldn't tell who was more excited, the cast to meet Michael or Michael to meet the cast. That's how enthusiastic he was."

Jackson's growing fascination with Cirque didn't end there. After attending many other performances by the troupe, known for its mesmerizing aerial acrobatics and otherworldly costumes, the King of Pop decided to visit the company's Montreal headquarters to get a firsthand look at its operations.

"I did the tour with him," Cirque president/CEO Daniel Lamarre remembers. "As you can imagine, all our employees were thrilled to have him in our studio, and he was thrilled to be here. He spent a lot of time in our creative studio and our costume workshop. It was a great day."

At the time, Jackson was still filling arenas and stadiums around the world. Neither the pop icon nor Cirque could have fathomed that an arena trek blending hits like "Billie Jean" and "Thriller" with stunning visuals and the theatrical touch of Cirque would one day rank among the top 10 highest-grossing tours in history.

But indeed it has, proving that even in death, Michael Jackson remains one of the most lucrative musical brands in today's live entertainment business.

CONCEIVED THROUGH AN equal revenue-sharing partnership between the Jackson estate and Cirque du Soleil, "Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour" recently became the No. 9 top-grossing tour of all time, earning $325.1 million from 407 shows that drew 2,985,324 concert-goers, according to Billboard Boxscore. Tickets prices ranged between $50 and $250.

"Immortal" also ranked fourth among Billboard's top 25 highest-grossing tours of 2012 and took home the Creative Content Award at the Billboard Touring Awards that same year. Although official rankings haven't yet been released, "Immortal" will rank among the highest-grossing tours of 2013 as well.


On the Boxscore chart, "Immortal" edges out the Rolling Stones' 1994-95 Voodoo Lounge tour (ranked No. 10, with $320 million in grosses) and trails Bruce Springsteen's 2012-13 Wrecking Ball tour (No. 8, $347 million). U2, the Stones and Roger Waters are the top three highest-grossing touring acts, respectively. Jackson is the only deceased artist among the top 10.


The Jackson estate's deal with Cirque also includes a permanent Las Vegas theater production, "Michael Jackson One," that debuted in May at a refurbished, 1,800-seat theater at Mandalay Bay, the former home of "The Lion King" and "Mamma Mia!" Since opening, "One" has been selling at about 93% occupancy from an average of 10 shows per week, according to Cirque.

"The 'One' and 'Immortal' shows represent a true Michael experience, the next best thing to seeing him live," says Branca, who now serves as co-executor of the Jackson estate with John McClain. "'Immortal' is akin to a rock concert experience with a live band in an arena, and 'One' is more of a theatrical show."

With a total development cost of about $145 million, "Immortal" and "One" are two separate and distinct productions built around Jackson's music. Both shows were written and directed by Jamie King, a dancer on Jackson's Dangerous world tour in the early '90s. The productions also feature several other musicians, choreographers and costume designers Jackson worked with during his career.

Despite the onstage absence of Jackson himself, King says the songs, images, spoken-word interludes and other visuals chosen for "Immortal" and "One" reflect the very best of the pop legend's life and musical career.

"I had the heavy responsibility of bringing Michael's spirit onto the stage, reflecting his creative sensibilities and projecting his unbelievable talent for his fans," says King, who has also directed arena tours by Madonna, Britney Spears and Rihanna. "Michael was never, ever missing during the development, rehearsals and launch of these two shows."

"Immortal" debuted at Montreal's Bell Centre in October 2011 and performed its 407th show at New Zealand's Vector Arena on Nov. 3. The trek will relaunch in December with a lengthy run in Dubai before returning to various-sized North American arenas in March 2014 (see story, right). Cirque is also in talks with international promoters about bringing "Immortal" to select overseas territories. So far, it has already visited 25 countries on four continents.

Lamarre believes the tour will continue to climb the Boxscore chart. "I wouldn't be surprised if by the end of the tour, whenever the end of the tour is, we ranked among the top five touring shows in the history of rock'n'roll," he says.

WHEN JACKSON DIED on June 25, 2009, from drug-related cardiac arrest at the age of 50, he was reportedly $500 million in debt from years of excessive spending. Though he still had high earning potential based on 50 sold-out shows for his "This Is It" residency at London's O2 Arena, Jackson has earned more money in death than when he was living. Billboard estimated that MJ Inc. generated at least $1 billion in revenue in the year following his death (Billboard, June 2010).

Last year the Jackson estate paid off the late singer's outstanding personal debt, thanks in part to a lucrative $250 million deal with Sony Music, profits from the concert film "Michael Jackson: This Is It," 50 million albums sold worldwide after his death, his half ownership of Sony/ATV Music Publishing, various licensing deals and the high-grossing Cirque shows.

"Sometimes, sadly, our great artists are appreciated more after they've passed away. Michael was a great artist and his legacy is enduring," Branca says. "But there was a lot of interest in Michael, and a lot of earning power, before he passed away, witnessed with 50 sold-out shows at the O2 Arena."

Overall earnings from the Jackson estate are divided among charity (20%), the singer's children (40%) and his mother, Katherine Jackson (40%). Jackson's three kids will receive Katherine's share upon her death. Generally, Branca and McClain receive a 10% commission rate of the estate's earnings.

But the co-executors had always planned on a live experience around Jackson's music. Cirque seemed like an ideal partner given the artist's past appreciation for the troupe. So in late 2009, the estate began discussions with Cirque about potential projects. "We had thought about several potential partners to create a show, and after careful deliberation we felt Cirque was the best potential partner," Branca says. "They're very creative and groundbreaking, much like Michael was. They're also perfectionists, like Michael was."Branca says the estate is constantly approached with ideas for Jackson-related projects, but he and McClain are very selective about new partnerships and licensing deals. "We don't want to over-license Michael, but we do license those products that we think are appropriate and fun," Branca says, citing a successful approval for a Jackson slot machine in Las Vegas. "We're careful."

Branca and McClain initially envisioned only a permanent show in Vegas based on Jackson's music, similar to Cirque's perennially sold-out "Beatles Love" concept at the Mirage Hotel, which began in 2006. But after lengthy talks, Lamarre and Cirque founder Guy Laliberte found that a permanent tech-heavy show would take years to create and that a global arena tour could be a lucrative endeavor in the meantime.

"In an ideal world, maybe we would've done both at the same time," Lamarre says. "But when doing a permanent show that will probably last forever in Las Vegas, you have to bring technology that is very complicated. We had to redo the theater at Mandalay Bay, which took almost two years. We couldn't resist the temptation of touring around the world."

Twenty months after the debut of "Immortal," the Jackson estate and Cirque, in partnership with MGM Resorts International, began previews of "One" on May 23. The show officially opened June 29. Cirque says it could sell more than 452,000 tickets from 270 performances by the end of 2013. (Numbers for "One" haven't been reported to Boxscore.)

Cirque and the estate each own 50% of "Immortal" and "One," and share equally in the cost of producing them. The estate receives royalties from the use of Jackson's music and other assets. Royalties also go to Sony for the use of his solo master recordings and to music publishers like Warner/Chappell (which administers Jackson's Mijac Music catalog) and Universal Music Publishing Group (which handles the catalog of songwriter Rod Temperton, who wrote hits like "Rock With You" and "Thriller").

Branca says the two-pronged Cirque deal plays "an important part of the earnings for the estate." But he wouldn't project where the shows rank among the estate's overall portfolio, in terms of revenue.

"These touring shows were created to generate long-term revenue," he says. "But the point of these shows is also to continue introducing Michael to new generations of fans. We're finding that not only existing Michael Jackson fans go to the shows, but also kids and new fans who come and become Michael fans."


IS NEW MUSIC COMING?

BRANCA BELIEVED IT made sense to release an album in conjunction with the "Immortal" tour. So in November 2011, as part of its multimillion-dollar 10-album deal with the Jackson estate through 2017, Sony released the "Immortal" soundtrack on MJJ/Epic Records.

Aside from the soundtrack, there aren't plans to release other albums or DVDs in conjunction with "Immortal" or "One." However, Cirque and the Jackson estate are exploring the idea of releasing a mobile app that provides a look into the show experiences, Branca notes.The set features an alternative version of the Jackson 5 hit "ABC" and a series of mash-ups and remixes. The "Immortal" tour utilizes more than 60 songs from Jackson's catalog, but the album includes 15 tracks (the deluxe edition has 22). The soundtrack debuted at No. 24 on the Billboard 200 and has sold 202,000 copies, according to Nielsen SoundScan.

Other albums released under the Jackson estate-Sony deal include Michael Jackson's This Is It (2009), Michael (2010) and the Bad 25th-anniversary edition (2012), which included a concert DVD and documentary directed by Spike Lee. They have collectively sold 2.4 million copies. Also released under the agreement was the three-disc DVD set "Michael Jackson's Vision" in 2010, which has sold 133,000.


"Michael Jackson is without question the most successful artist in the history of Epic Records," Epic chairman/CEO Antonio "L.A." Reid says. "His name is synonymous with our label and we take great pride in the fact that Epic has been his musical home for nearly 40 years. From a musical, emotional and business perspective, continuing our relationship with the Michael Jackson estate is paramount. It is a true partnership committed to furthering his legacy for generations to come."

Rumors continue to circulate about possible new Jackson music-both Brian May and Roger Taylor of Queen have said May has worked on tracks that Freddie Mercury and Jackson recorded in 1983-but neither Sony nor Branca would divulge any details about when fans might see the next album from the King of Pop.

"There's definitely music coming, but I can't reveal when we think it's coming," says Branca, who also declined to reveal whether any other Jackson-related projects are in the works beyond album releases. "Michael had a policy that we try to follow-not to talk about things until they're ready to be released. We like to keep things under wraps until we're ready to go with everything. We have ideas and things we're working on, but nothing that we're ready to announce."

http://www.billboard.com/articles/n...ng-life-after-death-the-billboard-cover-story




 
On the Boxscore chart, "Immortal" edges out the Rolling Stones' 1994-95 Voodoo Lounge tour (ranked No. 10, with $320 million in grosses) and trails Bruce Springsteen's 2012-13 Wrecking Ball tour (No. 8, $347 million). U2, the Stones and Roger Waters are the top three highest-grossing touring acts, respectively. Jackson is the only deceased artist among the top 10.

Wow! I never knew Immortal is in the Top 10 highest-grossing tours EVER (and could be in Top 5 by the end of it, according to the article). Great news.

The Estate is very secretive about upcoming projects:

Rumors continue to circulate about possible new Jackson music-both Brian May and Roger Taylor of Queen have said May has worked on tracks that Freddie Mercury and Jackson recorded in 1983-but neither Sony nor Branca would divulge any details about when fans might see the next album from the King of Pop.

"There's definitely music coming, but I can't reveal when we think it's coming," says Branca, who also declined to reveal whether any other Jackson-related projects are in the works beyond album releases. "Michael had a policy that we try to follow-not to talk about things until they're ready to be released. We like to keep things under wraps until we're ready to go with everything. We have ideas and things we're working on, but nothing that we're ready to announce."
 
Cirque du Soleil's Michael Jackson Tour Adding Arena Dates in 2014
News


By Mitchell Peters, Los Angeles | November 08, 2013 10:34 AM EST
Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour

"Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour," which recently became the ninth-top-grossing tour in history, will return to North American arenas in 2014, Billboard can exclusively reveal.

"We're in the process of fiercely booking it," Cirque du Soleil senior VP of touring shows Finn Taylor says. "We're mostly trying to do new markets so we can bring the show to new audiences, but there are some repeats of our more successful markets from the first tour."

Created in a partnership between the Michael Jackson estate and Cirque, "Immortal" will visit small to full-size arenas in the United States, Canada, Mexico and perhaps South America, beginning in March. The Cirque-promoted North American tour will perform in about 40 cities, but specific routing details weren't available at press time.

John Branca, who serves as co-executor of the Jackson estate with John McClain, says the upcoming "Immortal" performances could be slightly different from what audiences have already seen.

"I could see retooling the show in some ways and switching up some elements, but overall the format would stay very similar," Branca says. "There are certain numbers we might redo, but I don't think we would change the entire format."

In August, "Immortal" will once again visit Mexico City's Palacio de los Deportes, where it experienced some of its most lucrative business after grossing $13.2 million from 14 performances in 2012, according to Billboard Boxscore.

"We're positive we can sell another maybe 120,000-140,000 tickets in a second run," says Renato Herrera, executive VP at concert promoter OCESA, which operates the venue.

Herrera says there are also talks about taking "Immortal" to smaller arenas in such South American markets as Colombia, Argentina and Brazil.

Additionally, Cirque is in discussions with international promoters about bringing "Immortal" back to various parts of the world. With 407 shows under its belt, the trek has visited 25 countries on four continents. International dates haven't been confirmed beyond a lengthy run in Dubai, which goes through mid-January 2014.

"It's very tough to do one-offs with this show, because we have to bring all of the equipment with us," Taylor says. "We have to work on establishing some kind of regional leg or regional tour before we can get anywhere. There might be one or two Asian cities that want us, but we need six or seven to make it worthwhile."

http://www.billboard.com/biz/articl...chael-jackson-tour-adding-arena-dates-in-2014

-----------

Yeah! Great news for those in North America who want to see it again!:woohoo:
 

michael-jackson-billboard-cover-500.jpg


:cry:
 
Michael continues to reign :sc_imbad:.. He is truly Immortal :heart:

Oh^^ that little Michael doing a crotch grab is cracking me up!!! Too funny.

I did not realize that Immortal was owned 50% by Cirque. I thought when the show began it was written that the estate paid for the production costs, so why would they pay for this and then give the company 50% ownership? Anyone knows?
 
I did not realize that Immortal was owned 50% by Cirque. I thought when the show began it was written that the estate paid for the production costs, so why would they pay for this and then give the company 50% ownership? Anyone knows?

It`s a 50/50 partnerchip, sharing the costs and the income. This was clear since the start.
 
The King's Coffers: Behind the Earnings of Michael Jackson's Estate


By Ed Christman | November 08, 2013 10:01 AM EST

In June 2010, a year after Michael Jackson's death, Billboard looked at the estate's music-based revenue streams and estimated that some $1 billion of gross revenue flowed into it. Through interviews with industry experts and our own number-crunching, Billboard examined the revenue that Jackson generated in 2012, as well as that to date in 2013, and also estimated the earnings that revenue generated for the estate.

http://www.billboard.com/biz/articl...ehind-the-earnings-of-michael-jacksons-estate
 
Though he still had high earning potential based on 50 sold-out shows for his "This Is It" residency at London's O2 Arena, Jackson has earned more money in death than when he was living. Billboard estimated that MJ Inc. generated at least $1 billion in revenue in the year following his death (Billboard, June 2010).

imo this is completely wrong, death of anybody is the one-off thing, a dead person can not (in this case) record any other album, or go on tour.
if journalists like Mitchell Peters counted at least Bad, Dangerous and HIStory tours including selling albums/records of these albums, he would see how mega money machine MJ was!!!! btw, how many times MJ was among the top earning celebs in the 90´s? Like Dangerous or History albums and tours never existed!?

He had the most lucrative deals, the albums are among the top20 best sellers ever, and only during the 10 year period and at least 13 million people attended the 3 tours!

Why some journalist dont want to see the facts instead of the one-off death thing success like this is the standard of being successful because all of a sudden people/fans are buying tickets and records because somebody is dead and nothing before it is irrelevant?
NO, these people/fans have always been there and we can see they are here, somewhere, out there, around the globe.

and if the journalists can mention Sony/ATV, why now this is relevant and if MJ was alive it wast almost reported that the value was about 1-2 billion.

I dont get why such articles present (although I really appreciate it because it presents MJ positively) MJ as bigger, larger than life because he is dead now if this is just continuing success!
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/is-m...-life-after-death-JdR1ecZMR9yJ56YQgu4zQw.html

Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Billboard Editorial Director Bill Werde discusses the business of touring on Bloomberg Television's "Market Makers." (Source: Bloomberg)


Editorial director at billboard magazine joins us.

There is huge business around these brands, estates, after death, and that is what this war is about.

It'll want to connect with the artist.

The fact that billboard is hosting a conference about tours, it does take me back to jerry garcia.

This is a business where people drove around in winnebago's. why is it so big?

Where as the recorded music business has had its challenges, with people not paying for it, but there is no replacement for hours.

Is it also because of the sponsor opportunities?

For pepsi, you can dump your money into beyonce television advertisements, but if they sponsor the worldwide tour, their name is everywhere.

Brands use entertainers all the time, and one of the biggest tors was a rolling stores -- rolling stones tour.

Citibank sponsor this.

Help me get my head around this.

Why would citibank want to associate themselves with a rock band?

For the credit card company it is about the presale and offering opportunities that no one else can offer.

If you are a city card member, and you get a crack at meeting the rolling stones, that is the experience.

Furthermore, the rolling stones are not selling kids tickets anymore.

Not so much.

What are the ingredients for a successful tour?

Like any other business, it is pricing, demand, marketing.

The business had a correction where they went down for the first time in eight or nine years, and the business took it as a wake-up call.

You cannot over such a macro -- over saturate a market.

It is about using the metrics, social data, information fans will give you, and make sure you are routing the right to work -- tour.

It -- it is the artist traveling the world, how much of a cut do they get?

Typically, it is 80% split.

If you are a superstar, you could command up to 100% of the gross.

The numbers are amazing.

There were seven in the last year that did more than $100 million in growth, and at least three of them, you're looking at taylor swift, pink and rihanna.

Other artists are right behind them.

What does it say to the venues that these artists have so much control?

In new york you have msg, the barclays center, and they're all willing to undercut one another.

Are the venues making less and less money?

The menus are thin, but if they were not making money, they would not keep doing this.

Jim: runs -- jim dolan runs msg.

I do not think he could sell it out himself.

Is it as much about the music or is it the performance?

Is about the music, but there is an expectation of spectacle that is starting to feed this boom in touring because you are having these amazing experiences.

They want to see mick jagger twerk.

That is what it is.




 
Last edited:
<header class="section_header" style="margin: 0px 0px 25px; padding: 28px 50px 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; font-size: 14.399999618530273px; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: transparent; position: relative; text-align: center;">How Michael Jackson's Estate Earns $145 Million a Year (From the Magazine)


By Ed Christman, New York <time class="no-padding" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; outline: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: transparent;">| November 12, 2013 12:55 PM EST</time>
</header>
michael-jackson-quincy-jones-650-430.jpg



<small data-behavior="caption" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px; padding: 14px 0px 15px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: rgb(230, 230, 230); outline: 0px; font-size: 13px; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: transparent; color: rgb(197, 197, 197); display: block; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; text-align: left;">
</small>​
This article first appeared in Billboard Magazine -- subscribe here and buy this issue here.
In June 2010, a year after Michael Jackson’s death, Billboard looked at the estate’s music-based revenue streams and estimated that some $1 billion of gross revenue flowed into it. Through interviews with industry experts and our own number-crunching, Billboard examined the revenue that Jackson generated in 2012, as well as that to date in 2013, and also estimated the earnings that revenue generated for the estate. The results don’t match those of 2010, when Jackson’s loss was still fresh, but they remain impressive: 2012 music-based revenue of $544.6 million, with the estate’s earnings at $121 million. Estate sources suggest the full earnings total is closer to $160 million, which would leave $39 million in merchandising, film and TV licensing, DVD sales and other licensing deals.
MUSIC SALES AND STREAMING

2012 revenue: $51 million
Jackson estate share: $22.4 million

THIS ARTICLE FIRST APPEARED IN BILLBOARD MAGAZINEGET THIS WEEK'S ISSUESUBSCRIBE TO BILLBOARD HEREIPAD EDITION
In 2012, Jackson sold almost 819,000 album units in the United States and 2.8 million tracks, according to Nielsen SoundScan. The estate has said that his U.S. album sales are 30% of global album sales, and Billboard estimates the artist’s U.S. track sales at 48% of global sales, which extrapolates to total global album sales of 2.7 million units and 5.8 million track sales for a total revenue of about $39.2 million. Meanwhile, the Jackson 5’s total U.S. sales were 155,000 album units and 422,000 tracks. Using the same calculation, that would be 518,000 global albums and 880,000 tracks for a total of $7.2 million. In 2012, streaming was 12% of sales, which means the Jackson catalog generated another $5.5 million in streaming revenue, bringing total music revenue to $52 million. If Jackson gets a superstar 50% royalty rate (and one-fifth of the Jackson 5’s 20% royalty), then his estate’s share of that would be $22.7 million.
To date in 2013, Jackson’s 482,000 U.S. album sales (as of Oct. 27) and 1.9 million in track sales extrapolates to a global 1.6 million album units and nearly 4 million track sales, generating $23.7 million. The Jackson 5’s U.S. sales of 48,000 album units and 248,000 tracks extrapolate to 161,000 global albums and 516,000 track sales, or $2.5 million. Billboard estimates streaming in 2013 at about 15% of sales, or another $4 million, for a total of $30 million, with the estate earning $14 million.

TOURING/LICENSING

2012 revenue: $150.6 million
Jackson estate share: $30 million

“Michael Jackson: The Immortal World Tour” pulled in $150.6 million in 2012. Estimating the costs of staging that production at $90 million, that would leave $60 million to be split between Cirque du Soleil and the Jackson estate, or $30 million earnings for the latter.
So far this year, that show has pulled in $124.3 million. A new live-performance revenue stream has been added: “Michael Jackson One,” the residency at the Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas. Billboard estimates that “One” is generating approximately $2.5 million per week in box office, or $45 million since its opening on May 23. That puts total touring/licensing revenue at about $170 million. If the cost is about $100 million, that would leave $70 million to be split evenly, with the Jackson estate earning $35 million.
RECORDING CONTRACT

2012 revenue: $31 million
Jackson estate share: $31 million

In 2010, Sony Music Entertainment reached a deal with Jackson’s estate to release 10 albums of the singer’s music through 2017, with the estate guaranteed between $200 million and $250 million for the deal. That works out to $31 million per year, with the last release being the 25th-anniversary edition of Bad in September 2012.
MUSIC PUBLISHING

2012 revenue: $312 million
Jackson estate share: $38 million
When a Sony Corp. of America-led consortium of investors bought EMI Music Publishing, Sony’s share amounted to 38%, of which Jackson owns one-quarter, or 9.5%. Since it paid $2.2 billion for the company and divested song catalogs worth about $90 million, that means the Jackson estate’s share is worth $206.8 million. In its most recent public numbers for the year ended May 31, 2012, EMI Music Publishing generated $211 million in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, but with costs associated with the acquisition and closing of the deal, and then layoffs, there probably wasn’t any payout to shareholders in 2012. This year, Jackson’s payout, after debt service, could be worth about $9 million.

The Jackson estate also owns half of Sony/ATV, which has been valued at about $1.6 billion, which means *Jackson’s portion is worth about $800 million. According to recently released financial data, at midyear fiscal 2013, Sony/ATV had revenue of $315 million. If it earns the equivalent revenue in the other half of the year, Sony/ATV’s annual revenue should be about $630 million, and through the first 10 months that would equal $525 million. If the *company’s EBITDA hits the same 30% of revenue that EMI achieved, that should give the company $157.5 million to date in 2013. Sony Corp. put up about $300 million in equity toward the purchase price, probably put on the Sony/ATV books as a loan, which at 5% probably has about $15 million in annual debt service and $12.5 million through the end of October. That leaves earnings of $145 million. All of which means that if that’s split among shareholders before taxes, Jackson’s share would come to $72.5 million. As it is, the Jackson estate is guaranteed an annual payment of at least $23 million.
Billboard values Jackson’s Mijac Music catalog at about $150 million. Assuming the standard 10 times multiple on publishing, that yields about $15 million a year in royalties. Overall, Billboard estimates the valuation of Jackson’s publishing assets at $1.2 billion.

SUBSCRIBE TO BILLBOARD








http://www.billboard.com/biz/articl...hael-jacksons-estate-earns-145-million-a-year
 
Its a nice to read that Michael is that popular that he makes tons of money, but unfortunately there is a downside when they publish these kind of articles. There are people who think they should own some or most of that money and start doing silly things.
 
^Agree, lets hope quincy doesn't pick up a copy of this week's billboard.
 
Pleased to hear Immortal will tour the US again and be slightly different. I'd love to see it again.
 
Its a nice to read that Michael is that popular that he makes tons of money, but unfortunately there is a downside when they publish these kind of articles. There are people who think they should own some or most of that money and start doing silly things.

Several folks i know point to the record shattering '93 Oprah Winfrey interview hyping his fabulous wealth as the beginning of the crazy shit.
 
Several folks i know point to the record shattering '93 Oprah Winfrey interview hyping his fabulous wealth as the beginning of the crazy shit.

I wonder if Madonna has similar people after her money. Forbes wrote this:
"Madonna was the top earner on our recent Celebrity 100 list, raking in $125 million between June 2012 and June 2013. Not bad for a living person. Her late buddy Michael Jackson easily topped her though, earning $160 million over the past year by our estimate."

She too should have all sort of loonies after her money, or is that sort of thingy reserved only to Michael?
 
I wonder if Madonna has similar people after her money. Forbes wrote this:
"Madonna was the top earner on our recent Celebrity 100 list, raking in $125 million between June 2012 and June 2013. Not bad for a living person. Her late buddy Michael Jackson easily topped her though, earning $160 million over the past year by our estimate."

She too should have all sort of loonies after her money, or is that sort of thingy reserved only to Michael?

Michael was too good for this world: kind, polite, naive - so people tended to use and abuse him. Madonna is not kind, polite or naive. I just read a thread on another forum about the book her brother wrote about her. OK, just like with the so called "biographies" about Michael it could as well as be a lot of BS (Madonna does not seem to be on good terms with her brother - though I don't know much about her but that's what I came away with), but it has little stories such as Madonna sending a bill to people about really small things, like eating an apple or things like that. Now, Michael instead showered people with gifts and supported them and all. Look what he got in return! So that shows in this world you have to be arrogant and tough and selfish to survive. Because a lot of human nature is actually pretty ugly and if you are not they are gonna use and abuse you, like they did with Michael and still continue to do.
 
Michael's wealth became a target because of the vulnerable position he placed himself in. Out of purity, innocence and naivety granted. But nonetheless, he left himself open.

He also became a target from other types of people because of the sheer level or fame he attained, and power that came with it. People resented that. And I'm sure his race had a lot to do with that too.
 
if someone want to have the ebook of the full magazine, just simply send me a PM and you will get the download link.
 
Last edited:
For the complete story, buy this week's issue of Billboard.

Does anyone have the full issue?
 
So that shows in this world you have to be arrogant and tough and selfish to survive. Because a lot of human nature is actually pretty ugly and if you are not they are gonna use and abuse you, like they did with Michael and still continue to do.

Sad, but a very very harsh reality of the world we live in.
 
I wonder if Madonna has similar people after her money. Forbes wrote this:
"Madonna was the top earner on our recent Celebrity 100 list, raking in $125 million between June 2012 and June 2013. Not bad for a living person. Her late buddy Michael Jackson easily topped her though, earning $160 million over the past year by our estimate."

She too should have all sort of loonies after her money, or is that sort of thingy reserved only to Michael?

It's far more complicated than having a lot of money. I'm sure you know this, if not, you're trivializing what Michael went through.
 
Back
Top