troubleman84
Proud Member
Re: TMZ: Michael's London Shows In Jeopardy
For one show in Texas! :lol: This stuff is comical, OMG! :lol:
For one show in Texas! :lol: This stuff is comical, OMG! :lol:
'll post my write-up and analysis within the hour, but rest assured NOWHERE in any contract does any signature from any Jackson family member exist. It is all between Frank Dileo and the AllGood agency, there is no acknowledgment nor agreement that the Jacksons would perform any of what was described. Furthermore, this appears to be a conflict explicitly between AllGood Entertainment and Frank Dileo. It's kind of a mess but I do not believe the Jacksons are fully aware of any of it, nor do I believe it will have any affect on the actual contract signed by Michael with regards to the AEG concerts...
Facts are facts, they contacted MJ and AEG in March. They have got nowhere dealing with either, now reading between the lines I would guess if this was somthing to get really worried about they would have sorted it out then and pulled out all the stops to reach a mutual agreement.
$10 says this will all get worked out
so as Guy would say....
Let's Chilllllllllllll!
The blue pill is only Advil. Wake up.
posted by TSCM on kop
Thanks elusive (and TSCM).posted by TSCM on kop
posted by TSCM on kop
Quote:
'll post my write-up and analysis within the hour, but rest assured NOWHERE in any contract does any signature from any Jackson family member exist. It is all between Frank Dileo and the AllGood agency, there is no acknowledgment nor agreement that the Jacksons would perform any of what was described. Furthermore, this appears to be a conflict explicitly between AllGood Entertainment and Frank Dileo. It's kind of a mess but I do not believe the Jacksons are fully aware of any of it, nor do I believe it will have any affect on the actual contract signed by Michael with regards to the AEG concerts...
oh greatSo it was done behind Michael's back. Nice..... :smilerolleyes:
LOL well, he has 3 already I'm not sure if one more would make things any better!
Gooner,
I think you need to step back with your accusations, she is not creating drama END OFF
Its about being concerned for the fans and wanting them to know this is a serious affair,
Plus I am getting sick to the back teeth of your swipes and me and my people why you feel the need to follow such path is beyond me, it is my right as this is my house to ask you to refain.
This article is 100% correct and there is evidence to suggest that to be,
Regards
Gary
Perhaps he needs a manager to manage his managers! :lol:LOL well, he has 3 already I'm not sure if one more would make things any better!
but i mean the concerts are happening in the UK. a court ruling in the US stopping something from happeing in the UK i wouldnt think you could ( just a guess)
the whole thing sounds totally fake imo anyway.
$10 says this will all get worked out
so as Guy would say....
Let's Chilllllllllllll!
LOL yeah... and I miscounted... he actually has 4... Bain's also still somewhere in the mix... never got officially sacked!Perhaps he needs a manager to manage his managers! :lol:
So this is all nonsense then?
I think I'm just gunna wait for some word from the MJ camp
Comes back the original question: was Frank Dileo in the position to negotiate such a deal on behalf of any of the Jacksons? Did he have power of however you call it to sign for Michael, or any member of the Jackson family that is.
If I'm not mistaken... wasn't Raymone Bain still the person in charge, at least on paper, at that point in time?
Could it be that her lawsuit has a connection with this one? What I mean is: does Bains lawsuit serve as a way of 'proving' she was in charge, and not Frank Dileo, in order to make clear Frank had no power to sign? That would explain the weird actions she took of ensuring she had no ill will towards Michael....
But I'm going overboard now with a conspiracy theory. I think the big question is: did Frank do this alone, in order to get in front of the line there, in Michael land once again? That is the question, and the answer will dictate the outcome.
Oh and...
I think it's wise to take bread and a few drinks, because probably that's gonna take some time...
If this contract was real then surely all the brothers and Janet would have had to have signed it to ensure their involvement in this supposed 'concert'. Since none of the brothers or Janet have said anything about it and no doubt some of the family wouldn't have been able to keep quiet about such a deal, so I really think they have no idea about this at all. Sounds like to me that either somebody's been going behind MJ and his family's back or that someone is trying to start some ish up because they want to cash in on Michael's comeback.
Plus are we really supposed to believe that if MJ and his family wanted to make a big splash and do a reunion concert that they would choose Texas :lol:. It doesn't make much sense at all lol.
Raymone was gone and the Dr was in control