Profound message in Liberian Girl video (Full Version)

MsMo

Proud Member
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
2,527
Points
0
Old post from another site http://consequenceofsound.net/2009/08/19/break-yo-tv-michael-jacksons-liberian-girl/

Gillian Rosheuvel said:

“Is there any musical phenomenon more depressing than a bad video undermining a perfectly good song? As Michael Jackson ballads go, “Liberian Girl” is one of his most heartfelt, and a genuine highlight of 1987’s Bad. My 13-year-old self had all the words memorized, and I frequently imagined myself as the titular heroine.

Unfortunately, the video tries hard to make you forget what a good song it is. Its wretchedness is only amplified by the fact that this video was made by one of — if not the — most inventive video artists of all time. He, who married visuals and songs in such surprising and inventive ways, produced THIS?”

A most interesting reply from someone...worth the long read :clapping:
doesnt matter said:

I hope that my following words would help you to explain your daughter why THIS video is the work of a genius.
First of all to appreciate it you really NEED to see the full version, which is 5:43 minutes long. Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_JIkRylEzc

Hint: credits are the most important in this particular video!

Stop the video at mark 5:24, there you’ll see a man in bondage with 3 arms and “?” under his picture. Simple joke? Barely…..Read this, though it’s too long, you won’t be disappointed:

The Man Who Had Three Arms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a two-act play for three actors by Edward Albee.
The play takes place in a theatre where the main character HIMSELF is about to speak to the assembled group about his life of celebrity as The Man Who Had Three Arms.The other two actors of the play, MAN and WOMAN, play, variously, two people who are introducing HIMSELF, the parents and wife of HIMSELF, and the manager of HIMSELF. In the first act, HIMSELF describes his transformation from a successful family man to a person who is horrified to discover that a third arm is growing from between his shoulder blades. In the second act, HIMSELF describes being on the celebrity circuit and all that entails—“money, sex, adulation”—while he grows more and more in debt. His wife leaves him. He falls apart in front of the audience only to deal with a final surprise. Albee directed the Broadway premiere of the play at the Lyceum Theatre in New York City in April 1983 with Robert Drivas in the title role.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_Who_Had_Three_Arms

And here’s the excerpts of this play’s review for better understanding what it’s all about:

THE MAN WHO HAD THREE ARMS
By Frank Rich
Published: April 6, 1983, Wednesday
HIMSELF is mad because he was once ”the most famous man in the world” and now he isn’t so famous anymore. A standard-cut advertising man with a wife and three kids, he had one day awakened to discover that he was growing a third arm on his back. Suddenly Himself was sought after by royalty, cheered by ticker-tape parades and toasted by talk-show hosts. He had become, one might say, a contemporary Elephant Man – complete with trunk.

But when we meet Himself, the parade has passed by. The third arm ultimately withered away, and so did the protagonist’s celebrity and fortune. While he used to command $25,000 for a personal appearance, he now speaks for ”half a grand and a toddle or two of gin.” In the lecture we see, Himself is a last-minute replacement for a morefamous speaker who has died. Drunk and in debt, he’s now just another ordinary-looking man at the end of his rope.

One of the more shocking lapses of Mr. Albee’s writing is that he makes almost no attempt even to pretend that Himself is anything other than a maudlin stand-in for himself, with the disappearing arm representing an atrophied talent.

It’s hard to feel much sympathy for a man who, by his own account, greedily helped himself to the perks of fame – unlimited publicity, power, money and sex – and now complains that the adulation was ”idiotic,” that the power was short-lived, that the fortune was recklessly squandered, and that the sex was empty.

”Baggage” is easily the nicest term by which Himself refers to women. Indeed, the only person not treated contemptuously during the monologue is the speaker, who frequently likens his martyrdom to Christ’s.

HIMSELF whips himself and the audience ”into mutual rage and revulsion.” But only at the end does the anger come to a point. It’s then that Mr. Albee at last begins to deal seriously with the issue his play wants to be about – an inability, as Himself puts it, ”to distinguish between my self-disgust and my disgust with others.” As the curtain falls, the sobbing HIMSELF falls to his knees, torn between asking the despised audience to leave and begging it to stay.

It’s a painful, if embarrassing, spectacle, because it shows us the real and sad confusion that exists somewhere beneath the narcissistic arrogance and bile that the author uses as a dodge to avoid introspection the rest of the time. While ”The Man Who Had Three Arms” is mostly an act of self-immolation, its final display of self-revelation holds out at least the slender hope that Mr. Albee might yet pick himself up from the floor.
Did you see any parallels?

Watch this video one more time. From the very beginning its main theme is illusions and audience’s deception . The video is dedicated to Liz Taylor but where’s she? It begins with “a scene in an African village that seems related to the song’s lyrics”, but it’s another illusion. Then we see a girl, but it’s not about her. “Who’s directing this?”, asks Whoopi and we see Spielberg.

Dreyfuss asks: “WHICH MICHAEL JACKSON ARE WE TALKING ABOUT?”

“One of the most inventive video artists of all time, who married visuals and songs in such surprising and inventive ways?” Over-operated freak with a prosthetic nose – ***** *****? A child prodigy? The man, who had “weird” attraction to children? A reclusive pop-star? A drug-addict? etc. How many faces of Michael Jackson we’ve seen through all 40 years of his career? Do we still know whom he really was?

Probably, he was just a human being with his “anguish, pain and turbulations” and shaky relationships with audience who both praised and despised him at the same time. “The victim of selfish kind of love” denied the right to make mistakes without being critisized by each and everyone. And certainly a genius, foreseer, if you like, who knew exactly from the very beginning, how the “show” of his life would develop and end up, but unwilling to change anything, ’cause though “it was strange what he had to deal with, he dealt with it anyway”.

It’s just my humble opinion about the message of this video.

doesnt matter September 7, 2009 at 1:17 pm
 
Ah! That's thought-provoking. I hadn't heard of The Man Who Had Three Arms, so this explains a lot to me. Thank you MsMo for sharing this.
 
Fascinating analysis of the video. I've always wondered who the question mark person is. I still don't see how the video relates to the song, but then again the video for Leave Me Alone wasn't necessarily what the song was about either.
 
i don't take kindly to acknowledging introspection after a person dies, because i know that the introspector, if you will, by introspecting, if you will, reveals that he or she knew what he or she was talking about before the subject of his or her introspection, died. it shows a darkness in the introspector, if you will.

this is dedicated to all the introspectionists who are paying tribute to Michael, now, after his death. though, i long to hear the positives, anyway. spelling errors permitted.

by the way, there isn't' such thing as a bad video, if the song is great. i always thought that about MJ vids. i didn't study this video much..i enjoyed the song, so naturally, i enjoyed the video, whether i understood it, or not, or whether or not, i thought it required understanding, even if i was wrong. it's funny how, these days, people think that songs now require vids, because of the mark that MJ has left. the sony project coming up says that there will be videos to at least some of the songs. my question is..why? if you reel you can't make the video to a song, or if you feel like you're struggling for an idea for a video...just don't' make the video. all MJ songs are strong enough to go without videos, ironically.

so there are people out there who think MJ got too much surgery, and had strange relationships with kids....

the frightening thing is, there are too many non religious people out there, who are fooling themselves to think they're non religious. because their god is the media.

now..following my rant about the penchant for waxing poetic in a rear view mirror, i'd like to comment on something that i think is as close to the topic as i can get, but still making a point about viewers of MJ's career from the outside. i think that there are people who just cannot come to grips with the unimaginable heights of his career, and the precedent that there were no valleys in it. you can't equate on o2 sellout with poor album sales. they don't mix. either his album sales were poor and the o2 wasn't a sellout, or his album sales were rich and the o2 was a sellout. i think those people can't come to grips with the idea that they are envious of such an unprecedented career, so they 'justify' themselves with believing that MJ hated himself, or was full of himself, or was ungrateful, at the very least. these are the accusations that come with knowing he did nothing untoward. they can't come to grips with a career that defied the laws of the past, and just kept rising and rising. they purposely see their hatred for him as something other than hatred. they want to say it's his 'downfall'. but all it is, is their hate. he never had a downfall. they don't want to believe that a continuous rise is possible, because the past doesn't have any people with such a career. careers of others either leveled off, or declined. and a leveling off can be seen as a decline, also. his career took on so many different phases, that those people wanted to reason those phases to be a downfall, because those phases didn't take on the same shape as what happened for him in the 80s. no. what happened is what hasn't been seen before. not a decline. so, whatever an introspective person might see in this video may be what they want to see, even if there are tidbits of it that may seem, to them, to coincide with ideas that fit their thinking. maybe he knew that's what they were thinking, but there is no proof that he felt how they would like for him to have felt. envy is a natural thing, and it's embarrassing, and nobody wants to admit to it, but everybody wants to be the subject of it. and compound that with the rarity of someone who had no reason to envy anyone, and it really takes your head for a spin. Michael had no reason, and those people knew it, and it compounded their jealousy.
the last and easiest thing would be to classify a fan of an unprecedented one, such as MJ, who says nothing but positive things about him, as a fanboy. but lest we forget..this whole situation is unprecedented, so those accusers really have no basis for that. besides, what do i have to gain? i wanted much of what MJ had. i had every reason to envy him, too. i'm not in a position to adore him like a fangirl. the hardest thing to be, is objective, in a situation like this. but i believe i am. believe me, if someone else were to ride the road MJ rode, i would say the same things about them. if people were honest, the ending to this story is as mysterious as that of Amelia Earhardt. nobody can agree on anything...from times of death, to cause. there are those who worked with him, who say he was fine. and others who say he wasn't. those who say they were close to him who say he had a problem with drugs, and those who say they were close to him, who say he did not. other than Amelia, everybody agrees on the stories of other famous people. everybody agrees Elvis had an addiction problem, and he showed clear signs of it, to everybody. everybody knows that David Carradine committed suicide. everybody knows Michael Hutchence committed suicide, though some might say they were murdered. but nobody's story spawns as many varied opinions as Michael's. and, objectively speaking, when that happens, nobody has grounds to stand on, to assume the worst about his life. so, might as well assume the best. his genius and charity speak for themselves, though. nobody can honestly dispute that.
if you think i can't be objective, please check out my sex offender thread in gen. discussion. i consider myself a dyed in the wool Christian, yet i made the comments i made, there.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top