144000
Proud Member
this is a sensitive subject for me. and it's clear, that i think my timing is right.
question is, why would Michael Jackson hire an attorney so that that employee of his would reveal sensitive info about him? that doesn't make sense. MJ would fire him.
so that employees job is to protect Michael on ALL levels.
TMez did that.
we are no wiser about MJ's finances than we ever were. in other words, we're not wise about them at all.
if MJ wants you to know something, he will tell you.
that's elementary.
there's nothing hard about that.
i believe that there are people here who take advantage of their position to cross that line.
and i'm put in a tenuous position, because if i call them on it, i'm the bad guy, and i get in trouble.
i'll boldly say that i have what it takes to be a mod, on one level, because i don't pretend to know Michael Jackson. i go by his word, and by his word, only about things in his life, and i don't go beyond that. and i would go all out to protect that principle. but other than that, i don't have what it takes to be a mod, so i don't go that route. and because i'm not a mod, if i get angry and keep going about how people shouldn't cross that line, and i'm not a mod, i'm in the lesser positiion.
it shouldn't have to be about who is a mod and who is not a mod, when it comes to not crossing the line about what you think you know about Michael. to me, it's no different than the stalkers that have been making trouble on here, recently.
i mean..how do you know about who MJ's lovers are?
how do you really know the most minute details of his finances? why would Michael be boneheaded enough to reveal all that, in this world? he's smarter than that, and he proves it, daily. he protects that info like he protects his kids. certainly there are a lot of attempted wily coyotes who try and get him to reveal what he refuses to reveal, in courts and stuff. but they have been failures at it. no two people ever get their stories straight about his private affairs, anymore than the arvisos got their stories straight about their accusations.
if u claim to know MJ better than he knows himself, how are u any different from those that took advantage of peeps in the love in the dark thread?
there are plenty of people pm ing me who agree with me, and appreciate where i am coming from. obviously, i'm not gunna reveal who they are.
if i ever have to leave this site, i can hold up my head as to the reasons why. i love being here, simply cus i love bouncing about MJ off other fans' chests. i don't wanna be alone in that. i'm a fan of his.
please don't take advantage of me. i respect everyone here. all i ask is that you respect me too. and respect MJ, too.
i would like to think that everyone here knows that being a moderator on this site doesn't magically give someone the power to be inside Michael Jackson's skin.
question is, why would Michael Jackson hire an attorney so that that employee of his would reveal sensitive info about him? that doesn't make sense. MJ would fire him.
so that employees job is to protect Michael on ALL levels.
TMez did that.
we are no wiser about MJ's finances than we ever were. in other words, we're not wise about them at all.
if MJ wants you to know something, he will tell you.
that's elementary.
there's nothing hard about that.
i believe that there are people here who take advantage of their position to cross that line.
and i'm put in a tenuous position, because if i call them on it, i'm the bad guy, and i get in trouble.
i'll boldly say that i have what it takes to be a mod, on one level, because i don't pretend to know Michael Jackson. i go by his word, and by his word, only about things in his life, and i don't go beyond that. and i would go all out to protect that principle. but other than that, i don't have what it takes to be a mod, so i don't go that route. and because i'm not a mod, if i get angry and keep going about how people shouldn't cross that line, and i'm not a mod, i'm in the lesser positiion.
it shouldn't have to be about who is a mod and who is not a mod, when it comes to not crossing the line about what you think you know about Michael. to me, it's no different than the stalkers that have been making trouble on here, recently.
i mean..how do you know about who MJ's lovers are?
how do you really know the most minute details of his finances? why would Michael be boneheaded enough to reveal all that, in this world? he's smarter than that, and he proves it, daily. he protects that info like he protects his kids. certainly there are a lot of attempted wily coyotes who try and get him to reveal what he refuses to reveal, in courts and stuff. but they have been failures at it. no two people ever get their stories straight about his private affairs, anymore than the arvisos got their stories straight about their accusations.
if u claim to know MJ better than he knows himself, how are u any different from those that took advantage of peeps in the love in the dark thread?
there are plenty of people pm ing me who agree with me, and appreciate where i am coming from. obviously, i'm not gunna reveal who they are.
if i ever have to leave this site, i can hold up my head as to the reasons why. i love being here, simply cus i love bouncing about MJ off other fans' chests. i don't wanna be alone in that. i'm a fan of his.
please don't take advantage of me. i respect everyone here. all i ask is that you respect me too. and respect MJ, too.
i would like to think that everyone here knows that being a moderator on this site doesn't magically give someone the power to be inside Michael Jackson's skin.
Last edited: