Oprah Winfrey chosen to receive the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award - Does she deserve it?

Moonwalker.Fan

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
3,584
Points
0
Location
Slovakia

HollywoodNews.com: It’s just been announced that Oprah Winfrey will be presented with the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in November at its Governors Awards.

The Humanitarian Award is named after a Danish-born actor who helped form the Motion Picture Relief Fund in 1939 and is given to an individual “whose humanitarian efforts have brought credit to the industry.”


While her philanthropic work is well-known, Winfrey is seen as a curious choice to some for an award from the Academy. While she was nominated for an Oscar back in 1986 in the supporting actress category for her performance in The Color Purple, she has acted in just three feature films and has produced or executive produced three others.


Academy President Tom Sherak pointed out that Winfrey is an Academy member who has produced movies and has been nominated for an Academy Award.

“It has nothing to do with how many movie credits she has,” he said. “It has to do with the fact that she is one of us, she is a member and … she was one of the 50 most generous philanthropists in Business Week; as an individual performer she has given over $500 million of her own money to charity.

http://www.hollywoodnews.com/2011/0...receive-the-jean-hersholt-humanitarian-award/

***************


In the 36 hours since the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced that Oprah Winfrey will receive its prestigious Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award this year, there’s been a smattering of criticism from some quarters that she’s not deserving of such a high film-industry honor since she’s mainly known for her work in television. So let’s look at the other 33 people that have earned the Hersholt prize over the last five decades and see how Winfrey measures up.


Twelve of the past honorees have been movie-biz executives who worked mostly behind the scenes on numerous projects (think Samuel Goldwyn, Lew Wasserman, or Sherry Lansing). Seven others have been producers, screenwriters, or directors like Arthur Hiller (Love Story) or David L. Wolper, who, it should be noted, worked mostly in TV. The other 14 recipients are best known as performers of some sort: Bob Hope, Gregory Peck, Martha Raye, George Jessel, Frank Sinatra, Rosalind Russell, Charlton Heston, Danny Kaye, Charles “Buddy” Rogers, Audrey Hepburn, Elizabeth Taylor, Paul Newman, Quincy Jones, and Jerry Lewis.


Though Winfrey is certainly an industry powerhouse off-camera, she seems to fit best into this category. Since her film debut in 1985′s The Color Purple, Winfrey has been credited on five other film productions: Native Son (opposite Matt Dillon), Beloved, The Princess and the Frog (in which she did a voice part), and as producer on Precious and The Great Debaters. So she clearly has the fewest film credits of any of her comparable honorees.


But should that matter? Winfrey isn’t getting the same general honorary Oscar that veteran actor James Earl Jones will receive. Her award is for her humanitarian work, which is undeniably worthy of celebrating. And the fact remains that although she’s focused mainly on television in her career, Winfrey is a past Oscar nominee for her acting as well as a current Academy member. I don’t buy the argument that giving her the prize is a ratings ploy — though Winfrey will likely make a quick appearance at the Oscars next February, her award will be presented at the non-televised Governors Awards in November.


http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/08/04/oprah-winfrey-honorary-oscar/
 
So why hasn't Michael ever received one of those awards?????
 
So why hasn't Michael ever received one of those awards?????

... because MJ changed only the short movies/videos history :chained.... and he gave only 300 mil. dollars to charity. :baby:

... thats not enough ... in comparison with other laureates :horsey::zombie:
 
Maybe, despite my disdain for her, she has done some good things...but she definitely does NOT deserve it more than Michael. However, everyone and their mother in the U.S. especially is in love with the big O, so I'm not surprised about this at all.
 
no she does not. there're other people who have done far more than her, who'd deserve this.
 
IN all honesty, yes she does deserve this award.


She should also receive an award as the greatest humanitarian show off! One always hears about Oprah's good deeds thanks to her plug to the media. I say, a good deed is 10x greater if one does not need to boast about it, and in fact, tries to keep it silent.
 
^Me too. It's hard to compare humanitarian efforts with one another. Luckily doing good it's not really competition material. I think she made a lot of people aware on important topics. And she made America read books again, which she can't be praised for enough.
 
Back
Top