New Katherine Jackson Interview (about Michael's children, tribute concert, Michael of course, etc.)

MsCassieMollie

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
4,166
Points
0
Location
Valley Stream, New York
Bringing up Jackson's children: a highly charged interview with Michael Jackson's mother | Mail Online
There is nothing that can give a better glimpse into Michael Jackson himself than meeting his mother Katherine. They have the same whispery high voice. The same hunted look.

They have the same air of a person who has endured much, yet has a sense of naivety. More than anything else there is a feeling that she is not quite of this world.

I am inside the Jackson family home. The decor is chintzy faux Versailles with a few Seventies browns and oranges. There are paintings of princesses, lots of sculptures of giant hands, galloping horses and the odd giraffe.

There is an ornament depicting Michael Jackson holding up the world with doves and children. It’s ornate and sentimental, a bit like Michael. I walk past a row of children’s bikes — a reminder that she now has custody of Michael’s three children — and a swimming pool, in sight of majestic mountains under the blue California sky, to get to Katherine Jackson’s quarters. I had to go through double-gated security to get to this house 45 minutes from Hollywood.

She greets me warily but sweetly. She’s dressed in a pale blue jacket and black slacks. Her skin looks much younger than her 81 years. Her eyes are dark and dart around. She seems to be frisking me for my soul.

The Jacksons are naturally suspicious and they all believe in various conspiracy theories surrounding the death of her son and their brother.

She has just taken a call from her son Jermaine who is vehemently opposed to the Michael Forever Tribute Concert at the Millennium Stadium, Cardiff, on October 8, which will be televised and downloaded to more countries than any other show in the history of pop (or so they claim).

JLS will perform with Marlon, Tito and Jackie Jackson. And a pregnant Beyoncé, wearing a Michael wig, will be seen on film, introduced by the Jackson children — Prince Michael, 14, Paris, 13, and Blanket (passport name Prince Michael II), 10.

The concert has caused friction within the family, because Jermaine feels it is inappropriate to stage it at the same time as Dr Conrad Murray goes on trial for the involuntary manslaughter of Michael Jackson.

Katherine Jackson seems keen to diminish the spectre of the sad Michael, plagued with demons and eccentricities, and get on with celebrating his memory and cherishing his talent.

‘I don’t understand why my son feels that way,’ says Katherine softly, .
‘Jermaine feels it’s not the right time because of the trial coming up.
Michael’s been gone two years now. They kept postponing the trial. We didn’t know when exactly it was coming around and I don’t see anything wrong with this.

‘Jermaine has his own thoughts. He’s entitled to his opinion.’


But she says the other siblings are all behind it. ‘Three of them are performing and my daughter La Toya will be there. But just because some of the family don’t feel the same it doesn’t mean we’re divided.’

I have heard that Jermaine seems to be acting out the role of the new Joe Jackson, their disciplinarian father who used to beat them if they didn’t work hard enough in rehearsals.

Sources say that it is usually Jermaine and Randy on one side and Jackie, Tito, Marlon and La Toya on another, and Janet one step removed. Katherine disputes this.

‘When we are together we get on well. I don’t know how this lie started but I’m so tired of people believing it. Every family has their problems. It doesn’t mean we never get along. Anyone can agree on something today and change their mind tomorrow.

‘My children are grown up now. I always tell them: “This is your brother, this is your family. If you don’t agree with them and something happened to them you would not pass your family by. You would always give a helping hand.”

‘They may fight and have their differences. They may not speak for a while — and this never happened in my family — but if somebody got sick or needed help, I would always be there.

‘You can’t change a person but that doesn’t mean you don’t love them.’
I sense that here is a frail woman who has endured pain, betrayal, loss, and might snap at any minute.


Those around her say she is the driving force of the family and that nothing happens if she doesn’t want it to.

She is the legal guardian of Michael’s children. You can’t help wondering if she has the stamina to bring up two teenagers and a ten-year-old. Isn’t it all very demanding? ‘No, not at all. I have a lot of people helping. They’re good kids and I don’t have that much to worry about. They have their friends over. They ride their bikes.’

It’s almost more strange that she makes them seem normal. Their upbringing even before the tragedy was at the very least eccentric. They went out dressed in Spider-Man masks and Prince in a surgical mask. Yet they sound very well adjusted.

‘They go to acting school and they love that, although Paris doesn’t need lessons,’ Katherine chuckles, meaning she is a natural actress.
What makes Katherine happy now? ‘That’s not an easy question. I believe in the resurrection and I’m happy when Paris and Prince come home from school happy. Prince is a very good student. He’s always saying: “Grandma I got a 98 in my test.” It makes me happy to see them smile.’ She says she sees Michael in all three. ‘They are all going to be like him, especially Paris. She has pictures of him hanging all over her wall.


‘When I had a decorator come in who moved them, she put them all back. “I want Daddy hanging on the walls”, she said. I don’t know how she could, but she does.

‘She took a pillow and one of his jackets, and said: “I don’t want a jacket that’s been cleaned. I want something with his scent on it.” She put the jacket over the pillow and she breathes it. It’s still there.

‘She said: “I don’t ever want it cleaned. He’s worn it and it smells of him and I don’t ever want the smell to go away.” ’ Katherine starts weeping.
‘They’re doing OK,’ she says. ‘I’m doing OK. It’s hard being a mother and losing your child. It shouldn’t be that way round. There’s not a day goes by that I don’t...’


Her whispers turn into tears. ‘People tell me all the time that I’m strong, but I don’t think so. Paris, Prince and Blanket suffer in different ways. Prince tried to be stronger than the others. He wants to be a man. He doesn’t want people to see what’s inside.

‘During the funeral when the children were given the crown to put on top of the casket, he put his hand on my shoulder and started to cry. He wanted to be strong because he was around all his cousins. From the moment they came from the hospital [after Michael died], they were all bawling their eyes out.’ She composes herself slightly. ‘He was a very good son. People tried to poison the world against him. All this molestation stuff was just a lie.

‘Oprah Winfrey says if a child tells you something, believe it. It’s just the opposite! That first boy came out and admitted he lied because his father made him and the father wanted the money.’

She recalls what happened the day she got the news that something had happened to Michael. ‘I got a call to come to the hospital. We rushed down there and when we got there, we said: “Where is he?” and they took me to another room. They wanted to sit down and talk to me and that’s when I was told.

‘I said: “How is he?” They told me he didn’t make it. But all I could say was: “How is he?”

‘I think when your child has died there is nothing to take that pain away.’

She is looking forward to the Cardiff concert because, she says: ‘It makes me feel good that people all over the world can love him even after his death and it made me feel good to know that perhaps they didn’t believe those bad things after all. I know he didn’t do it. People are mixed up. They don’t know.

‘These people who did it, they know who they are. They know what they did.’

She’s resolutely silent and not going to tell me who the people are.

She seems to be saying that there was a conspiracy to murder her son, and in this thinking the family are not at war.

Jermaine in his graphic book, You Are Not Alone: Michael Through A Brother’s Eyes, reveals that Michael’s chimp wore clothes and Poison perfume by Christian Dior. The book paints him in all his weirdness, but it exonerates him of any crime.

The family toe one united line, which is that dark forces claimed Michael. Not those within him, but something beyond his reach.

Even this fractured and broken family can agree Michael was a victim — although nobody is exactly sure of what.

La Toya Jackson has spent the past two years making a documentary and it is speculated that in it she will reveal who she thinks is responsible for his alleged murder.

Did Michael ever tell his mother he wanted her to look after the children if anything happened to him?

‘No. He never talked about that but he always felt that someone was after him, trying to kill him. He would ask: “Why are they after me? I haven’t done anything. What are they accusing me of?” ’

It sounds like he was in a panic. I don’t want to say it sounds like he was paranoid in front of her in case I make her cry again. ‘No,’ she says, very resolute, ‘I don’t think he was panicking. He would say it just like that if he were here with us today. He felt something was going to happen.’

Katherine’s favourite Michael Jackson song is Man In The Mirror and she is looking forward to it being performed at the concert which she is attending even though she doesn’t like flying.

‘Every time I think that people did care about my son . . .’ She can’t finish the sentence for weeping.

‘If he were alive he’d be proud to see that a lot of people were giving back. It is so emotional because he really loved everyone and he’s not here to see it. I’m sure he will be nearby.’

Does she think that she can feel him around her and communicate with him and his spirit? She shakes her head. ‘Michael’s sleeping now and I know he’s not conscious of anything.’ She says this as a measure of ultimate sadness and relief. The profits from the concert will go to his favourite charities.

‘Wherever he was he would visit orphans and hospitals and babies and children in need. He would always give. Since he was that high.’ She gestures to knee level.

‘He would look at African children with big bellies and flies all over them on TV and he would cry. He’d say: “I’m going to help them one day.” ’

But I had heard that the concert was to directly benefit Michael’s children, because his executors had decided to wait until the children are 40 before releasing the millions they are holding in trust.

Although when Jackson died there were substantial debts, the subsequent posthumous sales of albums and DVDs are said to have generated £196 million.

On the day we meet there is a news story that suggests the trust had revised its policy and was to give £20 million to Katherine and the children and to some charities. ‘The only thing I’m going to say is they are unfair.’

Perhaps she means the estate is unfair because it’s a trust and the children will not be awarded that money straight away.

She continues: ‘They say they’re selling Hayvenhurst [the Jackson family’s English Tudor-style home in Encino, California, where Michael grew up]. I haven’t agreed to that. I don’t want it sold. Michael remodelled it as a gift to me, but I won’t go back to live there. I like where I live now because it’s lighter, brighter.

‘The happiest time for me and my family was when everybody was at home, nobody was married, my children were young and they could go out and play.

That was before they were signed to any record companies. They were just in talent shows. And we were all there sitting around the table eating and talking and having fun.

‘I used to cook soul food. In the wintertime we would buy a big piece of beef and put it in the freezer and I would freeze peaches so we would have steaks and gravy and rice and peach cobbler. We would always have a dessert. Maybe fried apple turnovers. Those were my happy days. But they will come again.

‘I am a spiritual person and I feel I will see my son again at the resurrection. I try to be strong.’

It certainly must have taken strength to stay with her husband of more than 60 years, Joe Jackson. They are still married, although estranged.
Her children have spoken about their father’s brutality. Michael in particular felt tortured by it.


It’s hard to grasp how this empathic, intelligent matriarch stood by as her husband Joe regularly beat his children if they didn’t get their songs right. It was also rumoured that he cheated on her. Does she still love him? ‘Well yes, I do. That’s a strange question.’

Not really. I want to say to her, not many women would. But, instead, I ask does she get on with him? ‘Oh yes.’

Here I see parallels with Michael, to want to believe the good in people, that the world can be beautiful when it most definitely isn’t.

Does that make her naive or strong? ‘I don’t have Michael’s pictures out all the time, but I have got some of his things. I’m never going to forget him. Every time I see something of his it just makes me feel bad.’ She shakes her head as if she both cherishes and is tortured by the memories.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He calls MJ Jack* in the title of his article! >=( He don't derserve to be given any interview, to explain anything to him cause he obviously don't care! They need to stop given interviews to the media!
 
He calls MJ Jack* in the title of his article! >=( He don't derserve to be given any interview, to explain anything to him cause he obviously don't care! They need to stop given interviews to the media!

Yeah but what can you expect? It's Daily Mail, a known UK tabloid that trashed Michael.
 
Can these people ever give an interview without discussing the kids? Obviously this was a paid interview, KJ will never say "No" to money.
 
I'd like to say I am surprised that Michael "Burn all tabloids" Jackson's mother allowed a rag magazine into her home...but after June 25th 2009, nothing surprises me.

As for Hayvenhurst, Katherine seems to be as manipulative as the rest of them. She most likely told them to sell the house so they would agree to buy her the new house, and now she is going to a rag to take digs at the people managing her son's estate & paying her bills.

How can she, a christian, be so ungrateful? Michael left her much and all her needs are met. As he requested.

So last night, I trashed Jermaine for promoting his book during trial procedure...and today, comes his mother, promoting a fake tribute. What can one say to that....?

Indeed money is the root of all evil. Irregardless of the tears, I feel nothing for her. No pity. No sadness. Just shame. And a lot of bitterness.
Michael deserves better...but I guess he will have to wait to get it from his flesh & blood.

ETA. They are working hard to make the executors look like the bad guys...but unfortunately, they did a great disservice to themselves since 06/25
 
Last edited:
‘When I had a decorator come in who moved them, she put them all back. “I want Daddy hanging on the walls”, she said. I don’t know how she could, but she does.

‘She took a pillow and one of his jackets, and said: “I don’t want a jacket that’s been cleaned. I want something with his scent on it.” She put the jacket over the pillow and she breathes it. It’s still there.

‘She said: “I don’t ever want it cleaned. He’s worn it and it smells of him and I don’t ever want the smell to go away.” ’ Katherine starts weeping.
‘They’re doing OK,’ she says. ‘I’m doing OK. It’s hard being a mother and losing your child. It shouldn’t be that way round. There’s not a day goes by that I don’t...’

Her whispers turn into tears. ‘People tell me all the time that I’m strong, but I don’t think so. Paris, Prince and Blanket suffer in different ways. Prince tried to be stronger than the others. He wants to be a man. He doesn’t want people to see what’s inside.

‘During the funeral when the children were given the crown to put on top of the casket, he put his hand on my shoulder and started to cry. He wanted to be strong because he was around all his cousins. From the moment they came from the hospital [after Michael died], they were all bawling their eyes out.’ She composes herself slightly. ‘He was a very good son.
:cry:
 
I am getting sick of this. Why can't they leave this elderly woman alone, and why does she allow these intrusions into her life. Again this reporter finds Michael and the way he raised his children strange. What was this interview suppose to prove. Why don't certain Jackson individuals understand that interviews will have thoughts from the reporter in it and they should stay away from disclosing their inner soul.

I wish someone would protect Katherine and let her live her life in peace. There is no need for her to constantly give updates on the lifestyles of the children, to speak of her family's interpersonal relationships, or to bare her grief to unsympathetic individuals.

The world should not know Paris' intimate feelings, words, and actions in reference to her sleeping with the dad's jacket. It should be a sweet treasure between herself and her dad. Now that everyone knows, it cheapens this delicate father-daughter relationship. Not everything needs to be told.

This person begins by pretending they understand Katherine and see Michael in her, but could not help but add their own editorial twist. There is even incorrect information about the trust.
 
This is from a British tabloid. what else do you expect? As for KJ, she'll tell you she "needs" money and hence the interview. This will continue till she eventually passes.
 
^True. I just began to think of something. Katherine believes that Michael is asleep and does not know what is going on. I on the other hand believe that the dead, in pure spirit form, are somewhere waiting and moving around, and they can see and hear what we are saying and doing. I had an experience from my dead father which makes me believe this, plus my religious beliefs. Now, because Katherine believes that Micheal does not know what is going on, could this be the reason why she is engaged in certain activities. To her way of thinking he does not know, so she could engage in these actions without feeling any guilt or that she is disloyal to the person's wishes. "It is like what you do not know can't hurt you," kind of thinking.
 
Just because Katherine doesn't want to live in Havenhurst anymore doesn't mean she want the house sold. That home has been a long-time family compound and it should stay in the family. Like she said, that home was Michael's gift to her--afterall he had it renovated and gutted---not to mention the Memory Room he had created detailing history of not just himself but also HIS family. People need to have a heart. I would be upset if I was her. The 'executors' need to leave Havenhurst out of the selling plans. Right is right. Just because it appears to be a legal right doesn't mean it's RIGHT.
 
^True. I just began to think of something. Katherine believes that Michael is asleep and does not know what is going on. I on the other hand believe that the dead, in pure spirit form, are somewhere waiting and moving around, and they can see and hear what we are saying and doing. I had an experience from my dead father which makes me believe this, plus my religious beliefs. Now, because Katherine believes that Micheal does not know what is going on, could this be the reason why she is engaged in certain activities. To her way of thinking he does not know, so she could engage in these actions without feeling any guilt or that she is disloyal to the person's wishes. "It is like what you do not know can't hurt you," kind of thinking.
No. That is not what she means. Her views are based on the scripture at Ecclesiastes 9:5 which states "the dead are conscience of NOTHING at all." She also believe in the resurrection hope which is also in the scriptures which promises there will be a time when "all those in memorial tombs will come out" (John 5:28). What she's saying is she looking forward to seeing her son again.
 
Now, because Katherine believes that Micheal does not know what is going on, could this be the reason why she is engaged in certain activities.

That could pretty much be the reason why she is doing this.........maybe she thinks "michael is gone so he wont know..... it just confuses me all of it
 
Can someone tell me how old is Blakey? I thought he was 9? 8? and now they say his age is 10? which one is it?
 
^True. I just began to think of something. Katherine believes that Michael is asleep and does not know what is going on. I on the other hand believe that the dead, in pure spirit form, are somewhere waiting and moving around, and they can see and hear what we are saying and doing. I had an experience from my dead father which makes me believe this, plus my religious beliefs. Now, because Katherine believes that Micheal does not know what is going on, could this be the reason why she is engaged in certain activities. To her way of thinking he does not know, so she could engage in these actions without feeling any guilt or that she is disloyal to the person's wishes. "It is like what you do not know can't hurt you," kind of thinking.

The witnesses believe in the sleeping soul. When ones dies you soul falls asleep and won't awaken again until judgment day as one of the chosen ones. So, Katherine does believe that Michael's asleep and is aware of nothing.

With that said, however, that hardly excuse her behavior. I have people in m family who are witnesses and they don't act like this towards their dead. They are suppose to honor dead, not used them for their own means and used their children as a means to score interviews. What Katherine did is a disgrace to herself, as a mother, and as a grandmother. I doubt those kids what their private moment broadcast for the entire world to judge. I know I wouldn't care if someone talked about my lowest point and what I did to ease my pain. The one of the problems I have with Toya.

Reading this interview, I didn't feel a bit of pity or sorrow for Katherine. I am way passed that point and all I can see is a woman who used and continue to used her dead son for her own means. I mean, she treats Murray's trial like its an extra chore to be bothered with rather than something to get justice for Michael and learned what happened on the day he died.


On your point Petrarose about someone needing to protect Katherine, I disagree. You can't protect someone who doesn't want to be protected. Katherine is an 81 years old and she isn't some naive lamb being led by 'evil' people. After getting involved in all these schemes, one can only conclude that she is a part of it or heavily agree with what is going on. So, she's far from a victim.
 
No. That is not what she means. Her views are based on the scripture at Ecclesiastes 9:5 which states "the dead are conscience of NOTHING at all." She also believe in the resurrection hope which is also in the scriptures which promises there will be a time when "all those in memorial tombs will come out" (John 5:28). What she's saying is she looking forward to seeing her son again.

I know what you are saying, but based on that thinking, it can justify why one would engage in certain actions. I am not saying that she did not get it from scriptures, nor am I saying that she does not believe in the resurrection.

Ramona I hear you, but still somewhere within me I still feel this woman should be protected, or have someone advising her and monitoring her actions, after all I have an 84 year old mom too. Sometimes we have to tell her what is best to do. She may complain that we are treating her like a child, but we persists in a loving way and make her see our point of view.
 
MsCassieMollie;3489910 said:
It’s almost more strange that she makes them seem normal. Their upbringing even before the tragedy was at the very least eccentric. They went out dressed in Spider-Man masks and Prince in a surgical mask. Yet they sound very well adjusted.

What is he trying to say on the first sentence?

La Toya Jackson has spent the past two years making a documentary and it is speculated that in it she will reveal who she thinks is responsible for his alleged murder.

I don't think that after her book and the tribute fiasco anyone will be interested in her documentary, even if she claims she will reveal names.

And a pregnant Beyoncé, wearing a Michael wig,will be seen on film, introduced by the Jackson children.."

Please, I don't mean any disrespect to Michael or to any of you, but is this a mockery? Why would she wear a Michael wig? Hope she doesn't do it. I don't think this is in good taste.
 
At this point I am beyond surprised by anything any member of that family does. I don't understand disclosing such personal information shared between her and Paris to a tabloid no less. And as for the house, is it just supposed to stay their uninhabited? why don't her other children purchase it from the Estate then and make her happy? If you ask me apart from sentimental reasons she wants that house to remain as it is, it acts as a refuge for various family members to live in when they may not have any other accomodations.

It just is hilarious to me when they sit down and do interviews with the tabloid media especially and all that happens is the very tabloid turns around and diss them to no end.
 
At this point I am beyond surprised by anything any member of that family does. I don't understand disclosing such personal information shared between her and Paris to a tabloid no less. And as for the house, is it just supposed to stay their uninhabited? why don't her other children purchase it from the Estate then and make her happy? If you ask me apart from sentimental reasons she wants that house to remain as it is, it acts as a refuge for various family members to live in when they may not have any other accomodations.

It just is hilarious to me when they sit down and do interviews with the tabloid media especially and all that happens is the very tabloid turns around and diss them to no end.

I was thinking the same thing...

The media does not respect them and they don't even try to hide it. But money is money right?
 
I was thinking the same thing...

The media does not respect them and they don't even try to hide it. But money is money right?

The Jacksons don't want respect. They want money, plain and simple. Anyone who has even an inch of respect for themselves wouldn't lower themselves to do interviews with people who belittled them and their love one, no matter the price or fame. However, the Jacksons had shown a willingness to cast aside their pride for the all mighty dollar. It wouldn't be so bad if it was just their pride, but they are lowering Michael and his children with them.

Look what they've done to Pairs. She is the most talked about of all the other kids because she spoke of her love for her daddy at his memorial. Now, some in the family had made her the poster child for Michael's kids. It's always; Paris said this, Paris does that, Paris told me this, ect. The other kids are mostly side note. The fact that Jacksons would do this to their dead brother's kids is just inexcusable.
 
Bringing up Jackson's children: a highly charged interview with Michael Jackson's mother | Mail Online
cle-2040808/Bringing-Jacksons-children-highly-charged-interview-Michael-Jacksons-mother.html?ito=feeds-newsxml]Bringing up Jackson's children: a highly charged interview with Michael Jackson's mother | Mail Online[/url]

And as for the house, is it just supposed to stay their uninhabited? why don't her other children purchase it from the Estate then and make her happy? If you ask me apart from sentimental reasons she wants that house to remain as it is, it acts as a refuge for various family members to live in when they may not have any other accomodations.

Maybe I'm not understanding why she wants to keep the house if she doesn't want to live in there. I personally think the house shouldn't be sold because that's the house where Michael lived and composed most of his music, but that's just me.
On the other hand, what i got from her statement is that she wants the house for her, she said Michael redecorated the house and gave it to her as a gift, but too bad; Michael didn't leave the house to her on his will. I believe if Michael would had wanted to give her the house, he'd had said so in his will. I think she worries too much about her children and grandchildren. It will help her if she realizes that they have to make it on their own or maybe she could just look around and see how other people live. Not everybody lives in mansions and have Mercedez cars and maids. Most people have to work hard to support themselves and their family. Sometimes I feel sorry for her and other times she makes feel so mad. Only God knows what's on her mind.
 
At this point I am beyond surprised by anything any member of that family does. I don't understand disclosing such personal information shared between her and Paris to a tabloid no less. And as for the house, is it just supposed to stay their uninhabited? why don't her other children purchase it from the Estate then and make her happy? If you ask me apart from sentimental reasons she wants that house to remain as it is, it acts as a refuge for various family members to live in when they may not have any other accomodations.

It just is hilarious to me when they sit down and do interviews with the tabloid media especially and all that happens is the very tabloid turns around and diss them to no end.

Exactly Exotic they tend to go to the most trashy outlets to bear their souls, and the reporters begin the interviews in a positive way to reel the reader in, and then once you get past the first sentence, you get the nastiness.

Basically, she brought trash into the home that Michael provided for her, and had the trash look at Michael's objects and ridiculed them. Then by his statements he disrespected the minors who live in the home, when he talked about normal. I want to know when members of the family look at or read the results of their interviews, how do they feel when they hear or see what the reporter interjects into the write up. Do they feel anger, shame or indifferent?

Then Michael fixed a home for her, but she wants to live somewhere else and keep the old home. If you are so attached to it, why don't you live in it? Oh, I forgot the new one has more light.

You know my feelings about exposing those sweet private details about Paris, so I won't even repeat it.

Aquarius when you mention that sometimes you feel sorry for Katherine but other times she makes you feel mad, I understand you. I do not like seeing her victimized or made a fool of, but my goodness why must she do the same wrong things over and over again when she knows how it will end and it will make her cry? Why constantly talk to tabloids; why constantly give updates on the kids--they are not an experiment that you have to do progress reports on at each and every stage!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Here's my take on this.

Most MSM still do not want to print positive, truthful articles about Michael, I believe. I'm guessing that the tabloids are only a viable option for Katherine to tell the truth about her son.

Also, these tabloids sell quite well, I assume. Therefore more spreading of truth, even though the source may be repugnant.

I would like to thank Katherine for sharing with us these lovely words about her beautiful Son. Nice to hear how much the kids love their Dad.

And for those who chastise Katherine over this.. you all read the article, didn't you...

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, anyone?
 
Anywho....La toya is not out of the spot light just yet, eh? She is working on a doc about MJ!? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! STOP and go away please! Stop cashing in on ur brother, lady! This ain't no damn made for tv movie for Lifetime! WTF?!
 
What a horrible piece, yet again KJ has been badly advised. Having said that, she still managed to make me cry.

A few things stand out for me - the words LaToya and documentary:no:

The family feuds part didn't make much sense to me.

I may be reading too much into it but the description of entering KJ quarters sounds like she is living almost separately from the children, I hope those rumors aren't true about the children being raised by bodyguards and nannies (or maybe I do, I just don't know anymore).

If Beyonce puts on a Michael wig then she has lost at least one fan.

Having said all of that, I still feel Katherine's pain. But it doesn't make a good excuse for many of her decisions.:no:
 
I still don't understand why the family is so against the estate. I know many of us have an idea why but for once I just wish they would really lay it out there and inform us fans on why they have so many issues with the estate. If they want money just tell us that's what your after.
I know they''ll probably never do that though.
I can't really believe she has no problem talking to a tabloid like this. Sometimes I wish we would know more about what is really going on with the family and all this stuff. I agree the stuff about the kids should be for them to reveal,not other family members. Certainly not in a tabloid magazine wihich everyone knows Michael hated.
It's really sad hearing all this from her,but it's more sad that she sees no problems with doing things like this.
 
Back
Top