New interview with Tom Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Vici

Proud Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
2,758
Points
48
Tom Barrack, a billionaire investor who made his fortune in real estate, has discovered a market in distressed celebrities. With Neverland Ranch and Miramax under his belt, he’s now on a shopping spree—and bringing along his buddy Rob Lowe.

You’ll see why Michael called this place Neverland,” says Tom Barrack, the newest owner of Michael Jackson’s Neverland Valley Ranch. Barrack is a 63-year-old billionaire with a gleaming shaved head, summer-in-Sardinia tan, personally trained muscles, and sockless tasseled loafers. He is sitting on the lawn beside the Tudor-style, panic-room-equipped main house, near a gnarled oak tree with steps winding up to the perch where Jackson wrote Bad.

This, the manicured park with the giant floral clock and movie theater featuring isolation boxes for immunocompromised children—default B-roll for all TV coverage of Jackson—comprises just 32 acres. It scarcely hints at the grandeur of the full property, which is nearly ten times that size, with 67,000 oaks and sycamores, the odd rattlesnake and mountain lion, and a former Chumash Indian worship site overlooking a savannah-like plain. “You’ll feel something, which I think was what drove him,” Barrack says of the Chumash site. “And I don’t mean that—I’m not coming from outer space—but you will actually feel it, I promise.”

When Barrack’s private-equity firm, Colony Capital, took over Neverland in November 2008, averting foreclosure, even the groomed portion was going to seed. Jackson, self-exiled after his child-molestation acquittal to places like Bahrain and Las Vegas, hadn’t been home since early 2005. His 275 employees had dwindled to four. The amusement-park rides and steam train—operable only by California’s single licensed steam-train engineer—had been sold off to raise money. The petting zoo’s animals had been removed by animal-rescue groups; the snakes from the reptile barn were, um, released into the wild.

Since then, Barrack’s team has worked steadily to rehabilitate the estate, refinishing the wood floors, relandscaping acres of grass, introducing more swans into the lakes, and repositioning Jackson’s statue of a long-gun-brandishing pirate to scare off coyotes. In the dance studio, a solitary bulb lights a spot worn down by Jackson’s spinning. The elephant barn now houses a labyrinth of walls filled with effusive notes penned by visitors from around the world. The only obvious reminders of Jackson’s complicated legacy are the bronze statues of children at play that dot the estate.

Barrack built his fortune making deals, and in some ways, Neverland began as just another one—a contrarian bet on a troubled asset, an operating business backed by real estate. Only in this case, the operating business was a person. Colony would bail Jackson out of his substantial debt; in return, the firm would assume ownership of Neverland, and Jackson, after a thirteen-year hiatus, would go back to work to generate new revenue. Jackson’s death, before he could carry out a planned comeback tour, turned the transaction into more of a straightforward real-estate play: Colony is fixing up Neverland and plans to sell it, at some point, for a profit. But after doing the Jackson deal, Barrack and his team began to wonder whether they might have stumbled on a whole new class of investment: the distressed celebrity.

Over the past two years, Barrack has been lining up deals that target celebrities and entertainment properties whose value he believes to be artificially depressed. In some cases, that’s because they haven’t yet figured out a way to monetize their assets. But mostly it’s because the investment is, in the classic sense, distressed—individuals like Jackson or Annie Leibovitz whose financial mismanagement has obscured their future revenue potential, or properties like the Miramax film library, which Disney is unloading at a time when no one can agree on what a studio archive is worth. This summer, Barrack created a new $500 million media-and-entertainment investment fund, working with his friend Rob Lowe, who is a partner in the fund. Together they have been on something of a shopping spree—and generating a little tabloid coverage while they’re at it. In one TMZ appearance, a paparazzo’s telephoto captured Lowe and Barrack, shirtless, checking their BlackBerrys on a yacht in the Mediterranean. In a second, the two men were video-ambushed as they entered the Mayfair restaurant C London for dinner with owner Giuseppe Cipriani and Formula One’s Flavio Briatore.

In 2005, Barrack’s grin appeared on the cover of Fortune, beside THE WORLD’S GREATEST REAL-ESTATE INVESTOR, and he got there largely by relying on this maniacal stamina. He launched Colony Capital in 1990, and for fifteen years, it averaged an annual return of 21 percent for its investors. The inaugural Colony transactions mined the S&L crisis by buying packages of bad loans from the FDIC at bargain prices. These deals possessed several of the elements that would characterize Barrack’s deals over the next two decades: They used real estate as collateral; they required intensive hands-on management; and, most important, they ran toward, rather than away from, regulatory complexity. Colony was the first private-equity firm to get a gaming license, for instance. “No one—no one—would go through that Bataan death march,” Barrack says. “So for four years, we had a monopoly, because there’s no other private-equity firm that would go through the licensing process, which is hell.”

Barrack’s turn into entertainment investing began with a visit to Michael Jackson’s home in Las Vegas in 2008. Barrack had received a call from Tohme Tohme, a fellow Lebanese-American who had become Jackson’s business manager. Jackson hadn’t released an album or toured in thirteen years, but he had three significant assets: the Neverland property, the MiJac catalogue of his own music, and the enormous Sony/ATV catalogue, which included, among other songs, most of the Beatles’ oeuvre. Jackson was facing a crisis, Tohme said. The holder of $270 million in loans to Jackson was foreclosing on Neverland and planned to sell it in five days. Would Barrack meet with Jackson? “It’s so not Tom’s thing,” Lowe says. “Getting roped into spending half an hour with Michael Jackson in some weird house is just not on his agenda.”

Somewhat grudgingly, Barrack arrived at Jackson’s fifties stucco rental on Palomino Lane. “Not one blade of grass,” Barrack says. “The house was old and musty.” The 1,000-plus-page Sony/ATV catalogue was on the table between them, and Barrack was quickly won over. “For sure, the guy is an absolute genius,” Barrack says. “He was remembering not just songs but every performance, every date, every script.” When it came to business matters, though, Jackson was lost. He knew only that if Neverland was foreclosed on as scheduled, it would trigger a cascade of financial devastation. For the past decade, he had repeatedly staved off financial reckoning by borrowing. Now he was out of options.

Barrack had a relationship with the loan holder, Fortress, and was able to get an extension to give his Colony team time to crunch the numbers. They concluded that the only way to make a deal work would be for Jackson to start generating new revenue, which meant performing old material. Two days later, Barrack called Jackson. “I told him: ‘Where you are is an insolvable puzzle unless you’re willing to go back to work. If you’re willing to do that, then we can help, but if you’re not willing to do that, it’s just presiding over a funeral.’ ” At first, Jackson demurred. “He really had a hard time with that, and he struggled for about three days. Finally, he calls back and says, ‘You’re right, I’ll do it.’ ”

Colony agreed to bail out Jackson; in return, the firm would take ownership of Neverland and arrange for AEG, the concert promoter owned by Barrack’s friend Phil Anschutz, to stage a comeback. An unforeseen complication arose when Barrack received a call from the King of Bahrain, whom he knew from Sardinia, where Barrack owns much of the Costa Smeralda; astonishingly, Jackson had apparently forgotten that while being hosted in Bahrain, he had signed over the rights to his catalogue to the king’s son. Colony had to buy out that interest. Jackson moved into a gated $100,000-a-month mansion in Bel-Air to prepare for a run of 50 concerts in London that would relaunch his career. Instead, it ended it. He was struggling physically and heavily medicated by a live-in doctor. He died, from a sedative overdose, eighteen days before the first concert.

But in the frenzy of posthumous adulation of Jackson—in those first days, it was hard to find an FM radio station that wasn’t playing “Billie Jean” or “Beat It”—Barrack watched as Jackson’s value was suddenly and spectacularly realized. This Is It, a documentary about Jackson’s preparation for the comeback concerts, grossed $261 million worldwide during its theatrical run, a record for a concert film, and the Jackson estate signed a series of lucrative deals, including a video game and a Cirque du Soleil show.

“What’s amazing,” Barrack says, “is he attained in death what he could never attain in life.” It may be an obvious observation, but it’s one with huge financial implications for a long-term investor. Anyone who had seen past the momentary distractions of controversy and scandal could have identified the intrinsic preciousness of Jackson’s talent and fan base. Colony hadn’t predicted Jackson would die, of course, but it had wagered correctly that, over time, Michael Jackson the asset would outshine its liabilities (and even Michael Jackson the person).

As a rule, Barrack is drawn to distressed situations. One of the adages in a list of “rules for success” that he sometimes distributes to employees is “befriend the bewildered.” And when you start applying the thought process of a vulture investor to pop culture, suddenly the world can seem dizzy with opportunity. Is Lindsay Lohan a drug-addled train wreck or an underestimated future cash machine? What about Mel Gibson? Rob Lowe himself, now a ubiquitous television star, would have made for a profitable distressed investment if Rob Lowe shares had been floated in the late eighties. It’s all a matter of correctly analyzing an asset’s fundamentals and buying at the right time.

Colony plans to do more deals in the movie business—perhaps rolling up other film libraries, such as Lionsgate’s—and in other entertainment sectors. It is looking at private TV channels (such as the New York Yankees channel), at European soccer teams, at sports stadiums, at structured-settlement types of royalty deals. Over the summer, Colony signed a deal with the yoga master Bikram Choudhury to help him transition his thousands of “authorized” studios to a franchise model.

But such deals can only be done one at a time. “The benefit and the detriment of that business, whether it’s Michael Jackson or Annie Leibovitz, is each one is so personalized,” Barrack says. “It’s a crafted investment, a venture-capital investment. It’s investing in talent that has been inefficient; by giving them a different set of clubs in the bag, you’ll make them efficient and take the arbitrage.”

------------------------------

POST EDIT:
They just added this to the article:

''The original version of this article stated that Jackson had not released an album in 13 years. He released Invincible in 2001. It also should have been stated that the agreement he made with the Prince of Bahrain was for a two-album recording contract, a stage show, and an autobiography, not catalogue rights.''


The article is very long, I just took out the parts that were about Michael.. http://nymag.com/news/business/69782/
 
Last edited:
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

PR stunt article nothing more.barrack is laughing all the way to the bank. best thing happened for him in mj passing. everyone gets what they want and theres no mj to hassle them.
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

what does rob lowe have to do with it ?
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

hes gone into business wiht barrack barrack bought out his house/debt in santa B. they have set up a company together. were out in london during the summer
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

hes gone into business wiht barrack barrack bought out his house/debt in santa B. they have set up a company together. were out in london during the summer
ah, thanxs elusive for being cool and breaking that down for me . appreicate it . sorry cant process all that at the moe . thanxs agin hun ((huggs)))))
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

distressed asset. oxymoron. lies. but we all know the power of repetition, don't we?
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

i wonder what the motive for this article is .some shit being pulled here.
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Is that even true? The part where it says Michael sold his rights to his catalog to King of Bahrains son, and Colony had to buy it back.

never heard about that.

???????????????????????????
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

No it is not.
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Is that even true? The part where it says Michael sold his rights to his catalog to King of Bahrains son, and Colony had to buy it back.

never heard about that.

???????????????????????????

not even mentioned in the law suite between them in London, MJ will never do that....not true at all !
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Is that even true? The part where it says Michael sold his rights to his catalog to King of Bahrains son, and Colony had to buy it back.

never heard about that.

???????????????????????????

Not true at all
Stupid article,lmao,as if MJ would ever forget if he sold the rights to the catologue
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Earlier this year wasn't Barak and Lowe claiming they were looking for a buyer for Neverland, and isn't Neverland partly owned by the Estate?
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Is that even true? The part where it says Michael sold his rights to his catalog to King of Bahrains son, and Colony had to buy it back.

never heard about that.

???????????????????????????

don't think so. as it was collateral for the loans I don't think it's even possible to do so.

also if you read the article even if true it looks like it was a partial interest not all of it.
 
Re: New interview with Tomb Barrack - Monetizing the Celebrity Meltdown

Earlier this year wasn't Barak and Lowe claiming they were looking for a buyer for Neverland, and isn't Neverland partly owned by the Estate?

according to all reports the estate is MAJORITY owner of the ranch yet for some reason barack likes to act like he owns it all and is in total control when all he did was buy out the debt on the place which was rumoured to be around 25 mill. 25 mill is prob a quater or a little more of what that ranch would be worth during decent economic times. funny how thome and barrack and AEG are all linked together. and u have thome trying to auction off all of mjs things from the house. anyone would think everything that has happened was all a part of a plan to gain control of mjs assets.the fact barack comes from santa B stinks enough. ppl know im not one for conspiracy stuff. but its funny how all the dots connect so much.and barrack seems to be obsessed with painting mj as some fool who he saved.whats the motive?
 
I agree elusive.. I am still confused as to Jermaine Jackson's role in all of this. Didn't Jermaine introduce Mike to Tohme Tohme in order to save the ranch? Jermaine has been awfully quiet in all of this. If anything it sounds like to me that Jermaine hooked his little brother up with some shady folks who were trying to get Mike's assets while MJ toured himself to death, no pun intended. Mike was being forced to tour in my opinion.
 
hes was probably on a % to get mj to go with thome. just like how he was so desperate to get mj to be laid to rest at the ranch. they were obviously offering $ if he could talk the family into it
 
Yep, I agree with you all. The Jermaine link stinks too much to ignore it even more so because he's never mentioned it.
 
Yep, I agree with you all. The Jermaine link stinks too much to ignore it even more so because he's never mentioned it.



yeah I find that odd. And then at the hospital when Jermaine announced that Mike was gone Tohme was in the background. What the heck was going on?
 
yeah I find that odd. And then at the hospital when Jermaine announced that Mike was gone Tohme was in the background. What the heck was going on?

He's the huge elephant in the room that nobody mentions and he's always there when something dodgy is happening. I don't like that guy at all.
 
bullshit. The estate owns the majority of Neverland and him refinancing the ranch has nothing to do with Michael's catalogue, wouldn't that make him part owner of the catalogue? Cuz he's not. The whole article is a lie.
 
The writer of this article is lazy and didn't check his facts as we can all see, and the original reference to the catalogue has already been edited.
 
I agree there seems to be a connection between Barrack, Jermaine, Thome and money. I am getting sick of these articles filled with inaccuracies. Now Barrack is a "savior". Didn't someone say the children said that they would buy back Neverland when they got control?
 
Didn't Jermaine introduce Mike to Tohme Tohme in order to save the ranch? .



Was it to save the ranch, or was it so that MJ would start generating

more money? I wonder.
 
yeah I find that odd. And then at the hospital when Jermaine announced that Mike was gone Tohme was in the background. What the heck was going on?
according to rumours/talk mj brought thome back days b4 the 25th. hence why he was there. whether its true who knows but its a reason for his appearence

The writer of this article is lazy and didn't check his facts as we can all see,
well if that info is coming out of baracks mouth the writer will take it as fact.the question is why is barack making such comments
 
according to rumours/talk mj brought thome back days b4 the 25th. hence why he was there. whether its true who knows but its a reason for his appearence


well if that info is coming out of baracks mouth the writer will take it as fact.the question is why is barack making such comments

oh.. I hadn't heard that. That sounds fishy to me.. Why bring him back if he thought he couldn't trust him? Everything with MJ during that time was confusion starting with the number of shows and all the rumors surrounding that period. Then with the rumors of him not being able to sleep and asking Nurse Cherilyn Lee for propofol. Just a mess.
 
of cause its confusing when its all based around rumours. the number of concerts is not confusing as we have the contracts. the only issue is over the xtra 19. but if thome had POA he was in his right to agree to them
 
I think Jermaine brought in Thome Thome Because he was Jealous of Michael and mad at him for taking his producers away when he was trying to do his album... Now i think he feels guilty.
 
Back
Top