tragickingdom
Proud Member
If you remember my last thread
Not often you find internet website comments as good as this.
http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=80778
this morning I had just got through from reading the recent report on the FBI open file on MJ from the NYDailyNews and jump down to read the web comments. After scanning through some posts, and ignoring a few complete ridiculous ones I had come across a post from you know who again.
and as always on point. had to share it here.
Not often you find internet website comments as good as this.
http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=80778
this morning I had just got through from reading the recent report on the FBI open file on MJ from the NYDailyNews and jump down to read the web comments. After scanning through some posts, and ignoring a few complete ridiculous ones I had come across a post from you know who again.
and as always on point. had to share it here.
Deborah Ffrench said:It amazes me that in these supposedly sophisticated media-savvy times, people don't realize just how easy it is to allege something about someone, and how that 'thing' then gathers its own momentum. The truth is Tom Sneddon wanted and needed FBI endorsement of his investigation to add gravitas to his deeply personal and careerist pursuit of Michael Jackson. It is perhaps understandable why it’s hard for people to relate to Mr Jackson. He was different to most, and that’s putting it mildly. He believed in giving children the real affection he, himself had been denied. Naive, maybe - but he was no molester. The problem was a matter of perception. People found, and still find it difficult to believe that someone who looked the way Michael did - could be 'innocent.' And by the time the media had distorted the hearsay heavy allegations into sordid sensationalism, no-one was paying attention to the fact that there was no substantive basis to the accusations. Despite the inflammatory title