RockOrBluesInNorway
Proud Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
- Messages
- 654
- Points
- 18
Since YouTube now support 60fps, I thought it would be cool to see Michaels first Billie Jean performance in '83. So here you go, enjoy :
Since YouTube now support 60fps, I thought it would be cool to see Michaels first Billie Jean performance in '83. So here you go, enjoy :
Speaking of Motown 25, Starvista has released Motown 25 concert on DVD!
That's not really 60fps. Hell, it wasn't even shot in 60fps! What you're seeing is the effect of motion interpolation (also nicknamed 'the soap opera effect').
That's not really 60fps. Hell, it wasn't even shot in 60fps! What you're seeing is the effect of motion interpolation (also nicknamed 'the soap opera effect').
Thanks for posting RockOrBluesInNorway
But I don't like this effect/interpolation, in my eyes it just looks cheap that way and somehow unreal-real (not in a good way.). I call it "slime-mode"
On my TV, I turned all this interpolation stuff "off". It has it's advantages for very fast camera movements. Maybe this generation will be perfectly fine with it, but for people who grew up with 24/25 fps for movies it's just meehhh :-/
Not sure about that, actually. Motown was shot for TV, which broadcasted almost entirely interlaced video until recently. If this is from an interlaced DVD source, it could just be fields separated, stretched to fit the whole frame, and put in sequence. "Real" 60FPS is pretty possible.That's not really 60fps. Hell, it wasn't even shot in 60fps! What you're seeing is the effect of motion interpolation (also nicknamed 'the soap opera effect').
Not sure about that, actually. Motown was shot for TV, which broadcasted almost entirely interlaced video until recently. If this is from an interlaced DVD source, it could just be fields separated, stretched to fit the whole frame, and put in sequence. "Real" 60FPS is pretty possible.