Latest on MJJC

Janet one of the top 10 richest celebrity women in the world (2006)

In 2006, Janet was worth 150 million dollars.
Katherine Jackson has complained that she is not getting enough money from the Michael Jackson Estate for her living expenses. This makes me wonder whether or not Janet Jackson helps out her mother with living expenses. If Janet would do that, maybe
Mrs. Jackson's money problems would be solved.
 
CherubimII said:
In 2006, Janet was worth 150 million dollars.
Katherine Jackson has complained that she is not getting enough money from the Michael Jackson Estate for her living expenses. This makes me wonder whether or not Janet Jackson helps out her mother with living expenses. If Janet would do that, maybe
Mrs. Jackson's money problems would be solved.
Click to expand...
Around 2006 Janet was going to buy her mother a house if she couldn't live in the Encino home. I am sure Janet does do some things for her family but why should she now pay for her living expenses when the estate is taking care of her? The estate makes much more money and it's not like Michael can spend it, so once they distribute the money(bills,the kids funds,paying the executors and etc) why not give Katherine the money she wants if they can afford it.
 
Last edited:
Moulin Rouge said:
Around 2006 Janet was going to buy her mother a house if she couldn't live in the Encino home. I am sure Janet does do some things for her family but why should she now pay for her living expenses when the estate is taking care of her? The estate makes much more money and it's not like Michael can spend it, so once they distribute the money(bills,the kids funds,paying the executors and etc) why not give Katherine the money she wants if they can afford it.
Click to expand...
Because it is not the Michael Jackson's Estate to give.
The money belongs to Michael Jackson's children:
Prince Michael, Paris, and Blanket.
When I last checked Janet Jackson
did not have any children.
 
Katherine has enough money for her living expenses. Only reason she wants more is so she can support her deadbeat sons' children. Now, Janet doesn't have to give her this money, but MJ's estate doesn't have to either and I'm glad they aren't as that's how Michael wanted it per his will.
 
CherubimII said:
Because it is not the Michael Jackson's Estate to give.
The money belongs to Michael Jackson's children:
Prince Michael, Paris, and Blanket.
When I last checked Janet Jackson
did not have any children.
Click to expand...
Who cares is janet has kids or not. Michael's children will always have their money and there's enough to give Kataherine more if she needs it, they're paying for expenses anyways. Either way i really don't care because this doesn't affect me. Whether Michael wanted to give all his money to charity or to leave it to Bubbles I wouldn't have cared.
 
Damn... Can at least one thread stay on topic??? N to the poster above you're deluded if you think the only reason Janet has money is because she talked about her brother. She worked hard for hers just like he worked hard for his
 
Moulin Rouge said:
Around 2006 Janet was going to buy her mother a house if she couldn't live in the Encino home. I am sure Janet does do some things for her family but why should she now pay for her living expenses when the estate is taking care of her? The estate makes much more money and it's not like Michael can spend it, so once they distribute the money(bills,the kids funds,paying the executors and etc) why not give Katherine the money she wants if they can afford it.
Click to expand...
Because its Michael's kids money, its not Katherine's nor her dozens of children's and their children's money, understood it? You can spin it as much as u want to. It's NOT THEIR MONEY. That is why they WONT BE GETTING ANYTHING More, than they already do. Period. Now you (and others like you) can go around in circles, this fact still won't change. It's not theirs to have, nor theirs to spend, why? Because it's Michael's money, and he didn't want them to have it. He could leave HIS money whom ever he wanted to, he decided to provide for his aging mother during her lifetime only,. but the rest is NOT for any other Jackson to have but his kids, and that too when they're old enough only.

What is the matter with people like you? Why do you guys go around in circles about the same damn thing, this is nothing new. It's been this way for almost 2 years now, and it's gonna remain this way until Michael's kids turn 40, and get their whole share of what's rightfully theirs. :smilerolleyes:


Good for Janet. .
 
Moulin Rouge said:
Around 2006 Janet was going to buy her mother a house if she couldn't live in the Encino home. I am sure Janet does do some things for her family but why should she now pay for her living expenses when the estate is taking care of her? The estate makes much more money and it's not like Michael can spend it, so once they distribute the money(bills,the kids funds,paying the executors and etc) why not give Katherine the money she wants if they can afford it.
Click to expand...

Katherine should just be getting what Michael wanted her to be getting, not what she wants, when she wants. We all know what she does with the money.

Again: Katherine should be getting what the will says she should be getting, NOT MORE.
 
Moulin Rouge said:
The estate makes much more money and it's not like Michael can spend it, so once they distribute the money(bills,the kids funds,paying the executors and etc) why not give Katherine the money she wants if they can afford it.
Click to expand...

You would think $26,000 would be enough for a 80yr old woman, they listed all her expenses but whatever...
the thing is that the estate cant just hand out whatever money katherine wants.. the estate are here to respect Michaels wishes not anyone elses..
 
Moulin Rouge said:
Around 2006 Janet was going to buy her mother a house if she couldn't live in the Encino home. I am sure Janet does do some things for her family but why should she now pay for her living expenses when the estate is taking care of her? The estate makes much more money and it's not like Michael can spend it, so once they distribute the money(bills,the kids funds,paying the executors and etc) why not give Katherine the money she wants if they can afford it.
Click to expand...



Why can't they give her the money she wants? HER SON SAID NO. And it is money for his kids not her
 
Moulin Rouge said:
Michael's children will always have their money and there's enough to give Kataherine more if she needs it, they're paying for expenses anyways.
Click to expand...

I find it very interesting that you blame the estate, because "there's enough," but don't mention the DEADBEATS who should be handling their responsibilities. The Estate of Michael Jackson is not responsible for Randy and Jermaine's children!

Katherine is EIGHTY-YEAR'S OLD for goodness sake, why should she have to beg and sign deals with the devil in order to take care of obligations her grown sons should be taking care of.

It's a crying shame that a woman that age is not allowed to enjoy her golden years because her adult sons don't want to handle their responsibilities!

Randy is on record saying he has enough money and it appears that Jermaine is earning "some" type of money. So what's the problem?
 
Big Apple2 said:
I find it very interesting that you blame the estate, because "there's enough," but don't mention the DEADBEATS who should be handling their responsibilities. The Estate of Michael Jackson is not responsible for Randy and Jermaine's children!

Katherine is EIGHTY-YEAR'S OLD for goodness sake, why should she have to beg and sign deals with the devil in order to take care of obligations her grown sons should be taking care of.

It's a crying shame that a woman that age is not allowed to enjoy her golden years because her adult sons don't want to handle their responsibilities!
Click to expand...


let her be that poster will never change her attitude, read pillim's post above..

Another thing that's a crying shame is that people self proclaimed fans, expect dead Michael Jackson and his estate to take care of other ppl's responsibility, just because ''there is enough''. If seeing the deadbeat jobless lazy folks pains u so much, give them your own money. Dammit. Who are you to dictate the estate what to do and what not, when in fact the man who all this money, fortune belonged to said NO loud and clear!!

These Jackson siblings were well able to have offspring like rats, sharing a woman, having multiple children with various women etc. yet they are not capable of clothing, feeding and putting a roof over the heads of their own kids?! So it's accepted for a nearly 60 year old man like Jermaine who's done nothing but run away from whatever responsibilities he's ever had his entire life, to glob trot yet claim he ain't got more than $215 per kid each month?! An because ''there is enough, and it's not like Michael can spend it'' it should be his estate to to take the burden of feeding, clothing, and baring all the expenses of additional 10 to 100 people?! NO!
If ''there is enough'' is supposed to be an excuse for freeloading, then these, people need to go and knock on Janet's door, and since homegirl is so attached to her family, she can willingly SHARE whatever she's got, because ''she's got enough'' for every X/Y/Z Jackson and their trillions of children.
Funny how, the excuse ''there is enough'' only comes up when Michael and his money is concerned, whenever the name of the other Jackson turns up, these same people go ''she already did.// it's not like she doesn't/she's done/she does ..'' right she has and she does and Michael didn't?!!. Why not just dig up Michael's body and sell his remains, after all it's not like he can use it anymore.

The same way it's not Janet's duty to pay for her dozens of siblings and the gazillions of offspring, the same way it's not Michael's NOR HIS ESTATE's duty, to pay for them or come up for their expenses. And Michael not being in the position to spend his money, is not an excuse nor does it matter. So just because he's dead, let's all just piss on his grave, or to be technical - on his tomb- and rob him of everything, including the man's dignity in the process? So because he is not here, it gives 'em the right to blatantly disrespect his wishes?! NO!.
Katherine Jackson is an 80 something year OLD woman, and who lives in luxurious mansion(s), who's got has multiple employees to take care of her needs. A woman who does not need to spend a dime out of her $7000/$26 0000 allowance on groceries or payments. I think it's fair to say that under these circumstances a woman of her age, who's getting everything paid by other's is well able to lead a good life on an allowance, regardless of the amount being $7000 or 26 000.
 
Last edited:
I'll tell you one thing,

Janet may have Randy's back when it comes to Michael's estate, but ole girl doesn't have Randy's back when it comes to supporting his children. LOL!
 
she doesn't have any ones back ,she just do things for her and she is helping other deadbeat because she also needs Michaels name for her dead career.do u really think she care about all these others .
for this one time she and randy are on same page as they share same cold heart.that reminds me one story about these two beating joes secretory or something for having an affair with him with katherin blessings.any one sees similarities.
 
blankyluvdoodoo said:
she doesn't have any ones back ,she just do things for her and she is helping other deadbeat because she also needs Michaels name for her dead career.do u really think she care about all these others .
for this one time she and randy are on same page as they share same cold heart.that reminds me one story about these two beating joes secretory or something for having an affair with him with katherin blessings.any one sees similarities.
Click to expand...
ur referring to the gina spargue incident arent u?, yeah, shows ya how common these two are,, they have def gone after joe
 
Since this news is now 5 years old, I don't think we need to have a thread to discuss it. We will only end up going around in circles about the same topic - the Jacksons and Michael's money.

Perhaps it may be better to just let this one go. It cannot end well.
 
TheChosenOne said:
Since this news is now 5 years old, I don't think we need to have a thread to discuss it. We will only end up going around in circles about the same topic - the Jacksons and Michael's money.

Perhaps it may be better to just let this one go. It cannot end well.
Click to expand...

I agree... I'm just wandering why they can't stay on topic
 
Some of you are a mess... This is janets money, she can do whatever she wants with her hard earned money. N yes she has supported family throughout the years. When she god divorced her monthly expenses were 150,000each to Rebbie, marlon and rebbie's husband. N I'm sure she helped pay other expenses also.
 
stop the hypocrisy already ,when it comes to janet ,it is her money leave her alone ,she did spend money on family .while Michael who has been working for his family since age 5,gave money to whole tribe and after death still paying for deadbeats ,their kids are staying in house which is paid by his estate ,even the clothes wore at his funeral was with his money ,still not enough for some .
leave Michael alone ,he made it very clear ,his money belongs to kids only and provided for his mother.
 
blankyluvdoodoo said:
stop the hypocrisy already ,when it comes to janet ,it is her money leave her alone ,she did spend money on family .while Michael who has been working for his family since age 5,gave money to whole tribe and after death still paying for deadbeats ,their kids are staying in house which is paid by his estate ,even the clothes wore at his funeral was with his money ,still not enough for some .
leave Michael alone ,he made it very clear ,his money belongs to kids only and provided for his mother.
Click to expand...

I would say sine age 5 he gave money to them because during that time and for the next 25 years they all were working and making their own money. I don't think he really started supporting them until the late 80's

The clothes for the Funeral were not paid for by the estate. Janet has that hookup. Janet and Donatella Versace are friends and she provided them with the outfits. I'm sure MJ's insurance covered the cost for everything else.
 
chanel05 said:
The clothes for the Funeral were not paid for by the estate. Janet has that hookup. Janet and Donatella Versace are friends and she provided them with the outfits.
Click to expand...

That was for the memorial. The clothes for the funeral were paid by the Estate.
 
chanel05 said:
I would say sine age 5 he gave money to them because during that time and for the next 25 years they all were working and making their own money. I don't think he really started supporting them until the late 80's

The clothes for the Funeral were not paid for by the estate. Janet has that hookup. Janet and Donatella Versace are friends and she provided them with the outfits. I'm sure MJ's insurance covered the cost for everything else.
Click to expand...

Man you actually go to the extent of mentioning something as trivial as paying for clothes??? Can you even imagine how much Michael has spent on his family? He has supported multiple families for decades!!!! How can you even mention Janet spening money on clothes when Michael was no longer there? So freaking petty. I understand why Janet does not want to support assorted extended family, but do not mention crap like this to show that she's generous.
 
mijaons said:
Man you actually go to the extent of mentioning something as trivial as paying for clothes??? Can you even imagine how much Michael has spent on his family? He has supported multiple families for decades!!!! How can you even mention Janet spening money on clothes when Michael was no longer there? So freaking petty. I understand why Janet does not want to support assorted extended family, but do not mention crap like this to show that she's generous.
Click to expand...

First... I dint even mention that. Another poster brought that up. I wasn't mentioning anything like that to show she is generous... I never even said she payed for the clothes because she didn't. The clothes were given to her by a friend who is Donatella Versace.. I was just pointing that out to the poster when they said MJ paid for the clothes. So don't come at me like that when I didn't even make that point to begin with.
 
chanel05 said:
I would say sine age 5 he gave money to them because during that time and for the next 25 years they all were working and making their own money. I don't think he really started supporting them until the late 80's

The clothes for the Funeral were not paid for by the estate. Janet has that hookup. Janet and Donatella Versace are friends and she provided them with the outfits. I'm sure MJ's insurance covered the cost for everything else.
Click to expand...

He supported his father since he was 5 years old. Don't you see anything wrong with this? Or you fall for the "father of the year" award for Joe?
 
^ On topic please! I don't understand the reason why people who dislike the Jackson family so much almost solely post in 2300 Jackson street. It's not healthy to nurture hate and the people who do come here out of interest for Jackson family matters would like it if not every single thread derails because of these angry anti-rants. It's hateful and boring to read because it's so repetitive.

Janet has worked very hard all her life while bringing joy to many. Cheers Janet!
 
pilinlim said:
He supported his father since he was 5 years old. Don't you see anything wrong with this? Or you fall for the "father of the year" award for Joe?
Click to expand...

MJ wasn't the only one who was making money then... All the kids were for awhile

Roosje said:
^ On topic please! I don't understand the reason why people who dislike the Jackson family so much almost solely post in 2300 Jackson street. It's not healthy to nurture hate and the people who do come here out of interest for Jackson family matters would like it if not every single thread derails because of these angry anti-rants. It's hateful and boring to read because it's so repetitive.

Janet has worked very hard all her life while bringing joy to many. Cheers Janet!
Click to expand...

I agree....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top