Janet Jackson engaged to Qatari Billionaire

billyworld99

Proud Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Messages
2,021
Points
0
janet27f-2-web.jpg



Janet Jackson is officially engaged to her billionaire boyfriend Wissam Al Mana, Us Weekly is reporting.
The 37-year-old Qatari mogul actually popped the question earlier this year, a source told the gossip magazine, giving “her a huge, expensive ring.
“She's afraid it will get lost, so she keeps it locked up!"
The third time might be a charm for Jackson, 46, who was perviously married to James De Barge manager Rene Elizondo. She was also rumored to be secretly married to then-boyfriend Jermaine Dupri in 2009.
There was speculation in October in the Emirates press that the pair were engaged in October and that the singer was planning to convert to Islam.
The couple is planning a lavish $20 million spring wedding, according to reports, that would include flying her family to Qatar on a fleet of private jets.
"She wants kids," a source told Us Weekly. "If she can't have them, she will adopt."


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertai...ngaged-report-article-1.1227503#ixzz2GCjSRi00
 
HAAAAAAAAAAA oh dear. This does not sound as though they have the facts. I see source said and rumors/speculations--speculation about her marriage to Dupri, speculation about an engagement in October, speculation about jets taking her whole family to Qatar. When did this 46 year old say she wants kids and "if she can't have them...? Didn't we hear this marriage story from another tabloid last year or 2010 where she was going to be married in the spring? It seems every few years they bring out some story of Janet's marriage, so you never know what is the truth.
 
Janet Jackson tweets sultry photo as she 'celebrates engagement to Qatari billionaire Wissam Al Mana'

By Daily Mail Reporter
UPDATED: 06:28 EST, 28 December 2012


If the reports are true then Janet Jackson has lots to celebrate this Christmas.
For the singer is said to have become engaged to Qatari billionaire Wissam Al Mana, whom she's been dating since 2010.
And as she tweeted a sultry seasonal greetings card to her fans, Janet certainly looked as if she were in a good mood.
Pouting over her shoulder, Janet's fur coat slips down to reveal her bare shoulder in the card.

article-0-16AB8DC7000005DC-756_634x817.jpg
Newly engaged? Janet Jackson tweeted this picture and wrote 'Season's Greetings! Love, Janet'

Wissam is the managing director of Al Mana Retail, which represents A/X Armani Exchange, and he's a shareholder in the Saks Fifth Avenue.
The 37-year-old businessman 'gave her a huge, expensive ring' and the 46-year-old pop star is so afraid it will get lost, 'she keeps it locked up,' according to Us Weekly.
Janet's wealthy beau plans on sparing no expense for their spring nuptials in Qatar, and 'he is flying in all of Janet's friends and family on private jets.'


article-0-168D18D8000005DC-958_634x682.jpg
Congrats! Janet Jackson has reportedly become engaged to Qatari billionaire Wissam Al Mana




article-0-168D17FB000005DC-4_634x798.jpg
Meet her mogul: Wissam is the managing director of Al Mana Retail, which represents A/X Armani Exchange, and he's a shareholder in the Saks Fifth Avenue
One source said that the pair's ceremony will undoubtedly be 'a circus,' and Al Mana plans to hire a 'top chef to create a custom menu.'
The Miss You Much hitmaker, who's almost a decade older than her Middle Eastern man, wants to start a family as soon as possible.
'If she can't have them, she will adopt,' said a Jackson insider.

article-2253367-16A8A283000005DC-536_634x844.jpg
Loving large: The Nutrisystem spokesperson was last seen with the luxury-brand mogul shopping in West Hollywood earlier this month, and in July the loved-up couple were spotted laughing on a yacht in Sardinia
The Nutrisystem spokesperson was last seen with the luxury-brand mogul shopping in West Hollywood earlier this month, and in July the loved-up couple were spotted laughing on a yacht in Sardinia.
Janet, who's net worth is estimated at $150 million, has been married twice before.
In 1985, she had her marriage to childhood friend and singer James DeBarge annulled after eloping only months earlier.
article-2253367-16A89EA6000005DC-377_634x793.jpg
Past love: Prior to Al Mana, the Rhythm Nation songstress had an on/off seven-year relationship with record producer Jermaine Dupri
And in 1991, she secretly married dancer, songwriter, and director René Elizondo, Jr., but the longtime couple divorced in 2000.
Two years later, the Rhythm Nation songstress began her on/off seven-year relationship with record producer Jermaine Dupri.
In the past, Jackson was linked to actor Rob Lowe, Hollywood screenwriter Gary DeVore, rapper Q-Tip, actor Matthew McConaughey, and Boyz II Men's Wanya Morris.
A spokesperson for Janet did not respond to a request for comment when contacted by Mail Online.




article-2253367-16A8AA26000005DC-737_306x397.jpg

article-2253367-16A8A841000005DC-715_306x397.jpg


Twice divorced: Janet has been married two times - to R&B singer James DeBarge in 1984 and music video director René Elizondo, Jr. in 1991
 
So now these papers are now copy and pasting each other's story? Why don't they wait for her to make an official statement to her fans. Now she can't even send a sexy photo to her fans, without it being connected to this engagement. The media can be so tiring.
 
Last edited:
So now these papers are now copy and pasting each other's story? Why don't they wait for her to make an official statement to her fans. Now she can't even send a sexy photo to her fans, without it being connected to this engagement. The media can be so tiring.
I wholeheartedly agree.
 
If true, I hope the rest of her family are taken notice? $$$$$$$...cause I'm sure this will make em happy. Then they can stop using MJ for cash. Pff wishful thinkin. -_-
 
Well based on her actions in the summer, she will not let them take all her hubbies money either. If this story is true I wish her well, but she is not saying anything. I actually like the way she keeps her business private and really admire her for that.
 
If it's true what the mag is saying, why hasn't she give the good news to her fans?
 
If it's true what the mag is saying, why hasn't she give the good news to her fans?

That is the good questions. The papers always have something to say about what Janet is doing in her private life, and most times it is not true, so her fans will have to wait and see.
 
^^Even after her behavior this past summer, I wish, if that's what she wants, this to be true. Hope she's not having her staff to say those things just to send the message to her boyfriend.
 
Nah she is not going after his money she was just helping others go after his money
 
Last edited:
Joining to kidnap and fake will crap showed she was going after her brother's money but you're probably right Justthefacts; however those actions of her showed her greedy side...
 
Joining to kidnap and fake will crap showed she was going after her brother's money but you're probably right Justthefacts; however those actions of her showed her greedy side...

Ok, You let tabloids get to you too much. She did not join in kid napping the kids. And she helped her brothers, probably cause they asked, she wasn't going after his money. She doesn't have a greedy side at all, there's never a time I can think of Janet being greedy. She never had problems with money, she has had other problems on her mind and other things going on. Janet is not like that at all.
 
Don't you remember the iPhone messages Prince posted on his twitter showing Janet didn't want PPB to see their grandma and legal guardian!? That's the kidnap I'm talking about. If she didn't go after MJ's money, why did she join in the fake will and the kidnap? There was no need for her to be involved in those crap...
 
Don't you remember the iPhone messages Prince posted on his twitter showing Janet didn't want PPB to see their grandma and legal guardian!? That's the kidnap I'm talking about. If she didn't go after MJ's money, why did she join in the fake will and the kidnap? There was no need for her to be involved in those crap...

You speak the TRUTH!!!! :bow:
 
Don't you remember the iPhone messages Prince posted on his twitter showing Janet didn't want PPB to see their grandma and legal guardian!? That's the kidnap I'm talking about. If she didn't go after MJ's money, why did she join in the fake will and the kidnap? There was no need for her to be involved in those crap...

It was for her Mom. Obviously all the ADULTS of the family were keeping her from the KIDS. I don't think even the tabloids fully know why but there is a obvious reason why that I am sure is legitimate. She was just helping her family, She was doing nothing wrong. When she signed but said nothing about helping with the estate everyone signed it. And there is no need? She is helping her family! You guys should really think about this stuff more before attacking or disliking the Jacksons.
 
The actions and consequences speak for themselves and I'm not referring what it was said on the tabloids. By "helping" her siblings, she lost her good reputation and respect she had with her fans or the ones who used to like her and I'm sure I'm not the only one... If this story is true it'd be convenient for her and probably her siblings and I hope she never involves with anything related to Michael ever again because the times she has done it, it's been a stain for his legacy.
 
It was for her Mom. Obviously all the ADULTS of the family were keeping her from the KIDS. I don't think even the tabloids fully know why but there is a obvious reason why that I am sure is legitimate. She was just helping her family, She was doing nothing wrong. When she signed but said nothing about helping with the estate everyone signed it. And there is no need? She is helping her family! You guys should really think about this stuff more before attacking or disliking the Jacksons.

:bugeyed really.
If she was helping the family, do you not think PPB is family?
Janet could have easily picked up the phone, and explain the reasons for their action and tell everything is ok, but no, she did not such a thing. She went behind the kids back and told others not to let kids to talk to their granny.
By the time, Janet knew damn well kids were frantic about their missing granny, and she did nothing to help them.
That is heartless.
 
Not wanting to derail the thread but Mrs Jackson herself said she was duped into the whole thing. So don't blame the tags for what went down.
 
I tend to think Janet was naiv enough to get duped into getting into the "kidnapping" thing for a "good reason" to help her mom or her family. It just doesn't make much sense to think she made it for any money reasons or because an evil side of her suddenly took over.

Everyone should just stop being too judgemental about these kind of things. You never know exactly what went on behind the scene for a long time. Let's leave the conclusion-jumping to the tabloids.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top