This is an important discussion to have. For a few years, my job was typing transcriptions of police interviews with kids who had been molested. I heard literally hundreds of stories (from kids ranging in age from 3 to 19), and while obviously everybody responds differently to these things, the MJ accusers' stories are vastly different from anything I encountered during the time I had that job. Even in cases where they reported abuse that had happened years prior, there weren't the inconsistencies we're seeing from Robson and Safechuck.
Oprah recently did a video slamming people who have questions about the accusations, saying people think "oh, if the person can't remember if it happened on Wednesday or Thursday, then it must not have happened." Not how skepticism and questioning works in these cases. Even in situations where people are reporting it years later, they still know about what year it happened based on their approximate age at the time (this is why the train station thing is the most damning in my mind) and typically what time of year in general. (The interviewer finds this out by asking how old they were when it happened, followed by questions like "was it hot or cold outside? do you remember if you were in school or on a break? was it a school day or a weekend? do you remember if it was before or after *insert holiday here*?" etc.) No one is asking people to remember the exact date and time that abuse occurred, but it is reasonable to think that, unless it happened with an extremely young child (like a baby or toddler), they would be able to narrow down at least a general time.
Sorry that kind of got to be a long-winded thing. This whole thing just frustrates me because I know quite a bit about what happens when people report this kind of abuse, and it seems like a lot of people who believe the accusations just don't.